RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The immediate referral of patients with risk factors for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) to specialized centers is recommended, thus favoring an early diagnosis and an interdisciplinary management. However, diagnostic errors are frequent, even in referral centers (RCs). We sought to evaluate the performance of the prenatal diagnosis for PAS in a Latin American hospital. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study including patients referred due to the suspicion of PAS was conducted. Data from the prenatal imaging studies were compared with the final diagnoses (intraoperative and/or histological). RESULTS: A total of 162 patients were included in the present study. The median gestational age at the time of the first PAS suspicious ultrasound was 29 weeks, but patients arrived at the PAS RC at 34 weeks. The frequency of false-positive results at referring hospitals was 68.5%. Sixty-nine patients underwent surgery based on the suspicion of PAS at 35 weeks, and there was a 28.9% false-positive rate at the RC. In 93 patients, the diagnosis of PAS was ruled out at the RC, with a 2.1% false-negative frequency. CONCLUSION: The prenatal diagnosis of PAS is better at the RC. However, even in these centers, false-positive results are common; therefore, the intraoperative confirmation of the diagnosis of PAS is essential.
OBJETIVO: Recomenda-se o encaminhamento imediato de pacientes com fatores de risco para espectro placentário acreta (PAS, na sigla em inglês) para centros especializados, favorecendo assim o diagnóstico precoce e o manejo interdisciplinar. No entanto, erros diagnósticos são frequentes, mesmo em centros de referência (CRs). Buscou-se avaliar o desempenho do diagnóstico pré-natal para PAS em um hospital latino-americano. MéTODOS: Um estudo descritivo retrospectivo incluindo pacientes encaminhados por suspeita de SAP foi realizado. Os dados dos exames de imagem do pré-natal foram comparados com os diagnósticos finais (intraoperatórios e/ou histológicos). RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 162 pacientes no presente estudo. A idade gestacional mediana no momento da primeira ultrassonografia suspeita de PAS foi de 29 semanas, mas as pacientes chegaram ao CR de PAS com 34 semanas. A frequência de resultados falso-positivos nos hospitais de referência foi de 68,5%. Sessenta e nove pacientes foram operadas com base na suspeita de PAS com 35 semanas e houve 28,9% de falso-positivos no CR. Em 93 pacientes, o diagnóstico de PAS foi descartado no CR, com frequência de falso-negativos de 2,1%. CONCLUSãO: O diagnóstico pré-natal de PAS é melhor no CR. Entretanto, mesmo nestes centros, resultados falso-positivos são comuns; portanto, a confirmação intraoperatória do diagnóstico de SAP é essencial.
Assuntos
Placenta Acreta , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Lactente , Placenta , Placenta Acreta/diagnóstico por imagem , Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ultrassonografia Pré-NatalRESUMO
Abstract Objective The immediate referral of patients with risk factors for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) to specialized centers is recommended, thus favoring an early diagnosis and an interdisciplinary management. However, diagnostic errors are frequent, even in referral centers (RCs). We sought to evaluate the performance of the prenatal diagnosis for PAS in a Latin American hospital. Methods A retrospective descriptive study including patients referred due to the suspicion of PAS was conducted. Data from the prenatal imaging studies were compared with the final diagnoses (intraoperative and/or histological). Results A total of 162 patients were included in the present study. The median gestational age at the time of the first PAS suspicious ultrasound was 29 weeks, but patients arrived at the PAS RC at 34 weeks. The frequency of false-positive results at referring hospitals was 68.5%. Sixty-nine patients underwent surgery based on the suspicion of PAS at 35 weeks, and there was a 28.9% false-positive rate at the RC. In 93 patients, the diagnosis of PAS was ruled out at the RC, with a 2.1% false-negative frequency. Conclusion The prenatal diagnosis of PAS is better at the RC. However, even in these centers, false-positive results are common; therefore, the intraoperative confirmation of the diagnosis of PAS is essential.
Resumo Objetivo Recomenda-se o encaminhamento imediato de pacientes com fatores de risco para espectro placentário acreta (PAS, na sigla em inglês) para centros especializados, favorecendo assim o diagnóstico precoce e o manejo interdisciplinar. No entanto, erros diagnósticos são frequentes, mesmo em centros de referência (CRs). Buscou-se avaliar o desempenho do diagnóstico pré-natal para PAS em um hospital latino-americano. Métodos Um estudo descritivo retrospectivo incluindo pacientes encaminhados por suspeita de SAP foi realizado. Os dados dos exames de imagem do pré-natal foram comparados com os diagnósticos finais (intraoperatórios e/ou histológicos). Resultados Foram incluídos 162 pacientes no presente estudo. A idade gestacional mediana no momento da primeira ultrassonografia suspeita de PAS foi de 29 semanas, mas as pacientes chegaram ao CR de PAS com 34 semanas. A frequência de resultados falso-positivos nos hospitais de referência foi de 68,5%. Sessenta e nove pacientes foram operadas com base na suspeita de PAS com 35 semanas e houve 28,9% de falso-positivos no CR. Em 93 pacientes, o diagnóstico de PAS foi descartado no CR, com frequência de falso-negativos de 2,1%. Conclusão O diagnóstico pré-natal de PAS é melhor no CR. Entretanto, mesmo nestes centros, resultados falso-positivos são comuns; portanto, a confirmação intraoperatória do diagnóstico de SAP é essencial.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Placenta Acreta , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal , Ultrassonografia , Reações Falso-PositivasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pfeiffer syndrome (PS) is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor FGFR1 and FGFR2 genes, occurring in approximately 1:100,000 live births. PS has a wide range of clinical expression and severity, so early prenatal diagnosis is difficult and genetic counseling is desirable. We describe a PS newborn with her ultrasound and molecular studies. CASE REPORT: We describe a female term newborn with cloverleaf-shaped skull, facial hypoplasia, low ears, exophthalmos and wide, broad and deviated thumbs and hallux. The patient was diagnosed by ultrasound at 29 WGA and referred to a tertiary care hospital for her follow-up. Molecular test revealed a heterozygous pathogenic variant in intron 8 of the FGFR2 gene (FGFR2: c.940-1G>C). It was a de-novo mutation. At 17 days of life, craniosynostosis correction and a Lefort-III frontomaxillary advancement were performed. CONCLUSION: Pfeiffer syndrome is a devastating genetic disorder. Prenatal diagnosis according PS morphological features in prenatal ultrasound allows timely genetic counseling, early referral to third-level centers, and close follow-up in the prenatal and postnatal stages.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This exploratory analysis was conducted to characterize the level of HPV types 6/11 antibodies in peripartum maternal blood and in cord blood of infants born to women who received 9-valent HPV (9vHPV) vaccine or quadrivalent HPV (qHPV) vaccine in a pivotal efficacy study (V503-001, NCT 00543543). METHODS: A total of 21 mother-infant pairs had evaluable HPV 6/11 results available for analysis. HPV6/11 antibodies were assessed using competitive Luminex immunoassay. The distribution of the ratios of infant to mother anti-HPV antibodies (i.e., infant-anti-HPV/mother- anti-HPV) was summarized. RESULTS: All mothers and infants were seropositive to HPV 6 and HPV 11. Anti-HPV 6/11 geometric mean titers (GMTs) in peripartum maternal blood and in cord blood of infant born to study participants were highly correlated. A 100% of infants born to seropositive mothers were also seropositive. The GMT ratios of peripartum maternal blood vs. those in cord blood were HPV 6: 1.23 [0.43, 3.49] and HPV 11: 1.29 [0.54, 3.07] in the 9vHPV vaccine group and HPV 6: 1.33 [0.41, 4.29] and HPV 11: 1.19 [0.45, 3.13] in the qHPV vaccine group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that antibodies induced by the 9vHPV vaccine cross the placenta, which could potentially be beneficial against HPV6/11 infection and related disease such as recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite/sangue , Papillomavirus Humano 11/imunologia , Papillomavirus Humano 6/imunologia , Imunidade Materno-Adquirida , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Sangue Fetal/imunologia , Vacina Quadrivalente Recombinante contra HPV tipos 6, 11, 16, 18/administração & dosagem , Vacina Quadrivalente Recombinante contra HPV tipos 6, 11, 16, 18/imunologia , Humanos , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Lactente , Mães , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Gravidez , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The multinational EDGE (Effectiveness of Diabetes control with vildaGliptin and vildagliptin/mEtformin) study assessed the effectiveness and tolerability of vildagliptin versus other oral antihyperglycemic drugs (OAD) when added to monotherapy in patients in the real-world setting. METHODS: Prospective, real-world observational study. The primary endpoint (PEP) was the proportion of patients achieving a reduction in HbA1c > 0.3% without peripheral edema, hypoglycemia, discontinuation, dueto gastrointestinal event, or weight gain > 5%. The secondary endpoint (SEP) was the proportion of patient achieving HbA1c < 7% (at month 12), without proven hypoglycemia or weight gain (≥ 3%). RESULTS: Of the 3,523 patients enrolled in Mexico, 2,847 were in the vildagliptin and 676 in the comparator cohort. The PEP was reached in 61.8 and 53.2% in the vildagliptin and comparator cohorts, respectively. The unadjusted odds ratio was 1.42 (95% CI: 1.19-1.68) in favor of vildagliptin. A similar advantage for vildagliptin-based therapies was seen for the SEP. The percentage was lower in the vildagliptin (n = 145; 5.0%) than in the comparator group (n = 95; 14.0%). CONCLUSION: Vildagliptin, added to a first-line OAD monotherapy, allows patients to reach target HbA1c without experiencing significant adverse events.
Assuntos
Adamantano/análogos & derivados , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Nitrilas/uso terapêutico , Pirrolidinas/uso terapêutico , Adamantano/efeitos adversos , Adamantano/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Humanos , Hipoglicemia/induzido quimicamente , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Masculino , México , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitrilas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Pirrolidinas/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , VildagliptinaRESUMO
Objetivo: Identificar el tipo de frecuencia de la patología vulvar en pacientes post-menopáusicas, sintomáticas o no, que consultaron al HMC. Evaluar la sensibilidad y especifidad del test de Collins. Determinar la correlación clínico diagnóstico-patológica de la vulva. Material y Metodos: Tuvimos 73 pacientes remitidos a "Clínica de Vulva" a las cuales se les practicó Test de Collins y Biopsia dirigida, enviando este material a análisis histopatológico. Resultados:La edad de las pacientes osciló entre 45 y 73 años, con promedio de 53.3. El síntoma predominante fue prurito (50.5); asintomáticas (23 por ciento) y otros (26.5 por ciento). Las lesiones encontradas clasificadas como levantadas y no levantadas (69.86 por ciento), y sin lesión 9.5 por ciento. El diagnóstico histopatológico fue: lesiones Malignas (2.7 por ciento) discriminadas así: Carcinoma escamocelular infiltrante e In Situ, las lesiones no neoplásicas:(97.3 por ciento): Liquen escleroso (1.4 por ciento) Hiperplasia de células escamosas (2.7 por ciento) y otras dermatosis (93.2 por ciento). De éstas: Eccema, Liquenificación, Liquen simple, Condiloma. Para el test de Collins obtuvimos: sensibilidad de 33 por ciento y una especificidad no medible. Conclusiones: la patología maligna de la vulva es poco frecuente. Dentro de los trastornos no neoplásicos encontramos varios que deben ser de conocimiento para el Ginecólogo con miras a un tratamiento específico. El Test de Collins es útil para el diagnóstico de patología maligna vulvar no así para transtornos no neoplásicos