RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor (BIBLI) combinations are commercially available and have been used for treating carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections. Continuous surveillance of susceptibility profiles and resistance mechanism identification are necessary to monitor the evolution of resistance within these agents. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the susceptibility rates of ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam in CRKP isolated from patients with bloodstream infections who underwent screening for a randomized clinical trial in Brazil. METHODS: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for meropenem, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam using the gradient diffusion strip method. Carbapenemase genes were detected by multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing isolates showing resistance to any BLBLI and New Delhi Metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM)-producing isolates with susceptibility to any BLBLI isolates were further submitted for whole-genome sequencing. RESULTS: From a total of 69 CRKP isolates, 39 were positive for blaKPC, 19 for blaNDM and 11 for blaKPC and blaNDM. KPC-producing isolates demonstrated susceptibility rates above 94â¯% for all BLBLIs. Two isolates with resistance to meropenem/vaborbactam demonstrated a Gly and Asp duplication at the porin OmpK36 as well as a truncated OmpK35. All NDM-producing isolates, including KPC and NDM coproducers, demonstrated susceptibility rates to ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam of 0â¯%, 9.1-21.1â¯% and 9.1-26.3â¯%, respectively. Five NDM-producing isolates that presented susceptibility to BLBLIs also had porin alterations CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that, although high susceptibility rates to BLBLIs were found, KPC-2 isolates were able to demonstrate resistance probably as a result of porin mutations. Additionally, NDM-1 isolates showed susceptibility to BLBLIs in vitro.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Compostos Azabicíclicos , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos , Ceftazidima , Combinação de Medicamentos , Infecções por Klebsiella , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Inibidores de beta-Lactamases , beta-Lactamases , Humanos , Brasil , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Inibidores de beta-Lactamases/farmacologia , Infecções por Klebsiella/microbiologia , Compostos Azabicíclicos/farmacologia , Ceftazidima/farmacologia , beta-Lactamases/genética , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/genética , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/isolamento & purificação , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Meropeném/farmacologia , Imipenem/farmacologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Ácidos Borônicos/farmacologia , Compostos Heterocíclicos com 1 AnelRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and microbiological risk factors associated with mortality in patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. METHODS: This multicentric prospective cohort study included hospitalized adult patients with a microbiologically confirmed infection treated with ceftazidime-avibactam for ≥48 hours. The clinical and microbiological risk factors for 30-day mortality were evaluated using a Cox regression model. RESULTS: Of the 193 patients evaluated from the five tertiary hospitals, 127 were included in the study. Thirty-five patients (27.6%) died within 30 days. Infections with AmpC beta-lactamase-carrying bacteria were independently related to 30-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-4.84, P < 0.01) after adjusting for time from infection to antimicrobial prescription (P = 0.04). Further, these bacterial infections were also related to higher in-hospital mortality (aHR 2.17, 95% CI 1.24-3.78, P < 0.01). Only one patient developed resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ceftazidime-avibactam had worse clinical outcomes in patients with infections with bacteria with chromosomally encoded AmpC beta-lactamase. However, these findings should be confirmed in future studies.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Compostos Azabicíclicos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Adulto , Humanos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Inibidores de beta-Lactamases/efeitos adversos , Ceftazidima/efeitos adversos , Combinação de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
The SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern (VOC) gamma (P.1) has increased transmissibility and resulted in elevated hospitalization and mortality rates in Brazil. We investigated the clinical course of COVID-19 caused by gamma and non-VOCs at a reference hospital in Brazil in a retrospective cohort study with nonelderly hospitalized patients from two periods, before and after the emergence of gamma. Cohort 1 included patients from both periods whose samples would be eligible for whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Cohort 2 was composed of randomly selected patients from Cohort 1 whose samples were submitted to WGS. A total of 433 patients composed Cohort 1: 259 from the first and 174 from the second period. Baseline characteristics were similar, except for a higher incidence of severe distress respiratory syndrome at admission in patients from the second period. Patients from the second period had significantly higher incidence rates of advanced respiratory support (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-2.59), invasive ventilatory support (aHR: 2.72; 95% CI: 2.05-3.62), and 28-day mortality from the onset of symptoms (aHR: 2.62; 95% CI: 1.46-4.72). A total of 86 (43 gamma and 43 non-gamma) patients composed Cohort 2. Patients with confirmed gamma VOC infections had higher advanced ventilatory support and mortality rates than non-gamma-infected patients. Our study suggests that non-elderly patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in the second period (used as a proxy of gamma infection) had a more severe clinical course. This might have contributed to higher hospitalization and death rates observed in the second wave in Brazil.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Brasil/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Progressão da DoençaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAVTE) remains challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOAs) for the treatment of CAVTE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing DOAs (Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, and Edoxaban) versus Dalteparin for the treatment of CAVTE was performed. Outcomes of interest included, VTE recurrence, all-cause mortality, event-free survival, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). Analysis was based on a random effects model and Bayesian Markov-chain Monte Carlo method was used for indirect comparisons. RESULTS: Four RCTs involving 2894 patients were included. Overall certainty of evidence was moderate regarding all outcomes. DOAs exhibited lower risk of VTE (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.44, 0.87; P = 0.007), similar risk of major bleeding (RR 1.33; 95% CI 0.84, 2.11; P = 0.23), and higher risk of CRNMB (RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.08, 2.56; P = 0.02), compared with Dalteparin. Risk of all-cause mortality and event-free survival were similar between groups with RR 0.99 (95% CI 0.84, 1.16) and RR 1.03 (95% CI 0.94, 1.13), respectively. Apixaban ranked first for recurrent VTE (42.4%) and major bleeding (62.3%) and Dalteparin ranked first for CRNMB (54.7%). Rivaroxaban ranked best considering all-cause mortality (58.7%); Apixaban ranked best for event-free survival (83.6%). CONCLUSIONS: DOAs presented a reduced risk of recurrent VTE with similar risk of major bleeding compared to Dalteparin. However, a higher risk of CRNMB is expected when this cohort of patients are treated with DOAs instead of Dalteparin.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Tromboembolia Venosa , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Teorema de Bayes , Inibidores do Fator Xa/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Metanálise em Rede , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologiaAssuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Brasil/epidemiologia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico PrecoceRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Copeptin, an equimolar indicator of serum antidiuretic hormone levels, has been associated with higher mortality in critically ill patients and with the development of diabetes in the general population. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association of copeptin levels with glycemic parameters in critically ill patients and to compare the time-course of copeptin in survivors and non-survivors. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENTS: From June to October 2019, critically ill patients were prospectively enrolled and followed for 90 days. MEASUREMENTS: Plasma copeptin levels were determined at intensive care unit (ICU) admission (copeptin T1), 24 h (copeptin T2), and 48 h (copeptin T3) after study entry. Blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels were measured. ICU, in-hospital, and 90-day mortality, and length of stay in the ICU and hospital were evaluated. RESULTS: 104 patients were included. No significant correlation was detected between copeptin levels and blood glucose (r = -0.17, p = 0.09), HbA1c (r = 0.01, p = 0.9), glycemic gap (r = -0.16, p = 0.11), and stress hyperglycemia ratio (r = -0.14, p = 0.16). Copeptin T3 levels were significantly higher in survivors than in non-survivors at hospital discharge (561 [370-856] vs 300 [231-693] pg/mL, p = 0.015) and at 90 days (571 [380-884] vs 300 [232-698] pg/mL, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: No significant correlations were found between copeptin levels and glycemic parameters, suggesting that copeptin is not a relevant factor in the induction of hyperglycemia during critical illness. Copeptin levels at ICU day 3 were higher in survivors than in non-survivors.
Assuntos
Glicemia/metabolismo , Glicopeptídeos/sangue , Hiperglicemia/sangue , Estado Terminal/mortalidade , Diabetes Mellitus/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus/mortalidade , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/mortalidade , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Despite widespread usage of central blood pressure assessment its predictive value among elderly people remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the capacity of central hemodynamic indices for predicting future all-cause and cardiovascular hard outcomes among elderly people. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review and meta-analysis developed at the Del Cuore cardiology clinic, in Antonio Prado, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. METHODS: 312 full-text articles were analyzed, from which 35 studies were included for systematic review. The studies included needed to report at least one central hemodynamic index among patients aged 60 years or over. RESULTS: For all-cause mortality, aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) and central systolic blood pressure (SBP) were significant, respectively with standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.85 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.69-1.01; I2 96%; P < 0.001); and SMD 0.27 (95% CI 0.15-0.39; I2 77%; P 0.012). For cardiovascular mortality brachial-ankle PWV (baPWV), central SBP and carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) were significant, respectively SMD 0.67 (95% CI 0.40-0.93; I2 0%; P 0.610); SMD 0.65 (95% CI 0.48- 0.82; I2 80%; P 0.023); and SMD 0.51 (95% CI 0.32-0.69; I2 85%; P 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis results showed that aPWV was promising for predicting all-cause mortality, while baPWV and central SBP demonstrated consistent results in evaluating cardiovascular mortality outcomes. Thus, the findings support usage of central blood pressure as a risk predictor for hard outcomes among elderly people. REGISTRATION NUMBER IN PROSPERO: RD42018085264
Assuntos
Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Análise de Onda de Pulso , Pressão Sanguínea , Artéria Braquial , Brasil/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite widespread usage of central blood pressure assessment its predictive value among elderly people remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the capacity of central hemodynamic indices for predicting future all-cause and cardiovascular hard outcomes among elderly people. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review and meta-analysis developed at the Del Cuore cardiology clinic, in Antonio Prado, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. METHODS: 312 full-text articles were analyzed, from which 35 studies were included for systematic review. The studies included needed to report at least one central hemodynamic index among patients aged 60 years or over. RESULTS: For all-cause mortality, aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) and central systolic blood pressure (SBP) were significant, respectively with standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.85 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.69-1.01; I2 96%; P < 0.001); and SMD 0.27 (95% CI 0.15-0.39; I2 77%; P 0.012). For cardiovascular mortality brachial-ankle PWV (baPWV), central SBP and carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) were significant, respectively SMD 0.67 (95% CI 0.40-0.93; I2 0%; P 0.610); SMD 0.65 (95% CI 0.48- 0.82; I2 80%; P 0.023); and SMD 0.51 (95% CI 0.32-0.69; I2 85%; P 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis results showed that aPWV was promising for predicting all-cause mortality, while baPWV and central SBP demonstrated consistent results in evaluating cardiovascular mortality outcomes. Thus, the findings support usage of central blood pressure as a risk predictor for hard outcomes among elderly people. REGISTRATION NUMBER IN PROSPERO: RD42018085264.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Análise de Onda de Pulso , Idoso , Pressão Sanguínea , Artéria Braquial , Brasil/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Previous studies have suggested that COVID-19 pneumonia is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study aimed to investigate the incidence of VTE among mechanically ventilated adults with COVID-19 pneumonia, compared to patients with respiratory failure related to other causes. Prospective study that enrolled critically ill adults with suspected COVID-19 pneumonia between June 2, 2020 and August 11, 2020. Critically ill adults with suspected COVID-19 pneumonia who required mechanical ventilation within 24 h after hospital admission were followed until death or hospital discharge. Sequential ultrasonography screening of the lower extremities and catheter insertion sites, as well as testing for plasma biochemical markers, were performed at the intensive care unit admission, day 3, day 7, and day 14. The primary outcome was a composite of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and thrombosis at the central catheter insertion sites. We enrolled 70 patients, including 57 patients with COVID-19 and 13 patients without COVID-19, and all patients completed follow-up. The incidence of the primary outcome was higher among patients with COVID-19 than among patients with respiratory failure related to other etiologies (36.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.023). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that VTE was independently associated with a COVID-19 diagnosis (odds ratio: 6.28, 95% confidence interval: 1.19-68.07) and D-dimer concentration (1-ng/mL increase, odds ratio: 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.30). The incidence of VTE was higher among critically ill mechanically ventilated patients, relative to among patients with respiratory failure related to other causes.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Estado Terminal , Pneumonia Viral , Embolia Pulmonar , Insuficiência Respiratória , Medição de Risco , Tromboembolia Venosa , Brasil/epidemiologia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/fisiopatologia , COVID-19/terapia , Teste para COVID-19/métodos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Estado Terminal/epidemiologia , Estado Terminal/terapia , Feminino , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/análise , Humanos , Incidência , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia Viral/etiologia , Pneumonia Viral/fisiopatologia , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/etiologia , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Insuficiência Respiratória/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/etiologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Medição de Risco/métodos , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Tromboembolia Venosa/sangue , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/terapiaRESUMO
Organizing pneumonia emerges as a late phase complication of COVID-19. Corticosteroids are standard therapy for organizing pneumonia, but the question of whether an approach with high dose corticosteroids would be beneficial for patients with organizing pneumonia secondary to COVID-19 remains to be answered. Herein we report a series of three patients, one male and two females, mean age 58.3 years old, admitted for COVID-19 with severe pulmonary disease requiring ventilatory support. The patients underwent chest computed tomography scans due to maintained hypoxemia, which showed a pattern compatible with organizing pneumonia. The patients were treated with a high dose of corticosteroids (prednisone 1â¯mg/kg PO), showing marked clinical improvement, and decreasing oxygen flow ratio demand. They were discharged after a mean period of 6.3 days of hospitalization. Our report suggests that patients with COVID-19 with organizing pneumonia might benefit from high dose corticosteroids as an adjuvant therapy.