RESUMO
Leptospirosis is a febrile zoonosis of worldwide distribution. A latex agglutination assay was evaluated in two studies, the first using a panel of well-characterized sera from patients with leptospirosis and from patients with other disease states and the second, a prospective hospital-based study, evaluating sera from 186 consecutive patients admitted to hospital with acute febrile illness. The confirmed leptospirosis serum panel included paired acute- and convalescent-phase specimens from 40 cases, of which 34 gave positive latex tests (case sensitivity, 85%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 70 to 94%). The other diseases represented in the panel of 112 specimens from nonleptospirosis patients included autoimmune diseases, brucellosis, dengue, melioidosis, malaria, syphilis, toxoplasmosis, viral hepatitis, and a number of other viral infections. The specificity of latex agglutination using this panel was 81% (95% CI, 73 to 87%). Among the patients with acute febrile illness, there were 25 cases of leptospirosis and 161 patients with other diagnoses. The sensitivity and specificity of latex agglutination in this group were 88% (95% CI, 72 to 97%) and 98% (95% CI, 95 to 100%), respectively. In this evaluation, the two distinct groups of specimens gave similar results for sensitivity, but specificity was different in each study. The sensitivity and specificity observed for the hospital study were similar to those obtained in evaluations of other rapid tests in the same population. The results of this study suggest that multiple evaluations of new diagnostic assays should be performed, because performance characteristics may vary in different populations.
Assuntos
Testes de Fixação do Látex/métodos , Leptospirose/diagnóstico , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Barbados , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Testes de Fixação do Látex/estatística & dados numéricos , Leptospira/imunologia , Leptospirose/imunologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
A sero-epidemiological study on canine leptospirosis was conducted in house, stray, farm and hunting dogs, as well as in suspect cases of clinical canine leptospirosis. Serum samples were collected from apparently healthy (vaccinated and non-vaccinated), house dogs. A questionnaire was administered to the owners to elicit information on risk factors for leptospirosis. The microscopic agglutination test was used to screen for leptospirosis using 17 international serovars. Reciprocal titres of between 100 and <800 were considered as evidence of past exposure while reciprocal titres of 800 or greater were classified as suggestive of acute/current infection. Of a total of 419 serum samples tested, 61 (14.6%) were seropositive for Leptospira agglutinins, 23 (5.5%) had mixed infections and 16 (3.8%) had current infection. Amongst 50 suspected cases of clinical leptospirosis, 24 (48.0%) were seropositive and only 13 (26.0%) had current infection compared with 10 (6.3%) and three (1.9%) of 160 apparently healthy house dogs respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05; chi2). Twelve (25.5%) of 47 hunting dogs, 10 (20.4%) of 49 farm dogs and five (4.4%) of 113 stray dogs were seropositive (P < 0.05; chi2). Overall, a total of nine serovars were detected with serovars mankarso, icterohaemorrhagiae RGA, autumnalis and copenhageni being involved in 29 (47.5%), 20 (32.8%), 25 (41.0%) and 10 (16.4%) respectively in 61 seropositive dogs (P < 0.05; chi2). Serovar mankarso was most predominant in seropositive apparently healthy dogs, 37.8% (14/37), suspected clinical cases of leptospirosis, 62.5% (15/24) compared with serovar icterohaemorrhagiae with a frequency of 21.6% (8/37) and 50.0% (12/24), the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.05; chi2). Although all vaccines used for prevention of canine leptospirosis in the country contain serovars canicola and icterohaemorrhagiae, serovar mankarso was mostly associated with infection and disease and may be a good candidate for inclusion in the vaccine used locally. The public health risk posed to owners of dogs infected with Leptospira cannot be over-emphasized considering the zoonotic nature of the disease.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Doenças do Cão/epidemiologia , Leptospira/imunologia , Leptospirose/veterinária , Saúde Pública , Animais , Cães , Feminino , Leptospirose/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Trinidad e Tobago/epidemiologiaRESUMO
A sero-epidemiological study on canine leptospirosis was conducted in house, stray, farm and hunting dogs, as well as in suspect cases of clinical canine leptospirosis. Serum samples were collected from apparently healthy (vaccinated and non-vaccinated), house dogs. A questionnaire was administered to the owners to elicit information on risk factors for leptospirosis. The microscopic agglutination test was used to screen for leptospirosis using 17 international serovars. Reciprocal titres of between 100 and <800 were considered as evidence of past exposure while reciprocal titres of 800 or greater were classified as suggestive of acute/current infection. Of a total of 419 serum samples tested, 61 (14.6%) were seropositive for Leptospira agglutinins, 23 (5.5%) had mixed infections and 16 (3.8%) had current infection. Amongst 50 suspected cases of clinical leptospirosis, 24 (48.0%) were seropositive and only 13 (26.0%) had current infection compared with 10 (6.3%) and three (1.9%) of 160 apparently healthy house dogs respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05; chi2). Twelve (25.5%) of 47 hunting dogs, 10 (20.4%) of 49 farm dogs and five (4.4%) of 113 stray dogs were seropositive (P < 0.05; chi2). Overall, a total of nine serovars were detected with serovars mankarso, icterohaemorrhagiae RGA, autumnalis and copenhageni being involved in 29 (47.5%), 20 (32.8%), 25 (41.0%) and 10 (16.4%) respectively in 61 seropositive dogs (P < 0.05; chi2). Serovar mankarso was most predominant in seropositive apparently healthy dogs, 37.8% (14/37), suspected clinical cases of leptospirosis, 62.5% (15/24) compared with serovar icterohaemorrhagiae with a frequency of 21.6% (8/37) and 50.0% (12/24), the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.05; chi2).
Assuntos
Cães , Animais , Humanos , Leptospirose , Vacinação , Trinidad e Tobago , Epidemiologia , PrevalênciaRESUMO
Leptospirosis is a common and underdiagnosed zoonosis. Two rapid assays for serological diagnosis of acute leptospirosis in diagnostic laboratories, the immunoglobulin M (IgM)-dipstick assay and the indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA), were evaluated and compared with standard assays. Sera were examined from 104 patients admitted to a hospital for investigation in a leptospirosis diagnostic protocol. Specimens for serology were taken on days 1 and 4 of the patients' hospital stay. Antibodies were detected using an IgM-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), microscopic agglutination test (MAT), an IgM-dipstick assay, and an IHA. Fifty-one patients were found to have leptospirosis. The sensitivity of the IgM-dipstick assay was 98%, its specificity was 90.6%, its positive predictive value was 90.9%, and its negative predictive value was 98%. The sensitivity of the IHA was 92.2%, its specificity was 94.4%, its positive predictive value was 95.9%, and its negative predictive value was 92.7%. The standard IgM-ELISA and MAT, were positive in the first samples tested from 67 and 55% of the cases, respectively, and the rapid IgM-dipstick assay and IHA were positive in 71 and 49%, respectively, in the first sample tested. Both rapid assays are highly sensitive and specific. Neither requires specialized equipment, and both are suitable for use in diagnostic laboratories.
Assuntos
Testes de Hemaglutinação/normas , Leptospirose/diagnóstico , Fitas Reagentes/normas , Doença Aguda , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Humanos , Imunoglobulina M/análise , Leptospirose/imunologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate two rapid assays for serological diagnosis of acute leptospirosis in diagnostic laboratories. DESIGN AND METHODS: 209 specimens were examined from 104 patients admitted to hospital for investigation in a leptospirosis diagnostic protocol. Specimens for serology were taken on days 1 and 4 of the hospital admission. Antibodies were detected using IgM-ELISA, microscopic agglutination (MAT), an IgM-dipstick assay and indirect haemagglutination assay. RESULTS: 51 patients were found to have leptospirosis. The sensitivity of the IgM-dipstick was 98 percent, specificity was 90.6 percent, positive predictive value was 90.9 percent and the negative predictive value was 98 percent. The sensitivity of IHA was 92. percent, specificity was 94.4 percent, positive predictive value was 95.9 percent and negative predictive value was 92.7 percent. The IgM-dipstick assay was positive in 71 percent of the cases in the first sample tested. CONCLUSIONS: Both assays are highly sensitive and specific. Neither requires specialized equipment, and both are suitable for use in diagnostic laboratories.(Au)
Assuntos
Humanos , Leptospirose/diagnóstico , Testes Sorológicos/métodos , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Testes de Hemaglutinação/métodos , Estudo de Avaliação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodosRESUMO
Rodents, particularly rats, are widely held to be the source of most human cases of leptospirosis. Feral rats were trapped at sites throughout Barbados during two six month surveys: from October to March 1986/87 and from October to March 1994/95. During the first survey, 63 rats were trapped, of which 26 (41%) were identified as Rattus rattus and 37 (59%) as Rattus norvegicus. In the second study, 100 rats were trapped, of which R. rattus comprised 24% (24) and R. norvegicus 76% (76). Cultures of blood, urine and kidney were made in EMJH medium. Leptospires were isolated from 12/63 (19%) and from 16/100 (16%) of the rats during 1986/87 and 1994/95, respectively; 27/28 isolates were recovered from the kidneys or urine or both, while only one isolate was recovered from the blood. During the first study, isolates were identified as serovars copenhageni (11) and arborea (1), while in the second study, serovars copenhageni (9), arborea (5) and bim (1) were identified; one isolate was lost before it could be identified. In the first study, antibodies were detected by microscopic agglutination at a titre of > or = 100 in 26/62 (42%) of rats tested, while in the second survey, 5/100 (5%) of rats had similar titres. In two surveys, conducted eight years apart, we confirmed that rats in Barbados are commonly infected with leptospires, and that viable organisms are found in the kidneys and urine, evidence of chronic infection and thus excretion of leptospires in rodent urine. Moreover, the predominant serovar isolated was copenhageni, of which Rattus spp. are the worldwide reservoir. There was little evidence that rats act as a reservoir for the serovar bim, the most common cause of human leptospirosis in Barbados.
Assuntos
Animais Selvagens/microbiologia , Vetores de Doenças , Leptospira/isolamento & purificação , Leptospirose/transmissão , Ratos/microbiologia , Animais , Barbados , Feminino , Humanos , Rim/microbiologia , Leptospirose/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Controle de Roedores , Urina/microbiologiaRESUMO
Rodents, particularly rats, are widely held to be the source of most human cases of leptospirosis. Feral rats were trapped at sites throughout Barbados during two-six month surveys: from October to March 1986/87 and from October to March 1994/95. During the first survey, 63 rats were trapped, of which 26 (41 percent) were identified as Rattus rattus and 37 (59 percent) as Rattus norvegicus. In the second study, 100 rats were trapped, of which R. rattus comprised 24 percent (24) and R. norvegicus 76 percent (76). Cultures of blood, urine and kidney were made in EMJH medium. Leptospires were isolated from 12/63 (19 percent) and from 16/100 (16 percent) of the rats during 1986/87 and 1994/95, respectively; 27/28 isolates were recovered from the kidneys or urine or both, while only one isolate was recovered from the blood. During the first study, isolates were identified as serovars copenhageni (11), arborea (1), while in the second study, serovars copenhageni (9), arborea (5) and bim (1) were identified; one isolate was lost before it could be identified. In the first study, antibodies were detected by microscopic agglutination at a titre of > or = 100 in 26/62 (42 percent) of rats tested, while in the second survey, 5/100 (5 percent) of rats had similar titres. In two surveys, conducted eight years aparts we confirmed that rats in Barbados are commonly infected with leptospires, and that viable organisms are found in the kidneys and urine, evidence of chronic infection and thus excretion of leptospires in rodent urine. Moreover, the predominant serovar isolated was copenhageni, of which Rattus spp. are the worldwide reservoir. There was little evidence that rats act as a reservoir for the serovar bim, the most common cause of human leptospirosis in Barbados.(AU)
Assuntos
21003 , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Animais Selvagens/microbiologia , Vetores de Doenças , Leptospira/isolamento & purificação , Leptospirose/transmissão , Ratos/microbiologia , Barbados , Rim/microbiologia , Leptospirose/prevenção & controle , Controle de Roedores , Urina/microbiologiaRESUMO
Rodents, particularly rats, are widely held to be the source of most human cases of leptospirosis. Feral rats were trapped at sites throughout Barbados during two six month surveys: from October to March 1986/87 and from October to March 1994/95. During the first survey, 63 rats were trapped, of which 26 (41) were identified as Rattus rattus and 37 (59) as Rattus norvegicus. In the second study, 100 rats were trapped, of which R. rattus comprised 24(24) and R. norvegicus 76(76). Cultures of blood, urine and kidney were made in EMJH medium. Leptospires were isolated from 12/63 (19) and from 16/100 (16) of the rats during 1986/87 and 1994/95, respectively; 27/28 isolates were recovered from the kidneys or urine or both, while only one isolate was recovered from the blood. During the first study, isolates were identified as serovars copenhageni (11) and arborea (1), while in the second study, serovars copenhageni (9), arborea (5) and bim (1) were identified; one isolate was lost before it could be identified. In the first study, antibodies were detected by microscopic agglutination at a titre of > or = 100 in 26/62 (42) of rats tested, while in the second survey, 5/100 (5) of rats had similar titres. In two surveys, conducted eight years apart, we confirmed that rats in Barbados are commonly infected with leptospires, and that viable organisms are found in the kidneys and urine, evidence of chronic infection and thus excretion of leptospires in rodent urine. Moreover, the predominant serovar isolated was copenhageni, of which Rattus spp. are the worldwide reservoir. There was little evidence that rats act as a reservoir for the serovar bim, the most common cause of human leptospirosis in Barbados.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Animais , Animais Selvagens/microbiologia , Leptospira/isolamento & purificação , Leptospirose/transmissão , Ratos/microbiologia , Vetores de Doenças , Barbados , Controle de Roedores , Leptospirose/prevenção & controle , Rim/microbiologia , Urina/microbiologiaRESUMO
Serology plays an important role in the diagnosis of leptospirosis. Few laboratories have the resources and expertise to perform the microscopic agglutination test. There is a need for rapid and simple serological tests which facilitate the early diagnosis of leptospirosis, while antibiotic therapy may be most effective. A commercially available indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA; MRL Diagnostics, Cypress, Calif.) was evaluated with multiple serum specimens from 107 patients being investigated for leptospirosis. By using a combination of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods for immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies and the microscopic agglutination test, 54 patients were found to have leptospirosis and 53 were found not to have leptospirosis. The sensitivity of IHA for the detection of acute leptospirosis was 100%, the specificity was 94%, the positive predictive value was 95%, and the negative predictive value was 100%. IHA was negative when 13 antinuclear antibody-positive sera, 24 serum specimens from patients with syphilis, and 16 serum specimens false positive by the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory test were tested. IHA was shown to detect both IgM and IgG classes of antibodies in human sera. Serum specimens from 27 dogs investigated for leptospirosis were studied: 3 samples gave nonspecific hemagglutination, but for all remaining samples, the results of IHA and an IgM ELISA were concordant. Performance of IHA was simple, and IHA requires no specialized equipment. It represents a useful assay for laboratories which require a leptospiral diagnostic capability but lack the expertise to perform specialist investigations.
Assuntos
Testes de Hemaglutinação , Leptospirose/diagnóstico , Doença Aguda , Animais , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Cães , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Seguimentos , Cobaias , HumanosRESUMO
Rodents, particularly rats, are widely held to be the source of most human cases of leptospirosis. Feral rats were trapped at sites throughout the island of Barbados during two six month surveys, from October - March 1986/87 and 1994/95. During the first survey, 63 rats were trapped, of which 26 (41 percent) were identified as Rattus rattus and 37 (59 percent) as Rattus norvegicus. In the second study, 100 rats were trapped, of which R. rattus comprised 24 percent (24) and R. norvegicus 76 percent (76). Cultures of blood, urine and kidney were made in EMJH medium. Leptospira were isolated from 12/63 (19 percent) and from 16/100 (16 percent) of the rats during 1986/87 and 1994/95, respectively; 27/28 isolates were recovered from the kidneys or urine or both, while only one isolate was recovered from blood. During the first study, isolates were identified as serovars copenhageni (11) and arborea (1), while in the second study, serovars copenhageni (9), arborea (5) and bim (1) were identified; one isolate was lost before it could be identified. In the first study, antibodies were detected by microscopic agglutination at a titre of > 100 in 26/62 (42 percent) of rats tested, while in the second survey, 5/100 (5 percent) of rats had similar titres. In two surveys, conducted eight years apart, we confirmed that rats in Barbados are commonly infected with leptospira, and that viable organisms are found in the kidneys and urine, evidence of chronic infection and thus excretion of leptospira in rodent urine. Moreover, the predominant serovar isolated was copenhageni, of which Rattus spp. are the worldwide reservoirs. There was little evidence that rats act as a reservoir for the serovar bim, the most common cause of human leptospirosis in Barbados. (AU)