RESUMO
â¢This study aimed to assess the learning curve effect on patient's clinical outcome for EESD. Retrospective observational study, enrolling patients that underwent EESD from 2009 to 2021, divided in 2 groups. Mean procedure time was 111.8 min and 103.6 min for T1 and T2, respectively (P=0.004). The learning curve in esophageal ESD could be overcomed effectively and safely by an adequately trained Western endoscopist. Background - Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (EESD) is a complex and time-consuming procedure at which training are mainly available in Japan. There is a paucity of data concerning the learning curve to master EESD by Western endoscopists. Objective - This study aimed to assess the learning curve effect on patient's clinical outcome for EESD. Methods - This is a retrospective observational study. Enrolling patients that underwent EESD from 2009 to 2021. The analysis was divided into two periods; T1: case 1 to 49 and T2: case 50 to 98. The following features were analyzed for each group: patients and tumors characteristics, en-bloc, complete and curative resection rates, procedure duration and adverse events rate. Results - Ninety-eight EESD procedures were performed. Mean procedure time was 111.8 min and 103.6 min for T1 and T2, respectively (P=0.004). En bloc resection rate was 93.8% and 97.9% for T1 and T2, respectively (P=0.307). Complete resection rate was 79.5% and 85.7% for T1 and T2, respectively (P=0.424). Curative resection rate was 65.3% and 71.4% for T1 and T2, respectively (P=0.258). Four patients had complications; three during T1 period and one during T2 period. Overall mortality rate: 0%. Conclusion - The esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection could be performed effectively and safely by an adequately trained Western endoscopist.
Assuntos
Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa , Curva de Aprendizado , Humanos , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Japão , América Latina , Esôfago , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
ABSTRACT Background: Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (EESD) is a complex and time-consuming procedure at which training are mainly available in Japan. There is a paucity of data concerning the learning curve to master EESD by Western endoscopists. Objective: This study aimed to assess the learning curve effect on patient's clinical outcome for EESD. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study. Enrolling patients that underwent EESD from 2009 to 2021. The analysis was divided into two periods; T1: case 1 to 49 and T2: case 50 to 98. The following features were analyzed for each group: patients and tumors characteristics, en-bloc, complete and curative resection rates, procedure duration and adverse events rate. Results: Ninety-eight EESD procedures were performed. Mean procedure time was 111.8 min and 103.6 min for T1 and T2, respectively (P=0.004). En bloc resection rate was 93.8% and 97.9% for T1 and T2, respectively (P=0.307). Complete resection rate was 79.5% and 85.7% for T1 and T2, respectively (P=0.424). Curative resection rate was 65.3% and 71.4% for T1 and T2, respectively (P=0.258). Four patients had complications; three during T1 period and one during T2 period. Overall mortality rate: 0%. Conclusion: The esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection could be performed effectively and safely by an adequately trained Western endoscopist.
RESUMO Contexto: A dissecção endoscópica da submucosa do esôfago (DSEE) é um procedimento complexo, cujo treinamento está disponível principalmente no Japão. Há uma escassez de dados sobre a curva de aprendizado para se capacitar na realização da DSEE por endoscopistas ocidentais. Objetivo: Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar o efeito da curva de aprendizado no resultado clínico dos pacientes submetidos a DSEE. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo observacional retrospectivo. Foram incluídos pacientes submetidos a DSEE no período de 2009 a 2021. A análise foi dividida em dois períodos; T1: caso 1 a 49 e T2: caso 50 a 98. Os seguintes parâmetros foram analisados para cada grupo: características clínicas dos pacientes e dos tumores de esôfago, taxas de ressecção em bloco, completa e curativa, duração do procedimento e taxa de eventos adversos. Resultados: Noventa e oito procedimentos de DSEE foram realizados. O tempo médio do procedimento foi de 111,8 min e 103,6 min nos períodos T1 e T2, respectivamente (P=0,004). A taxa de ressecção em bloco foi de 93,8% e 97,9% nos períodos T1 e T2, respectivamente (P=0,307). A taxa de ressecção completa foi de 79,5% e 85,7% nos períodos T1 e T2, respectivamente (P=0,424). A taxa de ressecção curativa foi de 65,3% e 71,4% para T1 e T2, respectivamente (P=0,258). Quatro pacientes tiveram complicações; três durante o período T1 e um durante o período T2. Taxa de mortalidade geral: 0%. Conclusão: A DSEE pode ser realizada de forma eficaz e segura por um endoscopista ocidental adequadamente treinado.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The standard of practice when a superficial lesion was identified during upper GI endoscopy is to take an endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) of the lesion. The histopathologic findings then will determine the management plan. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en-bloc resection for early neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract and provides an adequate specimen that permits a more reliable histopathologic assessment. The objective of this study was to determine the rate of histopathologic discrepancy between EFB and specimens resected by ESD, and to identify the predisposing risk factors for this discordance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study, enrolling patients with superficial gastric neoplasms that underwent EFB followed by ESD. We divided cases to concordant or discordant group according to the histopathologic diagnosis of EFB and ESD specimens. We also analyzed the features that may have influenced the occurrence of histopathologic discordance and the association between discordant samples of adenocarcinoma and neoplastic invasion to deeper layers. RESULTS: A total of 115 gastric ESD procedures were performed with 84 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Histopathologic discordance between EFB and ESD specimens were observed in 35.8% of cases (30/84 lesions). The univariant-bivariant analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that histologic discordance was closely related to the size of the lesions ( P =0.028). CONCLUSION: Histopathologic discrepancy between EFB and ESD specimens may occur in approximately one-third of cases, particularly for lesions over 20 mm, which may lead to crucial delays in gastric cancer precise diagnosis and treatment.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Biópsia/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/patologiaRESUMO
Background and study aims Submucosal (SM) injection is a critical step in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). In Japan, use of viscous solutions such as sodium hyaluronate are recommended; the commercially product available is MucoUp (Seikagaku Co. and Boston Scientific Japan Co., Japan). Nevertheless, MucoUp is expensive and unavailable in many Western countries. For the past 8 years, we have been using low-cost sterile teardrops solution composed of 0.4â% sodium hyaluronate (Adaptis Fresh, Legrand Laboratory, Brazil). This solution is readily available in drugstores with a cost of approximately US$ 10.00 for each 10-cc bottle. The aim of this study was to present the clinical outcome with off-label sodium hyaluronate use for SM injection in gastric ESD. Patients and methods A single-center retrospective study of collected data investigating consecutive patients that underwent gastric ESD between 2012 and 2019. ESD was performed using 0.4â% sodium hyaluronate teardrop for SM injection and Flush Knife BT 2.5 (Fujifilm Co., Japan). The following data were analyzed: clinical-pathological features, en-bloc, R0 and curative resection rate, procedure duration, adverse events, and clinical outcome. Results ESD was performed with sodium hyaluronate for submucosal injection in 78 patients. The en-bloc resection rate and R0 resection rate were 96.1â% and 92.3â%, respectively. The curative resection rate for epithelial lesions was 83.8â%. Adverse events occurred in 5 cases (6.3â%): delayed bleeding (3.8â%, 3 cases) and perforation (2.5â%, 2 cases); all managed successfully by clipping and thermal coagulation. The mean volume of sodium hyaluronate solution used per patient was 10 cc (SD: ±â8âcc). During follow-up (mean: 17 months; SD: ±â14.5 months), two patients developed metachronous lesions (2.5â%). Conclusions Off-label use of teardrops with 0.4â% sodium hyaluronate for submucosal injection was demonstrated to be safe and able to provide an effective submucosal cushion that facilitates SM dissection in gastric ESD procedures.
RESUMO
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/a-1265-6598.].