RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Age is closely related to the efficacy of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Latest clinical trials have proved the better overall survival (OS) for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors verse chemotherapy in NSCLC patients. However, we had no clear idea of the efficacy of them in elderly patients. So we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for NSCLC patients of different age groups and summarized overall treatment-related adverse events. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched for all clinical trials in NSCLC until 30th of April 2019. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy in NSCLC patients. The hazard ratio (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of OS, progression-free survival or adverse events (AEs) were used. RESULTS: A total of 4994 patients from 8 RCTs were included. Immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly prolonged the OS (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61-0.89) versus chemotherapy in NSCLC patients who were less than 65 years old. Also, they prolonged the OS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59-0.93) in NSCLC patients who were more than 65 years old. However, there was no statistical significance of OS (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.57-1.30) among NSCLC patients who were more than 75 years old. It also showed that the single use of immune checkpoint inhibitors had fewer all-grade AEs. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the NSCLC patients who were less or more than 65 years, immune checkpoint inhibitors could achieve better OS than chemotherapy. But there was no significant difference when NSCLC patients who were more than 75 years old. Older patient should be offered immune therapies if it is possible and the mechanism in old age treatment should be further studied.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
We examined the effects of co-culturing CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells with sirolimus or cyclosporin A on Treg cell proliferation and differentiation and on transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) and Foxp3 expression. CD4+ CD25+ Treg cells were harvested from mononuclear cells of spleens of C57BL/6 mice using immunomagnetic beads and divided into control, sirolimus, and cyclosporine groups. Following a 96-h co-culture, Treg cells were assayed by flow cytometry. FoxP3 and TGF-ß mRNA levels and secretion were assayed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Smad protein of the TGF-ß signaling pathway was assayed by western blot and its effect on CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ Treg cell proliferation was determined. Sirolimus-promoted differentiation and proliferation was examined using a TGF-ß neutralizing antibody. Sirolimus-treated CD4+ T cell TGF-ß secretion increased 2.5X over control levels (P < 0.01), but that of the cyclosporine group decreased marginally (P > 0.05). The CD4+ cell proportion decreased significantly (41.25 vs 69.22%, P < 0.01) and slightly (65.21 vs 69.22, P > 0.05) in the cyclosporine and sirolimus groups, respectively. T cell Foxp3 mRNA expression was significantly higher in the sirolimus-treated than in the cyclosporine (53.7 vs 40.2%, P < 0.05) and control groups (P < 0.01), but was significantly lower in the cyclosporine group than in controls (23.6 vs 40.2%, P < 0.01). Overall, sirolimus promoted CD4+ CD25+ Treg cell proliferation and growth in vitro, whereas cyclosporin A inhibited proliferation. Sirolimus might promote CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ regulatory T cell proliferation by inducing TGF-ß secretion in vivo.