RESUMO
We conducted a 3-year cost-effectiveness analysis on the cavitated dentine carious lesion preventive capabilities of composite resin (CR) (reference group) and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC) sealants compared to supervised toothbrushing (STB) in high-risk first permanent molars. School children aged 6-7 years in 6 schools (2 per group) received CR and ART/HVGIC sealants or STB daily for 180 days each school year. Data were collected prospectively and cost estimates were made for sample data and a projection of 1,000 sealants/STB high-risk permanent molars. Although STB had the best outcome, its high implementation cost (95% of cost for supervisors visiting schools 180 days/school year) affected the results. ART/HVGIC was cost-effective compared to CR for the sample data (savings of USD 37 per cavitated dentine carious lesion prevented), while CR was cost-effective compared to ART/HVGIC for the projection (savings of USD 17 per cavitated dentine carious lesion prevented), and both were cost-saving compared to STB. Two STB scenarios were tested in sensitivity analyses with variations in caries incidence and number of supervision days; results showed STB had lower costs and higher savings per cavitated dentine carious lesion prevented than CR and ART/HVGIC. A major assumption is that both scenarios have the same high effectiveness rate experienced by STB under study conditions; however, they point to the value of further research on the benefits of adopting STB as a long-term venture in a general population of school children.
Assuntos
Resinas Compostas/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Tratamento Dentário Restaurador sem Trauma/economia , Cárie Dentária/prevenção & controle , Dente Molar , Selantes de Fossas e Fissuras/uso terapêutico , Escovação Dentária , Brasil/epidemiologia , Criança , Cárie Dentária/epidemiologia , Dentifrícios/uso terapêutico , Dentição Permanente , Feminino , Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the exfoliation pattern of primary molars treated according to three treatment protocols. The hypothesis tested was that there is no difference in the exfoliation pattern of primary molars treated according to conventional restorative treatment using amalgam (CRT), atraumatic restorative treatment using highviscosity glassionomer (ART), and ultraconservative treatment (UCT). The latter consisted of restoring small cavities with ART and cleaning medium/large nonrestored cavities daily with toothpaste/toothbrush under supervision. METHODS: A sample of 302 children aged 67 years from a suburban area of Brasilia was followed up for 3.5 years. The numbers of treated molars were 341 (CRT), 244 (ART), and 275 (UCT). Exfoliation rates were obtained using the PHREG procedure. Differences between the three treatment protocol groups were tested using the Wald test. RESULTS: After 3.5 years, there was no difference over the exfoliation rates of all primary molars as 51.0% (CRT), 48.7% (ART), and 59.3% (UCT) had exfoliated at the overall period (P = 0.34). CONCLUSION: The three treatment protocols led to similar exfoliation patterns of all primary molars after 3.5 years.
Assuntos
Restauração Dentária Permanente/métodos , Dente Molar , Esfoliação de Dente/epidemiologia , Dente Decíduo , Brasil/epidemiologia , Criança , Tratamento Dentário Restaurador sem Trauma/efeitos adversos , Tratamento Dentário Restaurador sem Trauma/métodos , Cárie Dentária/cirurgia , Restauração Dentária Permanente/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Esfoliação de Dente/etiologia , Dente Decíduo/cirurgiaRESUMO
UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic investigation plus meta-analysis into survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations using high-viscosity glass ionomers and to compare the results with those from the 2005 ART meta-analysis. Until February 2010, four databases were searched. Two hundred four publications were found, and 66 reported on ART restorations or sealant survival. Based on five exclusion criteria, two independent reviewers selected the 29 publications that accounted for the meta-analysis. Confidence intervals (CI) and or standard errors were calculated and the heterogeneity variance of the survival rates was estimated. Location (school/clinic) was an independent variable. The survival rates of single-surface and multiple-surface ART restorations in primary teeth over the first 2 years were 93% (CI, 91-94%) and 62% (CI, 51-73%), respectively; for single-surface ART restorations in permanent teeth over the first 3 and 5 years it was 85% (CI, 77-91%) and 80% (CI, 76-83%), respectively and for multiple-surface ART restorations in permanent teeth over 1 year it was 86% (CI, 59-98%). The mean annual dentine lesion incidence rate, in pits and fissures previously sealed using ART, over the first 3 years was 1%. No location effect and no differences between the 2005 and 2010 survival rates of ART restorations and sealants were observed. The short-term survival rates of single-surface ART restorations in primary and permanent teeth, and the caries-preventive effect of ART sealants were high. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ART can safely be used in single-surface cavities in both primary and permanent teeth. ART sealants have a high caries preventive effect.