RESUMO
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the immediate bone damage and bone repair after osteotomy for implants using conventional drills and drills powered by piezoelectric motor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve rabbits received a tibial osteotomy with a conventional drill (control), with a diamond like carbon drill (DLC) and with a piezoelectric drill (Piezo). The animals were euthanized immediately, 30 and 60 days postoperatively. The tibias were removed and analyzed by means of histomorphometry, immunohistochemistry and microtomography. RESULTS: The immediate damage to the tissue at the cavity margins was similar (P > .05). At 30 and 60 days, the amount of newly formed bone tissue was similar (P > .05). Osteocalcin was intense score at 60 days in Piezo group. Microtomography revealed that bone volume at 30 days (control 3.8; DLC 4.3; and Piezo 2.4) and 60 days (control 4.9; DLC 4.82; and Piezo 3.95) were similar. There was a significant difference in bone formation between 30 (2.4) and 60 days (3.95) for the Piezo group (P = .016). CONCLUSION: The immediate effects and repair of cavities made using conventional, DLC coated, or ultrasound drills were similar.
Assuntos
Implantes Dentários , Piezocirurgia , Animais , Sobrevivência Celular , Osteotomia , Estudos Prospectivos , CoelhosRESUMO
The procedure of maxillary sinus lifting using autogenous bone was considered the reference standard choice for oral rehabilitation in cases of severe atrophic maxilla. However, it is not always a viable option, due to the limitations or morbidity caused by grafting techniques. This has led to the development of bone substitutes, which have been elaborated and improved. Choosing the best biomaterial becomes difficult due to the wide variety of bone substitutes. The aim of this article is to present some of these materials that are reported in the current scientific literature for maxillary sinus lifting.
El procedimiento de elevación del seno maxilar utilizando hueso autógeno se consideraba la opción estándar de oro para la rehabilitación oral en casos de maxilar atrófico grave. Sin embargo, no siempre es una opción viable, debido a las limitaciones o a la morbilidad causada por técnicas de injerto, lo que justifica la existencia de sustitutos óseos que han sido elaborados y mejorados. En cuanto a la amplia variedad de sustitutos óseos, se hace difícil la mejor elección de biomaterial. El objetivo de este informe es presentar una variedad de sustitutos óseos respetados en la literatura científica actual, usados en la elevación del seno maxilar.