RESUMO
Our aim was to compare the wound healing of autogenous bone grafts with that of fresh-frozen allogeneic block bone in rabbits. We used 25 animals. One was killed before the experiment to provide the allogeneic bone, and the remainder were killed at four time points (n=6 in each group). On histometrical analysis there was a significant difference between the two groups only at 45days and between 15 and 45days in the intergroup analysis. However, there was significantly more revascularisation (p<0.05), resorption (p<0.05), and bony replacement (p<0.05) in the autogenous group in the immunohistochemical analysis. In later periods, the autogenous bone was replaced by newly-formed bone in all samples, whereas it was always possible to find regions of devitalised bone in the fresh-frozen allogeneic bone grafts. Autogenous grafts were completely replaced whereas, in the fresh- frozen allogeneic grafts, we found acellular tissue that had been incorporated into the receptor bed interface during the later evaluation times.
Assuntos
Remodelação Óssea , Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Animais , Criopreservação , Imuno-Histoquímica , Modelos Animais , Neovascularização Fisiológica , Osteogênese , Coelhos , Transplante Autólogo , Transplante HomólogoRESUMO
A systematic review of the advantages and disadvantages of piezoelectric surgery in comparison with conventional saws for sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) was performed. Relevant studies published in the last 10 years were identified through a search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Direct, and Embase databases and assessed against predetermined eligibility criteria. The initial search resulted in 1736 articles. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 articles remained. A total of 799 patients with an average age of 27.5 years underwent SSO performed using a saw or ultrasonic device. Results showed that it took longer to perform the osteotomies using an ultrasonic device than using a conventional saw. At ≥6 months of follow-up, neurosensory disturbance was seen in 4.7% of patients who underwent piezoelectric surgery versus 61.6% of patients who underwent surgery in which a conventional saw was used. It was found that the use of piezoelectric surgery in SSO leads to the best outcome regarding neurosensory disturbance when compared to conventional saws (P=0.04) at ≥6 months of follow-up. Further studies are required for the evaluation of the other clinical parameters assessed.