RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The increased demand for esthetics and minimally invasive tooth restorations resulted in a rapid development of adhesive dentistry. However, much controversy remains about the safe use and cytotoxic effects of different groups of dental adhesives. The present study performed a systematic review to identify the answer to the following question: are self-etch adhesives more cytotoxic than those employing the etch-and-rinse system? METHODS: This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement; a quality assessment for in vitro studies was conducted using the ToxRTool. Specific search strategies were developed and performed in the electronic databases MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and LILACS/BBO. After removal of duplicated studies and application of the exclusion criteria, ten eligible articles were selected and submitted to a qualitative descriptive analysis comparing both groups of dental adhesives. Most in vitro test systems employed pulp cells or gingival fibroblasts. RESULTS: The methodologies presented great variability regarding the exposure to the test materials. Only four studies assessed the role of the degree of conversion of the materials in their toxicity, with conflicting results. SIGNIFICANCE: While the lack of methodological standardization among the studies still hinders the establishment of a relationship between type of dental adhesive and toxicity, studies employing dentin barrier systems indicate greater cytotoxicity for etch-and-rinse adhesives.
Assuntos
Colagem Dentária , Cimentos Dentários , Adesivos , Polpa Dentária , Dentina , Adesivos Dentinários , Teste de Materiais , Cimentos de ResinaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the compressive strength of first maxillary premolars from young and elderly people. BACKGROUND: Findings have revealed that changes happening on dental structure lead to a higher susceptibility of tooth fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty teeth were divided into four groups as follows: G I (n = 7) premolars of elderly patients with fused roots, G II (n = 8) premolars of elderly with separate roots, G III (n = 7) pre-molars of young people with fused roots and G IV (n = 8) premolars of young people with roots separated. The roots were placed in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) cylinder and embedded in acrylic resin. Afterward, the samples were subjected to fracture by compressive strength in a universal testing machine. Loads were applied in continuous and progressive speed of 0.5 mm/min until the moment of fracture. The values found underwent statistical analysis (ANOVA α = 0.05). RESULTS: With regard to age, there was a statistical difference, the teeth of the elderly being more susceptible to fracture (p < 0.05). With regard to root morphology, no significant differences between both groups were observed (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that with the methodology employed, the age factor was important with regard to fracture resistance to compression.