Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 20(1): 141, 2020 Mar 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32138721

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Domestic violence is a leading cause of social morbidity and may increase during and after pregnancy. In high-income countries screening, referral and management interventions are available as part of standard maternity care. Such practice is not routine in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) where the burden of social morbidity is high. METHODS: We systematically reviewed available evidence describing the types of interventions, and/or the effectiveness of such interventions for women who report domestic violence during and/or after pregnancy, living in LMIC. Published and grey literature describing interventions for, and/or effectiveness of such interventions for women who report domestic violence during and/or after pregnancy, living in LMIC was reviewed. Outcomes assessed were (i) reduction in the frequency and/or severity of domestic violence, and/or (ii) improved physical, psychological and/or social health. Narrative analysis was conducted. RESULTS: After screening 4818 articles, six studies were identified for inclusion. All included studies assessed women (n = 894) during pregnancy. Five studies reported on supportive counselling; one study implemented an intervention consisting of routine screening for domestic violence and supported referrals for women who required this. Two studies evaluated the effectiveness of the interventions on domestic violence with statistically significant decreases in the occurrence of domestic violence following counselling interventions (488 women included). There was a statistically significant increase in family support following counselling in one study (72 women included). There was some evidence of improvement in quality of life, increased use of safety behaviours, improved family and social support, increased access to community resources, increased use of referral services and reduced maternal depression. Overall evidence was of low to moderate quality. CONCLUSIONS: Screening, referral and supportive counselling is likely to benefit women living in LMIC who experience domestic violence. Larger-scale, high-quality research is, however, required to provide further evidence for the effectiveness of interventions. Improved availability with evaluation of interventions that are likely to be effective is necessary to inform policy, programme decisions and resource allocation for maternal healthcare in LMIC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO CRD42018087713.


Assuntos
Violência Doméstica/prevenção & controle , Violência Doméstica/estatística & dados numéricos , Violência Doméstica/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Índia , Quênia , Nigéria , Peru , Gravidez , Fatores Socioeconômicos , África do Sul
2.
Psychol Health Med ; 25(6): 687-702, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31762313

RESUMO

Our study evaluated factors associated with ill-health in a population-based longitudinal study of women who delivered a singleton live-born baby in a 3-month period across Jamaica. Socio-demographics, perception of health, chronic illnesses, frequency and reasons for hospital admission were assessed. Relationships between ill-health and maternal characteristics were estimated using log-normal regression analysis. Of 9,742 women interviewed at birth, 1,311 were assessed at four stages, 27.7% of whom reported ill-health at least once. Hospitalization rates were 20.9% during pregnancy, 6.1% up to 12 months and 0.5% up to 22 months after childbirth. Ill-health, reported by 11% of women, was less likely with better education (RR=0.62, 95%; 0.42-0.84). Hospital admission was associated with higher socio-economic status (RR=1.33, 95% 1.04-1.70) and Caesarean section [CS] (RR=1.57, 95%; 1.21-2.04). One in three (33.7%) women reported chronic illnesses, and the likelihood increased with age, parity and delivery by elective CS (RR=1.44, 95%; 1.20-1.73). In multivariable analyses, ill-health was more likely with chronic illness (RR=2.06, 95%; CI: 1.71-2.48) and hospital admission from 12 to 22 months after childbirth (RR=1.54, 95% CI: 1.12-2.12). Ill-health during pregnancy and after childbirth represent a significant burden of disease and requires a standardised comprehensive approach to measuring and addressing this disease burden.


Assuntos
Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Materna , Transtornos Puerperais/epidemiologia , Classe Social , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Doença Crônica , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Jamaica/epidemiologia , Estudos Longitudinais , Morbidade , Análise Multivariada , Paridade , Parto , Período Pós-Parto , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Fatores de Risco , Saúde da Mulher , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA