RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe the practice of pediatric intensive care in Latin America and compare it with two European countries. DESIGN: Analysis of data presented by member countries of the Sociedad Latinoamericana de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico (SLACIP), Spain and Portugal, in the context of a Symposium of Spanish and Portuguese - speaking pediatric intensivists during the Fifth World Congress on Pediatric Intensive Care. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric intensivists in representation of each member country of the SLACIP, Spain and Portugal. INTERVENTIONS: None. VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Each country presented its data on child health, medical facilities for children, pediatric intensive care units, pediatric intensivists, certification procedures, equipment, morbidity, mortality, and issues requiring intervention in each participating country. RESULTS: Data from 11 countries was analyzed. Nine countries were from Latin America (Argentina, Colombia, Cuba, Chile, Ecuador, Honduras, México, Dominican Republic and Uruguay), and two from Europe (Spain and Portugal). Data from Bolivia and Guatemala were partially considered. Populational, institutional, and operative differences were identified. Mean PICU mortality was 13.29% in Latin America and 5% in the European countries (P=0.005). There was an inverse relationship between mortality and availability of pediatric intensive care units, pediatric intensivists, number of beds, and number of pediatric specialty centers. Financial and logistic limitations, as well as deficiencies in support disciplines, severity of diseases, malnutrition, late admissions, and inadequate initial treatments could be important contributors to mortality at least in some of these countries. CONCLUSION: There are important differences in population, morbidity and mortality in critically ill children among the participating countries. Mortality shows an inverse correlation to the availability of pediatric intensive care units, intensive care beds, pediatric intensivists, and pediatric subspecialty centers.
Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Distribuição por Idade , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Países em Desenvolvimento , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Lactente , Mortalidade Infantil , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/provisão & distribuição , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica/organização & administração , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica/provisão & distribuição , América Latina , Admissão do Paciente , Pediatria/educação , Portugal , Sociedades Médicas , Espanha , Tecnologia de Alto Custo/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos HumanosRESUMO
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured by Doppler method in an aleatory sample of 251 healthy children from south-east Santiago Chile (131 females and 120 males) which were divided by age in five groups: 0 to 28 days (n = 5) 1 to 5 months (n = 48), 6 to 11 months (n = 48), 12 to 17 months (n = 46) and 18 to 24 months (n = 45). Great dispersion of SBP values occurred among newborn infants (range 85 to 125) in comparison with groups 1 to 5 months (105 to 130), 6 to 11 months (118 to 130). Fifty and 95 percentiles were, respectively, 107 to 125; 116 to 130; 121 to 130; 118 to 130 and 120 to 130. These values were greater than those obtained by sphygmomanometry in a similar matched group of children.