RESUMO

Our study evaluates the feasibility of compassionate exemption of Radium-223 (223Ra) treatment in metastatic hormone-sensitive high-grade prostate cancer (mHSHGPC) patients with concomitant androgen deprivation-therapy (ADT). Seven patients with mHSHGPC, were treated with six cycles of 223Ra plus ADT. All patients had undergone to 18F-NaF-PET/CT. A qualitative analyses of the 18F-NaF-PET/CT was performed in conjunction with Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Lactate-dehydrogenase (LDH) and Prostatic-Specific Antigen (PSA) values. The mean of SUVmax values were used as a quantitative measure of tumoral burden. Changes in PSA, ALP, LDH from baseline were evaluated, and were defined as increase or decrease of at least 30%. Clinical response was achieved if there was pain reduction using visual analogic scale. Four patients showed a significant reduction in mean SUVmax after 3 cycles of 223Ra, and one after 6 cycles. Patients who showed reductions in mean SUVmax after Ra-223 also showed reductions in PSA, ALP and LDH. Four weeks after the last cycle of 223Ra all patients had decreased total PSA, ALP and LDH values ≥ 30% also significant improvement on pain. No progress disease was documented after 14 ± 4 weeks. We found slight to moderate decreases in neutrophils and hemoglobin in two patients. We concluded that 223Ra plus ADT can be useful in mHSHGPC; the semi-quantitative 18F-NaF-PET/CT as a method effective to monitor the treatment response. Due to concomitant administration of ADT, 18F-NaF-PET/CT cannot differentiate whether the findings were due to androgen blockade or the 223Ra; nevertheless, data supporting the efficacy of 223Ra is the significant improvement on pain.

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cutoff values established by ROC curves to classify (18)F-NaF uptake as normal or malignant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PET/CT images were acquired 1 hour after administration of 185 MBq of (18)F-NaF. Volumes of interest (VOIs) were drawn on three regions of the skeleton as follows: proximal right humerus diaphysis (HD), proximal right femoral diaphysis (FD) and first vertebral body (VB1), in a total of 254 patients, totalling 762 VOIs. The uptake in the VOIs was classified as normal or malignant on the basis of the radiopharmaceutical distribution pattern and of the CT images. A total of 675 volumes were classified as normal and 52 were classified as malignant. Thirty-five VOIs classified as indeterminate or nonmalignant lesions were excluded from analysis. The standardized uptake value (SUV) measured on the VOIs were plotted on an ROC curve for each one of the three regions. The area under the ROC (AUC) as well as the best cutoff SUVs to classify the VOIs were calculated. The best cutoff values were established as the ones with higher result of the sum of sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: The AUCs were 0.933, 0.889 and 0.975 for UD, FD and VB1, respectively. The best SUV cutoffs were 9.0 (sensitivity: 73%; specificity: 99%), 8.4 (sensitivity: 79%; specificity: 94%) and 21.0 (sensitivity: 93%; specificity: 95%) for UD, FD and VB1, respectively. CONCLUSION: The best cutoff value varies according to bone region of analysis and it is not possible to establish one value for the whole body.

RESUMO

Abstract Objective: To assess the cutoff values established by ROC curves to classify18F-NaF uptake as normal or malignant. Materials and Methods: PET/CT images were acquired 1 hour after administration of 185 MBq of18F-NaF. Volumes of interest (VOIs) were drawn on three regions of the skeleton as follows: proximal right humerus diaphysis (HD), proximal right femoral diaphysis (FD) and first vertebral body (VB1), in a total of 254 patients, totalling 762 VOIs. The uptake in the VOIs was classified as normal or malignant on the basis of the radiopharmaceutical distribution pattern and of the CT images. A total of 675 volumes were classified as normal and 52 were classified as malignant. Thirty-five VOIs classified as indeterminate or nonmalignant lesions were excluded from analysis. The standardized uptake value (SUV) measured on the VOIs were plotted on an ROC curve for each one of the three regions. The area under the ROC (AUC) as well as the best cutoff SUVs to classify the VOIs were calculated. The best cutoff values were established as the ones with higher result of the sum of sensitivity and specificity. Results: The AUCs were 0.933, 0.889 and 0.975 for UD, FD and VB1, respectively. The best SUV cutoffs were 9.0 (sensitivity: 73%; specificity: 99%), 8.4 (sensitivity: 79%; specificity: 94%) and 21.0 (sensitivity: 93%; specificity: 95%) for UD, FD and VB1, respectively. Conclusion: The best cutoff value varies according to bone region of analysis and it is not possible to establish one value for the whole body.

Resumo Objetivo: Acessar valores de corte estabelecidos pela curva ROC para classificar a captação de 18F-NaF como normal ou maligna. Materiais e Métodos: Imagens de PET/CT foram realizadas 1 hora após a administração de 185 MBq de18F-NaF e volumes de interesse (VOIs) foram desenhados em três regiões do esqueleto: diáfise umeral proximal direita (UD), diáfise femoral proximal direita (FD) e corpo da primeira vértebra lombar (VB1), em 254 pacientes, totalizando 762 VOIs. A captação nos VOIs foi classificada como normal ou maligna baseada no padrão de distribuição do radiofármaco e nas imagens de CT. Um total de 675 volumes foi classificado como normais e 52 como malignos. Trinta e cinco VOIs classificados como indeterminados ou lesões não malignas foram excluídos da análise. Os valores de captação (SUVs) medidos nos VOIs foram plotados em uma curva ROC para cada uma das três regiões. Foi calculada a área sob a curva (AUC), bem como os valores de SUV mais adequados para a classificação dos VOIs (maior resultado da soma da sensibilidade e especificidade). Resultados: As AUCs foram 0,933, 0,889 e 0,975 para UD, FD e VB1, respectivamente. Os valores de corte mais adequados de SUV foram 9,0 (sensibilidade: 73%; especificidade: 99%), 8,4 (sensibilidade: 79%; especificidade: 94%) e 21,0 (sensibilidade: 93%; especificidade: 95%)para UD, FD e VB1, respectivamente. Conclusão: O valor de corte de SUV mais adequado varia de acordo com a região óssea em análise e não é possível estabelecer um valor adequado para todo o esqueleto.

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze standardized uptake values (SUVs) using three different tube current intensities for attenuation correction on (18)FNaF PET/CT scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 254 (18)F-NaF PET/CT studies were analyzed using 10, 20 and 30 mAs. The SUVs were calculated in volumes of interest (VOIs) drawn on three skeletal regions, namely, right proximal humeral diaphysis (RH), right proximal femoral diaphysis (RF), and first lumbar vertebra (LV1) in a total of 712 VOIs. The analyses covered 675 regions classified as normal (236 RH, 232 RF, and 207 LV1). RESULTS: Mean SUV for each skeletal region was 3.8, 5.4 and 14.4 for RH, RF, and LV1, respectively. As the studies were grouped according to mAs value, the mean SUV values were 3.8, 3.9 and 3.7 for 10, 20 and 30 mAs, respectively, in the RH region; 5.4, 5.5 and 5.4 for 10, 20 and 30 mAs, respectively, in the RF region; 13.8, 14.9 and 14.5 for 10, 20 and 30 mAs, respectively, in the LV1 region. CONCLUSION: The three tube current values yielded similar results for SUV calculation.

OBJETIVO: Analisar os valores de captação (SUVs) utilizando três diferentes intensidades de mAs para realização de correção de atenuação na 18F-NaF PET/CT. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Um total de 254 exames de 18F-NaF PET/CT foi estudado utilizando 10, 20 e 30 mAs. Os SUVs foram calculados utilizando volumes de interesse (VOIs) desenhados em três regiões do esqueleto: diáfise proximal do úmero direito (UD), diáfise proximal do fêmur direito (FD) e primeira vértebra lombar (VB1), totalizando 712 VOIs. Desse total, 675 regiões classificadas como normal foram analisadas (236, 232 e 207 na UD, FD e VB1, respectivamente). RESULTADOS: A média dos SUVs para cada região óssea foi 3,8, 5,4 e 14,4 para UD, FD e VB1, respectivamente. Quando os exames foram agrupados pelo valor da corrente mAs, a média de valores de captação foi 3,8, 3,9 e 3,7 para 10, 20 e 30 mAs, respectivamente, na UD; 5,4, 5,5 e 5,4 para 10, 20 e 30 mAs, respectivamente, na FD; e 13,8, 14,9 e 14,5 para 10, 20 e 30 mAs, respectivamente, na VB1. CONCLUSÃO: As três correntes analizadas apresentaram resultados similares para o cálculo de SUV.

RESUMO

Objective: To analyze standardized uptake values (SUVs) using three different tube current intensities for attenuation correction on 18FNaF PET/CT scans. Materials and Methods: A total of 254 18F-NaF PET/CT studies were analyzed using 10, 20 and 30 mAs. The SUVs were calculated in volumes of interest (VOIs) drawn on three skeletal regions, namely, right proximal humeral diaphysis (RH), right proximal femoral diaphysis (RF), and first lumbar vertebra (LV1) in a total of 712 VOIs. The analyses covered 675 regions classified as normal (236 RH, 232 RF, and 207 LV1). Results: Mean SUV for each skeletal region was 3.8, 5.4 and 14.4 for RH, RF, and LV1, respectively. As the studies were grouped according to mAs value, the mean SUV values were 3.8, 3.9 and 3.7 for 10, 20 and 30 mAs, respectively, in the RH region; 5.4, 5.5 and 5.4 for 10, 20 and 30 mAs, respectively, in the RF region; 13.8, 14.9 and 14.5 for 10, 20 and 30 mAs, respectively, in the LV1 region. Conclusion: The three tube current values yielded similar results for SUV calculation. .

Objetivo: Analisar os valores de captação (SUVs) utilizando três diferentes intensidades de mAs para realização de correção de atenuação na 18F-NaF PET/CT. Materiais e Métodos: Um total de 254 exames de 18F-NaF PET/CT foi estudado utilizando 10, 20 e 30 mAs. Os SUVs foram calculados utilizando volumes de interesse (VOIs) desenhados em três regiões do esqueleto: diáfise proximal do úmero direito (UD), diáfise proximal do fêmur direito (FD) e primeira vértebra lombar (VB1), totalizando 712 VOIs. Desse total, 675 regiões classificadas como normal foram analisadas (236, 232 e 207 na UD, FD e VB1, respectivamente). Resultados: A média dos SUVs para cada região óssea foi 3,8, 5,4 e 14,4 para UD, FD e VB1, respectivamente. Quando os exames foram agrupados pelo valor da corrente mAs, a média de valores de captação foi 3,8, 3,9 e 3,7 para 10, 20 e 30 mAs, respectivamente, na UD; 5,4, 5,5 e 5,4 para 10, 20 e 30 mAs, respectivamente, na FD; e 13,8, 14,9 e 14,5 para 10, 20 e 30 mAs, respectivamente, na VB1. Conclusão: As três correntes analizadas apresentaram resultados similares para o cálculo de SUV. .