RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The new corona virus infection, has a wide range of clinical manifestations. Fever and cough are the most common symptoms. The olfactory function may be also affected with COVID-19. In this randomized clinical trial, we wanted to evaluate the therapeutic effect of olfactory training with and without oral vitamin A for COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction. METHODS: Patients answered to the standard Persian version of anosmia reporting tool and performed the quick smell test before and after 12 weeks and at the end of the 12 months follow up. The patients were randomly allocated to three groups; Group A treatment with olfactory training, Group B treatment with oral vitamin A and olfactory training, and Group C as control group which only underwent nasal irrigation twice a day. Patients were treated for 3 months and followed up for 12 months. RESULTS: Totally 90 patients were included in three groups. After interventions, 76.9% of patients in Group A, 86.7% of patients in Group B, and 26.7% of patients in Group C completely improved. The average intervention time was statistically significant in relationship with the final olfactory status of the patients in the 12 months follow-up. The olfactory training has significantly improved the smell alteration at the end of 3- and 12- months follow-up in A and B groups. CONCLUSION: A three-months olfactory training is effective for improvement of COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction. Adding daily oral vitamin A to olfactory training did not lead to better results in improving olfactory dysfunction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Step 2 (Level 2*): Randomized trial.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transtornos do Olfato , Vitamina A , Humanos , Vitamina A/uso terapêutico , Vitamina A/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/complicações , Masculino , Feminino , Método Duplo-Cego , Transtornos do Olfato/etiologia , Transtornos do Olfato/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Vitaminas/uso terapêutico , Vitaminas/administração & dosagem , Treinamento OlfativoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and factors associated with olfactory dysfunction in individuals exposed to Isotretinoin (ISO) for the treatment of acne, using the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT®). METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled age and sex-matched patients with acne who were current users of oral ISO and unexposed controls without olfactory complaints. UPSIT® and a validated questionnaire (Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation) were administered to evaluate nasal obstruction in patients exposed to ISO. RESULTS: A total of seventy patients were recruited, with 35 in the exposed group and 35 in the unexposed group, consisting of 18 males and 17 females in each group, aged from 17 to 47 years. The prevalence of olfactory dysfunction was higher in the exposed group compared to the non-exposed group (62.9% vs. 17.1%), yielding a Prevalence Ratio (PR) of 3.7 (95% CI 1.9-7.1). However, no participants were categorized as anosmia or severe hyposmia and the majority of dysfunction was mild hyposmia compared to moderate hyposmia (51.5% vs. 11.4%). Among the exposed individuals, gasoline, orange, coffee, and wood exhibited the highest rates of identification errors (≥54%). Olfactory function demonstrated a negative correlation with treatment duration (pâ¯=â¯0.01), cumulative dose (pâ¯=â¯0.02), and nasal obstruction (pâ¯=â¯0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Olfactory dysfunction was more prevalent among ISO users, despite the patients being unaware of the disorder. Olfactory changes were correlated with treatment duration, cumulative dose, and nasal obstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.
Assuntos
Acne Vulgar , Fármacos Dermatológicos , Isotretinoína , Transtornos do Olfato , Humanos , Masculino , Isotretinoína/efeitos adversos , Isotretinoína/administração & dosagem , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Acne Vulgar/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Adolescente , Transtornos do Olfato/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos do Olfato/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem , Prevalência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Inquéritos e Questionários , Administração Oral , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Olfactory symptoms have been reported as particular in COVID-19 patients. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize and analyze the existing evidence on the monitoring loss of sense of smell and taste in COVID-19 patients, and for how long symptoms persist after the virus is no longer active in the organism. METHODS: A search was implemented in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA, and the risk of bias was assessed through the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The review protocol is registered in PROSPERO. RESULTS: Our systematic review included data from 14 articles with a total of 2143 participants. The most reported sensory symptom of COVID-19 was anosmia, which was detected in 1499 patients, being the only symptom to appear in all studies. Ageusia was detected in 595 patients, dysgeusia in 514 patients, and hyposmia in 209 patients. The studies provided the number of 729 patients with sensory symptoms during the acute COVID-19 infection of 15 days, and 1020 patients with lasting sensory symptoms, presenting sensory dysfunctions after the average latent period of 15 days of the acute COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION: Evidence points to the loss or dysfunction of taste and smell as one of the symptoms of COVID-19 persisting for an average time of 15 days, with 44% of COVID-19 patients with persistent symptoms for more than 15 days. Nevertheless, most studies do not perform a follow-up with those patients. Therefore, further research on sensory symptoms and their follow-up is required.
INTRODUÇÃO: Sintomas olfativos foram relatados como específicos em pacientes com COVID-19. OBJETIVO: Sintetizar e analisar as evidências existentes sobre o monitoramento da perda de olfato e paladar em pacientes com COVID-19 e por quanto tempo os sintomas persistem. MÉTODOS: Foi realizada uma busca nas bases de dados PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Science Direct e Web of Science. Esta revisão sistemática e metanálise foi realizada de acordo com o PRISMA, e o risco de viés foi avaliado por meio da Escala de Newcastle-Ottawa. O protocolo de revisão está registrado no PROSPERO. RESULTADOS: Nossa revisão sistemática incluiu dados de 14 artigos com um total de 2143 participantes. O sintoma sensorial mais comumente relatado de COVID-19 foi anosmia, detectado em 1.499 pacientes, sendo o único sintoma a aparecer em todos os estudos. Ageusia foi detectada em 595 pacientes, disgeusia em 514 pacientes e hiposmia em 209 pacientes. Os estudos forneceram o número de 729 pacientes com sintomas sensoriais por 15 dias durante a infecção aguda por COVID-19 e 1020 pacientes com sintomas sensoriais duradouros, apresentando disfunções sensoriais após o período latente médio de 15 dias da infecção aguda por COVID-19. CONCLUSÃO: Evidências apontam a perda ou disfunção do paladar e olfato como um dos sintomas da COVID-19 persistindo por um tempo médio de 15 dias, com 44% dos pacientes com COVID-19 com sintomas persistentes por mais de 15 dias. No entanto, a maioria dos estudos não realiza acompanhamento desses pacientes. Portanto, mais pesquisas sobre sintomas sensoriais e seu acompanhamento são necessárias.
Assuntos
Humanos , Ageusia , Anosmia , COVID-19 , DisgeusiaRESUMO
Introduction Some common symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are fever, cough, and shortness of breath. But ear, nose, and throat (ENT) manifestations such as loss of smell and taste are also very common. Objectives To compare the general and otorhinolaryngological manifestations of COVID-19 and to compare the treatments given and mortality rate during its two waves. Methods This retrospective study was conducted on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) cases in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Six hundred patients were included in the 1st wave sample and 516 were in the 2nd wave sample. The data collected included demographics, comorbidities, general, and ENT symptoms, need for ventilatory support, oxygen therapy, and mortality for both the waves. Results Fever, malaise, and myalgia were more frequently presented in the first wave than in the second, whereas shortness of breath was more common in the second wave. In the second wave, a significant increase in anosmia cases was reported, whereas sore throat, nasal obstruction, dysphagia, nasal discharge, and sneezing were significantly reduced compared with the first wave ( p < 0.001). The case fatality rate increased from 11.33 to 21.55% ( p < 0.001) from the 1 st to the 2 nd wave. The patients who died in the second wave were younger than those in the first wave. Two doses of vaccination showed protection from the death over those not vaccinated and those who only received one dose ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Ear, nose, and throat (ENT) manifestations are very common along with the general symptoms. As anosmia and dysgeusia are early presenting symptoms in COVID-19 patients, all physicians should screen patients for ENT symptoms.
RESUMO
Abstract Background Parkinson's disease (PD) causes motor and non-motor symptoms such as hyposmia, which is evaluated through olfactory tests in the clinical practice. Objective To assess the feasibility of using the modified Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (mCCCRC) olfactory test and to compare its performance with the Sniffin' Sticks-12 (SS-12, Burghart Messtechnik GmbH, Wedel, Germany) test. Methods A transversal case-control study in which the patients were divided into the PD group (PDG) and the control group (CG). The cost and difficulty in handling substances to produce the mCCCRC test kits were evaluated. Sociodemographic characteristics, smoking habits, past coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections, self-perception of odor sense, and cognition through the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were also evaluated. The PDG was scored by part III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) and the Hoehn and Yahr Scale (H&Y) scale. Correlations were assessed through the Spearman rank correlation coefficient test (ρ, or rho). Results The mCCCRC test was easily manufactured and handled at a cost ten times lower compared with the SS-12. The groups (PDG: n= 34; CG: n= 38) were similar in terms of age, sex, level of schooling, smoking habits, and history of COVID-19. The tests results showed moderate correlation (rho = 0.65; p< 0.0001). The CG presented better cognitive performance and scored better in both tests (p< 0.0001). There was a tendency for a negative correlation with age, but good correlation with the MoCA (p= 0.0029). The results of the PDG group showed no correlation with olfactory results and motor performance or disease duration. The self-perception of hyposmia was low in both groups. Conclusion The mCCCRC is an easy-to-apply and inexpensive method that demonstrated a similar performance to that of the SS-12 in evaluating olfaction in PD patients and healthy controls.
Resumo Antecedentes A doença de Parkinson (DP) cursa com sintomas motores e não motores como a hiposmia, que é avaliada por diferentes testes olfativos na prática clínica. Objetivo Avaliar a viabilidade do teste olfatório Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center modificado (mCCCRC) e compará-la à do teste Sniffin' Sticks-12 (SS-12, Burghart Messtechnik GmbH, Wedel, Alemanha). Métodos Estudo transversal de caso-controle em que os pacientes foram divididos no grupo DP (GDP) e no grupo controle (GC). O custo e as dificuldades no manuseio das substâncias necessárias para a produção dos kits do teste mCCCRC foram avaliados. Características sociodemográficas, tabagismo, histórico de infecção por doença do coronavírus 2019 (coronavírus disease 2019, COVID-19, em inglês), autopercepção do olfato e cognição pelo Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) também foram avaliados. O GDP foi avaliado pela parte III da Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) e pela escala de Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y). As correlações utilizaram o teste do coeficiente de correlação de postos de Spearman (ρ, ou rho). Resultados O mCCCRC foi facilmente poroduzido e manipulado com custo dez vezes inferior ao do SS-12. Os grupos (GDP: n= 34; GC: n= 38) eram similares em termos de idade, sexo, escolaridade, tabagismo e histórico de COVID-19. Os resultados obtidos em ambos os testes mostraram excelente correlação (rho = 0.65; p< 0.0001). O GC teve um desempenho cognitivo melhor e pontuou melhor nos dois testes (p< 0.0001). Houve uma tendência a uma correlação negativa com a idade, mas boa correlação com a pontuação no MoCA (p= 0.0029). Os resultados olfativos do GDP não mostraram correlação com desempenho motor ou duração da doença. A autopercepção de hiposmia foi baixa em ambos os grupos. Conclusão O mCCCRC é um teste de fácil aplicação, baixo custo, e apresentou um desempenho semelhante ao do SS-12 na avaliação olfativa de pacientes com DP e controles saudáveis.
RESUMO
Abstract Introduction Some common symptoms of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are fever, cough, and shortness of breath. But ear, nose, and throat (ENT) manifestations such as loss of smell and taste are also very common. Objectives To compare the general and otorhinolaryngological manifestations of COVID-19 and to compare the treatments given and mortality rate during its two waves. Methods This retrospective study was conducted on severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) cases in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Six hundred patients were included in the 1st wave sample and 516 were in the 2nd wave sample. The data collected included demographics, comorbidities, general, and ENT symptoms, need for ventilatory support, oxygen therapy, and mortality for both the waves. Results Fever, malaise, and myalgia were more frequently presented in the first wave than in the second, whereas shortness of breath was more common in the second wave. In the second wave, a significant increase in anosmia cases was reported, whereas sore throat, nasal obstruction, dysphagia, nasal discharge, and sneezing were significantly reduced compared with the first wave (p < 0.001). The case fatality rate increased from 11.33 to 21.55% (p < 0.001) from the 1st to the 2nd wave. The patients who died in the second wave were younger than those in the first wave. Two doses of vaccination showed protection from the death over those not vaccinated and those who only received one dose (p < 0.05). Conclusion Ear, nose, and throat (ENT) manifestations are very common along with the general symptoms. As anosmia and dysgeusia are early presenting symptoms in COVID-19 patients, all physicians should screen patients for ENT symptoms.
RESUMO
Abstract Background Olfactory dysfunction (OD) represents a frequent manifestation of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Apolipoprotein E (APOE) is a protein that interacts with the angiotensin-converting enzyme receptor, essential for viral entry into the cell. Previous publications have suggested a possible role of APOE in COVID-19 severity. As far as we know, no publications found significant associations between this disease's severity, OD, and APOE polymorphisms (E2, E3, and E4). Objective To analyze the epidemiology of OD and its relationship with APOE polymorphisms in a cohort of Long-COVID patients. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study with patients followed in a post-COVID neurological outpatient clinic, with OD being defined as a subjective reduction of olfactory function after infection, and persistent OD being defined when the complaint lasted more than 3 months after the COVID-19 infection resolution. This cross-sectional study is part of a large research with previously reported data focusing on the cognitive performance of our sample. Results The final sample comprised 221 patients, among whom 186 collected blood samples for APOE genotyping. The persistent OD group was younger and had a lower hospitalization rate during the acute phase of the disease (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the APOE variant E4 allele frequency was lower in this group (p = 0.035). This study evaluated OD in an outpatient population with COVID-19. In the current literature on this disease, anosmia is associated with better clinical outcomes and the E4 allele is associated with worse outcomes. Conclusion Our study provides new information to these correlations, suggesting APOE E4 as a protective factor for OD.
Resumo Antecedentes A disfunção olfatória (DO) é uma manifestação frequente da doença do coronavírus 2019 (COVID-19). A apolipoproteína E (APOE) é uma proteína que interage com o receptor da enzima conversora de angiotensina, essencial para a entrada viral na célula. Publicações anteriores sugeriram um possível papel da APOE na gravidade da COVID-19. Até onde sabemos, nenhuma publicação encontrou associações significativas entre a gravidade dessa doença, DO e polimorfismos da APOE (E2, E3 e E4). Objetivo Analisar a epidemiologia da DO e sua relação com os polimorfismos do gene APOE em uma coorte de pacientes com COVID longa. Métodos Um estudo de coorte prospectiva com pacientes acompanhados em ambulatório neurológico pós-COVID, com DO sendo definida como uma redução subjetiva da função olfativa após a infecção e a DO persistente sendo definida quando a queixa durou mais de 3 meses após a resolução da infecção por COVID-19. Este estudo transversal é parte de uma pesquisa maior com dados anteriormente relatados, focando na performance cognitiva dos pacientes. Resultados Foram selecionados 221 pacientes para esse estudo, dos quais 186 haviam coletado amostras de sangue para genotipagem APOE. O grupo DO persistente foi mais jovem e apresentou menor taxa de internação na fase aguda da doença (p < 0,001). Além disso, a frequência do alelo E4 da APOE foi menor nesse grupo (p = 0,035). Este estudo avaliou a DO em uma população com COVID longa. Na literatura atual sobre essa doença, a anosmia está associada a melhores desfechos clínicos e o alelo E4 está associado a piores desfechos. Conclusão Nosso estudo acrescenta novas informações a essas correlações, sugerindo a APOE E4 como um fator de proteção para DO.
RESUMO
Patients with adult Refsum Disease (ARD) have retinitis pigmentosa and thus nyctalopia, anosmia, sensorineural deafness, polyneuropathy, and ataxia. Upon physical examination, patients with ARD have congenital short metacarpals, metatarsals, and cardiac arrhythmias. Manifestations due to the lack of phytanoyl-CoA hydroxylase in peroxisomes needed for alpha-oxidation of phytanic acid lead patients to accumulate phytanic acid in their body tissues. To our knowledge, no consensus for clinical diagnostic criteria for patients with ARD has been published. Our patient had nyctalopia, retinal findings, and visual field results compatible with retinitis pigmentosa. Additionally, the patient had decreased macular thickness and volume in both eyes, the findings being worse in the left eye. The patient had undergone hand surgery due to chronic pain in both hands, as well as his fourth and fifth metatarsal bones were shortened. Interestingly, audiology evaluation showed mild hearing loss in the right ear and mild to moderate hearing loss in the left ear. Inheritance patterns in patients with ARD have been described. Physical examination, phytanic acid evaluation, and genetic studies may all help reach an ARD diagnosis. This is the first report of adult Refsum disease in Puerto Rico.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Healthcare workers (HCWs) may have different response to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination due to previous occupational exposure to Mycobacterium particles. We report subgroup analysis of the BATTLE trial, comparing BCG effects in HCWs vs non-HCWs. This was a secondary analysis of a trial. METHODS: The BATTLE trial was a double-blind placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial that investigated BCG revaccinating adults who were recently infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus. BCG and placebo recipients were sub-grouped based on regular occupational contact with patients into HCWs (48 BCG and 50 placebo) and non-HCWs (124 BCG and 134 placebo). Weekly COVID-19 symptom progression and injection site reactions were compared between subgroups on weeks one, two, three, and six follow-ups. RESULTS: HCWs were more likely to complain of itching on the injection site early after injection (OR = 2.5, p = 0.049). They developed peeling and crusting on the site of injection faster than non-HCWs (during the second week, p = 0.033 and 0.040, OR = 3.3 and 2.7, respectively). HCWs were also more likely to maintain their papule or develop a late onset pustule during later weeks (weeks four and six, p = 0.024 and 0.006, OR = 2.2 and 8.6, respectively). In terms of COVID-19 symptom progression, recovery from anosmia was more likely in the non-HCWs who received BCG (week six, pHolm's corrected = 0.002, OR = 3.3). CONCLUSION: HCWs' local reaction to BCG injection was slightly more rapid and more intense, possibly due to their occupational exposure. BCG may also ameliorate COVID-19 induced inflammation and anosmia in non-HCWs but not HCWs. Therefore, HCWs might be less likely to benefit from BCG vaccination. CLINICALTRIALS: gov register number NCT04369794.
RESUMO
Os distúrbios do olfato (DO) impactam de forma significativa na qualidade de vida dos indivíduos, e o conhecimento teórico a respeito do assunto deve ser de domínio dos alergologistas e imunologistas clínicos, possibilitando, assim, o seu diagnóstico e implementação de intervenções. Suas causas podem ser variadas, entre elas estão: rinite alérgica, rinossinusite crônica com ou sem pólipos, infecções de vias aéreas superiores, exposição a substâncias químicas, doenças neurológicas, drogas, traumas e o próprio envelhecimento. O olfato pode ser avaliado e mensurado através de testes com metodologias diferentes, cujo objetivo é avaliar parâmetros como a identificação de odores, limiar e discriminação olfativa. Esses testes são de fundamental importância para caracterizar objetivamente a queixa do paciente, como também avaliar o olfato antes e após determinada aplicação terapêutica. O tratamento das desordens olfativas é baseado em sua etiologia, portanto determinar a sua causa é indispensável para uma melhor eficácia no manejo. Entre as principais opções estão os corticoides tópicos, com impacto significativo nos pacientes com doença sinusal associada, treinamento olfatório e outras intervenções como ômega 3, vitamina A intranasal, e terapias que ainda requerem mais estudos.
Olfactory dysfunction significantly impacts quality of life, and allergists and clinical immunologists must be informed about it for diagnostic and interventional purposes. The causes are varied: allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with or without polyps, upper airway infections, exposure to chemicals, neurological diseases, drugs, trauma, and aging itself. Olfactory function can be evaluated and measured by several tests that use different methodologies to evaluate and identify odors, olfactory threshold, and olfactory discrimination. These tests are fundamental for objectively characterizing patient complaints and evaluating olfactory function before and after therapeutic interventions. Olfactory disorders are treated according to their etiology, so determining their cause is a major factor in treatment efficacy. The main options include topical corticosteroids, which have a significant impact on patients with sinus disease, olfactory training, other therapies (such as omega 3 and intranasal vitamin A), in addition to therapies that require further research.