RESUMO

PURPOSE: Data on short courses of antibiotic therapy for Enterobacterales bacteremia in high-risk neutropenic patients are limited. The aim of the study was to describe and compare the frequency of bacteremia relapse, 30-day overall and infection-related mortality, Clostridiodes difficile infection and length of hospital stay since bacteremia among those who received antibiotic therapy for 7 or 14 days. METHODS: This is a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study in adult high-risk neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies or hematopoietic stem cell transplant and monomicrobial Enterobacterales bacteremia. They received appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy, had a clinical response within 7 days, and infection source control. Clinical, epidemiological and outcomes variables were compared based on 7 or 14 days of AT. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were included (100, 7-day antibiotic therapy; 100, 14-day antibiotic therapy). Escherichia coli was the pathogen most frequently isolated (47.5%), followed by Klebsiella sp. (40.5%). Among those patients that received 7-day vs. 14-day antibiotic course, a clinical source of bacteremia was found in 54% vs. 57% (p = 0.66), multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales isolates in 28% vs. 30% (p = 0.75), and 40% vs. 47% (p = 0.31) received combined empirical antibiotic therapy. Overall mortality was 3% vs. 1% (p = 0.62), in no case related to infection; bacteremia relapse was 7% vs. 2% (p = 0.17), and length of hospital stay since bacteremia had a median of 9 days (IQR: 7-15) vs. 14 days (IQR: 13-22) (p = < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that seven-day antibiotic therapy might be adequate for patients with high-risk neutropenia and Enterobacterales bacteremia, who receive appropriate empirical therapy, with clinical response and infection source control.

Assuntos

Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae , Neutropenia , Humanos , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Neutropenia/complicações , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/mortalidade , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Enterobacteriaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Resultado do Tratamento , Tempo de Internação , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Adulto Jovem

RESUMO

Streptococcus agalactiae or Group B Streptococcus (GBS) infections are commonly associated with infections in neonates and pregnant women. However, there has been a rising incidence in nonpregnant adults. The risk of GBS infection in nonpregnant adults is increased for patients of advanced age and those with underlying medical conditions such as diabetes mellitus and cancer. We present a 77-year-old female with type-2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and bilateral foot ulcers that presented in probable septic shock with necrotic foot ulcers and necrotizing fasciitis and underwent bilateral lower limb amputations. The patient fulfilled the Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome (STSS) criteria as defined by The Working Group on Severe Streptococcal Infections. These criteria were created for group A Streptococcus (Streptococcus pyogenes). Our patient fulfilled the Working Group's criteria, except that the blood culture was positive for group B Streptococcus (Streptococcus agalactiae). Numerous studies demonstrate the importance of early detection and antibiotic treatment for GBS infections in general and early surgical management for necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) such as necrotizing fasciitis.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: CKD patients on hemodialysis (HD) with Staphylococcus aureus (SA) bacteremia present high morbidity, mortality and increased risk of MRSA. Vancomycin is the antibiotic of choice in these cases, it has a narrow therapeutic margin and inadequate dosage generates a risk of toxicity, therefore, the recommendation is to dosage it through serum levels. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study in 3 hospitals of third level of complexity in the city of Medellin in which there were differences in the measurement and implementation of vancomycin25 dosage based on trough levels (VL) in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis (CKD- HD) with uncomplicated bacteremia based infection by methilcillin-resistant Staphyloccocus aureus (MRSA). The primary outcome was the composite of hospital mortality, clinical response (fever, hemodynamic instability and altered consciousness), complications associated with bacteremia, or bacteriological response failure (positive cultures at first week follow-up) at 7 days. The composite variables were analyzed individually as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The main unadjusted outcome (OR 1.3, CI 0.6 - 2.7) and adjusted for age, Charlson index, loading dose, initial dose, dosing frequency and MIC to vancomycin (OR 1.2, CI 0.5 - 2.7). Regarding adjusted secondary outcomes: clinical response (OR 1.4 CI 0.3 - 5.8), death (OR 1.3 CI 0.3 - 4.6) and complications (OR 0.9, CI 0.37 - 2.2). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the measurement of trough levels in patients with HD-CKD does not modify the composite outcome. The main limitation is the sample size and type of study, randomized control trials may be required to confirm the results presented.

Assuntos

Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Diálise Renal , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Vancomicina , Humanos , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Masculino , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Idoso , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana

RESUMO

Background: Listeria monocytogenes, a Gram-positive bacillus, primarily affects immunocompromised individuals. Endocarditis is a rare but severe complication of L. monocytogenes bacteremia, irrespective of native or prosthetic valves. While there is no standardized treatment, the use of ampicillin proves effective in most cases. Surgical intervention is reserved for cases involving valve dehiscence, heart failure, or myocardial abscess. Case presentation: A 54-year-old female, with mitral valve replacement, presented with fever, chest pain and dyspnea at rest. Patient was initially diagnosed with bacterial pneumonia; however, subsequent evaluation revealed L. monocytogenes bacteremia, resulting in endocarditis. Surgical management was contraindicated due to multiple prior valve replacement surgeries. Symptoms resolution, along with improvements in echocardiographic and clinical parameters, was achieved through extended antibiotic treatment only with no surgical intervention. Conclusion - key takeaways: This case underscores the critical importance of individualized treatment approaches in endocarditis, particularly in patients with surgery approach contraindication, and emphasized the success achieved through ampicillin-based management.

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to compare the continuous infusion of cefepime with the intermittent infusion in patients with sepsis caused by Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). METHODS: Randomized 1:1 multicenter double-blinded placebo-controlled study with allocation concealment; multicenter study in the intensive care units of Colombia. Patients with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock, and GNB-suspected bacteremia. Cefepime was administered for 7 to 14 days over 30 m intermittently every 8 h over 24 h plus continuous saline solution (0.9%) (G1) or 3 g administered continuously plus saline solution every 8 h (0.9%) (G2). The percentage of clinical response at 3, 7, and 14 days, relapse at 28 days, and mortality at discharge were measured. RESULTS: The recruitment was stopped at the suggestion of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) following an FDA alert about cefepime. Thirty-two patients were randomized; 25 received the intervention, and GNB bacteremia was confirmed in 16 (9 G1 and 7 G2). Favorable clinical response in days 3, 7, and 14 was 88.8%, 88.8%, and 77.8% (G1) and was similar for G2 (85.7%). There were no relapses or deaths in G2, while in G1, one relapse and two deaths were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the use of cefepime for the treatment of Gram-negative infections in critically ill patients, but we could not demonstrate differences between continuous or intermittent administration because of the small sample size, given the early suspension of the study.

RESUMO

Introduction: Uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Current guidelines recommend a minimum of 14 days of treatment. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of short versus usual antibiotic therapy in adults with uncomplicated S. aureus bacteremia (SAB). Methods: We developed a search strategy to identify systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies (NRS), comparing short versus usual or long antibiotic regimens for uncomplicated SAB in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Register up to June 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS I tool. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software with a random effect model. Results: Six NRS with a total of 1700 patients were included. No significant differences were found when comparing short versus prolonged antibiotic therapy as defined by the authors for 90-day mortality [odds ratio (OR): 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-1.46, p: 0.55; I2 = 0%] or 90-day recurrence or relapse of bacteremia [OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.31-1.68, p: 0.45; I2 = 26%]. Sensitivity analysis showed similar results when comparing a predefined duration of <14 days versus ⩾14 days and when excluding the only study with a high risk of bias. Conclusion: Shorter-duration regimens could be considered as an alternative option for uncomplicated SAB in low-risk cases. However, based on a small number of studies with significant methodological limitations and risk of bias, the benefits and harms of shorter regimens should be analyzed with caution. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the best approach regarding the optimal duration of therapy.

---

Comparing short and regular antibiotic treatment duration, for a type of blood infection caused by S. aureus We investigated the optimal duration of antibiotic treatment for adults with a specific type of blood infection (uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus), a condition with a significant global impact on mortality and costs. After a thorough search, only six trials involving 1700 patients were identified. We therefore decided to perform a meta-analysis (a type of statistical analysis). The results showed that the duration of antibiotics, whether short or long (less or more than 14 days), did not significantly affect mortality or recurrence of infection within 90 days. Consequently, we suggested that shorter courses of antibiotics might be appropriate for less severe cases. However, we emphasized caution because of the limitations of the studies. We recommended further research with improved methods to determine the optimal approach to treating this type of infection.

RESUMO

Our goal was to identify predictors of invasive bacterial infection (ie, bacteremia and bacterial meningitis) in febrile infants aged 2-6 months. In our multicenter retrospective cohort, older age and lower temperature identified infants at low risk for invasive bacterial infection who could safely avoid routine testing.

Assuntos

Bacteriemia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Febre , Meningites Bacterianas , Humanos , Lactente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Febre/etiologia , Febre/diagnóstico , Meningites Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico

RESUMO

Bloodstream infections (BSI) pose a substantial threat to the well-being and survival of patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Risk factors for these infections vary across the different post-HSCT phases. In the pre-engraftment period, patients are particularly susceptible to infection due to prolonged neutropenia, mucosal damage, and extensive use of central venous line (CVL). In the post-engraftment phase, the emergence of graft versus host diseases further compounds the risk. The epidemiology of these infections has undergone notable changes over the years due to multifactorial reasons, including the evolution of protocols that intensify immunosuppression. In this context, the emergence of multi-drug resistance (MDR) microorganisms can be a challenge due to the elevated risk of mortality in these vulnerable patients. Unfortunately, there is a lack of comprehensive data on this topic, particularly in pediatrics. This article aims to provide a summary of the epidemiology of BSI in the different post-transplant phases and the impact of MDR pathogens. Having knowledge about the local epidemiology of BSI can be instrumental in tailoring targeted therapies, leading to improved survival rates in HSCT recipients.

Assuntos

Bacteriemia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Sepse , Humanos , Criança , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco

RESUMO

Few studies have evaluated the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CA) for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales bacteremia (KPC-PEB) in high-risk neutropenic patients. This is a prospective multicenter observational study in high-risk neutropenic patients with multi-drug resistant Enterobacterales bacteremia. They were compared according to the resistance mechanism and definitive treatment provided: KPC-CPE treated with CA (G1), KPC-CPE treated with other antibiotics (G2), and patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacterales bacteremia who received appropriate definitive therapy (G3). Thirty-day mortality was evaluated using a logistic regression model, and survival was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves. A total of 238 patients were included: 18 (G1), 52 (G2), and 168 (G3). Klebsiella spp. (60.9%) and Escherichia coli (26.4%) were the Enterobacterales most frequently isolated, and 71% of the bacteremias had a clinical source. The resistance profile between G1 and G2 was colistin 35.3% vs. 36.5%, amikacin 16.7% vs. 40.4%, and tigeclycline 11.1% vs. 19.2%. The antibiotics prescribed in combination with G2 were carbapenems, colistin, amikacin, fosfomycin, tigecycline, and fluoroquinolones. Seven-day clinical response in G1 vs. G2 vs. G3 was 94.4% vs. 42.3% vs. 82.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). Thirty-day overall mortality in G1 vs. G2 vs. G3 was 22.2% vs. 53.8% vs. 11.9%, respectively (p < 0.001), and infection-related mortality was 5.5% vs. 51.9% vs. 7.7% (p < 0.001). The independent risk factors for mortality were Pitt score > 4: OR 3.63, 95% CI, 1.18-11.14 (p = 0.025) and KPC-PEB treated with other antibiotics: OR 8.85, 95% CI, 2.58-30.33 (p = 0.001), while 7-day clinical response was a protective factor for survival: OR 0.02, 95% CI, 0.01-0.08 (p < 0.001). High-risk neutropenic patients with KPC-CPE treated with CA had an outcome similar to those treated for ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, with higher 7-day clinical response and lower overall and infection-related mortality than those treated with other antibiotics. In view of these data, CA may be considered the preferred therapeutic option for KPC-PEB in high-risk neutropenic patients.