RESUMO

Introdução: A cefaleia pós punção dural (CPPD) é uma complicação da punção lombar, um procedimento que, apesar de bem tolerado, está sujeito a adversidades, ocorrendo devido a um vazamento persistente do líquido cefalorraquidiano (LCR) do local da punção dural. A incidência de CPPD pode estar relacionada às características dos pacientes e dos procedimentos. Notou-se que em mulheres jovens até 30 anos, o risco de CPPD é maior quando comparado aos homens, não apresentando diferença a partir da quinta década de vida. Objetivo: investigar os diferentes sintomas e efeitos gerados pelos diferentes tipos de agulha, como calibre e modo de inserção, que visem reduzir a CPPD. Métodos: Trata-se de uma revisão sistemática de literatura realizada no período de 2 de agosto a 20 de novembro de 2023 por meio de pesquisas no PubMed. Foram utilizados os descritores: "Post-Dural Puncture Headache" e suas variações do MeSH, sendo submetidos aos critérios de inclusão: estudos em humanos, nos últimos 10 anos, ensaios clínicos e ensaios clínicos controlados e randomizados. Para garantir a qualidade da revisão sistemática foi aplicada a lista de verificação PRISMA de 2020. Resultados: Após investigação estatística, observou-se que as agulhas 25W e 25S demandaram maior tempo médio para a coleta de LCR (15 e 7 min, respectivamente). Ao se comparar 25W com 20Q (3 min), 22S (5 min) e 25S quanto à esta variável, observouse diferença significativa em todas as comparações. Conclusão: As agulhas do tipo atraumática foram associadas com redução do risco de desenvolvimento de CPPD quando comparadas às convencionais. Foi constatado que, dentre as agulhas convencionais, a traumática de 25G é melhor para a prevenção de CPPD que a de 22G.

Introduction: Post-Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) is a complication of lumbar puncture, a procedure that, despite being well-tolerated, is subject to adversities, occurring due to a persistent leakage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from the site of dural puncture. The incidence of PDPH may be related to patient and procedural characteristics. It has been noted that in young women up to 30 years old, the risk of CPPD is higher compared to men, with no difference between sexes from the fifth decade of life onward. Objective: To investigate the different symptoms and effects generated by different types of needles, such as gauge and insertion method, aiming to reduce CPPD. Methods: Is a systematic literature review conducted from August to October 2023 through searches on PubMed. The descriptors "Post-Dural Puncture Headache" and its MeSH variations were used. A total of 1,839 articles were found, which were then subjected to inclusion criteria: studies conducted in the last 10 years, controlled trials, and randomized clinical trials. Results: After statistical investigation, it was observed that the 25W and 25S needles required a longer average time for cerebrospinal fluid collection (15 and 7 minutes, respectively). When comparing 25W with 20Q (3 minutes), 22S (5 minutes), and 25S regarding this variable, a significant difference was observed in all comparisons. Conclusion: Atraumatic needles were associated with a reduction in the risk of developing CPPD compared to conventional needles. It was found that among conventional needles, the traumatic 25G needle is better for preventing CPPD than the 22G needle.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block (SGB) is an effective, low-risk treatment option for Postdural Puncture Headache (PDPH) refractory to conservative management. CASE REPORT: This report presents four complex cases of patients with headache related to low cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Three of them were successfully treated with the application of local anesthetic topical drops through the nasal cavity. CONCLUSION: The novel approach described in this report has minimal risks of discomfort or injury to the nasal mucosa. It is quick to apply and can be administered by the patient himself.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Background and objectives The Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block (SGB) is an effective, low-risk treatment option for Postdural Puncture Headache (PDPH) refractory to conservative management. Case report This report presents four complex cases of patients with headache related to low cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Three of them were successfully treated with the application of local anesthetic topical drops through the nasal cavity. Conclusion The novel approach described in this report has minimal risks of discomfort or injury to the nasal mucosa. It is quick to apply and can be administered by the patient himself.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: O Bloqueio do Gânglio Esfenopalatino (BGEP) é opção de tratamento efetivo associado a baixo risco para Cefaleia Pós-Punção Dural (CPPD) refratária às medidas conservadoras. Relato de caso: Este relato apresenta quatro pacientes com alta complexidade que apresentaram cefaleia relacionada à baixa pressão do líquido cefaloraquidiano. Três pacientes foram tratados com sucesso pela instilação de gotas de anestésico local tópico na cavidade nasal. Conclusões: A nova abordagem descrita neste relato apresenta riscos mínimos de desconforto ou lesão à mucosa nasal. A aplicação é rápida e pode ser administrada pelo próprio paciente.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Background: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is an iatrogenic condition following lumbar puncture (LP). Incidence is variable and often associated with young females. Technical features of the procedure (i.e. needle gauge) have been investigated; however there is no investigation on the method of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection. Objective: To investigate whether mild CSF aspiration is associated with increased PDPH in selected patients. Methods: 336 subjects were eligible to the study. Data on 237 patients from a tertiary neurology hospital who underwent diagnostic LP from February 2010 to December 2012 were analysed. Patient demographics, lumbar puncture method, CSF biochemical characteristics, opening pressures, and a follow-up inquire on PDPH occurrence were collected. CSF was collected either by allowing free flow or by mild aspiration. Results: The aspiration arm (n=163) was comprised of 55.8% females with mean age of 52(35‒69) years. Sex distribution was not different between the two arms (p=0.191). A significant larger amount of CSF was obtained in the aspiration arm (p=0.011). The incidence of PDPH in the aspiration arm was 16.5% versus 20.2% in the free flow arm, not statistically significant (p=0.489). No relevant associations emerged from the analyses in the subgroup aged <65 years. Conclusions: Aspiration of the CSF during LP was not associated with increased rates of PDPH compared to the standard method, particularly when larger amounts of CSF are required and ideal conditions are met. This is the first study looking into this matter, aiming to add safety to the procedure. Further randomized trials are required.

Resumo Introdução: Cefaleia pós-punção dural (CPPD) é uma condição iatrogênica após punção lombar (LP). Incidência é variável; frequentemente associada a mulheres jovens. Características técnicas do procedimento (ex: calibre da agulha) foram investigadas; no entanto, não há investigação sobre o método de coleta do líquido cefalorraquidiano (LCR). Objetivo: Avaliar se aspiração leve do LCR está associada ao aumento da CPPD em pacientes selecionados. Métodos: 336 indivíduos foram elegíveis para o estudo. Dados de 237 pacientes em um hospital neurológico terciário que foram submetidos à PL diagnóstica de fevereiro de 2010 a dezembro de 2012 foram analisados. Coletamos dados demográficos dos pacientes, método da PL, características bioquímicas do LCR, pressões de abertura e ocorrência da CPPD. Todos as PLs ocorreram em decúbito lateral. O LCR foi coletado permitindo livre fluxo ou aspiração leve. Resultados: O grupo aspiração (n=163) apresentava 55,8% de mulheres, idade média de 52(35‒69) anos. A distribuição por sexo não foi diferente entre os dois grupos (p=0,191). Uma quantidade maior de LCR foi obtida no grupo aspiração (p=0,011). A incidência de CPPD no grupo de aspiração foi de 16,5% versus 20,2% no fluxo livre, não estatisticamente significante (p=0,489). Nenhuma associação emergiu das análises no subgrupo com idades <65 anos. Conclusões: A aspiração do LCR durante PL não está associada ao aumento da CPPD em comparação com a método padrão, particularmente quando quantidades maiores de LCR são necessárias e condições ideais são satisfeitas. Este é o primeiro estudo a investigar o topico, visando aumentar a segurança do procedimento. Necessita-se futuros estudos randomizados.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Purpose Sphenopalatine ganglion block is widely accepted in chronic pain; however it has been underestimated in post dural puncture headache treatment. The ganglion block does not restore normal cerebrospinal fluid dynamics but effectively reduces symptoms associated with resultant hypotension. When correctly applied it may avoid performance of epidural blood patch. The transnasal approach is a simple and minimally invasive technique. In the cases presented, we attempted to perform and report the ganglion block effectiveness and duration, using ropivacaine. Clinical features We present four obstetrics patients with post dural puncture headache, after epidural or combined techniques, with Tuohy needle 18G that underwent a safe and successful sphenopalatine ganglion block. We performed the block 24-48 h after dural puncture, with 4 mL of ropivacaine 0.75% in each nostril. In three cases pain recurred within 12-48 h, although less intense. In one patient a second block was performed with complete relief and without further recurrence. In the other two patients a blood patch was performed without success. All patients were asymptomatic within 7 days. Conclusion The average duration of analgesic effect of the block remains poorly defined. In the cases reported, blocking with ropivacaine was a simple, safe and effective technique, with immediate and sustained pain relief for at least 12-24 h.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivo O bloqueio do gânglio esfenopalatino é amplamente aceito em dor crônica; porém, esse bloqueio tem sido subestimado no tratamento de cefaleia pós-punção dural. O bloqueio do gânglio não restaura a dinâmica normal do líquido cefalorraquidiano, mas reduz de modo eficaz os sintomas associados à hipotensão resultante. Quando aplicado corretamente, pode evitar a realização de tampão sanguíneo epidural. A abordagem transnasal é uma técnica simples e minimamente invasiva. Nos casos apresentados, tentamos realizar o bloqueio do gânglio e relatar sua eficácia e duração usando ropivacaína. Características clínicas Apresentamos quatro pacientes de obstetrícia com cefaleia pós-punção dural, após técnica epidural ou técnicas combinadas, com agulha Tuohy (18 G), que foram submetidas ao bloqueio do gânglio esfenopalatino de forma segura e bem-sucedida. Realizamos o bloqueio após 24 a 48 horas da punção dural, com 4 mL de ropivacaína a 0,75% em cada narina. Em três casos, a dor voltou em 1-48 horas, embora menos intensa. Em uma paciente, um segundo bloqueio foi realizado com alívio completo e sem recorrência. Nas outras duas pacientes, um tampão sanguíneo foi feito sem sucesso. Todas as pacientes estavam assintomáticas dentro de sete dias. Conclusão A duração média do efeito analgésico do bloqueio continua mal definida. Nos casos relatados, o bloqueio com ropivacaína foi uma técnica simples, segura e eficaz, com alívio imediato e prolongado da dor durante pelo menos 12-24 horas.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Background and objectives: Neurological complications of spinal anesthesia are rare conditions. Headache caused by low pressure of the cerebrospinal fluid is one of the most frequent, which occurs after post-dural puncture. A comprehensive history and physical exam must be carried out before making the diagnosis of Post-Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) and additional tests are necessary to exclude the possibility of developing serious neurological complications such as Dural Sinus Thrombosis (DST). According to the Case Report a differential diagnosis between Dural Sinus Thrombosis with PDPH is discussed. Case report: A 22 year-old lady, ASA Physical Status Class I was admitted at 39 weeks of gestation for delivery. For labor pain relief she requested epidural for analgesia, but unfortunately accidental dural puncture occurred. She developed an occipital headache and neck pain in the second day postpartum which was relieved by both lying down and supporting treatment such as rehydration, analgesics and caffeine. On day third postpartum she was discharged without complaints. On day fifth postpartum the pain returned and became more intense and less responsive to oral analgesics. She was admitted to the hospital to do a complete neurological and image investigation that showed a lesion consistent with the diagnosis of cortical vein thrombosis and Dural Sinus Thrombosis (DST). She was treated with oral anticoagulants. After two days, a repeated magnetic resonance image (MRI) showed partial canalization of the central sinus thrombus. The patient was discharged from hospital five days after her admission without any of the initial symptoms. Conclusion: The report describes a patient who developed severe headache following continuous epidural analgesia for delivery. Initially it was diagnosed as PDPH, however with the aid of MRI the diagnosis of DST was later established and treated. DST is a rare condition and is often underdiagnosed. Because of its potentially lethal complications, it should always be considered in acute headache differential diagnosis.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: As complicações neurológicas da raquianestesia são condições raras. A cefaleia causada pela baixa pressão do fluido cerebrospinal é uma das mais frequentes e ocorre após a punção dural. Anamnese completa e exame físico geral devem ser feitos antes de fazer o diagnóstico de cefaleia pós-punção dural (CPPD) e testes adicionais são necessários para excluir a possibilidade de complicações neurológicas graves, como trombose de seios durais (TSD). De acordo com o relato do caso, discutiremos o diagnóstico diferencial entre TSD e CPPD. Relato de caso: Paciente de 22 anos, estado físico ASA I, foi admitida com 39 semanas de gestação para o parto. Para alívio da dor do trabalho de parto, a paciente solicitou analgesia peridural, mas infelizmente ocorreu uma punção dural acidental. A paciente desenvolveu cefaleia occipital e dor cervical no segundo dia pós-parto - ambas aliviadas com repouso e terapia de suporte, como reidratação, analgésicos e cafeína. No terceiro dia pós-parto, a paciente recebeu alta sem queixas. No quinto dia pós-parto, a dor retornou e ficou mais intensa e com pouca resposta aos analgésicos orais. Ela foi admitida no hospital para uma completa investigação neurológica e de imagem que mostrou uma lesão compatível com o diagnóstico de trombose venosa cortical e TSD. A paciente foi tratada com anticoagulantes orais. Após dois dias, a repetição de ressonância nuclear magnética (RM) mostrou canalização parcial de trombo do seio central. A paciente recebeu alta hospitalar cinco dias após a admissão, sem quaisquer dos sintomas iniciais. Conclusão: O caso descreve uma paciente que desenvolveu cefaleia grave após epidural contínua para o parto. Inicialmente ela foi diagnosticada como CPPD, contudo com o auxílio da RNM foi estabelecido o diagnóstico tardio de TSD. TSD é uma condição rara e frequentemente subdiagnosticada. Ela deve sempre ser considerada como diagnóstico diferencial de cefaleia aguda em decorrência de suas complicações potencialmente letais.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Sphenopalatine ganglion block is widely accepted in chronic pain; however it has been underestimated in post dural puncture headache treatment. The ganglion block does not restore normal cerebrospinal fluid dynamics but effectively reduces symptoms associated with resultant hypotension. When correctly applied it may avoid performance of epidural blood patch. The transnasal approach is a simple and minimally invasive technique. In the cases presented, we attempted to perform and report the ganglion block effectiveness and duration, using ropivacaine. CLINICAL FEATURES: We present four obstetrics patients with post dural puncture headache, after epidural or combined techniques, with Tuohy needle 18G that underwent a safe and successful sphenopalatine ganglion block. We performed the block 24-48h after dural puncture, with 4mL of ropivacaine 0.75% in each nostril. In three cases pain recurred within 12-48h, although less intense. In one patient a second block was performed with complete relief and without further recurrence. In the other two patients a blood patch was performed without success. All patients were asymptomatic within 7 days. CONCLUSION: The average duration of analgesic effect of the block remains poorly defined. In the cases reported, blocking with ropivacaine was a simple, safe and effective technique, with immediate and sustained pain relief for at least 12-24h.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neurological complications of spinal anesthesia are rare conditions. Headache caused by low pressure of the cerebrospinal fluid is one of the most frequent, which occurs after post-dural puncture. A comprehensive history and physical exam must be carried out before making the diagnosis of Post-Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) and additional tests are necessary to exclude the possibility of developing serious neurological complications such as Dural Sinus Thrombosis (DST). According to the Case Report a differential diagnosis between Dural Sinus Thrombosis with PDPH is discussed. CASE REPORT: A 22 year-old lady, ASA Physical Status Class I was admitted at 39 weeks of gestation for delivery. For labor pain relief she requested epidural for analgesia, but unfortunately accidental dural puncture occurred. She developed an occipital headache and neck pain in the second day postpartum which was relieved by both lying down and supporting treatment such as rehydration, analgesics and caffeine. On day third postpartum she was discharged without complaints. On day fifth postpartum the pain returned and became more intense and less responsive to oral analgesics. She was admitted to the hospital to do a complete neurological and image investigation that showed a lesion consistent with the diagnosis of cortical vein thrombosis and Duhral Sinus Thrombosis (TSD). She was treated with oral anticoagulants. After two days, a repeated magnetic resonance image (MRI) showed partial canalization of the central sinus thrombus. The patient was discharged from hospital five days after her admission without any of the initial symptoms. CONCLUSION: The report describes a patient who developed severe headache following continuous epidural analgesia for delivery. Initially it was diagnosed as PDPH, however with the aid of an MRI the diagnosis of TSD was later established and treated. TSD is a rare condition and is often underdiagnosed. Because of its potentially lethal complications, it should always be considered in acute headache differential diagnosis.

RESUMO

Abstract Background and objectives: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common complication following subarachnoid blockade and its incidence varies with the size of the needle used and the needle design. Suportive therapy is the usual initial approach. Epidural blood patch (EBP) is the gold-standard when supportive therapy fails but has significant risks associated. Sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) may be a safer alternative. Case report: We observed a 41 year-old female patient presenting with PDPH after a subarachnoid blockade a week before. We administrated 1 l of crystalloids, Dexamethasone 4 mg, parecoxib 40 mg, acetaminophen 1 g and caffeine 500 mg without significant relief after 2 hours. We performed a bilateral SPGB with a cotton-tipped applicator saturated with 0.5% Levobupivacaine under standard ASA monitoring. Symptoms relief was reported 5 minutes after the block. The patient was monitored for an hour after which she was discharged and prescribed acetaminophen 1 g and ibuprofen 400 mg every 8 hours for the following 2 days. She was contacted on the next day and again after a week reporting no pain in both situation. Conclusions: SPGB may attenuate cerebral vasodilation induced by parasympathetic stimulation transmitted through neurons that have synapses in the sphenopalatine ganglion. This would be in agreement with the Monro-Kellie concept and would explain why caffeine and sumatriptan can have some effect in the treatment of PDPH. Apparently, SPGB has a faster onset than EBP with better safety profile. We suggest that patients presenting with PDPH should be considered primarily for SPGB. Patients may have a rescue EBP if needed.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: Cefaleia pós-punção dural (CPPD) é uma complicação comum após bloqueio subaracnoideo e sua incidência varia de acordo com o tamanho e desenho da agulha usada. Geralmente, a terapia de apoio é a abordagem inicial. O tampão sanguíneo peridural (TSP) é o padrão de terapia quando a terapia de apoio falha, mas tem riscos significativos associados. O bloqueio do gânglio esfenopalatino (BGEP) pode ser uma opção mais segura. Relato de caso: Atendemos uma paciente de 41 anos, com CPPD após bloqueio subaracnoideo uma semana antes. Administramos cristaloides (1 L), dexametasona (4 mg), parecoxib (40 mg), acetaminofeno (1 g) e cafeína (500 mg), sem alívio significativo após 2 horas. Fizemos um bloqueio bilateral do gânglio esfenopalatino, com um aplicador com ponta de algodão saturada com levobupivacaína a 0,5% sob monitoração padrão ASA. O alívio dos sintomas foi relatado 5 minutos após o bloqueio. A paciente foi monitorada por uma hora e depois recebeu alta com prescrição de acetaminofeno (1 g) e ibuprofeno (400 mg) a cada 8 horas para os dois dias seguintes. A paciente foi contatada no dia seguinte e novamente após uma semana e, em ambos os contatos, relatou não sentir dor. Conclusões: O BGEP pode ter atenuado a vasodilatação cerebral induzida pelo estímulo parassimpático transmitido através dos neurônios que têm sinapses no gânglio esfenopalatino. Esse mecanismo estaria de acordo com o conceito de Monro-Kellie e explicaria por que a cafeína e o sumatriptano podem ter algum efeito no tratamento da CPPD. Aparentemente, o BGEP tem um início mais rápido do que o do TSP, com um melhor perfil de segurança. Sugerimos que os pacientes que se apresentam com CPPD devam ser considerados primeiro para BGEP. Os pacientes podem ser submetidos a um TSP de resgate, caso necessário.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common complication following subarachnoid blockade and its incidence varies with the size of the needle used and the needle design. Supportive therapy is the usual initial approach. Epidural blood patch (EBP) is the gold-standard when supportive therapy fails but has significant risks associated. Sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) may be a safer alternative. CASE REPORT: We observed a 41 year-old female patient presenting with PDPH after a subarachnoid blockade a week before. We administrated 1l of crystalloids, Dexamethasone 4mg, parecoxib 40mg, acetaminophen 1g and caffeine 500mg without significant relief after 2hours. We performed a bilateral SPGB with a cotton-tipped applicator saturated with 0.5% Levobupivacaine under standard ASA monitoring. Symptoms relief was reported 5minutes after the block. The patient was monitored for an hour after which she was discharged and prescribed acetaminophen 1g and ibuprofen 400mg every 8hours for the following 2 days. She was contacted on the next day and again after a week reporting no pain in both situations. CONCLUSIONS: SPGB may attenuate cerebral vasodilation induced by parasympathetic stimulation transmitted through neurons that have synapses in the sphenopalatine ganglion. This would be in agreement with the Monro-Kellie concept and would explain why caffeine and sumatriptan can have some effect in the treatment of PDPH. Apparently, SPGB has a faster onset than EBP with better safety profile. We suggest that patients presenting with PDPH should be considered primarily for SPGB. Patients may have a rescue EBP if needed.

Assuntos