Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Front Oncol ; 14: 1406951, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39040443

RESUMO

Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFRs) play a significant role in Estrogen Receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer by contributing to tumorigenesis and endocrine resistance. This review explores the structure, signaling pathways, and implications of FGFRs, particularly FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3, and FGFR4, in ER+ breast cancer. FGFR1 is frequently amplified, especially in aggressive Luminal B-like tumors, and its amplification is associated with poor prognosis and treatment resistance. The co-amplification of FGFR1 with oncogenes like EIF4EBP1 and NSD3 complicates its role as a standalone oncogenic driver. FGFR2 amplification, though less common, is critical in hormone receptor regulation, driving proliferation and treatment resistance. FGFR3 and FGFR4 also contribute to endocrine resistance through various mechanisms, including the activation of alternate signaling pathways like PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK. Endocrine resistance remains a major clinical challenge, with around 70% of breast cancers initially hormone receptor positive. Despite the success of CDK 4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy (ET), resistance often develops, necessitating new treatment strategies. FGFR inhibitors have shown potential in preclinical studies, but clinical trials have yielded limited success due to off-target toxicities and lack of predictive biomarkers. Current clinical trials, including those evaluating FGFR inhibitors like erdafitinib, lucitanib, and dovitinib, have demonstrated mixed outcomes, underscoring the complexity of FGFR signaling in breast cancer. The interplay between FGFR and other signaling pathways highlights the need for comprehensive molecular profiling and personalized treatment approaches. Future research should focus on identifying robust biomarkers and developing combination therapies to enhance the efficacy of FGFR-targeted treatments. In conclusion, targeting FGFR signaling in ER+ breast cancer presents both challenges and opportunities. A deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms and resistance pathways is crucial for the successful integration of FGFR inhibitors into clinical practice, aiming to improve outcomes for patients with endocrine-resistant breast cancer.

2.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 26(2): 389-397, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37713046

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To study the clinicopathological variables connected with disease-free survival (DFS) as well as overall survival (OS) in patients who are ER-positive or HER2-negative and to propose nomograms for predicting individual risk. METHODS: In this investigation, we examined 585 (development cohort) and 291 (external validation) ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients from January 2010 to January 2014. From January 2010 to December 2014, we retrospectively reviewed and analyzed 291 (external validation) and 585 (development cohort) HER2-negative, ER-positive breast cancer patients. Cox regression analysis, both multivariate and univariate, confirmed the independence indicators for OS and DFS. RESULTS: Using cox regression analysis, both multivariate and univariate, the following variables were combined to predict the DFS of development cohort: pathological stage (HR = 1.391; 95% CI = 1.043-1.855; P value = 0.025), luminal parting (HR = 1.836; 95% CI = 1.142-2.952; P value = .012), and clinical stage (HR = 1.879; 95% CI = 1.102-3.203; P value = 0.021). Endocrine therapy (HR = 3.655; 95% CI = 1.084-12.324; P value = 0.037) and clinical stage (HR = 6.792; 95% CI = 1.672-28.345; P value = 0.009) were chosen as predictors of OS. Furthermore, we generated RS-OS and RS-DFS. According to the findings of Kaplan-Meier curves, patients who are classified as having a low risk have considerably longer DFS and OS durations than patients who are classified as having a high risk. CONCLUSION: To generate nomograms that predicted DFS and OS, independent predictors of DFS in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients were chosen. The nomograms successfully stratified patients into prognostic categories and worked well in both internal validation and external validation.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Receptor ErbB-2 , Intervalo Livre de Doença
3.
Clin Genet ; 95(5): 558-568, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30614523

RESUMO

Breast Cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and is the leading cause of cancer deaths in women. BC is a heterogeneous disease with different clinical and genetic features. According to immunohistochemical markers, BC is subdivided into four main subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, ERBB2 positive and triple negative. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are transcripts with more than 200 nucleotides and deregulated lncRNAs are associated with human diseases, including BC. In order to improve BC molecular classification, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), including lncRNAs, have been used. In this review, we focus on lncRNAs with differential expression in BC subtypes and how these RNAs may act to contribute to BC heterogeneity. We also emphasize the potential of these lncRNAs as biomarkers.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/classificação , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , RNA Longo não Codificante/genética , Estrogênios/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , RNA Longo não Codificante/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA