RESUMO

ABSTRACT Purpose The clinical outcomes of kidney transplantation from deceased donors have seen significant improvements with the use of machine perfusion (MP), now a standard practice in transplant centers. However, the use of perfusate biomarkers for assessing organ quality remains a subject of debate. Despite this, some centers incorporate them into their decision-making process for donor kidney acceptance. Recent studies have indicated that lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), glutathione S-transferase, interleukin-18, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) could predict post-transplant outcomes. Materials and Methods Between August 2016 and June 2017, 31 deceased-donor after brain death were included and stroke was the main cause of death. Pediatric patients, hypersensitized recipients were excluded. 43 kidneys were subjected to machine perfusion. Perfusate samples were collected just before the transplantation and stored at -80ºC. Kidney transplant recipients have an average age of 52 years, 34,9% female, with a BMI 24,6±3,7. We employed receiver operating characteristic analysis to investigate associations between these perfusate biomarkers and two key clinical outcomes: delayed graft function and primary non-function. Results The incidence of delayed graft function was 23.3% and primary non-function was 14%. A strong association was found between NGAL concentration and DGF (AUC=0.766, 95% CI, P=0.012), and between LDH concentration and PNF (AUC=0.84, 95% CI, P=0.027). Other perfusate biomarkers did not show significant correlations with these clinical outcomes. Conclusion The concentrations of NGAL and LDH during machine perfusion could assist transplant physicians in improving the allocation of donated organs and making challenging decisions regarding organ discarding. Further, larger-scale studies are required.

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The clinical outcomes of kidney transplantation from deceased donors have seen significant improvements with the use of machine perfusion (MP), now a standard practice in transplant centers. However, the use of perfusate biomarkers for assessing organ quality remains a subject of debate. Despite this, some centers incorporate them into their decision-making process for donor kidney acceptance. Recent studies have indicated that lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), glutathione S-transferase, interleukin-18, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) could predict post-transplant outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 2016 and June 2017, 31 deceased-donor after brain death were included and stroke was the main cause of death. Pediatric patients, hypersensitized recipients were excluded. 43 kidneys were subjected to machine perfusion. Perfusate samples were collected just before the transplantation and stored at -80ºC. Kidney transplant recipients have an average age of 52 years, 34,9% female, with a BMI 24,6±3,7. We employed receiver operating characteristic analysis to investigate associations between these perfusate biomarkers and two key clinical outcomes: delayed graft function and primary non-function. RESULTS: The incidence of delayed graft function was 23.3% and primary non-function was 14%. A strong association was found between NGAL concentration and DGF (AUC=0.766, 95% CI, P=0.012), and between LDH concentration and PNF (AUC=0.84, 95% CI, P=0.027). Other perfusate biomarkers did not show significant correlations with these clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: The concentrations of NGAL and LDH during machine perfusion could assist transplant physicians in improving the allocation of donated organs and making challenging decisions regarding organ discarding. Further, larger-scale studies are required.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Kidney transplantation is the best option for kidney replacement therapy, even considering that most of the times the grafts do not survive as long as their recipients. In the Khalil et al's experience, published in this issue of the Journal, they analyze their second kidney graft survival and describe those significant predictors of early loss. This editorial comments on the results and put in perspec tive that most of the times, long-term graft survival could be inadvertently jeopardized if the immunosuppressive therapy is reduced or withdrawn for any reason, and that it could happen frequently if the transplant physician intends to innovate with the clinical care without proper evidence-based data.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prolonged donor hepatectomy time may be implicated in early and late complications of liver transplantation. AIM: To evaluate the impact of donor hepatectomy time on outcomes of liver transplant recipients, mainly early allograft dysfunction. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included brain-dead donors and adult liver graft recipients. Donor-recipient matching was obtained through a crossover list. Clinical and laboratory data were recorded for both donors and recipients. Donor hepatectomy, cold ischemia, and warm ischemia times were recorded. Primary outcome was early allograft dysfunction. Secondary outcomes included need for retransplantation, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, and patient and graft survival at 12 months. RESULTS: From January 2019 to December 2021, a total of 243 patients underwent a liver transplant from a brain-dead donor. Of these, 57 (25%) developed early allograft dysfunction. The median donor hepatectomy time was 29 (23-40) min. Patients with early allograft dysfunction had a median hepatectomy time of 25 (22-38) min, whereas those without it had a median time of 30 (24-40) min (P = 0.126). CONCLUSION: Donor hepatectomy time was not associated with early allograft dysfunction, graft survival, or patient survival following liver transplantation.

RESUMO

Introduction: Kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), impacting recipient and graft survivals. The incidence of PTDM ranges from 15% to 30%, with most cases occurring in the first year post-transplant. Some clinical and laboratory characteristics pre- and post-transplant may be associated with a higher PTDM incidence in a more extended follow-up period. This study aimed to analyze the prevalence of PTDM among renal transplant recipients without previous DM diagnosis during a five-year post-transplant follow-up, as well as clinical and laboratory characteristics associated with a higher incidence of PTDM during this period. Material and methods: Single-center retrospective cohort including kidney transplant recipients older than 18 years with a functioning graft over six months of follow-up between January and December 2018. Exclusion criteria were recipients younger than 18 years at kidney transplantation, previous diabetes mellitus diagnosis, and death with a functioning graft or graft failure within six months post-transplant. Results: From 117 kidney transplants performed during the period, 71 (60.7%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 18 (25.3%) had PTDM diagnosis, and most (n=16, 88.9%) during the 1st year post-transplant. The need for insulin therapy during the hospital stay was significantly higher in the PTDM group (n=11, 61.1% vs. n=14, 26.4%, PTDM vs. non-PTDM). Other PTDM risk factors, such as older age, high body mass index, HLA mismatches, and cytomegalovirus or hepatitis C virus infections, were not associated with PTDM occurrence in this series. During 5-year post-transplant follow-up, the graft function remained stable in both groups. Conclusion: The accumulated incidence of PTDM in this series was similar to the reported in other studies. The perioperative hyperglycemia with the need for treatment with insulin before hospital discharge was associated with PTDM.

RESUMO

Introduction:  Non-adherence in kidney transplants is diversely defined. Immunosuppression non-adherence (INA) is the most used definition and has been associated with graft loss and acute rejection. But INA assesses only one fraction of adherence. Therefore, we analyzed the association of a holistic non-adherence definition with transplant outcomes and compared its prediction performance with other definitions. Methods:  We retrospectively included 739 kidney recipients between 2019 and 2021. We evaluated holistic non-adherence (HNA), suboptimal-immunosuppressor levels (SIL), appointment non-adherence (ANA), procedure non-adherence (PNA) and INA. The main outcomes were graft loss, graft rejection, and mortality. A backward logistic regression was performed estimating adjusted and un-adjusted odds ratio (OR) for each outcome. Finally, we compared the non-adherence definitions' prediction for the main outcomes using the area under the curve. Results: HNA was present in 28.7% of patients. Non-adherent patients had an adjusted OR of 2.66 (1.37-5.15) for mortality, 6.44 for graft loss (2.71-16.6), and 2.28 (1.15-4.47) for graft rejection. INA and PNA presented a moderate discrimination for graft loss and HNA and ANA mild-to-moderate discrimination for graft loss and death. Conclusion: Holistic non-adherence was associated with worst outcomes in kidney recipients and had a significant prediction performance for graft loss and mortality.

RESUMO

Tacrolimus (Tac) is currently the most common calcineurin-inhibitor employed in solid organ transplantation. High intra-patient variability (IPV) of Tac (Tac IPV) has been associated with an increased risk of immune-mediated rejection and poor outcomes after kidney transplantation. Few data are available concerning the impact of high Tac IPV in non-kidney transplants. However, even in kidney transplantation, there is still a controversy whether high Tac IPV is indeed detrimental in respect to graft and/or patient survival. This may be due to different methods employed to evaluate IPV and distinct time frames adopted to assess graft and patient survival in those reports published up to now in the literature. Little is also known about the influence of high Tac IPV in the development of other untoward adverse events, update of the current knowledge regarding the impact of Tac IPV in different outcomes following kidney, liver, heart, lung, and pancreas tran splantation to better evaluate its use in clinical practice.

RESUMO

Background: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have worse graft and overall survival, but recent evidence suggests that the difference is no longer significant. Objective: To compare the outcomes between patients with end-stage kidney disease due to DM (ESKD-DM) and ESKD due to nondiabetic etiology (ESKD-non-DM) who underwent kidney transplantation (KT) up to 10 years of follow-up. Design: Survival analysis of a retrospective cohort. Setting and Patients: All patients who underwent KT at the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Colombia, between 2004 and 2022. Measurements: Overall and graft survival in ESKD-DM and ESKD-non-DM who received KT. Patients who died with functional graft were censored for the calculation of kidney graft survival. Methods: Log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards model, and competing risk analysis were used to compare overall and graft survival in patients with ESKD-DM and ESKD-non-DM who underwent KT. Results: A total of 375 patients were included: 60 (16%) with ESKD-DM and 315 (84%) with ESKD-non-DM. Median follow-up was 83.3 months. Overall survival was lower in patients with ESKD-DM at 5 (75.0% vs 90.8%, P < .001) and 10 years (55.0% vs 86.7%, P < .001). Cardiovascular death was higher in patients with diabetes (27.3% vs 8.2%, P = .021). Death-censored graft survival was similar in both groups (96.7% vs 93.3% at 5 years, P = .324). On multivariate analysis, the factors associated with global survival were DM (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.23-3.60, P = .006), recipient age (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.02-1.08, P < .001), delayed graft function (HR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.24-3.46, P = .005), and donor age (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.01-1.05, P = .002). In the competing risk analysis, DM was associated with mortality only in the cardiovascular death group (sub-hazard ratio [SHR] = 6.06, 95% CI = 1.01-36.4, P = .049). Limitations: Change in diabetes treatment received over time and adherence to glycemic targets were not considered. The sample size is relatively small, which limits the precision of our estimates. The Kidney Donor Profile Index and the occurrence of treated acute rejection were not included in the regression models. Conclusion: Overall survival is lower in patients with diabetes, possibly due to older age and cardiovascular comorbidities. Therefore, patients with diabetes should be followed more closely to control cardiovascular risk factors. However, there is no difference in graft survival.

Contexte: Les patients diabétiques (DB) sont ceux qui présentent les pires résultats de greffe et de survie globale, mais des données récentes suggèrent que la différence n'est désormais plus significative. Objectif: Comparer les résultats des patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale terminale causée par le DB (IRT-DB) et ceux des patients non-diabétiques (IRT-nonDB) pour une période de 10 ans après une transplantation rénale (TR). Conception: Analyse de la survie d'une cohorte rétrospective. Sujets et cadre de l'étude: Tous les patients qui ont subi une TR à l'Hôpital Universitario San Ignacio (Colombie) entre 2004 et 2022. Mesures: La survie globale et la survie du greffon chez les patients IRT-DB et IRT-nonDB après une TR. Les patients décédés avec un greffon fonctionnel ont été censurés pour le calcul de la survie du greffon. Méthodologie: Le test logarithmique par rangs, un modèle de régression à effet proportionnel de Cox et une analyse des risques concurrents ont été utilisés pour comparer la survie globale et la survie du greffon des patients atteints d'IRT-DB et d'IRT-nonDB après une TR. Résultats: Au total, 375 patients ont été inclus à l'étude, soit 60 patients (16 %) atteints d'IRT-DB et 315 (84 %) atteints d'IRT-nonDB. La durée médiane du suivi était de 83,3 mois. La survie globale était plus faible chez les patients atteints d'IRT-DB à 5 ans (75,0 c. 90,8 %; p<0,001) et à 10 ans (55,0 % c. 86,7 %; p<0,001). Les décès de causes cardiovasculaires ont été plus nombreux chez les patients diabétiques (27,3 % c. 8,2 %; p=0,021). La survie du greffon censurée pour le décès était similaire pour les deux groupes (96,7 % c. 93,3 % à 5 ans, p=0,324). Dans l'analyse multivariée, les facteurs associés à la survie globale étaient le DB (RR=2,11; IC95 : 1,23-3,60; p=0,006), l'âge du receveur (RR=1,05; IC95 : 1,02-1,08; p<0,001), le retard de fonction du greffon (RR = 2,07; IC95 : 1,24-3,46; p = 0,005) et l'âge du donneur (RR = 1,03; IC95 : 1,01-1,05; p=0,002). Dans l'analyse des risques concurrents, le DB a été associé à la mortalité uniquement dans le groupe de patients décédés de causes cardiovasculaires (RRS=6,06; IC95 : 1,01-36,4; p=0,049). Limites: Les modifications dans le traitement du diabète au fil du temps et l'observance des cibles glycémiques n'ont pas été prises en compte. La taille de l'échantillon est relativement faible, ce qui limite la précision des estimations. L'indice de profil du donneur (Kidney Donor Profile Index­KDPI) et la survenue d'un rejet aigu traité n'ont pas été inclus dans les modèles de régression. Conclusion: La survie globale est plus faible chez les patients diabétiques, peut-être en raison de l'âge avancé et des comorbidités cardiovasculaires de ces patients. Les patients diabétiques devraient par conséquent faire l'objet d'un suivi plus rapproché afin de surveiller les facteurs de risque cardiovasculaire. Aucune différence n'a cependant été observée pour la survie du greffon.

RESUMO

Introducción: El aumento de glúteos tiene como objetivo lograr una apariencia y contorno más joven; así como crear la proporción ideal entre cintura y cadera. Esto se puede lograr mediante la lipoinyección, aunque en este caso existen controversias en cuanto a la viabilidad del tejido injertado y la supervivencia de la grasa. Objetivo: Determinar el porcentaje de supervivencia del injerto de grasa autóloga y su relación con el volumen inyectado en pacientes sometidas a lipotransferencia glútea. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, descriptivo, de corte longitudinal y prospectivo con una muestra de 44 pacientes sometidas a lipotransferencia glútea en el Servicio de Cirugía Plástica del Hospital Docente Clínico Quirúrgico Dr. Miguel Enríquez en el período comprendido entre marzo de 2018 y junio de 2021. Resultados: El estudio evidencia que, mediante ultrasonido y fórmulas, el volumen promedio y la altura de la de grasa en los glúteos se duplica en el posoperatorio mediato y disminuye en el posoperatorio tardío sin llegar a los valores del preoperatorio. Además, se estableció que cerca de la media del volumen de grasa autóloga injertada en los glúteos sobrevive de manera definitiva en el posoperatorio tardío. Además, quedó establecido que la relación entre el volumen infiltrado y la supervivencia del injerto de grasa autóloga es inversamente proporcional: mientras mayor es el volumen, menor es su supervivencia. Conclusiones: Solo la mitad del volumen de grasa autóloga injertada en los glúteos sobrevive de manera definitiva, y la supervivencia de la grasa es inversamente proporcional al volumen infiltrado(AU)

Introduction: Buttock augmentation aims to achieve a more youthful appearance and contour; as well as creating the ideal proportion between waist and hips. This can be achieved by lipoinjection, although in this case there are controversies regarding the viability of the injected tissue and the survival of the fat. Objective: To determine the percentage of autologous fat graft survival and its relationship with the injected volume in patients undergoing gluteal fat transfer. Methods: An observational, descriptive, longitudinal and prospective study was carried out, with a sample of 44 patients undergoing gluteal lipotransfer, in the plastic surgery service of the Dr. Miguel Enriquez Clinical Surgical Teaching Hospital, in the intermediate period between March 2018 to June 2021. Results: The study shows that through ultrasound and formulas, the average volume and height of fat in the buttocks doubles in the immediate postoperative period, decreasing in the late postoperative period, without reaching preoperative values. Furthermore, it's established that about the mean volume of autologous fat grafted to the buttocks survives definitively in the late postoperative period. In addition, it was established that the relationship between the infiltrated volume and the survival of the autologous fat graft is inversely proportional, the greater the volume, the less its survival. Conclusions: Only half of the volume of autologous fat injected into the buttocks survives definitively, and the survival of the fat is inversely proportional to the volume injected(AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The age for kidney transplantation (KT) is no longer a limitation and several studies have shown benefits in the survival of elderly patients. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship of the baseline Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score to morbidity and mortality after transplantation. METHODS: In this multicentric observational retrospective cohort study, we included patients older than 60 years admitted on the waiting list (WL) for deceased donor KT from January 01, 2006, to December 31, 2016. The CCI score was calculated for each patient at inclusion on the WL. RESULTS: Data for analysis were available of 387 patients. The patients were divided in tertiles of CCI: group 1 (CCI: 1-2) n = 117, group 2 (CCI: 3-4) n = 158, and group 3 (CCI: ≥5) n = 112. Patient survival was significantly different between CCI groups at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively: 90%, 88%, and 84% for group 1, 88%, 80%, and 72% for group 2, and 87%, 75%, and 63% for group 3 (p < 0.0001). Variables associated with mortality were CCI score (p < 0.0001), HLA mismatch (p = 0.014), length of hospital stay (p < 0.0001), surgical complications (p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Individualized strategies to modify these variables may improve patient's morbidity and mortality after KT.

Assuntos