RESUMO

ABSTRACT A 59-year-old man presented with a unilateral blurring of vision in his left eye. His left eye's visual acuity was hand movements level. He underwent phacoemulsification surgery, and an intrastromal posterior chamber intraocular lens was implanted. The intrastromal intraocular lens was extracted and a new intraocular lens was implanted. Usinge the Snellen chart, the final best-corrected visual acuity was 20/40. With this case report, we wish to emphasize that a single stepwise clear corneal incision merged with wound-assisted intraocular lens injections can result in intraocular lens misdirection into the corneal stroma. As a result, while performing a misdirected intraocular lens removal, we recommend that the wound be carefully constructed.

RESUMO Um homem de 59 anos apresentou embaçamento visual unilateral no olho esquerdo. Sua acuidade visual nesse olho era no nível de movimentos da mão. O paciente havia se submetido a uma cirurgia de facoemulsificação em que foi feita a implantação intraestromal de uma lente intraocular de câmara posterior. Foi feita a extração dessa lente intraestromal intraocular e uma nova lente intraocular foi implantada. A melhor acuidade visual corrigida final foi de 20/40 pela tabela de Snellen. Com este relato de caso, os autores desejam apontar que uma incisão de degrau único em córnea clara, quando combinada com a injeção de uma lente ocular através da incisão, pode levar a um direcionamento incorreto da lente intraocular para dentro do estroma corneano. Portanto, recomenda-se uma construção cuidadosa da incisão ao se remover uma lente intraocular direcionada incorretamente.

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate visual outcomes, satisfaction, and quality of life of patients assisted in a Medical School hospital by the Brazilian Public Health System, who underwent bilateral diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Methods: Case series study with intervention, including 20 patients who underwent bilateral implantation of multifocal IOL EyeDiff® (Eyeol UK, Dunstable, UK). Exclusion criteria were corneal astigmatism >1.5 cylindrical diopters, previous ocular surgery or ocular disease, and intra- or postoperative complications. Patients were evaluated one, three, and six months after surgery. Monocular and binocular visual acuity for distance, intermediate and near, under photopic and mesopic conditions, monocular contrast sensitivity under photopic conditions, defocus curve, and quality of life were assessed. Results: Monocular distance-corrected visual acuity was 0.3 logMAR or better and monocular distance-corrected near visual acuity was J3 or better in all eyes under photopic conditions. Binocular distance-corrected near visual acuity was J1 in all cases. Contrast sensitivity was at the minimum level of normality for low and high spatial frequencies and within normal limits for intermediate spatial frequency. The quality of life questionnaire showed a high level of patient satisfaction. Conclusion: Bilateral implantation of the multifocal intraocular lens EyeDiff® provides patients with good visual acuity and quality of life, besides spectacle independence. The visual acuity and contrast sensitivity progressively improved between one and six postoperative months.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar os resultados visuais, satisfação e qualidade de vida de pacientes atendidos em um hospital escola pelo Sistema Único de Saúde, submetidos a implante bilateral de lente intraocular multifocal difrativa. Métodos: Estudo tipo série de casos com intervenção, incluindo 20 pacientes submetidos a implante bilateral da lente intraocular multifocal difrativa EyeDiff® (Eyeol UK, Dunstable, UK). Os critérios de exclusão foram astigmatismo corneano >1,5 dioptria cilíndrica, cirurgia ou doença ocular prévias e complicações intraoperatórias ou pós-operatórias. Os pacientes foram avaliados após 1, 3 e 6 meses da cirurgia. Foram avaliadas a acuidade visual monocular e binocular para longe, intermediário e perto sob condições fotópica e mesópica, sensibilidade ao contraste monocular sob condições fotópicas, curva de defocus e questionário para avaliação da qualidade de vida. Resultados: A acuidade visual para longe corrigida monocular foi de 0,3 logMAR ou melhor e a acuidade visual para perto com correção para longe foi J3 ou melhor em todos os olhos, sob condições fotópicas. A acuidade visual binocular para perto com a correção para longe foi J1 em todos os casos. A sensibilidade ao contraste estava no nível mínimo de normalidade para frequências espaciais baixas e altas e abaixo dos limites normais para frequência espacial intermediária. O questionário de qualidade de vida mostrou que os pacientes apresentavam altos níveis de satisfação. Conclusão: O implante bilateral da lente intraocular multifocal EyeDiff® proporcionou boa acuidade visual e qualidade de vida, e independência de óculos aos pacientes. A acuidade visual e a sensibilidade ao contraste melhoraram progressivamente entre um e seis meses de pós-operatório.

RESUMO

Introducción: El síndrome de uveítis-glaucoma-hifema (UGH) es una complicación infrecuente de las cirugías de catarata, debido a un roce mecánico ejercido por una lente intraocular (LIO) sobre el iris. Caso clínico: Un varón de 64 años, con antecedente de cirugía de catarata, presenta disminución de la agudeza visual y dolor en el ojo derecho. En el examen oftalmológico, se evidenciaron signos de uveítis anterior, presión intraocular (PIO) elevada, microhifema y una LIO de una pieza plegable en sulcus que provocaba un roce mecánico con la cara posterior del iris. El tratamiento médico fue insuficiente, por lo que se realizó una cirugía de explante de LIO de una pieza plegable y se reemplazó por una LIO de tres piezas plegables. La evolución posoperatoria fue favorable. Conclusión: Se debe sospechar de esta complicación, en pacientes con antecedente de cirugía de catarata, especialmente en casos en los cuales la LIO es de una pieza y ha sido implantada fuera del saco capsular.

Introduction: Uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome (UGH) is a rare complication of cataract surgery, due to mechanical chafing exerted by an intraocular lens (IOL) on the iris. Clinical case: A 64-year-old man with a history of cataract surgery, who presented decreased visual acuity and pain in the right eye. The ophthalmological examination revealed signs of anterior uveitis, elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), microhyphema, and a single-piece foldable IOL in the sulcus that caused a mechanical chafing with the posterior face of the iris. The medical treatment was insufficient; for this reason, a folding simple-piece IOL explant surgery was performed and replaced by a three-piece IOL. Postoperative evolution was favorable. Conclusion: Should be suspected this complication in patients with a history of cataract surgery, especially in cases in which the IOL is in single-piece and has been implanted outside the capsular bag.

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the stability and efficacy of the double-flanged 5-0 polypropylene suture to fixate subluxated cataracts at 18 months and the possible complications of this new technique Methods: This technique uses a 5-0 polypropylene monofilament to create two flanges with a thermocautery, for fixation of a capsular tension segment to the sclera to fix the subluxated capsular bag. This technique was implemented in 17 eyes requiring intraocular lens implantation in a setting of zonular dialysis due to trauma, Marfan syndrome, microspherophakia, idiopathic disease, and post-phacoemulsification status. Results: Follow-up of the patients occurred at 18 months. Best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly from 0.85 to 0.39 (logMAR), whereas the spherical and cylindrical refractive errors and intraocular pressure remained stable from preoperation. No suture photodegradation or pseudophacodonesis were detected. Conclusion: The double-flanged 5-0 polypropylene suture transscleral bag fixation technique has shown favorable long-term outcomes in terms of bag intraocular lens/complex fixation and stability. In eyes with zonular weakness or dialysis, this technique appears to be a safe and knotless option for cataract surgery.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a estabilidade e eficácia da técnica double-flanged com sutura de 5-0 polipropileno para fixação de cataratas subluxadas aos 18 meses e as possíveis complicações desta nova técnica. Métodos: Esta técnica utiliza um monofilamento de polipropileno 5-0 para criar dois flanges com um termocautério para fixar um Segmento de Tensão Capsular na esclera a fim de estabilizar o saco capsular subluxado. Esta técnica foi implementada em 17 olhos que necessitavam do implante de lente intraocular em casos de diálise zonular devido a trauma, síndrome de Marfan, microesferofacia, subluxação idiopática ou pós-facoemulsificação que provocou subulxação do saco capsular intraoperatória. Resultados: O seguimento dos pacientes foi de 18 meses. A acuidade visual corrigida melhorou significativamente de 0,85 para 0,39 (logMAR), enquanto os erros de refração esféricos e cilíndricos e a pressão intraocular permaneceram estáveis. Nenhuma fotodegradação de sutura ou pseudofacodonese foi encontrada. Conclusão: A técnica double-flanged para fixação transescleral de saco capsular com sutura de 5-0 polipropileno mostrou resultados de estabilidade de longo prazo para o complexo lente/saco capsular. Então, aparenta ser uma opção segura para cirurgia de catarata, sem necessidade pontos, em olhos com fraqueza zonular ou diálise.

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the stability and the refractive error of the different intraocular lens (IOL) after cataract surgery. METHOD: Retrospective, observational and single-center study. Patients diagnosed with cataract and myopia who underwent a phacoemulsification surgery with intraocular lens placement without complications were included. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmological examination, ultrasound biomicroscopy was performed at 2 weeks, 1 and 3 months after surgery. Descriptive statistics were performed using measures of central tendency and comparative analyzes. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Thirty-one subjects with a diagnosis of axial myopia and senile cataract were included, 20 women (64.5%) and 11 men (35.5%), with a mean age was 62.8 ± 13.14 years. The IOL displacement were not different for the upper, lower, temporal and nasal quadrants; however, we observed a tendency to inclination to the temporal sector (p = 0.054) between the first and third postoperative month. Therefore, the were no significant differences in spherical equivalent between groups postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The inclination of the IOL did not change over time after surgery, the changes were similar with the different three types of IOL.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la estabilidad y el desplazamiento de diferentes lentes intraoculares (LIO) a los 3 meses y los cambios refractivos asociados después de la facoemulsificación. MÉTODO: Estudio retrospectivo, observacional y unicéntrico. Se revisaron expedientes de pacientes sometidos a cirugía de facoemulsificación con colocación de LIO. Se realizó un examen oftalmológico completo, ultrabiomicroscopía a las 2 semanas, 1 y 3 meses después de la cirugía. Se realizó estadística descriptiva y análisis comparativos. Se tomó como diferencia significativa un valor de p < 0.05. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 31 ojos con diagnóstico de miopía y catarata senil, 20 mujeres (64.5%) y 11 hombres (35.5%), con una edad media de 62.8 ± 13.14 años. En cuanto al desplazamiento de la LIO, no se observaron diferencias significativas para los cuadrantes superior, inferior, temporal y nasal. Se observa una tendencia hacia temporal (p = 0.054) entre el primer y el tercer mes posoperatorios. El equivalente esférico tampoco mostró diferencias. CONCLUSIONES: El desplazamiento de la LIO no cambió con el tiempo después de la facoemulsificación. Los cambios fueron similares con los tres diferentes tipos de LIO y al compararlos proporcionan estabilidad refractiva en pacientes miopes.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT A 38-year-old patient who developed aphakia and aniridia secondary to trauma suffered from vision loss. To improve her vision, an iris-intraocular lens complex (Reper®) was fixed to the sclera with Canabrava's double-flanged technique. There was a satisfactory increase in the patient's visual acuity and no complications were observed during the 6-months follow-up. Canabrava technique simplifies and improves the fixation of the iris-intraocular lens complex to the sclera. It is a safe option that does not require scleral flaps or knots.

RESUMO Uma paciente de 38 anos desenvolveu afacia e ani­ridia secundárias a um trauma, levando à perda da visão. Para melhorar sua visão, um complexo de íris e lente intraocular (Reper®) foi fixado à esclera com a técnica de flange duplo de Canabrava. Houve um aumento satisfatório na acuidade visual do paciente e nenhuma complicação foi observada durante o acompanhamento de 6 meses. A técnica de Canabrava simplifica e melhora a fixação do complexo de íris e lente intraocular na esclera. É uma opção segura que não requer retalhos ou pontos esclerais.

RESUMO

Objetivo: Determinar la relación de los planos anatómicos del cristalino con la posición real de la lente intraocular en pacientes con diagnóstico de catarata atendidos en el Centro de Microcirugía Ocular del Instituto Cubano de Oftalmología durante el período de enero del 2018 a enero 2021. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, descriptivo, prospectivo longitudinal en 89 ojos de 67 pacientes operados de catarata con implante de lente intraocular (LIO) por técnica de facoemulsificación. Se empleó para el cálculo del poder de la lente el IOL Master 700 y la fórmula de SRK/T. Se utilizó la imagen de OCT ofrecida por el IOL Máster 700 para determinar el plano ecuatorial y plano central del cristalino, así como la posición real de la lente intraocular. Resultados: Predominó el grupo de edad entre 60 - 79 años, el sexo femenino representó el 53 por ciento. Los ojos tamaño promedio y las medidas biométricas oculares en valores promedios estándar fueron los más representativos. El plano ecuatorial mostró menos diferencia con la posición real de la lente intraocular en comparación con la diferencia evidenciada entre el plano central y la posición real de la lente. La adecuada posición del lente intraocular calculado en la bolsa capsular independiente a la longitud axial, permitió obtener un resultado refractivo en correspondencia al esperado previo a la cirugía. Conclusión: Los parámetros anatómicos del cristalino (plano ecuatorial, plano central) constituyen variables importantes a tener en cuenta para el desarrollo y perfeccionamiento de las fórmulas para el cálculo del lente intraocular(AU)

Purpose: To determine the relationship of the anatomical planes of the crystalline lens with the actual position of the intraocular lens in patients with a diagnosis of cataract seen at the Ocular Microsurgery Center of the Cuban Institute of Ophthalmology during the period January 2018 and January 2021. Methods: An observational, descriptive, prospective longitudinal study was performed in 89 eyes of 67 patients operated on for cataract with intraocular lens implantation (IOL) by phacoemulsification technique. The IOL Master 700 and the SRK/T formula were used to calculate lens power. The OCT image provided by the IOL Master 700 was used to determine the equatorial plane and central plane of the crystalline lens, as well as the actual position of the intraocular lens. Results: The age group 60-79 years was predominant, female gender represented 53 percent. Average eye size and ocular biometric measurements in standard average values were the most representative. The equatorial plane showed less difference with the actual intraocular lens position compared to the difference evidenced between the central plane and the actual lens position. The adequate position of the intraocular lens calculated in the capsular bag independent to the axial length, allowed to obtain a refractive result in correspondence to the one expected before surgery. Conclusion: The anatomical parameters of the crystalline lens (equatorial plane, central plane) are important variables to be taken into account for the development and improvement of the formulas for the calculation of the intraocular lens(AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: Determinar los resultados refractivos con las fórmulas Holladay 2 y Barret Universal 2 a partir del cálculo de la lente intraocular en pacientes operados de catarata. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo prospectivo y longitudinal con 60 ojos de 50 pacientes operados de catarata mediante la técnica de facoemulsificación. Se empleó para el cálculo de la lente el IOL Master 700 y el Pentacam AXL con la fórmula Holladay 2 y Barret Universal 2, respectivamente. Resultados: Predominó el sexo femenino y el grupo etario mayor de 60 años. Los ojos mayores de 26 mm mostraron la mayor diferencia entre el poder dióptrico de la lente intraocular que se implantó según Holladay y en menores de 22 mm según Barret Universal. Ambos grupos presentaron una disminución del equivalente esférico, siendo superior a 7 y 5 dioptrías en ojos mayores de 26 mm en el posoperatorio de ambas fórmulas. Posterior a la cirugía se observó una mejoría en la agudeza visual sin corrección y corregida de más de 4 líneas en la cartilla de Snellen, independiente de la longitud axial, para ambos grupos en estudio. Sin cambios significativos en el cilindro queratométrico. En el 70,0 por ciento de los casos, el resultado refractivo final estuvo en rango de la emetropía para el grupo Holladay 2 y el 66,7 por ciento para el grupo Barret Universal 2. Conclusiones: Ambas fórmulas resultan útiles para el cálculo de la lente intraocular en todos los rangos de longitud axial(AU)

Objective: To determine refractive outcomes with the Holladay 2 and Barret Universal 2 formulas from intraocular lens calculation in cataract surgery patients. Methods: A prospective and longitudinal descriptive study was performed with 60 eyes of 50 patients who underwent cataract surgery by phacoemulsification. The IOL Master 700 and Pentacam AXL with the Holladay 2 and Barret Universal 2 formula, respectively, were used to calculate the lens. Results: Female gender and age group older than 60 years predominated. Eyes larger than 26 mm showed the greatest difference between the dioptric power of the intraocular lens implanted according to Holladay and those smaller than 22 mm according to Barret Universal. Both groups presented a decrease of the spherical equivalent, being higher than 7 and 5 diopters in eyes larger than 26 mm postoperatively in both formulas. Postoperatively, there was an improvement in uncorrected and corrected visual acuity of more than 4 lines in the Snellen chart, independent of axial length, for both groups under study. No significant changes in keratometric cylinder. In 70.0 percent of the cases, the final refractive result was in the emmetropia range for the Holladay 2 group and 66.7 percent for the Barret Universal 2 group. Conclusions: Both formulas are useful for the calculation of the intraocular lens in all axial length ranges(AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: Optimizar las constantes utilizadas por las fórmulas SRK/T, SRK/T2, Holladay 1 y Hoffer Q para cinco modelos de lentes intraoculares (LIO), implantados durante la cirugía de catarata en el Instituto Cubano de Oftalmología (enero/2006-octubre/2019). Método: Se estudiaron retrospectivamente 47341 pacientes. Las constantes se optimizaron ajustando a cero el error de predicción promedio (EPm) y obteniendo el valor que arrojó el máximo número de ojos con error de predicción absoluto -EP- ≤; 0,25, tanto para la biometría ultrasónica como para la óptica. La eficacia de las constantes optimizadas se verificó mediante el análisis de los errores absolutos medio y mediano (EAM/EAMed) más bajos y el porcentaje de ojos en un intervalo determinado de error de predicción en función del valor de las constantes. También se analizaron el índice de rendimiento de la fórmula de Haigis y un nuevo índice introducido. Resultados: Las constantes optimizadas fueron significativamente diferentes de los valores del fabricante. Los valores obtenidos para EPm = 0 fueron diferentes a los mínimos de EAM y EAMed. El porcentaje de ojos con -EP- ≤ 0,25 y 0,50 D difirió cuando los criterios de optimización fueron diferentes. SRK/T y SRK/T2 mostraron los mejores rendimientos, según ambos índices. Conclusiones: Las constantes optimizadas mejoran los resultados postoperatorios para cada combinación LIO-fórmula. Diferentes criterios de optimización conducen a diferentes resultados. El EAM, el EAMed y el porcentaje de ojos con -EP- ≤; 0,50 D son parámetros válidos para comprobar el rendimiento de las fórmulas, hasta disponer de un índice único, fiable y consensuado(AU)

Objective: To optimize the constants used by the SRK/T, SRK/T2, Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q formulas for five intraocular lens (IOL) models implanted during cataract surgery at the Cuban Institute of Ophthalmology (January/2006-October/2019). Methods: 47341 patients were retrospectively studied. The constants were optimized by adjusting the average prediction error (EPm) to zero and obtaining the value that showed the maximum number of eyes with absolute prediction error -EP- ≤ 0.25, for both ultrasonic and optical biometry. The effectiveness of the optimized constants was verified by analyzing the lowest average and median absolute errors (EAM/EAMed) and the percentage of eyes in a given range of prediction error as a function of the value of the constants. The Haigis formula performance index and a newly introduced index were also analyzed. Results: The optimized constants were significantly different from the manufacturer's values. The values obtained for EPm = 0 were different from the EAM and EAMed minima. The percentage of eyes with -EP- ≤ 0.25 and 0.50 D differed when the optimization criteria were different. SRK/T and SRK/T2 showed the best performances, according to both indexes. Conclusions: Optimized constants improve postoperative outcomes for each IOL-formula combination. Different optimization criteria lead to different results. The EAM, the EAMed and the percentage of eyes with -EP- ≤ 0.50 D are valid parameters to check the performance of the formulas, until a single, reliable and consensual index is available(AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To analyse the distribution of the difference between both eyes in the calculation of the dioptric power of the intraocular lens in a series of 7994 patients and the biometric variables that determine it. METHODS: The data of patients between 3 and 99 years old, residents of the city of Guayaquil and neighbouring sites, who received ocular biometry by partial optical coherence interferometry between 2004 and 2020 were reviewed. Ocular biometrics, including axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and the mean corneal dioptre power (CD), were measured by partial coherence interferometry. Refraction without or with cycloplegia was recorded in spherical equivalent (SE). The Haigis formula from the IOL Master instrument was used to calculate the dioptric power of the intraocular lens in both eyes. RESULTS: Data from the bilateral optical biometry of 7994 patients were analysed. The mean and standard deviation of AL, CD, ACD and dioptre power of the IOL were 23.66 ±â€¯1.25, 43.70 ±â€¯1.49, 3.34 ±â€¯0.40 and +20.46 ±â€¯3.84, respectively. 2538 (31.7%) patients had equal dioptre power of the IOL between both eyes. 3243 (40.6%) patients had a 0.50 D difference; 1162 (14.5%), 1.0 D; 425 (5.3%), 1.5 D. 626 patients (7.8%) had a difference in IOL dioptre of 2 D or more, with a maximum of 24 D. The asymmetry of AL between OU was ≥0.4 mm in 10.49%, while that of CD reached ≥1 D in 1.9%. CONCLUSIONS: 92.16% of patients had a difference within 1.5 D between both eyes in the calculation of the dioptre power of the intraocular lens. In case an eye is programmed in which it is impossible to perform a reliable biometry, either due to trauma or due to white or brunescent cataract, the calculation of the intraocular lens could be done taking as a reference the biometry of the contralateral eye.

Assuntos