RESUMO

Abstract Introduction: Living donor kidney transplantation is considered the ideal renal replacement therapy because it has a lower complication rate and allows an efficient response to the high demand for grafts in the healthcare system. Careful selection and adequate monitoring of donors is a key element in transplantation. Individuals at greater risk of developing kidney dysfunction after nephrectomy must be identified. Objective: To identify risk factors associated with a renal compensation rate (CR) below 70% 12 months after nephrectomy. Methods: This observational retrospective longitudinal study included living kidney donors followed up at the Lower Amazon Regional Hospital between 2016 and 2022. Data related to sociodemographic variables, comorbid conditions and kidney function parameters were collected. Results: The study enrolled 32 patients. Fourteen (43.75%) had a CR < 70% 12 months after kidney donation. Logistic regression found obesity (Odds Ratio [95%CI]: 10.6 [1.7-65.2]), albuminuria (Odds Ratio [95%CI]: 2.41 [1.2-4.84]) and proteinuria (Odds Ratio [95%CI]: 1.14 [1.03-1.25]) as risk factors. Glomerular filtration rate was a protective factor (Odds Ratio [95% CI]: 0.92 [0.85-0.99]). Conclusion: Obesity, albuminuria and proteinuria adversely affected short-term renal compensation rate. Further studies are needed to uncover the prognostic implications tied to these risk factors. Our findings also supported the need for careful individualized assessment of potential donors and closer monitoring of individuals at higher risk.

Resumo Introdução: O transplante de rim de doador vivo é considerado a terapia renal substitutiva ideal por oferecer menor taxa de complicações e possibilitar uma resposta eficiente à grande demanda por enxertos no sistema de saúde. A seleção criteriosa e o acompanhamento adequado dos doadores constituem um pilar fundamental dessa modalidade terapêutica, sendo essencial a identificação dos indivíduos em maior risco de disfunção renal pós-nefrectomia. Objetivo: Identificar fatores de risco para uma Taxa de Compensação (TC) da função renal inferior a 70% 12 meses após a nefrectomia. Métodos: Estudo observacional, retrospectivo e longitudinal conduzido com doadores de rim vivo acompanhados no Hospital Regional do Baixo Amazonas entre 2016 e 2022. Foram coletados dados correspondentes a variáveis sociodemográficas, comorbidades e parâmetros de função renal. Resultados: Foram incluídos 32 pacientes na amostra final. Destes, 14 (43,75%) obtiveram TC < 70% 12 meses após a doação. A regressão logística identificou a obesidade (Odds Ratio [IC95%]: 10.6 [1.7-65.2]), albuminúria (Odds Ratio [IC95%]: 2.41 [1.2-4.84]) e proteinúria (Odds Ratio [IC95%]: 1.14 [1.03-1.25]) como fatores de risco. A taxa de filtração glomerular atuou como fator de proteção (Odds Ratio [IC95%]: 0.92 [0.85-0.99]). Conclusão: Obesidade, albuminúria e proteinúria demonstraram impacto negativo na taxa de compensação renal em curto prazo, o que reitera a necessidade de estudos acerca das implicações prognósticas desses fatores. Além disso, reforça-se a necessidade de avaliação cuidadosa e individualizada dos possíveis doadores, com acompanhamento rigoroso, especialmente para indivíduos de maior risco.

RESUMO

Introduction: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC) is the liver's second most common neoplasm. Until now, surgery is the only curative option, but only 35% of the cases are considered resectable at the diagnosis, with a post-resection survival of around 30%. Advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative care related to liver transplantation (LT) have facilitated the expansion of indications for hepatic neoplasms. Method: This study is a comprehensive review of the global experience in living donor LT (LDLT) for treating iCC and describes our first case of LDLT for an unresectable iCC. Results: While exploring LT for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma dates to the 1990s, the initial outcomes were discouraging, marked by poor survival and high recurrence rates. Nevertheless, contemporary perspectives underscore a reinvigorated emphasis on extending the frontiers of LT indications within the context of the "oncologic era." The insights gleaned from examining explants, wherein incidental iCC was categorized as hepatocellular carcinoma in the preoperative period, have demonstrated comparable survival rates to small hepatocellular carcinoma. These findings substantiate the potential viability of LT as a curative alternative for iCC. Another investigated scenario pertains to "unresectable tumors with favorable biological behavior," LT presents a theoretical advantage by providing free margins without the concern of a small future liver remnant. The constraint of organ shortage persists, particularly in nations with low donation rates. LDLT emerges as a viable and secure alternative for treating iCC. Conclusion: LDLT is an excellent option for augmenting the graft pool, particularly in carefully selected patients.

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The finding of an asymptomatic stone in the study of a living kidney donor does not necessarily contraindicate donation, however, there is no consensus on the management of these cases. The use of a graft with lithiasis may represent a risk of recurrence in the remaining kidney in the donor and eventual obstructive complications in the transplanted kidney. The objective of this work is to present the usefulness of ureteroscopy (URS) to resolve lithiasis ex vivo before transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Donors with a small, asymptomatic kidney stone and with an analysis of lithogenic factors without relevant findings were considered to continue in the donation process. The kidney unit with stone was selected for nephrectomy. RESULTS: Four donor kidneys underwent flexible URS after nephrectomy under hypothermic preservation conditions during bench preparation. The average time of the procedure was 35 minutes and the stone was extracted in all cases without incident. The transplant was carried out in the usual way and the evolution of the recipients was without complications and with excellent renal function. During follow-up, no recurrence of lithiasis was observed in donors or recipients. CONCLUSIONS: In this experience, the URS of the donor kidney was a feasible procedure and was not associated with adverse consequences for the graft. The main advantage of this procedure is to avoid the potential risk to the recipient of an obstructive graft complication.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Complete surgical resection is the treatment of choice for patients with liver metastases, but in some patients, it is not possible to obtain a complete R0 resection. Moreover, the recurrence rate is up to 75% after three years. After the experience of the Oslo group with cadaveric liver transplant, some centers are starting their experience with liver transplant for colorectal liver metastasis. AIMS: To present our initial experience with living donor liver transplant for colorectal liver metastasis. METHODS: From 2019 to 2022, four liver transplants were performed in patients with colorectal liver metastases according to the Oslo criteria. RESULTS: Four patients underwent living donor liver transplants, male/female ratio was 3:1, mean age 52.5 (42-68 years). All patients were included in Oslo criteria for liver transplant. Two patients had already been submitted to liver resection. The decision for liver transplant occurred after discussion with a multidisciplinary team. Three patients recurred after the procedure and the patient number 3 died after chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Living donor liver transplant is a viable treatment option for colorectal liver metastasis in Brazil, due to a shortage of donors.

RESUMO RACIONAL: A ressecção cirúrgica completa é o tratamento de escolha para pacientes com metástases hepáticas, mas em alguns pacientes não é possível obter uma completa ressecção R0. Além disso, a taxa de recorrência é de até 75% após 3 anos. Após a experiência do grupo de Oslo com transplante hepático cadavérico, alguns centros estão iniciando sua experiência com transplante hepático para metástase hepática colorretal. OBJETIVOS: Apresentar a experiência inicial com transplante de fígado de doador vivo para metástase hepática colorretal. MÉTODOS: De 2019 a 2022, foram quatro transplantes hepáticos em pacientes com metástases hepáticas colorretais, de acordo com os critérios de Oslo. RESULTADOS: Quatro pacientes foram submetidos a transplante hepático de doador vivo, a relação homem/mulher de 3:1, a idade média foi de 52,5 (42-68 anos). Todos os pacientes foram incluídos nos critérios de Oslo para transplante de fígado. Dois pacientes já haviam sido submetidos à ressecção hepática. A decisão pelo transplante hepático ocorreu após discussão com equipe multidisciplinar. Três pacientes recidivaram após o procedimento e o paciente número 3 morreu após a quimioterapia. CONCLUSÕES: O transplante de fígado com doador vivo é uma opção viável de tratamento para metástase hepática colorretal no Brasil, devido à escassez de doadores.

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective To describe the radiological characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions that achieved a complete response following drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) preceding liver transplantation. Methods This single-center case-control study enrolled patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant DEB-TACE therapy, were followed up with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography, and were successively evaluated according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The HCCs were divided into two groups based on their diameter (Group A: ≤3cm; Group B: 3cm). Viability was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method according to tumor size categories. The relationship between tumor variables was analyzed using bivariate Cox regression. Results Three-hundred and twenty-eight patients with 667 hepatocellular carcinomas who underwent their first DEB-TACE session were enrolled. A total of 105 hepatocellular carcinomas in 59 patients exhibited complete response after the initial DEB-TACE session and were divided into Group A (92 HCCs) and Group B (13 HCCs). The diameter in Group A decreased significantly compared to the pre-procedure size until the second assessment (p<0.001), with no subsequent reduction in diameter, despite maintaining a complete response. In Group B, the reduction in diameter remained significant compared with the initial value until the sixth imaging evaluation (p=0.014). The average reduction was 45.1% for Group B and a maximum of 14.9% in Group A. Conclusion HCCs >3cm exhibited a greater reduction in size and a longer time to recurrence. HCCs ≤3cm had a shorter relapse time. The recurrence rates were similar. These findings may aid in planning for liver transplantation.

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction: Sensitization to human leukocyte antigen is a barrier to. Few data have been published on desensitization using polyvalent human intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) alone. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the of 45 patients with a positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) or flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) against living donors from January 2003 to December 2014. Of these, 12 were excluded. Patients received monthly IVIG infusions (2 g/kg) only until they had a negative T-cell and B-cell FCXM. Results: During the 33 patients, 22 (66.7%) underwent living donor kidney transplantation, 7 (21.2%) received a deceased donor graft, and 4 (12.1%) did not undergo transplantation. The median class I and II panel reactive antibodies for these patients were 80.5% (range 61%-95%) and 83.0% (range 42%-94%), respectively. Patients (81.8%) had a positive T-cell and/or B-cell CDCXM and 4 (18.2%) had a positive T-cell and/or B-cell FCXM. Patients underwent transplantation after a median of 6 (range 3-16). The median donor-specific antibody mean fluorescence intensity sum was 5057 (range 2246-11,691) before and 1389 (range 934-2492) after desensitization (p = 0.0001). Mean patient follow-up time after transplantation was 60.5 (SD, 36.8) months. Nine patients (45.0%). Death-censored graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years after transplant was 86.4, 86.4, and 79.2%, respectively and patient survival was 95.5, 95.5, and 83.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Desensitization using IVIG alone is an effective strategy, allowing successful transplantation in 87.9% of these highly sensitized patients.

Resumo Introdução: Sensibilização HLA é uma barreira ao transplante em pacientes sensibilizados. Há poucos dados publicados sobre dessensibilização utilizando somente imunoglobulina intravenosa humana polivalente (IgIV). Métodos: Revisamos retrospectivamente prontuários de 45 pacientes com prova cruzada positiva por citotoxicidade dependente do complemento (CDCXM) ou citometria de fluxo (FCXM) contra doadores vivos, de Janeiro/2003-Dezembro/2014. Destes, excluímos 12. 33 pacientes receberam infusões mensais de IgIV (2 g/kg) apenas até apresentarem FCXM células T e B negativa. Resultados: Durante dessensibilização, 22 pacientes (66,7%) realizaram transplante renal com doador vivo, 7 (21,2%) receberam enxerto de doador falecido, 4 (12,1%) não realizaram transplante. A mediana do painel de reatividade de anticorpos classes I e II para estes pacientes foi 80,5% (intervalo 61%-95%) e 83,0% (intervalo 42%-94%), respectivamente. 18 pacientes (81,8%) apresentaram CDCXM célula T e/ou B positiva; 4 (18,2%) apresentaram FCXM célula T e/ou B positiva. Pacientes realizaram transplante após mediana de 6 (intervalo 3-16) infusões. A mediana da somatória da intensidade média de fluorescência do anticorpo específico contra o doador foi 5057 (intervalo 2246-11.691) antes e 1389 (intervalo 934-2492) após dessensibilização (p = 0,0001). O tempo médio de acompanhamento do paciente pós transplante foi 60,5 (DP, 36,8) meses. Nove pacientes (45,0%) não apresentaram rejeição e 6 (27,3%) apresentaram rejeição mediada por anticorpos. Sobrevida do enxerto censurada para óbito em 1, 3, 5 anos após transplante foi 86,4; 86,4; 79,2%, respectivamente, e sobrevida do paciente foi 95,5; 95,5; 83,7%, respectivamente. Conclusões: Dessensibilização utilizando apenas IgIV é uma estratégia eficaz, permitindo transplante bem-sucedido em 87,9% destes pacientes altamente sensibilizados.

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction: Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best treatment for chronic kidney disease. In Brazil, there are currently more than 26 thousand patients on the waitlist. Kidney Paired Donation (KPD) offers an incompatible donor-recipient pair the possibility to exchange with another pair in the same situation, it is a strategy to raise the number of KT. Discussion: KPD ceased being merely an idea over 20 years ago. It currently accounts for 16.2% of living donors KT (LDKT) in the USA and 8% in Europe. The results are similar to other LDKT. It is a promising alternative especially for highly sensitized recipients, who tend to accumulate on the waitlist. KPD is not limited to developed countries, as excellent results were already published in India in 2014. In Guatemala, the first LDKT through KPD was performed in 2011. However, the practice remains limited to isolated cases in Latin America. Conclusion: KPD programs with different dimensions, acceptance rules and allocation criteria are being developed and expanded worldwide to meet the demands of patients. The rise in transplantability brought about by KPD mostly meets the needs of highly sensitized patients. The Brazilian transplant program is mature enough to accept the challenge of starting its KPD program, intended primarily to benefit patients who have a low probability of receiving a transplant from a deceased donor.

Resumo Introdução: O transplante renal (TxR) é sabidamente o melhor tratamento para doença renal crônica. No Brasil, mais de 26 mil pacientes aguardam em lista atualmente. A doação renal pareada (DRP) oferece a um par de doador/receptor incompatível a possibilidade de trocar com outro par na mesma situação, representando uma estratégia para aumentar o número de TxR. Discussão: A DRP deixou de ser apenas uma ideia há mais de 20 anos. Atualmente é responsável por 16,2% dos TxR com doador vivo (TxRDV) nos EUA e 8% na Europa. Os resultados são semelhantes a outros TxRDV. Essa modalidade representa uma alternativa promissora, especialmente para os receptores hipersensibilizados que tendem a se acumular em lista de espera. A DRP não está limitada a países desenvolvidos. Em 2014, a Índia já publicava excelentes resultados. Na Guatemala, o primeiro TxRDV através de DRP aconteceu em 2011. Porém, a prática permanece limitada a casos isolados na América Latina. Conclusão: Programas de DRP com diferentes dimensões, regras para aceitação e critérios para alocação estão sendo desenvolvidos e expandidos mundialmente com o objetivo de atender às demandas dos pacientes. O aumento na capacidade de transplantar trazido pela DRP vem ao encontro especialmente das necessidades dos pacientes hipersensibilizados. O programa de TxR brasileiro tem maturidade para assumir o desafio de iniciar o programa de DRP, com o objetivo de beneficiar principalmente seus pacientes que estão em maior desvantagem por apresentarem baixas chances de transplante com doadores falecidos.

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction: Few studies have investigated pre-donation factors that could affect renal recovery after living kidney donation (LKD). We retrospectively investigated the role of John Cunningham virus (JCV) infection and other pre-donation factors on the magnitude of kidney function decline after LKD. Methods: Urine JCV viral loads, glomerular filtration rate, and blood pressure were evaluated in 60 consecutive LK donors before donation. Suboptimal compensatory hypertrophy was defined as an eGFR <60% of the pre-donation eGFR. Results: LKD (40% JCV infected) were followed for 3.2±1.6 years. No association was found between age, gender, and baseline hypertension with 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th years post-donation eGFR <60% of the pre-donation eGFR. Mean eGFR recovery at the 3rd year after donation was lower in JCV infected donors vs non-infected donors (61.8% vs 71.0%, p=0.006). Conclusion: We hypothesized that JCV could shift glomeruli into a hyperfiltration state before nephrectomy, modulating the magnitude of compensatory hypertrophy after donation. Conversely, JCV might curtail the ability of the remaining kidney to promote hyperfiltration. Longer follow up is needed to determine whether JCV viruria ultimately leads to lower eGFR over time or if it is a protective factor for the remaining kidney.

Resumo Introdução Poucos estudos investigaram fatores anteriores à doação que poderiam afetar a recuperação renal após doação renal de doador vivo (LKD, do inglês Living Kidney Donation). Investigamos retrospectivamente o papel da infecção pelo vírus John Cunningham (JCV) e outros fatores de risco pré-doação na magnitude do declínio da função renal após LKD. Métodos: Cargas virais de JCV na urina, taxa de filtração glomerular e pressão arterial foram avaliadas consecutivamente em 60 doadores renais vivos antes da doação. Hipertrofia compensatória subótima foi definida como uma TFGe <60% da TFGe pré-doação. Resultados: LKD (40% infectados pelo JCV) foram acompanhados por 3,2±1,6 anos. Não foi encontrada nenhuma associação entre idade, sexo e hipertensão basal com a TFGe pós-doação no 1º, 2º, 3º e 4º anos <60% da TFGe pré-doação. A recuperação média da TFGe no 3º ano após a doação foi menor em doadores infectados pelo JCV vs doadores não infectados (61,8% vs 71,0%, p=0,006). Conclusão: Levantamos a hipótese de que o JCV pode levar os glomérulos a um estado de hiperfiltração antes da nefrectomia, modulando a magnitude da hipertrofia compensatória após a doação. Por outro lado, o JCV pode limitar a capacidade do rim remanescente de promover a hiperfiltração. É necessário um acompanhamento mais longo para determinar se a virúria por JCV leva, em última instância, a uma menor TFGe ao longo do tempo ou se é um fator de proteção para o rim remanescente.

RESUMO

Abstract The growing demand for transplant kidneys requires strategies to increase organ supply and avoid long waiting periods on the list. The increase in the number of transplants from living donors involves the growth in the use of unrelated donors and paired kidney donation. Most of these transplants are performed in the USA, where they already represent, respectively, 34% and 16% of total transplants from living donors. In Latin America, and especially in Brazil, there is no collective enthusiasm for these modalities, either at the request of transplanters or that of the community, with the region's priority being to increase transplants from deceased donors, which growth can be up to three-fold. Concerning transplants from matched donors, the possible conflicting results between donors can generate public challenges and they risk compromise the concepts of equal opportunities for transplant candidates, with the possibility of generating resistance to organ donation, especially in regions with socioeconomic limitations and disparities in access to qualified health care and education. This donation model involves challenging ethical and logistical issues, which are subject to questionings, starting with an act of exchange between two pairs until reaching embarrassing proposals, which can compromise the altruistic character of organ donation, and thus not be universally incorporated.

Resumo A demanda crescente por rins para transplante requer estratégias para aumentar a oferta de órgãos e evitar longos períodos de espera em lista. O aumento no número de transplantes com doador vivo envolve o crescimento da utilização de doadores não aparentados e a doação renal pareada. A maior parte desses transplantes são realizados nos EUA, onde já representam, respectivamente, 34% e 16% do total de transplantes com doador vivo. Na América Latina, e especialmente no Brasil, não existe entusiasmo coletivo por essas modalidades, quer por demanda dos transplantadores ou da comunidade, sendo prioridade da região incrementar o transplante com doador falecido, cujo crescimento pode ser de até três vezes. Na modalidade de transplantes com doadores pareados, os possíveis resultados conflitantes entre doadores podem gerar questionamentos públicos e riscos que comprometem os conceitos de equidade de oportunidades para os candidatos a transplante, com possibilidade de gerar resistência à doação de órgãos, especialmente em regiões com limitações socioeconômicas e disparidades de acesso aos atendimentos de saúde e educação qualificados. Esse modelo de doação envolve questões éticas e logísticas desafiadoras, que estão sujeitas a questionamentos, começando por um ato de troca entre dois pares até alcançar propostas constrangedoras, o que pode comprometer o caráter altruístico da doação de órgãos, e assim não ser universalmente incorporado.

RESUMO

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical, laboratory, and donation-specific outcomes of living kidney donors 6 years after donation. METHODS: We included a total of 93 kidney donors and 54 age- and sex-matched individuals as control group through a type 2 cohort consecutive recruitment. We detected kidney function abnormalities and the presence of hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular events during the 6 years follow-up period. RESULTS: The mean serum creatinine levels were higher (p<0.001), and the estimated glomerular filtration rate levels were lower (p<0.001) in living kidney donors 6 years after donation when compared with controls. The protein/creatinine ratio of the study population was also higher (p=0.014). There was no difference in outcomes between the groups for end-stage kidney disease and cardiovascular mortality. A higher rate of new-onset hypertension (6.4 vs. 32.9%), diabetes mellitus (0.0 vs. 4.3%), chronic kidney disease (0.0 vs. 2.1%), and cardiovascular disease (0.0 vs. 2.1%) was demonstrated among donors 6 years after donation (p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our data have demonstrated that the reduction in Glomerular filtration rate induced by kidney donation might cause an increase in adverse renal and cardiovascular events.