RESUMO

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies on migraine with aura are challenging due to the rarity of patients with triggered cases. This study optimized methodologies to explore differences in ictal and interictal spatiotemporal activation patterns based on visual stimuli using fMRI in two patients with unique aura triggers. Both patients underwent separate fMRI sessions during the ictal and interictal periods. The Gaussian Process Classifier (GPC) was used to differentiate these periods by employing a machine learning temporal embedding approach and spatiotemporal activation patterns based on visual stimuli. When restricted to visual and occipital regions, GPC had an improved performance, with accuracy rates for patients A and B of roughly 86-90% and 77-81%, respectively (p < 0.01). The algorithm effectively differentiated visual stimulation and rest periods and identified times when aura symptoms manifested, as evident from the varying predicted probabilities in the GPC models. These findings contribute to our understanding of the role of visual processing and brain activity patterns in migraine with aura and the significance of temporal embedding techniques in examining aura phenomena. This finding has implications for diagnostic tools and therapeutic techniques, especially for patients suffering from aura symptoms.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo : Estimar la frecuencia de migraña, y discapacidad generada en estudiantes de medicina de una universidad privada de Lima Metropolitana. Métodos : Estudio transversal en una muestra no probabilística por conveniencia, mediante la aplicación online del autocuestionario ALCOI-95, para evaluar la presencia de migraña, seguido por el cuestionario MIDAS para medir la discapacidad en los positivos al primer cuestionario. El rendimiento académico fue evaluado mediante el promedio ponderado de sus calificaciones. Resultados : Cuarenticinco (21,6%) de 208 estudiantes experimentaron migraña (12,5% con aura y 9,1% sin aura), 14 (33,3%) de los cuales mostraron discapacidad severa y 12 (28,6%) moderada. Los portadores de migraña con aura tuvieron una media menor del promedio ponderado acumulado de sus calificaciones, comparado con aquellos con migraña sin aura. Los factores independientemente asociados a la migraña fueron tener un miembro de la familia nuclear con migraña y problemas para mantener el sueño. Conclusión : Dos de cada 10 estudiantes presentaron migraña y 1/3 de los afectados experimentó discapacidad severa.

SUMMARY Objective: To estimate the frequency of migraine, associated factors and disability generated (including its relationship with academic performance) in medical students at a private university in Metropolitan Lima. Methods: Cross-sectional study in a non-probabilistic convenience sample using the online application of the ALCOI-95 self-questionnaire, to assess the presence of migraine, followed by the MIDAS questionnaire to measure disability in those positive to the first questionnaire. . Results: Fourty-five (21.6%) of 208 students experienced migraine (12.5% with aura and 9.1% without aura), 14 (33.3%) of whom showed severe, and 12 (28.6%) moderate disability. Migraine with aura carriers had a lower mean than the cumulative weighted average of their academic scores. Independent factors associated with migraine were to have a nuclear family member with migraine, and sleep-maintenance problems. Conclusion: Two out of 10 students had migraine, and one third of them had severe disability.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introduction: Headache is a very common complaint in doctors' offices, with primary causes being the majority in relation to secondary ones. Despite this, the identification of secondary headaches is very relevant in clinical practice, since these can be a life-threatening condition, functionality or even a reversible cause. However, imaging screening for all individuals with headache is costly and unrewarding. Therefore, it is important to know the warning signs that, together with the clinical context, lead to a more precise indication of these exams and early and well-targeted therapeutic interventions. Clinical case: This is a 60-year-old man, previously dyslipidemic and smoker, with migraine with aura reported since childhood, who underwent treatment with sodium valproate, with headache attack suppression. About 4 months before admission, he presented with an alteration in the pain pattern, amaurosis fugax in the right eye, dizziness and mild paresis and hypoesthesia in the left side of the body, primarily treated by him as migraine crises, without improvement with the use of triptans. A new outpatient investigation was carried out, which showed multiple small infarcts in the right hemisphere secondary to atheromatous plaque in the right carotid bulb with an obstruction of approximately 85%. Diagnostic and therapeutic arteriography was performed, with stent implantation, uneventfully. Conclusion: The differential diagnosis between migraine with aura and a cerebrovascular event has already been widely reported in the literature and constitutes a pitfall in the routine of headaches, since a serious and potentially disabling condition can be overlooked. The joint evaluation of the alarm signs with the global context becomes an important tool in the propaedeutics of these patients, with knowledge of this casuistry being something relevant within clinical practice.

Introdução: A cefaleia é uma queixa muito comum nos consultórios médicos, sendo as causas primárias majoritárias em relação às secundárias. Apesar disso, a identificação de cefaleias secundárias é muito relevante na prática clínica, uma vez que estas podem ser uma condição potencialmente fatal, funcional ou mesmo uma causa reversível. No entanto, o rastreio imagiológico para todos os indivíduos com cefaleias é dispendioso e pouco recompensador. Portanto, é importante conhecer os sinais de alerta que, juntamente com o contexto clínico, levam a uma indicação mais precisa destes exames e a intervenções terapêuticas precoces e bem direcionadas. Caso clínico: Trata-se de um homem de 60 anos, previamente dislipidémico e fumador, com queixa de enxaqueca com aura desde a infância, que realizou tratamento com valproato de sódio, com supressão das crises de cefaleia. Cerca de 4 meses antes da internação apresentou alteração do padrão álgico, amaurose fugaz em olho direito, tontura e leve paresia e hipoestesia no lado esquerdo do corpo, tratada por ele primariamente como crises de enxaqueca, sem melhora com o uso de triptanos. Foi realizada nova investigação ambulatorial que evidenciou múltiplos pequenos infartos no hemisfério direito secundários a placa de ateroma no bulbo carotídeo direito com obstrução de aproximadamente 85%. Foi realizada arteriografia diagnóstica e terapêutica, com implante de stent, sem intercorrências. Conclusão: O diagnóstico diferencial entre enxaqueca com aura e evento cerebrovascular já foi amplamente relatado na literatura e constitui uma armadilha na rotina das cefaleias, uma vez que uma condição grave e potencialmente incapacitante pode ser negligenciada. A avaliação conjunta dos sinais de alarme com o contexto global torna-se uma ferramenta importante na propedêutica destes pacientes, sendo o conhecimento desta casuística algo relevante dentro da prática clínica.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the associations of physical activity (PA) levels with migraine subtypes. BACKGROUND: Physical activity has been associated with reduced migraine prevalence, but less is known about its relationship with migraine subtypes and PA levels as recommended by World Health Organization (WHO). METHODS: In this cross-sectional analysis of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil), we estimated the odds ratios (ORs) of migraine with aura (MA) and migraine without aura (MO), compared to participants without headaches, according to PA levels in the leisure time (LTPA), commuting time (CPA), and combined PA domains. RESULTS: In total, 2773 participants provided complete data, 1556/2773 (56.1%) were women, mean (SD) age of 52.3 (9.1) years. In this study's sample, 1370/2773 (49.4%) participants had overall migraine, 480/2773 (17.3%) had MA, and 890/2773 (32.0%) had MO. In the LTPA domain, there were reduced odds of MA (OR 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.96; p = 0.030) and MO (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.90; p = 0.005) in participants who met the WHO PA guidelines after adjustment for confounder variables. In the analyses stratified by intensity, moderate LTPA was associated with reduced odds of MA (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.320-0.99; p = 0.049), while vigorous LTPA was associated with reduced odds of MO (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.395-0.77; p = 0.001). There were no significant associations between migraine subtypes and CPA or combined PA domains. In the whole migraine sample, meeting the WHO PA guidelines in the LTPA (OR 0.275, 95% CI 0.083-0.90; p = 0.034), CPA (OR 0.194, 95% CI 0.064-0.58; p = 0.004), and combined domains (OR 0.115, 95% CI 0.032-0.41; p = 0.001) was associated with reduced odds of daily migraine attack frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Meeting the WHO PA guidelines for LTPA, but not CPA or combined PA domains, is associated with lower migraine occurrence. Moderate LTPA favors MA reduction, while vigorous LTPA favors MO reduction.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a primary headache with high levels of associated disability that can be related to a variety of symptoms and comorbidities. The role of physical therapy in the management of migraine is largely unknown. Therefore, the aim of this review is to highlight and critically discuss the current literature and evidence for physical therapy interventions in individuals with migraines. METHODS: A narrative review of the literature was performed. RESULTS: Physical therapists assessing and treating patients with migraine should focus on two primary aspects: (1) musculoskeletal dysfunctions, and (2) vestibular symptoms/postural control impairment. Signs and symptoms of musculoskeletal and/or vestibular dysfunctions are prevalent among individuals with migraines and different disability levels can be observed depending on the presence of aura or increment of the migraine attacks. CONCLUSION: A proper physical examination and interview of the patients will lead to a tailored treatment plan. The primary aim regarding musculoskeletal dysfunctions is to reduce pain and sensitization, and physical therapy interventions may include a combination of manual therapy, exercise therapy, and education. The aim regarding postural control impairment is to optimize function and reduce vestibular symptoms, and interventions should include balance exercises and vestibular rehabilitation. However, consistent evidence of benefits is still lacking due to the lack of and therefore need for tailored and pragmatic clinical trials with high methodological quality.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introduction: The typical aura without headache is a type of migraine with aura regularly assessed by ophthalmology. It is defined as at least two recurrent attacks, lasting from 5 to 60 minutes, of reversible, visual, sensorial and / or language unilateral neurological symptoms.Methods: We present a case report of a male with typical aura without headache. Results: Male with a history of migraine without aura in adolescence and without vascular risk factors. Referred from ophthalmology by biweekly episodes characterized by central teicopsia that progressively covers the entire visual field in 20 minutes, without being influenced by opening or closing eyes, which disappears after 40 minutes from the beginning. The episodes are not stereotyped, they are not followed by headache, nor do they associate other neurological symptoms. Neurological examination and complementary tests were normal. It is concluded in favor of typical aura without headache and after six months of starting treatment with Lamotrigine there were no recurrences. Final conclusion: The diagnosis of typical aura without headache begins with an adequate anamnesis. Due to the nature of its manifestations it is necessary to differentiate it from other etiologies such as transient ischemic attacks and focal seizures due to the diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic implications. It may appear, as in this case, in patients with migraine without aura. Lamotrigine is an excellent therapeutic option in the typical aura without headache.

Introducción: El aura típica sin cefalea es un tipo de migraña con aura valorada al inicio regularmente por oftalmología. Se define como al menos dos ataques recurrentes, de 5 a 60 minutos de duración, de síntomas neurológicos unilaterales reversibles, visuales, sensoriales y/o lenguaje. Métodos: Presentamos el caso clínico de un varón con aura migrañosa sin cefalea. Resultados: Varón con antecedente de migraña sin aura en la adolescencia y sin factores de riesgo vascular. Remitido desde oftalmología por episodios bisemanales caracterizados por teicopsia central que progresivamente abarca todo el campo visual en 20 minutos, sin influenciarse con la apertura o cierre ocular, que desaparece tras 40 minutos desde el inicio. Los episodios no son estereotipados, no se siguen de cefalea, ni asocian otros síntomas neurológicos. La exploración neurológica y las pruebas complementarias fueron normales. Se concluye a favor de aura típica sin cefalea y tras seis meses de iniciar el tratamiento con Lamotrigina no existieron recurrencias. Conclusión final: El diagnóstico de aura típica sin cefalea inicia con una anamnesis adecuada. Por la naturaleza de sus manifestaciones se hace necesario diferenciarle de otras etiologías como accidentes isquémicos transitorios y crisis epilépticas focales por las implicaciones diagnósticas, terapéuticas y pronósticas. Puede aparecer, como en este caso, en pacientes con migraña sin aura. La lamotrigina es una excelente opción terapéutica en el aura típica sin cefalea.

Assuntos

RESUMO

La migraña con aura en pacientes pediátricos es reportada con frecuencia; el aura típica sin migraña, en raras ocasiones, y el aura persistente asociada al denominado síndrome de Alicia en el País de las Maravillas, excepcionalmente. El objetivo de este reporte es presentar un caso clínico correspondiente a la última variedad mencionada. Se trata de una paciente de 6 años de edad, quien tuvo, al menos, dos episodios con estas características antes de presentar un cuadro clínico completo de aura y, consecutivamente, cefalea con más frecuencia. Los estudios complementarios practicados de manera sistemática a la paciente fueron normales, con mejoría clínica con el tratamiento convencional. Se debe sospechar el síndrome en todo paciente que se presente con las características descritas a fin de aproximarse al diagnóstico de aura sin migraña, descartar patologías orgánicas o de otra naturaleza e instaurar la terapéutica adecuada.

Migraine with aura in children is often reported, typical aura without headache is reported sometimes, but persistent aura and Alice in Wonderland syndrome is exceptionally reported. We present a case corresponding to the last one mentioned in a 6-year-old patient who had at least two episodes with the typical characteristics of aura without migraine before developing more frequently the complete clinical picture of aura and subsequently headache. The complementary studies systematically done to the patient were normal and she improved with conventional therapy. It is important to emphasize that the syndrome should be suspected in any patient who presents the described manifestations in order to approach to the diagnosis of aura without migraine, to discard either organic pathology or another cause and to indicate adequate therapeutic measures.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Migraine with aura in children is often reported, typical aura without headache is reported sometimes, but persistent aura and Alice in Wonderland syndrome is exceptionally reported. We present a case corresponding to the last one mentioned in a 6-year-old patient who had at least two episodes with the typical characteristics of aura without migraine before developing more frequently the complete clinical picture of aura and subsequently headache. The complementary studies systematically done to the patient were normal and she improved with conventional therapy.It is important to emphasize that the syndrome should be suspected in any patient who presents the described manifestations in order to approach to the diagnosis of aura without migraine, to discard either organic pathology or another cause and to indicate adequate therapeutic measures.

La migraña con aura en pacientes pediátricos es reportada con frecuencia; el aura típica sin migraña, en raras ocasiones, y el aura persistente asociada al denominado síndrome de Alicia en el País de las Maravillas, excepcionalmente.El objetivo de este reporte es presentar un caso clínico correspondiente a la última variedad mencionada. Se trata de una paciente de 6 años de edad, quien tuvo, al menos, dos episodios con estas características antes de presentar un cuadro clínico completo de aura y, consecutivamente, cefalea con más frecuencia. Los estudios complementarios practicados de manera sistemática a la paciente fueron normales, con mejoría clínica con el tratamiento convencional.Se debe sospechar el síndrome en todo paciente que se presente con las características descritas a fin de aproximarse al diagnóstico de aura sin migraña, descartar patologías orgánicas o de otra naturaleza e instaurar la terapéutica adecuada.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the presence and handicap due to vestibular symptoms in three subgroups of patients with migraine and controls. METHODS: Women between 18-55 years old were diagnosed by headache specialists and stratified as migraine with aura (n = 60), migraine without aura (n = 60), chronic migraine (n = 60) and controls (n = 60). Information regarding demographics, headache and vestibular symptoms were collected in this cross-sectional study. The self-perceived handicap related to vestibular symptoms was assessed through the Dizziness Handicap Inventory questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 85% of women with migraine with aura and chronic migraine had vestibular symptoms contrasted to 70% of the migraine without aura group ( p < 0.05), and 12% of the control group reported symptoms ( p < 0.0001). Patients with migraine exhibited greater Dizziness Handicap Inventory scores than controls ( p < 0.001); and migraine with aura and chronic migraine groups reached greater scores than migraine without aura ( p < 0.01). Presence of migraine is associated with a greater risk of vestibular symptoms (migraine without aura: 5.20, migraine with aura: 6.60, chronic migraine:6.20, p < 0.0003) and with a greater risk of moderate-to-severe handicap (migraine without aura: 20.0, migraine with aura: 40.0, chronic migraine: 40.0, p < 0.0003). The presence of aura and greater migraine frequency adds to the risk of any handicap (migraine with aura: 1.9, chronic migraine: 1.7, p < 0.04) and to the risk of moderate-to-severe handicap (migraine with aura: 2.0, chronic migraine: 2.0, p < 0.0003). Migraine aura, intensity and frequency predict 36% of the dizziness handicap. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of vestibular symptoms is increased in migraine during and between headache attacks, particularly in migraine with aura and chronic migraine along with an increased handicap due to those symptoms. Vestibular symptoms among subgroups of migraine should be considered when evaluating the functional impact of migraine.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Migraine and cerebrovascular diseases are disabling disorders, which are possibly closely interrelated. Heterogeneous and scattered evidence in literature remains a challenge. We searched for systematic reviews including diverse cerebrovascular events in migraineurs and reported relevant original studies to update the evidence when necessary. The studies show that migraine is associated with increased risk of transient ischemic attacks, any stroke, and possibly hemorrhagic stroke. In addition, migraine with aura increases the risk of ischemic stroke and white matter abnormalities. Migraine without aura increases the risk of cervical artery dissection as a cause of ischemic stroke. Groups with specific risk profiles are women, young people, smokers, and oral contraceptive users. The pathophysiology of the association remains uncertain. However, genetic and environmental factors may be involved in intricate mechanisms responsible for oxidative stress, vascular dysfunction and, ultimately, vascular events. In conclusion, migraine is a potential risk factor for cerebrovascular diseases. Migraineurs should be carefully evaluated considering their vascular risk assessment based on current evidence, so that healthcare professionals can provide appropriate and individualized management of other cardiovascular risk factors, notably quitting smoking and restricting use of oral contraceptives.

Assuntos