RESUMO

Pioglitazone, an agonist at peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, is FDA-approved for the treatment of insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. Numerous studies in male rodents suggest that pioglitazone inhibits inflammatory and neuropathic pain, but few included female subjects. To address this gap, we compared the effects of pioglitazone in both sexes in the intraplantar methylglyoxal model (MG) model of chemical pain and painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN), the plantar incision model (PIM) of postoperative pain, the spared nerve injury (SNI) model of traumatic nerve injury, and the ZDF rat and db/db mouse models of PDN. We administered pioglitazone by one-time intrathecal or intraperitoneal injection or by adding it to chow for 6 weeks, followed by measurement of hypersensitivity to non-noxious mechanical, noxious mechanical, heat, and/or cold stimuli. In all mouse models, injection of pioglitazone decreased pain-like behaviors with greater potency and/or efficacy in females as compared to males: heat and mechanical hypersensitivity in the MG model (0.1-10 mg/kg); mechanical hypersensitivity in the PIM model (10 µg); mechanical and cold hypersensitivity in the SNI model (100 mg/kg); and heat hypersensitivity in the db/db model (100 mg/kg). Furthermore, co-administration of low doses of morphine (1 mg/kg) and pioglitazone (10 mg/kg) decreased SNI-induced mechanical and cold hypersensitivity in female but not male mice. In the ZDF rat, pioglitazone (100 mg/kg) decreased heat and mechanical hypersensitivity with no sex difference. In the db/db model, pioglitazone had no effect when given into chow for 6 weeks at 0.3, 3 or 30 mg/kg doses. We conclude that females exhibit greater anti-hyperalgesic responses to pioglitazone in mouse models of chemical-induced nociception, postsurgical pain, neuropathic pain, and PDN. These findings set the stage for clinical trials to determine whether pioglitazone has analgesic properties across a broad spectrum of chronic pain conditions, particularly in women.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Previous data indicate that the diabetogenic substance streptozotocin might act in nociceptive neurons changing the sensory signal, regardless of hyperglycemia. In the present article the effects of streptozotocin were compared with another diabetogenic drug, alloxan, for diabetes induction in rats. A possible direct effect of these drugs was tested by means of in vivo experiments and in vitro assays using cultured primary nociceptive neurons. Streptozotocin (17.5 and 35 mg/kg), alloxan (15 and 30 mg/kg) or vehicle were injected in adult male rats and the animal groups were separated according to glycemic levels. Body mass, glycemia and paw mechanical sensitivity were evaluated for 5 weeks. Streptozotocin caused an increase in mechanical sensitivity in both hyperglycemic and normoglycemic rats, while alloxan induced mechanical sensitization only in hyperglycemic animals. Injection of both substances induced local inflammation at rat paws; however, only streptozotocin caused significant mechanical sensitization when injected near to sensory neurons at the dorsal root ganglia. Also, streptozotocin treatment induced a reduction in intracellular calcium levels and inhibited capsaicin induced calcium transients and membrane depolarization. Alloxan did not affect calcium levels or membrane potential in primary nociceptive neurons. These findings suggest that alloxan might be a better option for animal studies regarding painful diabetic neuropathy as streptozotocin directly affects nociceptive neurons, probably by modulating TRPV1 channel activation.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine whether dietary supplementation with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) reduces neuropathic pain symptoms in Mexican-Americans with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Forty volunteers with type 2 diabetes enrolled in the "En Balance-PLUS" program, which provided weekly nutrition-diabetes education and daily supplementation with 1,000 mg docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-200 mg eicosapentaenoic acid over 3 months. The study assessed self-reported neuropathic pain symptoms pre/postintervention using the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), monitored clinical laboratory values at baseline and 3 months, and performed baseline and 3-month metabolomic analysis of plasma samples. RESULTS: A total of 26 participants self-reported neuropathic pain symptoms at baseline. After 3 months of omega-3 PUFA supplementation, participants reported significant improvement in SF-MPQ scores (sensory, affective, and visual analogue scale; P<0.001, P=0.012, and P<0.001, respectively). Untargeted metabolomic analysis revealed that participants in the moderate-high SF-MPQ group had the highest relative plasma sphingosine levels at baseline compared to the low SF-MPQ group (P=0.0127) and the nonpain group (P=0.0444). Omega-3 PUFA supplementation increased plasma DHA and reduced plasma sphingosine levels in participants reporting neuropathic pain symptoms (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). Increased plasma DHA levels significantly correlated with improved SF-MPQ sensory scores (r=0.425, P=0.030). Improved SF-MPQ scores, however, did not correlate with clinical/laboratory parameters. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that omega-3 PUFAs dietary supplementation may reduce neuropathic pain symptoms in individuals with type 2 diabetes and correlates with sphingosine levels in the plasma.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a serious, polymorphic, and prevalent complication of diabetes mellitus. Most PDN treatment guidelines recommend a selection of drugs based on patient comorbidities. Despite the large numbers of medications available, most randomized clinical trials (RCTs) conducted so far have yielded unsatisfactory outcomes. Therefore, treatment may require a personalized approach based on pain phenotype or comorbidities. METHODS: To evaluate whether or not a patient's pain phenotype or comorbidities can influence the response to a specific PDN treatment, we conducted a systematic review using two different approaches: pain phenotype and associated comorbidities-based treatment. RESULTS: Out of 45 identified papers, 7 were thoroughly reviewed. We found four RCTs stratified according to pain phenotype with three main results: (1) paroxysmal pain had a better response to pregabalin; (2) the preservation of thermal sensation or nociception anticipated a positive response to the topical treatment of pain; and, (3) after a failure to duloxetine (60 mg/day), the patients with evoked pain or severe deep pain had a better response to association of duloxetine/pregabalin while those with paresthesia/dysesthesia benefited from duloxetine monotherapy (120 mg/day). By contrast, the other three papers provided weak and even contradictory evidence about PDN treatment based on comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Although more studies are needed to provide an adequate recommendation for clinical practice, our systematic review has provided some evidence that PDN phenotyping may optimize clinical outcomes and could, in the future, lead to both less empirical medicine and more personalized pain therapeutics.

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy affects 40-50% of patients with diabetic neuropathy, leading to impaired quality of life and substantial costs. Duloxetine and pregabalin have evidence-based support, and are formally approved for controlling painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. METHODS: We used a 12-week decision model for examining painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy first-line therapy with daily doses of duloxetine 60mg or pregabalin 300mg, under the perspective of the Instituto Venezolano de los Seguros Sociales. We gathered model parameters from published literature and expert´s opinion, focusing on the magnitude of pain relief, the presence of adverse events, the possibility of withdrawal owing to intolerable adverse events or due to lack of efficacy, and the quality-adjusted life years expected in each strategy. We analyzed direct medical costs (which are expressed in Bolívares Fuertes, BsF) comprising drug acquisition besides additional care devoted to treatment of adverse events and poor pain relief. We conducted both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Total expected costs per 1000 patients were BsF 1 046 146 (26%) lower with duloxetine than with pregabalin. Most of these savings (91%) corresponds to the difference in the acquisition’s cost of each medication. duloxetine also provided 23 more patients achieving good pain relief and a gain of about two quality-adjusted life years per 1000 treated. Model was robust to plausible changes in main parameters. Duloxetine remained the preferred option in 93.9% of the second-order Monte Carlo simulations. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests duloxetine dominates (i.e., is more effective and lead to gains in quality-adjusted life years), remaining less costly than pregabalin for treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

INTRODUCCIÓN : La neuropatía diabética periférica dolorosa (NDPD) afecta a 40-50% de los pacientes con neuropatía diabética y se asocia con un deterioro significativo de la calidad de vida y con costos de magnitud considerable. Tanto duloxetina (DUL) como pregabalina (PGB) cuentan con sustento científico basado en evidencias y han sido formalmente aprobados para controlar la NDPD. MÉTODOS: Se utilizó un modelo de decisión a 12 semanas para examinar el tratamiento de primera línea para la neuropatía diabética periférica dolorosa, con dosis diarias de duloxetina 60 mg o con pregabalina 300 mg, bajo la perspectiva del Instituto Venezolano de los Seguros Sociales. Los parámetros del modelo proceden de literatura publicada y opinión de expertos, enfocándose en la magnitud del alivio del dolor, la presencia de eventos adversos, la posibilidad de abandono debido a eventos adversos intolerables o por falta de eficacia y en los años de vida ajustados por calidad esperados con cada estrategia. Se analizaron los costos médicos directos (expresados en bolívares fuertes), integrados por la adquisición de medicamentos, además del cuidado adicional que se origina por el tratamiento de los eventos adversos y como consecuencia de un pobre alivio del dolor. Se llevaron a cabo análisis de sensibilidad de tipo determinístico y probabilístico. RESULTADOS: Los costos totales esperados por cada 1000 pacientes fueron de 1 046 146 bolívares fuertes (26%) más bajos con duloxetina en comparación con la pregabalina. La mayor parte de estos ahorros (91%), corresponde a la diferencia en el costo de adquisición entre ambos medicamentos. La duloxetina también se asoció con ganancias de 23 pacientes que lograron un buen alivio del dolor y de dos años de vida ajustados por calidad por cada 1000 tratados. El modelo se mantuvo robusto ante cambios plausibles en sus parámetros principales. La duloxetina continuó siendo la opción preferida en 93,9% de las simulaciones de Monte Carlo de segundo orden generadas. CONCLUSIONES: El presente estudio sugiere que la duloxetina domina a (es más efectiva, conduce a ganancias en años de vida ajustados por calidad y es menos costosa que) la pregabalina, para el tratamiento de la neuropatía diabética periférica dolorosa.

Assuntos