Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent ; 16(Suppl 1): S27-S32, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37663206

RESUMO

Aim: This study evaluated the short-term clinical and microbiological performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RM-GIC) cement containing chlorhexidine (CHX) for atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in primary teeth. Materials and methods: The clinical trial was conducted in 36 children that received ART in primary molars either with GIC (group I, n = 18) or GIC containing 1.25% CHX (group II, n = 18). The survival rate of restorations was checked 7 days, 3, and 6 months after their application when saliva and biofilm were collected for microbiological assessment of mutans streptococci (MS) counts. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis/Mann-Whitney U tests for clinical analysis and microbiological evaluations (p < 0.05). Results: The survival rate of restorations was similar comparing groups I with II. Microbiological analysis showed a significant reduction in MS levels 7 days after the treatment in both saliva and biofilm of children treated with RM-GIC containing CHX (group II); however, MS counts at 3 and 6 months did not differ from the initial counts. Conclusion: A total of 1.25% CHX improved the microbiological properties of GIC in the short term without impairing the clinical performance of ART restorations. Clinical significance: Glass ionomer cement (GIC) containing CHX could be an alternative in ART procedures with the objective of promoting an additional antimicrobial effect, which is interesting for children with high counts of MS during the initial phase of adaptation to dental treatment. How to cite this article: da Silva ME, de Sena MD, Colombo NH, et al. Short-term Clinical and Microbiological Performance of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement Containing Chlorhexidine for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(S-1):S27-S32.

2.
J. appl. oral sci ; 28: e20190042, 2020. graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO - Odontologia | ID: biblio-1056592

RESUMO

Abstract Gap formation of composite resin restorations is a serious shortcoming in clinical practice. Polymerization shrinkage stress exceeds the tooth-restoration bond strength, and it causes bacterial infiltration within gaps between cavity walls and the restorative material. Thus, an intermediate liner application with a low elastic modulus has been advised to minimize polymerization shrinkage as well as gap formation. Objective: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess gap formation volume in premolars restored with different bulk-fill composites, with and without a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) liner, using x-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Methodology: Sixty extracted human maxillary premolars were divided into six groups according to bucco-palatal dimensions (n=10). Standardized Class II mesio-occluso-distal cavities were prepared. G-Premio Bond (GC Corp., Japan) was applied in the selective-etch mode. Teeth were restored with high-viscosity (Filtek Bulk Fill, 3M ESPE, USA)-FB, sonic-activated (SonicFill 2, Kerr, USA)-SF and low viscosity (Estelite Bulk Fill Flow, Tokuyama, Japan)-EB bulk-fill composites, with and without a liner (Ionoseal, Voco GmbH, Germany)-L. The specimens were subjected to 10,000 thermocycles (5-55°C) and 50,000 simulated chewing cycles (100 N). Gap formation based on the volume of black spaces at the tooth-restoration interface was quantified in mm3 using micro-computed tomography (SkyScan, Belgium), and analyses were performed. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA and the Bonferroni correction test (p < 0.05). Results: The gap volume of all tested bulk-fill composites demonstrated that Group SF (1.581±0.773) had significantly higher values than Group EB (0.717±0.679). Regarding the use of a liner, a significant reduction in gap formation volume was observed only in Group SFL (0.927±0.630) compared with Group SF (1.581±0.773). Conclusion: It can be concluded that different types of bulk-fill composite resins affected gap formation volume. Low-viscosity bulk-fill composites exhibited better adaptation to cavity walls and less gap formation than did sonic-activated bulk-fill composites. The use of an RMGIC liner produced a significant reduction in gap formation volume for sonic-activated bulk-fill composites.


Assuntos
Humanos , Resinas Compostas/química , Imageamento Tridimensional/métodos , Preparo da Cavidade Dentária/métodos , Materiais Dentários/química , Restauração Dentária Permanente/métodos , Polimerização , Técnicas In Vitro , Teste de Materiais , Cimentos de Resina , Análise do Estresse Dentário , Microtomografia por Raio-X
3.
Clin Oral Investig ; 22(9): 3171-3177, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29524027

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the caries-preventive effect and the retention rates of sealants prepared with a new modified and a high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (GIC) in recently erupted first permanent molars.  MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six children (224 teeth) were included in a split-mouth randomised clinical trial. All children had their four first permanent molars sealed with either Clinpro XT Varnish (CXT) or Fuji IX GP FAST (FJ). FJ sealants were placed according to the ART protocol. Retention rates and caries-preventive effect of both materials were assessed clinically after 24 months, and survival curves were created according to the Kaplan-Meier method. For sealant retention rates, analyses were performed according to both the traditional method and modified sealant retention categorisation. RESULTS: FJ sealants were retained longer in comparison to CXT sealants (p < 0.05), regardless of the categorisation used. In relation to the caries-preventive effect, no statistically significant differences were observed between materials (p = 0.99). Sealants prepared with the high-viscosity GIC according to the ART protocol survived longer than those prepared with the modified GIC, but both materials were equally effective in preventing cavitated dentine lesions over 24 months. CONCLUSION: We concluded that GIC-based sealants are effective in preventing dentine caries lesions.


Assuntos
Cárie Dentária/prevenção & controle , Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro/uso terapêutico , Selantes de Fossas e Fissuras/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Resinas Compostas , Dentição Permanente , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Dente Molar , Propriedades de Superfície , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 15(3)July-Sept. 2016. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO - Odontologia | ID: biblio-875034

RESUMO

Aim: This study investigated the effect of an in-office bleaching technique on lightness, color and surface roughness of two commercially available materials: a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and a nanohybrid resin composite. Methods: Twelve disk-shaped specimens were prepared with both materials. The samples were bleached with 35% hydrogen peroxide. Bleaching was tested initially onto a smooth surface and later onto a polished one of the same specimens. The effect of the treatments on lightness and color was verified with a spectrophotometer. Surface roughness was measured with a digital surface roughness tester. The data were statistically analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's test (alpha = 0.05). Results: Significant variation in lightness and color was observed on the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement after the first bleaching procedure. Roughness increased significantly only after polishing the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement surface. Composite color variation was evident in the last observation period, but roughness and lightness variation due to bleaching and polishing was not significant. Conclusion: The bleaching treatment caused significant color alterations on the materials tested. This study observed that the application of in-office bleaching onto the glass-ionomer cement promoted clinically observable color alteration, and polishing after bleaching is contraindicated for this material. (AU)


Assuntos
Resinas Compostas , Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro , Peróxido de Hidrogênio , Espectrofotômetros , Clareamento Dental
5.
Braz. dent. sci ; 18(2): 31-37, 2015. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO - Odontologia | ID: lil-766808

RESUMO

Objetivo: Apesar da resina composta e o cimento de ionômero de vidro serem amplamente usados para restaurações cervicais, sob condições erosivas estas podem desgastar mais rapidamente. Este estudo objetivou comparar a resistência adesiva ao microcisalhamento de uma resistência de união (RC) e um cimento de ionômero de vidro modificado por resina (RMGIC) à dentina erodida associada à Clorexidina 2% num período de até 6 meses. Material e Métodos: Oitenta terceiros molares humanos foram cortados e uma dentina regular foi obtida, e subsequentemente, foram inclusos com resina acrílica em tubos de PVC. Os dentes foram divididos em dois grupos, de acordo com o tratamento recebido: Adper Single Bond 2 + RC Filtek Z250 (Z) ou RMGIC Vitremer (V). Metade dos corpos de prova foram imersos em saliva artificial (AS) por 24 h (grupo controle) e metade foi erodido artificialmente 3x/1 min diariamente com Coca Cola ®-RC por 5 dias. Metade dos corpos de prova, para cada condição descrita, recebeu água e outra metade a clorexidina 2% por 1 min, antes da restauração. Para todos os grupos, os corpos de prova foram armazenados em saliva artificial renovada semanalmente até os testes. A resistência de união ao microcisalhamento foi avaliado após 1 e 6 meses. Os resultados foram analisados com teste ANOVA 4 critérios e Tukey (p < 0,05). Resultados: Os fatores materiais, substrato e tempo foram estatisticamente significantes, além da interação entre o material e o tempo. O tratamento (água X clorexidina) não foi um fator significante. As restaurações com Z demonstraram resistência de união significantemente maior comparada ao V, em todas as situações. Conclusão: Tanto para a dentina sadia quanto erodida, a resina composta apresentou maior resistência de união comparada ao cimento de ionômero de vidro. O tempo e uso da clorexidina não interferiu na resistência de união. A resina composta demonstrou maior resistência adesiva quando comparada ao cimento de ionomero de vidro.


Objective: Although resin composites and glassionomer cements are widely used for dental cervical region restorations, under erosive condition they can wear out quickly. This study aimed to compare, by means of microshear bond strength, the performance of a resin composite (RC) and a resin-modified glassionomer cement (RMGIC) to eroded dentin and its association with 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) up to 6 months. Material and Methods: Eighty sound third molars teeth were cut to obtain flat coronal dentin, which were subsequently embedded in self-curing acrylic resin circular molds. Teeth were divided into two groups, according to the treatment with the Adper Single Bond 2 + RC Filtek Z250 (Z) or the RMGIC Vitremer (V). Half of the specimens were immersed in artificial saliva-AS (control groups) and half subjected to 3x/1 min daily immersion in Regular Coca Cola ®-RC for 5 days. Half of the specimens for each described condition were treated with water and half with 2% chlorhexidine for 1 min prior the restoration. For all groups, the specimens were stored in artificial saliva weekly renewed up to tests. The microshear bond strength was evaluated after 1 month and 6 months. Data, in normal distribution, were analyzed with four-way ANOVA and Tukey (p < 0.05). Results: The factors materials, substrate and time were statistically significant and also the interaction between material and time. Treatment (water x CHX) was not a significant factor. Restorations with Z showed significantly higher bond strength compared to V in all situations. There was a reduction in bond strength values over time for all tested conditions. Conclusion: For both sound and eroded dentin, the resin composite presented higher bond strength compared to resin-modified glassionomer material. The bond strength performance was overall reduced with time and the use of chlorexidine itself did not interfere on bond strength through time...


Assuntos
Humanos , Clorexidina , Dentina , Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro , Resinas Sintéticas , Erosão Dentária
6.
J Dent ; 42(6): 735-41, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24613604

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the influence of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) on the bond strength (BS) of a glass-fibre post to the root canal, regarding the cements (dual-cured resin or resin-modified glass-ionomer cement), the root thirds and the time of storage. METHOD: Eighty bovine roots were selected and endodontically treated, before being randomly assigned to the following groups according to the luting protocol: ARC (RelyX ARC); ARC+CHX; RL (RelyX Luting 2); and RL+CHX. After 24 h of luting, the roots were sliced to obtain 1 mm-thick slices. Half of each group was submitted to either 7-day or 6-month storage in artificial saliva (n=10). The specimens were subjected to push-out tests with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The data were analysed with four-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (P≤0.05). The failure modes were analysed with a digital microscope (50× and 200×). RESULTS: ARC yielded a significantly higher BS compared to RL (P<0.001). Despite CHX exerted a significant effect; it depends on the interaction with the luting cement and time (P<0.001). Thus, CHX decreased the values of BS to those of ARC after 6 months (P<0.001). On the 7th day of storage, the ARC+CHX presented higher BS to the cervical and middle thirds compared to RL+CHX (P=0.012). Time solely was not a significant factor (P=0.081). Adhesive cement-dentine type and mixed failures were predominant modes for the ARC groups. For the RL groups, the main failures were adhesive cement-post and mixed modes. CONCLUSIONS: Glass-fibre posts luted with RelyX ARC dual-cure resin cement exhibited higher BS than those luted with RelyX Luting 2 resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. Furthermore, CHX was not effective to improve the BS and negatively affected the BS of RelyX ARC after 6 months of storage. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The use of chlorhexidine solution seems not to improve the bond strength of fibre posts to root canals, disregarding the composition of the luting cement.


Assuntos
Clorexidina/análogos & derivados , Colagem Dentária , Materiais Dentários/química , Cavidade Pulpar/ultraestrutura , Inibidores Enzimáticos/química , Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro/química , Vidro/química , Técnica para Retentor Intrarradicular/instrumentação , Cimentos de Resina/química , Animais , Bis-Fenol A-Glicidil Metacrilato/química , Bovinos , Clorexidina/química , Resinas Compostas/química , Dentina/ultraestrutura , Teste de Materiais , Polietilenoglicóis/química , Ácidos Polimetacrílicos/química , Distribuição Aleatória , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Saliva Artificial/química , Autocura de Resinas Dentárias , Estresse Mecânico , Propriedades de Superfície , Fatores de Tempo , Ápice Dentário/ultraestrutura
7.
São Paulo; s.n; 2013. 99 p. ilus, tab, graf. (BR).
Tese em Português | LILACS, BBO - Odontologia | ID: lil-715010

RESUMO

O presente estudo in vitro analisou o efeito de 3 sucos de fruta com baixo pH (suco de cupuaçu, taperebá e laranja), e saliva artificial (controle) sobre materiais restauradores indicados em lesões cervicais não cariosas: resina composta nanoparticulada (Filtek Z350 XT), cimento de ionômero de vidro resino modificado (Vitremer) e um cimento de ionômero de vidro convencional (Fuji II). Os materiais foram avaliados, quantitativamente, quanto à alteração de: peso, rugosidade superficial e microdureza superficial, e qualitativamente, por microscopia eletrônica de varredura (MEV). Foram confeccionados 144 corpos de prova para cada teste quantitativo (n=12) e 45 para o MEV (n=3), de (8mm de diâmetro x 2mm de altura). Os corpos de prova foram preparados, mantidos em saliva artificial por 24 h à 37º C, receberam acabamento em politriz, e em seguida foram realizadas as leituras iniciais. Durante um período de 10 dias consecutivos, os corpos de prova foram submetidos ao desafio erosivo (nos respectivos sucos de frutas) durante 30 minutos três vezes ao dia, totalizando 90 minutos/dia e mantidos em saliva artificial entre os intervalos. Após o período de ciclagem erosiva, foram realizadas as leituras finais...


This in vitro study examined the effects of 3 fruit juices with low pH (cupuaçu, taperebá and orange) and artificial saliva (control) upon restorative materials indicated in noncarious cervical lesions: nanoparticle composite resin (Filtek Z350 XT), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Vitremer) and a glass ionomer cement (Fuji II). The materials were evaluated quantitatively as for alterations in weight, surface roughness and surface microhardness, and qualitatively by scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). 144 specimens were prepared for each quantitative test (n = 12) and 45 for the SEM (n = 3), of (8mm diameter x 2mm height). The specimens were prepared, stored in artificial saliva for 24 hours at 37º C, were finished in a polishing machine, and then the initial readings were performed. During a period of 10 consecutive days, the specimens were subjected to erosive challenge (in the respective juices) for 30 minutes, three times a day, and totaling 90 minutes/day and kept in artificial saliva between intervals. After the erosive cycling period, the final readings were taken. The data were analyzed using t test, ANOVA and Tukey...


Assuntos
Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro/análise , Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura , Resinas Compostas/análise , Erosão Dentária
8.
Rev. odonto ciênc ; 25(1): 83-87, jan.-mar. 2010. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO - Odontologia | ID: biblio-874067

RESUMO

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the influence of topical acidulated phosphate fluoride on the surface roughness of both human enamel and different restorative materials. Methods: Resin-modified glass ionomer (Vitremer = V), microhybrid composite resin with fluoride (Tetric Ceram = T), and nanofiller composite resin without fluoride (Z350 = Z) were evaluated. Acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF, 1.23%) was applied to half of the specimens (groups VF, TF, ZF and EF). Ten intact human third molars were used to obtain enamel specimens (E). Six experimental groups (n=10) and two control groups (n=10) were formed. The mean surface roughness (Ra) of both the restorative materials and enamel, with and without fluoride, was evaluated with a profilometer. Data were analyzed with an ANOVA, Tukey's test, Student's t-test, and Dunn-Bonferroni test at the 5% significance level. Results: The mean values of surface roughness, in micrometers, were as follows: Z=0.60; TF=1.00; ZF=1.05; VF=1.18; T=2.10; V=2.70; E=16.99; and EF=21.19. Both E and EF presented significantly higher surface roughness than the other experimental groups. Conclusion: It was concluded that APF increased the surface roughness of enamel and decreased the surface roughness of both resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and microhybrid composite resin with fluoride. The surface roughness of the nanofiller composite resin was not modified by APF.


Objetivo: Este estudo avaliou a influência da aplicação tópica de flúor fosfato acidulado sobre a rugosidade do esmalte e de diferentes materiais restauradores. Metodologia: Amostras de cimento de ionômero de vidro modificado por resina (Vitremer - V), resina composta microhíbrida com flúor (Tetric Ceram - T) e resina nanopartículada sem flúor em sua composição (Z350 - Z) foram confeccionadas. Metade das amostras recebeu aplicação tópica de flúor fosfato acidulado a 1,23% (FFA) (grupos VF, TF, ZF e EF) e a outra metade não, totalizando 6 grupos experimentais (n=10). Dez terceiros molares humanos hígidos foram utilizados para confecção de amostras de esmalte (E), constituindo os grupos controles (n=10). A rugosidade média superficial (Ra) dos materiais restauradores e do esmalte, com e sem flúor, foi analisada pelo rugosímetro. Os dados foram submetidos à análise de variância, testes de Tukey, t-Student e de Dunn-Bonferroni (5 % de significância). Resultados: Os valores médios de rugosidade, em micrômetros, foram: Z=0,60; TF=1,00; ZF=1,05; VF=1,18; T=2,10; V=2,70; E=16,99 e EF=21,19. E e EF apresentaram Ra significativamente superior aos grupos experimentais. Conclusão: Concluiu-se que o FFA aumentou a rugosidade do esmalte, diminuiu a do cimento de ionômero de vidro e da resina microhíbrida com flúor e não alterou a rugosidade da resina nanoparticulada sem flúor.


Assuntos
Humanos , Resinas Compostas , Esmalte Dentário , Flúor/efeitos adversos , Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro , Estudos de Casos e Controles
9.
Braz. dent. j ; 21(6): 533-537, 2010. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-572300

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of etching and light-curing time on the shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) upon debonding of orthodontic brackets. Sixty-eight bovine permanent incisors were obtained and embedded in acrylic resin. Edgewise metallic brackets were bonded to the teeth with Fuji Ortho LC RMGIC. The specimens were randomly assigned to 4 groups, using the following etching and light-curing times: G1: 10 percent polyacrylic acid and 40 s (control); G2: 37 percent phosphoric acid and 40 s; G3: 10 percent polyacrylic acid and 50 s; and G4: 37 percent phosphoric acid and 50 s. Shear test was performed at 0.5 mm/min and the ARI was assessed. G2 (3.6 ± 0.98 MPa) presented significantly higher (p<0.05) SBS than G1 (2.76 ± 0.86 MPa) and G4 (2.86 ± 0.68 MPa), and there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) between G2 and G3 (2.94 ± 0.67 MPa). ARI presented prevalence of scores 2 and 3 in all groups. RMGIC SBS enhanced with 37 percent phosphoric acid etching and 40 s light-curing time, but this did not occur when the light-curing time was increased, regardless of the acid used. RMGIC presented prevalence of failures at the adhesive/bracket interface.


O objetivo desta pesquisa foi avaliar a influência do condicionamento ácido e do tempo de fotopolimerização na Resistência Adesiva (RA) e no Índice de Adesivo Remanescente (IAR) do Cimento Ionômero de Vidro Modificado por Resina (CIVMR). Sessenta e oito incisivos permanentes de bovinos foram obtidos e incluídos em resina acrílica. Bráquetes metálicos edgewise foram colados nesses corpos de prova com o CIVMR Fuji Ortho. A amostra foi dividida em 4 grupos, utilizando os seguintes condicionamentos ácidos e tempos de fotopolimerização: G1- Ácido poliacrílico a 10 por cento e 40 s (controle); G2- Ácido fosfórico a 37 por cento e 40 s; G3- Ácido poliacrílico a 10 por cento e 50 s; e G4- Ácido fosfórico a 37 por cento e 50 s. O teste de cisalhamento foi realizado a 0,5 mm/min e o IAR avaliado. O G2 (3,6 ± 0,98 MPa) apresentou RA estatisticamente maior que o G1 (2,76 ± 0,86 MPa) e o G4 (2,86 ± 0,68 MPa) (p<0,05), e não houve diferença estatística entre G2 e G3 (2,94 ± 0,67 MPa) (p>0,05). O IAR apresentou prevalência dos escores 2 e 3 em todos os grupos. A RA do CIVMR aumenta com condicionamento com ácido fosfórico a 37 por cento e 40 s de fotopolimerização, mas isto não ocorre quando o tempo de fotopolimerização é aumentado, independente do tipo de ácido utilizado; e o CIVMR apresenta prevalência de fratura na interface adesivo/bráquete.


Assuntos
Animais , Bovinos , Condicionamento Ácido do Dente/métodos , Colagem Dentária , Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro , Cura Luminosa de Adesivos Dentários/métodos , Resinas Acrílicas , Silicatos de Alumínio , Descolagem Dentária , Análise do Estresse Dentário , Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro/química , Teste de Materiais , Braquetes Ortodônticos , Resistência ao Cisalhamento , Fatores de Tempo
10.
Rev. odontol. UNESP ; 35(4): 247-252, out.-dez. 2006. tab
Artigo em Português | LILACS, BBO - Odontologia | ID: biblio-858462

RESUMO

O cimento de ionômero de vidro foi desenvolvido a partir da união de dois outros materiais, o cimento de silicato e o cimento policarboxilato de zinco. Mesmo com a evolução desses materiais, a propriedade solubilidade/desintegração ainda está pouco clara na literatura. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar comparativamente a solubilidade e desintegração de cimentos de ionômero de vidro modificados por resina e de compômeros, bem como, a necessidade ou não de aplicação de agentes de proteção sobre suas superfícies. Os materiais utilizados foram: M1-Vitremer (3M Co.); M2-Fuji II LC (GCAmerica Inc.); M3-Dyract (Dentsply); e M4-Compoglass (Vivadent). Os agentes de proteção superficial utilizados foram: P1-Fluroshield (Dentsply) e P2-FinishingGloss (3M Co.). Estes materiais foram submetidos a testes de solubilidade e desintegração de acordo com a norma ISO 7489 de 1986. Aos resultados foram aplicadas transformações angulares e submetidos à análise de variância (p < 0,05) a dois critérios fixos e teste de homogeneidade. Os cimentos de ionômero de vidro modificados por resina e os compômeros apresentaram diferentes valores de solubilidade e desintegração. O menor valor foi obtido pelo Dyract, seguido pelo Fuji II LC e Compoglass com valores intermediários e Vitremer com o maior valor. Concluiu-se que os materiais submetidos à proteção superficial apresentaram menores valores de solubilidade e desintegração que os não protegidos; os agentes protetores, Finishing Gloss e Fluroshield mostraram-se eficazes para proteção superficial dos cimentos de ionômero de vidro modificados por resina e compômeros


The glass ionomer cement was developed from two other materials, the silicate cement and the zinc policarboxilate cement. Even though these materials have been enhanced since their creation, the solubility/disintegration properties are still not clear in the specific literature. This study main purpose was to evaluate the solubility and disintegration of resin modified glass ionomer cements as well as the necessity of using coating materials over their surface. M1-Vitremer (3M ESPE); M2-Fuji II LC (GCAmerica Inc.); M3-Dyract (Dentsply); and M4-Compoglass(Vivadent) were used in this study. The coating materials used were P1- Fluroshield (Dentsply) and P2-Finishing Gloss (3M ESPE). These materials underwent solubility and disintegration tests according to ISO 7489 policies from 1986. The results were submitted to angular transformations and variance analysis and homogeneity test suggesting: the resin modified glass ionomer cements and compomers showed different solubility and disintegration rates, Dyract < Fuji II LC = Compoglass < Vitremer; the resin modified glass ionomer cements and compomers submitted to the surface protection showed lower solubility and disintegration rates contrasted to the non-protected specimens; Finishing Gloss and Fluroshield demonstrated effective surface protection for resin modified glass ionomer cements and compomers


Assuntos
Análise de Variância , Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro , Cimentos de Resina , Compômeros , Solubilidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA