RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Tools for screening of nutrition risk in patients with cancer are usually validated against other screening instruments. Here with the performance of Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) and Nutritional Screening Tool (NUTRISCORE) to identify the risk of malnutrition was assessed. A full nutritional evaluation and diagnosis following criteria from the Global Leadership Initiative of Malnutrition (GLIM) was the reference standard for the classification of malnutrition. METHODS: Diagnostic test prospective analysis of adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of cancer. MST, NUTRISCORE and nutritional evaluation and diagnosis by GLIM criteria were independently performed within 24 h of admission to a 4th tier hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. RESULTS: From 439 patients the sensitivity and specificity of MST was 75% and 94% and of NUTRISCORE 45% and 97% respectively. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were 0.90 for MST and 0.85 for NUTRISCORE (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The MST showed a significantly better diagnostic performance over NUTRISCORE for detection of malnutrition risk at admission to hospital of patients with cancer.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The current version of the Fetal Medicine Foundation competing risks model for preeclampsia prediction has not been previously validated in Brazil. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed (1) to validate the Fetal Medicine Foundation combined algorithm for the prediction of preterm preeclampsia in the Brazilian population and (2) to describe the accuracy and calibration of the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm when considering the prophylactic use of aspirin by clinical criteria. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cohort study, including consecutive singleton pregnancies undergoing preeclampsia screening at 11 to 14 weeks of gestation, examining maternal characteristics, medical history, and biophysical markers between October 2010 and December 2018 in a university hospital in Brazil. Risks were calculated using the 2018 version of the algorithm available on the Fetal Medicine Foundation website, and cases were classified as low or high risk using a cutoff of 1/100 to evaluate predictive performance. Expected and observed cases with preeclampsia according to the Fetal Medicine Foundation-estimated risk range (≥1 in 10; 1 in 11 to 1 in 50; 1 in 51 to 1 in 100; 1 in 101 to 1 in 150; and <1 in 150) were compared. After identifying high-risk pregnant women who used aspirin, the treatment effect of 62% reduction in preterm preeclampsia identified in the Combined Multimarker Screening and Randomized Patient Treatment with Aspirin for Evidence-Based Preeclampsia Prevention trial was used to evaluate the predictive performance adjusted for the effect of aspirin. The number of potentially unpreventable cases in the group without aspirin use was estimated. RESULTS: Among 2749 pregnancies, preterm preeclampsia occurred in 84 (3.1%). With a risk cutoff of 1/100, the screen-positive rate was 25.8%. The detection rate was 71.4%, with a false positive rate of 24.4%. The area under the curve was 0.818 (95% confidence interval, 0.773-0.863). In the risk range ≥1/10, there is an agreement between the number of expected cases and the number of observed cases, and in the other ranges, the predicted risk was lower than the observed rates. Accounting for the effect of aspirin resulted in an increase in detection rate and positive predictive values and a slight decrease in the false positive rate. With 27 cases of preterm preeclampsia in the high-risk group without aspirin use, we estimated that 16 of these cases of preterm preeclampsia would have been avoided if this group had received prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: In a high-prevalence setting, the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm can identify women who are more likely to develop preterm preeclampsia. Not accounting for the effect of aspirin underestimates the screening performance.

RESUMO

RESUMEN Objetivo: evaluar la sensibilidad y especificidad del test G8 en el tamizaje de adultos mayores con cáncer para la realización de la valoración geriátrica integral (VGI). Materiales y métodos: el presente estudio observacional y retrospectivo se realizó en el Servicio de Geriatría del Hospital Almenara de Lima, Perú. Se revisaron los informes de VGI en las historias clínicas electrónicos de adultos mayores (> 60 años) con cáncer, ambulatorios y hospitalizados, durante noviembre de 2022 y julio de 2023. Los pacientes se clasificaron según los criterios SIOG-1 (Sociedad Internacional de Oncología Geriátrica), formando dos grupos: pacientes aptos y pacientes no aptos o unfit (vulnerables + frágiles + muy enfermos). Del test G8 se estimó la sensibilidad, especificidad y valor predictivo positivo, área bajo la curva característica operativa del receptor (AUC). Resultados: ingresaron al estudio 201 pacientes, 91 mujeres (45,3%) y 110 (54,7%) varones, la media de la edad fue de 76,2 ± 7,4 años. Las neoplasias más frecuentes fueron colorrectal, estómago, próstata y vías biliares. La prevalencia de pacientes aptos y no aptos (unfit) fue del 23,4 y 76,6%, respectivamente. Cuando el puntaje de la prueba G8 fue ≤11, la sensibilidad, especificidad, valor predictivo positivo y AUC fueron 73,4% (intervalo de confianza al 95%: 65,7-80,2%), 91,5% (79,6%-97,6%), 96,6% (91,7-98,6%) y 89% (84-93%), respectivamente. Conclusiones: el test G8 con puntaje ≤11 tendría una alta sensibilidad y especificidad, para identificar adultos con cáncer vulnerables o frágiles, que podrían beneficiarse de la VGI.

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate sensitivity and specificity of the G8 test in screening older adults with cancer who may benefit from a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). Material and methods: This observational retrospective study was carried out in the Geriatrics Service of the Guillermo Almenara Hospital in Lima, Peru. CGA reports were reviewed in the electronic medical records of older adults (> 60 years) with cancer, both outpatients and inpatients, between November 2022 and July 2023. Patients were classified according to the SIOG-1 (International Society of Geriatric Oncology) criteria into two groups: fit and non-fit patients (vulnerable + frail + too sick). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), were estimated for the G8 test. Results: 201 patients entered the study, 91 women (45.3%) and 110 (54.7%) men; their mean age was 76.2 ± 7.4 years. The most frequent neoplasms were colorectal, stomach, prostate, and bile ducts. The prevalence of eligible and unfit patients was 23.4% and 76.6%, respectively. When the G8 test score was ≤11, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and AUC were 73.4% (95% Confidence Interval: 65.7- 80.2%), 91.5% (79.6%-97.6%), 96.6% (91.7-98.6%), and 89% (84-93%), respectively. Conclusions: The G8 test with a score ≤11 would have high sensitivity and specificity for identifying vulnerable or frail patients with cancer who could benefit from the CGA.

RESUMO

Abstract Background Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) requires trained professionals for its adequate diagnosis. There is a shortage of such professionals in Brazil. Screening tools could identify priority cases. The only instrument for that in Brazilian Portuguese is employed for toddlers up to 2.5 years old. Objective The Mini-TEA scale was conceived and tested as a screening for children from 2.5 to 12 years old. Methods After local ethics committee's approval, this study was conducted from December 2022 to April 2023 in the Associação de Pais e Amigos dos Excepcionais, Passo Fundo/RS, of invitations to children's parents/relatives who were under evaluation for ASD and by local advertisement. Inclusion criteria were age from 2.5 to 12 years old; consent from the child's legal guardians. 75 children's parents/relatives were interviewed using the 15-item Mini-TEA scale. After that, children were evaluated for the diagnosis of ASD by a pediatric neurologist. Sensibility and specificity for ASD diagnosis along the Mini-TEA scores were measured. Experts and target population evaluated the validity/reliability of the Mini-TEA scale. The reproducibility of the scores was assessed about 40 days later. Results From the 75 participants, 28 received a diagnosis of ASD. Scores ≥ 10 on the Mini-TEA scale require further evaluation of the children (sensitivity 100%; specificity 68%). Content validity coefficient (CVC) rendered values > 0.80 (acceptable). Test-retest analyzes with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) indicated excellent reliability (> 0.90). The time spent for applying the screening was about 10 minutes. Conclusion The Mini-TEA scale presents as an easy tool for screening ASD among children.

Resumo Antecedentes O transtorno do espectro autista (TEA) requer profissionais treinados para o diagnóstico, escassos no Brasil. Instrumentos de triagem poderiam identificar casos prioritários para avaliação. O único em português brasileiro é empregado para crianças até 30 meses de idade. Objetivo A escala Mini-TEA foi concebida e testada como triagem para crianças entre 2,5 e 12 anos. Métodos Estudo foi conduzido de dezembro de 2022 a abril de 2023 na Associação de Pais e Amigos dos Excepcionais (APAE) de Passo Fundo/RS, após a aprovação bioética local. O recrutamento consistiu em convite aos familiares de crianças que estavam sendo avaliadas para TEA e por divulgação local. Os critérios de inclusão foram idade entre 2,5 e 12 anos e consentimento do guardião legal. Familiares de 75 crianças foram entrevistados com a escala Mini-TEA (15 itens). Depois, as crianças foram avaliadas para o diagnóstico de TEA por neuropediatra. A sensibilidade e a especificidade do diagnóstico de TEA com os escores da Mini-TEA foram mensuradas. A validade e a confiabilidade da escala Mini-TEA foram avaliadas por experts e pela população alvo. A reprodutibilidade dos escores foi medida após ± 40 dias. Resultados Dos 75 participantes, 28 receberam diagnóstico de TEA. Escores ≥ 10 na escala Mini-TEA requerem avaliação das crianças (sensibilidade 100%; especificidade 68%). O coeficiente de validação de conteúdo (CVC) rendeu valores > 0,80 (aceitável). Análises de teste-reteste com coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (ICC) indicou excelente confiabilidade (> 0,90). O tempo gasto para a triagem foi cerca de 10 minutos. Conclusão A escala Mini-TEA constitui ferramenta breve e fácil para triagem de TEA em crianças.

RESUMO

Abstract Background Shock index (SI) and age shock index (ASI) are less frequently used for assessment of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and their reported cut-off points are controversial. Objectives We aimed to define proper cut-off value of these indices for MACE prediction among Iranian patients with STEMI. Methods This study was in the context of the ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Cohort in Isfahan (SEMI-CI) study. SI and ASI were calculated by division of heart rate (HR) over systolic blood pressure (SBP) and age multiplied by SI, respectively, in 818 subjects with STEMI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine optimal SI and ASI cut-off values. Chi-square test, independent t test, and analysis of variance were employed for nominal and numerical variables, as appropriate, with consideration of p values < 0.05. MACE was defined as a composite of non-fatal reinfarction, heart failure (HF), recurrent percutaneous intervention (PCI), rehospitalization for cardiovascular diseases, and all-cause mortality. Results Mean age was 60.70 ± 12.79 years (males: 81.7%). Area under curve (AUC) values from ROC curve analysis for SI and ASI were 0.613 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.569 to 0.657, p < 0.001) and 0.672 (95% CI: 0.629 to 0.715, p < 0.001), respectively. Optimal SI and ASI cut-offs were 0.61 (sensitivity: 61%, specificity: 56%) and 39.5 (sensitivity: 65%, specificity: 66%), respectively. Individuals with SI ≥ 0.61 or within the highest quartile (SI ≥ 0.75) had significantly higher frequency of one-year MACE compared to the reference group (34.7% versus 22.2%, p < 0.001 and 42.4% versus 20.6%, p < 0.05, respectively). Similar relations were observed in terms of ASI values (ASI ≥ 39.5 versus ASI < 39.5: 43.6% versus 17.3%, p < 0.001, ASI Q4 ≥ 47.5 versus ASI Q1 ≤ 28.8: 49% versus 16.6%, p < 0.05). Conclusions SI and ASI cut-off values of 0.61 and 39.5 could reliably predict MACE occurrence among Iranian patients with STEMI.

RESUMO

RESUMEN En el presente estudio se estimó el rendimiento diagnóstico de la prueba Xpert®Xpress SARS-CoV-2 en comparación con la RT PCR en tiempo real-protocolo Charité, para la detección de SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes peruanos. Se trató de un diseño de prueba diagnóstica que incluyó 100 muestras de hisopado nasal y faríngeo. Se obtuvo una concordancia global de 98,70% (IC95%: 92,98-99,97), con un coeficiente kappa de 0,97 (IC95%: 0,86-1.00); se estimó una sensibilidad y especificad relativa de 100% y 96,15%, respectivamente. Adicionalmente, el porcentaje del área bajo la curva ROC fue 98,08% en ambos casos y se obtuvo una especificidad analítica del 100% para los diferentes virus respiratorios evaluados. En conclusión, la prueba Xpert®Xpress SARS-CoV-2 a partir de muestras de hisopado nasal y faríngeo fue altamente sensible y específica, así mismo el coeficiente kappa mostró una excelente correlación, al compararla con la prueba de referencia.

ABSTRACT The present study assessed the diagnostic performance of the Xpert®Xpress SARS-CoV-2 test in comparison with the Charité protocol real-time RT PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Peruvian patients. This was a diagnostic test study that included 100 nasal and pharyngeal swab samples. We obtained an overall concordance of 98.70% (95%CI: 92.98-99.97), with a kappa coefficient of 0.97 (95%CI: 0.86-1.00) and sensitivity and relative specificity rates of 100% and 96.15%, respectively. Additionally, the percentage of the area under the ROC curve was 98.08% in both cases, and an analytical specificity rate of 100% was obtained for the different respiratory viruses evaluated. In conclusion, the Xpert®Xpress SARS-CoV-2 test, by using nasal and pharyngeal swab samples, was highly sensitive and specific, and the kappa coefficient showed an excellent correlation when compared to the reference test.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar as propriedades psicométricas, contemplando validade, confiabilidade, sensibilidade e especificidade do SPMSQ-BR. Método A análise foi realizada em 93 idosos, avaliados com a versão brasileira do SPMSQ, Mini-Exame do Estado Mental (MEEM), Teste do Desenho do Relógio (TDR) e Teste de Fluência Verbal (TFV). A consistência interna foi estimada pelo coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Para avaliar a estabilidade intra-avaliador e a reprodutibilidade inter-avaliador, utilizou-se o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI) com intervalo de confiança de 95%. Para a validade concorrente e convergente, utilizou-se o coeficiente de correlação de Spearman. A acurácia para estabelecer o ponto de corte do SPMSQ-BR para rastreamento da sensibilidade e especificidade realizou-se através da curva ROC. Resultado: O SPMSQ-BR demonstrou excelente consistência interna (α=0,803), alta confiabilidade intra e inter-avaliador (CCI-0,977) e (CCI-0,973) respectivamente. Na validade concorrente apresentou forte correlação linear com o MEEM (-0,799 p<0,001), já com TDR (-0,584 p<0,01) e TFV (-0,569 p<0,01) foram encontradas correlações moderadas. O SPMSQ-BR mostrou-se capaz de discriminar o comprometimento cognitivo com ponto de corte a partir de 3 erros, conforme a escala original. A área sob a curva considerando a escolaridade foi de AUC=0,905 (S=81,3% e E=76,9%) e sem considerar a escolaridade AUC=0,927 (S=87,5% e E=80,8%) apresentando uma boa sensibilidade e especificidade em ambos os casos. Conclusão O estudo demonstrou que a versão brasileira do SPMSQ estabelecida como Breve Escala de Capacidade Cognitiva apresentou-se estável, reprodutível, válida e confiável para avaliar a capacidade cognitiva de idosos, além de ser sensível na identificação de comprometimento cognitivo.

Abstract Objective To evaluate the psychometric properties, including validity, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of the SPMSQ-BR. Method The analysis was conducted on 93 older adults, assessed with the Brazilian version of the SPMSQ, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Clock Drawing Test (CDT), and Verbal Fluency Test (VFT). Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. In order to assess intra-rater stability and inter-rater reproducibility, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval was employed. For concurrent and convergent validity, Spearman's correlation coefficient was utilized. Accuracy in establishing the cutoff point for the SPMSQ-BR to screen sensitivity and specificity was assessed through ROC curve analysis. Result The SPMSQ-BR demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α=0.803), high intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.977 and ICC=0.973), respectively. In terms of concurrent validity, it showed a strong negative linear correlation with the MMSE (-0.799, p<0.001), while moderate correlations were found with the CDT (-0.584, p<0.01) and VFT (-0.569, p<0.01). The SPMSQ-BR proved capable of discriminating cognitive impairment with a cutoff point of 3 errors, following the original scale. The area under the curve (AUC) considering education level was 0.905 (sensitivity=81.3%, specificity=76.9%), and without considering education level, the AUC was 0.927 (sensitivity=87.5%, specificity=80.8%), indicating good sensitivity and specificity in both cases. Conclusion The study demonstrated that the Brazilian version of the SPMSQ, established as a Brief Cognitive Capacity Scale, proved to be stable, reproducible, valid, and reliable for assessing the cognitive capacity of older adults. Furthermore, it showed sensitivity in identifying cognitive impairment.

RESUMO

Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDT) are useful to identify syphilis cases, particularly for hard-to-reach populations and if laboratory services are scarce. However, RDT performance may be suboptimal. We aimed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a syphilis RDT using well-characterized blood donors' samples. We categorized samples from 811 blood donors into five groups: 1 - Samples with reactive Chemiluminescence (QML), FTA-Abs, and VDRL; 2 - Samples with reactive QML and FTA-Abs, and nonreactive VDRL; 3 - Samples with reactive QML, and nonreactive for other markers (false-positives); 4 - Controls with nonreactive QML; and 5 - Samples reactive for HIV, with nonreactive QML. Sensitivity was tested in groups 1 (overall and according to VDRL titers) and 2; specificity was tested in groups 3‒5. The RDT had high specificity, even in samples reactive for HIV. The sensitivity was high (91.9%) in samples with reactive VDRL but varied between 75.0%‒100% according to VDRL titers. The overall sensitivity was lower (81.3%) in samples with reactive FTA-Abs and nonreactive VDRL. The RDT is a useful tool to detect active syphilis but may be more limited for cases with very early or remote infection, or those with prior treatment. When higher sensitivity is needed, additional strategies including recurrent testing or laboratory-based tests may be required.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Nutritional status assessment commonly relies on body mass index (BMI), which overlooks lean mass and adipose tissue distribution. However, waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) provide additional insights into fat accumulation. By combining these indices, it may be possible to identify older adults needing weight management interventions. OBJECTIVES: To assess the WC and WHtR as strategies for identifying individuals requiring weight management. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 509 elderly individuals in Northeast Brazil. Weight, height, hip circumference, and waist circumference were measured, and combined with indices such as BMI WC, WHR, and WHtR to identify those who require weight management. The DeLong test compared areas under the curves using receiver operating characteristic curves and statistical significance. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated to verify usefulness for clinical application. A validation sample of 599 elderly individuals from the country's Southern region was used to confirm the results. RESULTS: Both WC and WHtR showed adequate diagnostic accuracy with no statistically significant difference in AUCs. WHtR ≥ 0.50 had 92% sensitivity in identifying men and women requiring nutritional management. WC presented lower sensitivity but 93% specificity, useful for excluding elderly individuals from the nutritional risk category. These results were consistent in the validation sample. CONCLUSION: WHtR is a valuable index for screening nutritional risk management in the elderly population, applicable to men and women. Conversely, WC performs better in excluding individuals who do not need nutritional risk management.

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) and Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD) are widely used screening tools, but their sensitivity and specificity in low-income and middle-income countries are lower than in high-income countries. We conducted a study to determine the sensitivity and specificity of different versions of these scales in a Peruvian hospital population. DESIGN: Our study has a cross-sectional design. SETTING: Our participants are hospitalised patients in a Peruvian hospital. The gold standard was a clinical psychiatric interview following ICD-10 criteria for depression (F32.0, F32.1, F32.2 and F32.3) and anxiety (F41.0 and F41.1). PARTICIPANTS: The sample included 1347 participants. A total of 334 participants (24.8%) were diagnosed with depression, and 28 participants (2.1%) were diagnosed with anxiety. RESULTS: The PHQ-9's≥7 cut-off point showed the highest simultaneous sensitivity and specificity when contrasted against a psychiatric diagnosis of depression. For a similar contrast against the gold standard, the other optimal cut-off points were: ≥7 for the PHQ-8 and ≥2 for the PHQ-2. In particular, the cut-off point ≥8 had good performance for GAD-7 with sensitivity and specificity, and cut-off point ≥10 had lower levels of sensitivity, but higher levels of specificity, compared with the cut-off point of ≥8. Also, we present the sensitivity and specificity values of each cut-off point in PHQ-9, PHQ-8, PHQ-2, GAD-7 and GAD-2. We confirmed the adequacy of a one-dimensional model for the PHQ-9, PHQ-8 and GAD-7, while all PHQ and GAD scales showed good reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The PHQ and GAD have adequate measurement properties in their different versions. We present specific cut-offs for each version.

Assuntos