RESUMO
The six-minute step test (6MST) has been shown to be effective in assessing exercise capacity in individuals with COPD regardless of severity and, despite its easy execution, accessibility and validity, information on the prognostic power of this test remains uncertain. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the 6MST can predict the occurrence of exacerbations in patients with COPD. This is a prospective cohort study with a 36-month follow-up in patients with COPD. All patients completed a clinical assessment, followed by pulmonary function testing and a 6MST. The 6MST was performed on a 20 cm high step; heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, BORG dyspnea and fatigue were collected. Sixty-four patients were included in the study, the majority being elderly men. Performance on the 6MST demonstrated lower performance compared to normative values proposed in the literature, indicating a reduced functional capacity. Kaplan Meier analysis revealed that ≤ 59 steps climbed during the 6MST was a strong predictor of COPD exacerbation over a 36-month follow-up. We have identified a minimal threshold number of steps (≤ 59) obtained through the 6MST may be able predict the risk of exacerbations in patients with COPD.
Assuntos
Teste de Esforço , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Seguimentos , Estudos Prospectivos , Testes de Função Respiratória , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This is the first study to investigate the performance of 6MST in COPD patients divided into different symptom severity groups based on the CAT questionnaire score. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between the degree symptomatology using the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) with the six- minute step test (6MST) in COPD patients. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study in which 59 patients with COPD were evaluated. The groups were stratified according to the subsequent cutoff points: CAT <10 (little impact) n= 22; CAT 11-20 (moderate impact) n=20; CAT <20 (large impact) n=17. During 6MST the individuals were instructed to go up and down a single step with a height of 20 centimeters (cm). RESULTS: Comparing the groups in relation to performance on the 6MST, the number of climbs on the step were significantly higher in the CAT group <10 when compared to the CAT group >20, the variation in HR between rest and peak exercise (∆ HRpeak- rest) was lower in the CAT>20 group compared to the CAT<10 group and the CAT 11- 20 group. We found direct relationships between the number of ascents and descents in the 6MST vs the CAT score (r=0.35, p=0.007); and 6MST vs degree of obstruction of %FEV1 (r-0.46, p=0.002) We verified a linear regression model in which the FEV1 (L) and the CAT score influenced 29% in the performance of the 6MST. CONCLUSION: The COPD severity represented by the FEV1 and the CAT score are associated and influenced by 29% the performance of 6-minute step test. Our findings may have important implications for the clinical evaluation of these patients as well as for rehabilitation.
Assuntos
Teste de Esforço , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Testes de Função Respiratória , Exercício FísicoRESUMO
Exercise intolerance is the hallmark consequence of advanced chronic heart failure (HF). The six-minute step test (6MST) has been considered an option for the six-minute walk test because it is safe, inexpensive, and can be applied in small places. However, its reliability and concurrent validity has still not been investigated in participants with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Clinically stable HFrEF participants were included. Reliability and error measurement were calculated by comparing the first with the second 6MST result. Forty-eight hours after participants underwent the 6MST, they were invited to perform a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on a cycle ergometer. Concurrent validity was assessed by correlation between number of steps and peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2 peak) at CPET. Twenty-seven participants with HFrEF (60±8 years old and left ventricle ejection fraction of 41±6%) undertook a mean of 94±30 steps in the 6MST. Intra-rater reliability was excellent for 6MST (ICC=0.9), with mean error of 4.85 steps and superior and inferior limits of agreement of 30.6 and -20.9 steps, respectively. In addition, strong correlations between number of steps and CPET workload (r=0.76, P<0.01) and peak V̇O2 (r=0.71, P<0.01) were observed. From simple linear regression the following predictive equations were obtained with 6MST results: V̇O2 peak (mL/min) = 350.22 + (7.333 × number of steps), with R2=0.51, and peak workload (W) = 4.044 + (0.772 × number of steps), with R2=0.58. The 6MST was a reliable and valid tool to assess functional capacity in HFrEF participants and may moderately predict peak workload and oxygen uptake of a CPET.