RESUMO

Background: Using a previously unreported Peruvian registry of patients treated for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), this study explored whether wedge resection and lobectomy were equivalent regarding survival and impact on radiologic-pathologic variables. Methods: This observational, analytical, longitudinal study used propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis of a single-center retrospective registry of 2,570 patients with pathologic stage I-II NSCLC who were treated with wedge resection (n=1,845) or lobectomy (n=725) during 2000-2020. After PSM, 650 cases were analyzed (resection, n=325; lobectomy, n=325) through preoperative and clinical variables, including patients with ≥1 lymph node removed. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were created for 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional-recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Results: The principal complication was operative pain persisting >7 days for lobectomy versus wedge resection (58% vs. 23%, p=0.034) and shorter hospital stays for resection than for lobectomy (5.3 days vs. 12.8 days, p=0.009). The 5-year OS (84.3% vs. 81.2%, p=0.09) and DFS (79.1% vs. 74.1%, p=0.07) were similar and statistically insignificant between resections and lobectomies, respectively. LRFS was worse overall following wedge resection than lobectomy (79.8% vs. 91.1%, p<0.02). Nevertheless, in the PSM analysis, both groups experienced similar LRFS when the resection margin was >10 mm (90.9% vs. 87.3%, p<0.048) and ≥4 lymph nodes were removed (82.8% vs. 79.1%, p<0.011). Conclusion: Both techniques led to similar OS and DFS at 5 years; however, successful LRFS required a wedge resection with a surgical margin and adequate lymph node removal to obtain outcomes similar to lobectomy.

RESUMO

Traditionally, lobectomy was standard for stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent RCTs suggest sublobar resection's comparable outcomes. Our meta-analysis, incorporating 30 studies (including four RCTs), assessed sublobar resection's efficacy. Employing a random-effects model and I2 statistics for heterogeneity, we found sublobar resection reduced DFS (HR 1.31, p < 0.01) and OS (HR 1.27, p < 0.01) overall. However, RCT subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in DFS (p = 0.28) or OS (p = 0.62). Sublobar resection is a viable option for well-selected patients.

RESUMO

Background: Lung cancer represents a significant global health concern, often diagnosed in its advanced stages. The advent of massive DNA sequencing has revolutionized the landscape of cancer treatment by enabling the identification of target mutations and the development of tailored therapeutic approaches. Unfortunately, access to DNA sequencing technology remains limited in many developing countries. In this context, we emphasize the critical importance of integrating this advanced technology into healthcare systems in developing nations to improve treatment outcomes. Methods: We conducted an analysis of electronic clinical records of patients with confirmed advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a verified negative status for the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. These patients underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) for molecular analysis. We performed descriptive statistical analyses for each variable and conducted both univariate and multivariate statistical analyses to assess their impact on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Additionally, we classified genetic mutations as actionable or non-actionable based on the European Society for Medical Oncology Scale of Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) guidelines. Results: Our study included a total of 127 patients, revealing the presence of twenty-one distinct mutations. The most prevalent mutations were EGFR (18.9%) and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) (15.7%). Notably, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.258, P<0.001], tumor mutation burden (TMB) (HR: 2.073, P=0.042) and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (HR: 0.470, P=0.032) demonstrated statistical significance in both the univariate and multivariate analyses with respect to PFS. In terms of OS, ALK (HR: 0.285, P<0.001) and EGFR (HR: 0.482, P=0.024) exhibited statistical significance in both analyses. Applying the ESCAT classification system, we identified actionable genomic variations (ESCAT level-1), including EGFR, ALK, breast cancer (BRAF) gene, c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1), and rearranged during transfection (RET) gene, in 32.3% of the patients. Conclusions: Our findings from massive DNA sequencing underscore that 32.3% of patients who test negative for the EGFR mutation possess other targetable mutations, enabling them to receive personalized, targeted therapies at an earlier stage of their disease. Implementing massive DNA sequencing in developing countries is crucial to enhance survival rates among NSCLC patients and guide more effective treatment strategies.

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Mutations in the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral (KRAS) oncogene constitute a significant driver of lung adenocarcinoma, present in 10-40% of patients, which exhibit heterogeneous clinical outcomes, mainly driven by concurrent genetic alterations. However, characterization of KRAS mutational subtypes and their impact on clinical outcomes in Latin America is limited. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted at the National Cancer Institute (INCan) of Mexico. Individuals with advance-staged of adenocarcinoma and KRAS mutations, detected by next-generation sequencing, having undergone at least one line of therapy were included for analysis. Clinical and pathological characteristics were retrieved from institutional database from June 2014 to March 2023. RESULTS: KRAS was identified in fifty-four (15.6%) of 346 patients, among which 50 cases were included for analysis. KRASG12D (n = 16, 32%) and KRASG12C (n = 16, 32%) represented the most prevalent subtypes. KRASG12D mutations were associated with female (p = 0.018), never smokers (p = 0.108), and concurrences with EGFR (25.0% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.124) and CDKN2A (18.8% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.157). KRASG12D patients showed a better ORR (66.6% vs. 30.0%; OR 4.66, 95% CI 1.23-17.60, p = 0.023) and on multivariate analysis was significantly associated with better PFS (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16-0.80; p = 0.012) and OS (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.70; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study represents the first effort to comprehensively characterize the molecular heterogeneity of KRAS-mutant NSCLC in Latin American patients. Our data reinforce the current view that KRAS-mutated NSCLC is not a single oncogene-driven disease and emphasizes the prognostic impact of diverse molecular profiles in this genomically defined subset of NSCLC. Further validation is warranted in larger multicenter Latin American cohorts to confirm our findings.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Resistance to cisplatin is the main cause of treatment failure in lung adenocarcinoma. Drug-tolerant-persister (DTP) cells are responsible for intrinsic resistance, since they survive the initial cycles of treatment, representing a reservoir for the emergence of clones that display acquired resistance. Although the molecular mechanisms of DTP cells have been described, few studies have investigated the earliest molecular alterations of DTP cells in intrinsic resistance to cisplatin. In this work, we report a gene expression signature associated with the emergence of cisplatin-DTP cells in lung adenocarcinoma cell lines. After a single exposure to cisplatin, we sequenced the transcriptome of cisplatin-DTPs to identify differentially expressed genes. Bioinformatic analysis revealed that early cisplatin-DTP cells deregulate metabolic and proliferative pathways to survive the drug insult. Interaction network analysis identified three highly connected submodules in which SOCS1 had a significant participation in controlling the proliferation of cisplatin-DTP cells. Expression of the candidate genes and their corresponding protein was validated in lung adenocarcinoma cell lines. Importantly, the expression level of SOCS1 was different between CDDP-susceptible and CDDP-resistant lung adenocarcinoma cell lines. Moreover, knockdown of SOCS1 in the CDDP-resistant cell line partially promoted its susceptibility to CDDP. Finally, the clinical relevance of the candidate genes was analyzed in silico, according to the overall survival of cisplatin-treated patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Survival analysis showed that downregulation or upregulation of the selected genes was associated with overall survival. The results obtained indicate that these genes could be employed as predictive biomarkers or potential targets to improve the effectiveness of CDDP treatment in lung cancer patients.

RESUMO

Mesilato de osimertinibe, gefitinibe, erlotinibe, quimioterapia padrão. Indicação: Câncer de pulmão de células não pequenas com mutação do receptor do fator de crescimento epidérmico (EGFR). Pergunta: Mesilato de osimertinibe é mais eficaz e seguro que gefitinibe, erlotinibe ou quimioterapia para os desfechos de sobrevida global, sobrevida livre de progressão e de segurança no tratamento de carcinoma pulmonar de células não pequenas com mutação do EGFR? Métodos: Levantamento bibliográfico foi realizado na base de dados PUBMED e EPISTEMONIKOS, seguindo estratégias de buscas predefinidas. Foi feita avaliação da qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas com a ferramenta AMSTAR-2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Version 2). Resultados: Foram selecionadas duas revisões sistemáticas que atenderam aos critérios de elegibilidade. Conclusão: Mesilato de osimertinibe é mais eficaz do que gefitinibe ou erlotinibe na melhora da sobrevida global e da sobrevida livre de progressão em pacientes virgens de tratamento. Em pacientes previamente tratados, o mesilato de osimertinibe não é superior à quimioterapia padrão à base de platina no prolongamento da sobrevida global, mas é mais eficaz no aumento da sobrevida livre de progressão. Para câncer avançado, mesilato de osimertinibe não é mais eficaz do que a quimioterapia com ou sem pemetrexede para prolongar a sobrevida global, mas é mais eficaz em melhorar a sobrevida livre de progressão. Gefitinibe combinado com quimioterapia à base de pemetrexede foi superior à quimioterapia com ou sem pemetrexede na melhora da sobrevida global e da sobrevida livre de progressão

Osimertinib mesylate, gefitinib, erlotinib, standard chemotherapy. Indication: Non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. Question: Is osimertinib mesylate more effective and safer than gefitinib, erlotinib or chemotherapy for overall survival, progression-free survival and safety outcomes in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation? Methods: A bibliographic search was done in the PUBMED and EPISTEMONIKOS database, following predefined search strategies. The methodological quality of systematic reviews was evaluated using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Version 2 tool. Results: Two systematic reviews were selected because they met the eligibility criteria. Conclusion: Osimertinib mesylate is more effective than gefitinib or erlotinib in improving overall survival and progression-free survival in treatment-naive patients. In previously treated patients, osimertinib mesylate is not superior to standard platinum-based chemotherapy in prolonging overall survival, but it is more effective in increasing progression-free survival. For advanced cancer, osimertinib mesylate is not more effective than chemotherapy with or without pemetrexed in prolonging overall survival, but it is more effective in improving progression-free survival. Gefitinib combined with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy was superior to chemotherapy with or without pemetrexed in improving overall survival and progression-free survival

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción: El cáncer de pulmón es una de las enfermedades más graves y uno de los cánceres con mayor incidencia en las personas, responsable de los mayores índices de mortalidad oncológica a escala mundial. Objetivo: Analizar las características clínicas epidemiológicas de los pacientes con cáncer de pulmón. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo retrospectivo, con el objetivo de analizar las características clínicas epidemiológicas de los pacientes con el diagnóstico de cáncer de pulmón atendido en el Hospital Oncológico María Curie durante el quinquenio de enero de 2017 a diciembre de 2021. El universo de estudio incluyó a los 822 pacientes que fueron atendidos en el hospital durante el período antes señalado, con cáncer de pulmón. La muestra a discreción la conformaron 276 pacientes. Resultados: Predominio del cáncer de pulmón en los pacientes de 61 a 80 años de edad, sexo masculino, fumadores pasivos. La variedad cito-histológica con mayor incidencia fue el carcinoma de células pequeñas microcítico; debut de esta enfermedad en pacientes en estadio IV y con tratamiento recibido de radioterapia y quimioterapia en el 100 % de los pacientes. Conclusiones: Es un tumor predominante entre las neoplasias malignas, donde el diagnóstico oportuno permite tratar en estadios tempranos, lo cual favorece la sobrevida en pacientes.

Introduction: Lung cancer is one of the most serious diseases and one of the cancers with the highest incidence in people, responsible for the highest oncological mortality rates worldwide. Objective: To analyze the clinical-epidemiological characteristics of patients with lung cancer. Methods: A retrospective descriptive observational study was carried out, with the objective of analyzing the epidemiological clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with lung cancer treated at the María Curie Oncological Hospital during the five-year period from January 2017 to December 2021. The universe of study included 822 patients who were treated in the hospital during the aforementioned period with lung cancer. The sample at discretion was made up of 276 patients. Results: Prevalence of lung cancer in patients between 61 and 80 years of age, male, passive smokers. The cyto-histological variety with the highest incidence was small cell microcytic carcinoma; debut of this disease in patients in stage IV and with treatment received with radiotherapy and chemotherapy in 100% of the patients. Conclusions: It is a predominant tumor among malignant neoplasms, where timely diagnosis allows treatment in early stages, which favors survival in patients.

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Lung cancer is one of the most common carcinomas with the highest mortality in the world. Non-small cell lung carcinoma has a large proportion of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, of which rare EGFR mutations account for about 10%-20%. Currently, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) therapy is a standard treatment for patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma with EGFR mutations. To date, the toxicological effects of the EGFR L861Q variant (less than 2%) have been rarely reported, so further investigation of its sensitivity to six first-in-class TKIs is of great clinical interest. METHODS: In this study, two EGFR L861Q variants cell lines (EGFR L861Q variant and EGFR L861Q + exon 19 deletion variant) were established by CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology. The steady-state plasma concentrations of six TKIs (gefitinib/erlotinib/icotinib, the first generation; dacomitinib/afatinib, the second generation; and osimertinib, the third generation) were tested, respectively. The change of cell viability, proliferation, cloning ability, mitochondrial membrane potential and apoptosis were detected by MTT assay, EdU staining assay, colony formation assay, mitochondrial membrane potential and apoptosis test. TUNEL and Annexin V / PI staining were used to detect cell apoptosis, and flow cytometry was employed to explore the sensitivity of two variants to six TKIs. RESULTS: Our study indicated that the six TKIs inhibited the viability of the two cell lines in a time-dependent manner, and the inhibitory time of six TKIs on proliferation was different between the two cell lines. The proliferation and cloning ability of two cell lines were inhibited by six TKIs. The cytoskeleton morphology, microfilament structure and distribution of the two cell lines were changed by six TKIs. Compared with the control, the mitochondrial membrane potential decreased while the apoptosis increased of the two of variants after treatment with the six TKIs, and the associated mechanisms were elucidated. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the above results, EGFR L861Q + 19del variant and EGFR L861Q variant showed significant sensitivity to six first-in-class TKIs. Among the six TKIs, the first generation TKIs (gefitinib/erlotinib/icotinib), showed stronger inhibition ability to the EGFR L861Q + 19del variant and EGFR L861Q variant, among which gefitinib showed the strongest inhibition.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study aims to determine if the presence of specific clinical and computed tomography (CT) patterns are associated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was carried out in 6 databases between January 2002 and July 2021. The relationship between clinical and CT patterns to detect EGFR mutation was measured and pooled using odds ratios (OR). These results were used to build several mathematical models to predict EGFR mutation. RESULTS: 34 retrospective diagnostic accuracy studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results showed that ground-glass opacities (GGO) have an OR of 1.86 (95%CI 1.34 -2.57), air bronchogram OR 1.60 (95%CI 1.38 - 1.85), vascular convergence OR 1.39 (95%CI 1.12 - 1.74), pleural retraction OR 1.99 (95%CI 1.72 - 2.31), spiculation OR 1.42 (95%CI 1.19 - 1.70), cavitation OR 0.70 (95%CI 0.57 - 0.86), early disease stage OR 1.58 (95%CI 1.14 - 2.18), non-smoker status OR 2.79 (95%CI 2.34 - 3.31), female gender OR 2.33 (95%CI 1.97 - 2.75). A mathematical model was built, including all clinical and CT patterns assessed, showing an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81. CONCLUSIONS: GGO, air bronchogram, vascular convergence, pleural retraction, spiculated margins, early disease stage, female gender, and non-smoking status are significant risk factors for EGFR mutation. At the same time, cavitation is a protective factor for EGFR mutation. The mathematical model built acts as a good predictor for EGFR mutation in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

RESUMO

Significant advances have been made recently in the development of targeted therapy for lung adenocarcinoma. However, platinum-based chemotherapy remains as the cornerstone in the treatment of this neoplasm. This is the treatment option for adenocarcinomas without EGFR gain-of-function mutations or tumors that have developed resistance to targeted therapy. The High-Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1) is a multifunctional protein involved in intrinsic resistance to cisplatin. HMGB1 is released when cytotoxic agents, such as cisplatin, induce cell death. In the extracellular milieu, HMGB1 acts as adjuvant to induce an antitumor immune response. However, the opposite effect favoring tumor progression has also been reported. In this study, the effects of cisplatin in lung adenocarcinoma cell lines harboring clinically relevant mutations, such as EGFR mutations, were studied. Subcellular localization of HMGB1 was detected in the cell lines and in viable cells after a single exposure to cisplatin, which are designated as cisplatin-persistent cells. The mRNA expression of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), TLR-2, and TLR-4 receptors was measured in parental cell lines and their persistent variants. Finally, changes in plasma HMGB1 from a cohort of lung adenocarcinoma patients without EGFR mutation and treated with cisplatin-based therapy were analyzed. Cisplatin-susceptible lung adenocarcinoma cell lines died by apoptosis or necrosis and released HMGB1. In cisplatin-persistent cells, nuclear relocalization of HMGB1 and overexpression of HMGB1 and RAGE, but not TLR-2 or TLR-4, were observed. In tumor cells, this HMGB1-RAGE interaction may be associated with the development of cisplatin resistance. The results indicate a direct relationship between the plasma levels of HMGB1 and overall survival. In conclusion, HMGB1 may be an effective biomarker associated with increased overall survival of lung adenocarcinoma patients.