RESUMO
AIM: The pathways to post-operative pain are complex and encompass factors that extend beyond the treatment protocol employed. This study aimed to identify patient-related predictors of post-operative pain following root canal treatment. METHODOLOGY: A total of 154 patients received a single-visit root canal treatment for asymptomatic necrotic mandibular molars. Before treatment, dental anxiety, dental fear and sense of coherence (SOC) were measured as predictors for each patient using validated questionnaires. Other measured predictors included gender, age, previous negative experiences at the dental offices and prior root canal treatment. Post-operative pain was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale at multiple time-points over 30 days. Structural equation analysis was employed to evaluate the direct and indirect effects of patient-related predictors on a theoretical model of post-operative pain. The irrigant solution was also included in the model, as it was the only aspect that varied in the treatment protocol (sodium hypochlorite 2.5% and 8.25%). RESULTS: Dental anxiety (coefficient 0.028; p < .01), dental fear (coefficient 0.007; p = .02) and irrigant solution (coefficient 0.004; p = .03) exerted a direct effect on post-operative pain. SOC exerted an indirect effect on post-operative (coefficient 0.006; p = .01) through dental anxiety and dental fear. Moreover, previous negative experiences (coefficient 0.048; p = .04) exerted an indirect effect on post-operative pain through dental anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Dental anxiety, dental fear, previous negative experiences and SOC are patient-related predictors of post-operative pain following root canal treatment. These factors should be taken into consideration in clinical practice, as patients with these characteristics may be at an increased risk of experiencing post-operative pain.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the effect of intravenous (IV) methadone versus intrathecal morphine (ITM) within an Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) pathway on postoperative pain and outcomes (length of hospital stay and postoperative complications) after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two tertiary academic medical institutions within the same health system. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible 289 adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with an enhanced recovery pathway from January 2020 through July 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were administered ITM (0.25 mg) or IV methadone (0.1 mg/kg) if ITM was contraindicated. All patients were enrolled in an ERACS pathway using current Enhanced Recovery After Surgery society guidelines. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcome measures included postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption measured as oral morphine equivalents. We analyzed patient demographics, procedural factors, intraoperative medications, and outcomes. Adjusted linear mixed models were fit to analyze associations between intervention and pain outcomes. ITM was associated with decrease in pain scores on postoperative day 0 after adjusting for clinical variables (average marginal effect, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.977; p = 0.049). No difference in opioid consumption could be demonstrated between groups after adjusting for postoperative day and other variables of interest. CONCLUSIONS: ITM when compared with IV methadone was associated with a decrease in pain scores without any difference in opioid consumption after elective cardiac surgery. Methadone can be considered as a safe and effective alternative to ITM for ERACS protocols. Future large prospective studies are needed to validate this finding and further improve analgesia and safety.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Injeções Espinhais , Metadona , Morfina , Dor Pós-Operatória , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Metadona/administração & dosagem , Metadona/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Morfina/administração & dosagem , Morfina/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Administração Intravenosa , Estudos de Coortes , Resultado do Tratamento , Medição da Dor/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) as a rescue therapy in the recovery room. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center historical cohort study included patients who received either ESPB or intravenous meperidine for pain management in the recovery room. Patients' numeric rating scale (NRS) scores and opoid consumptions were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients were included in the statistical analysis. Sixty-two (57%) patients received ESPB postoperatively (pESPB) and 46 (43%) patients were managed with IV meperidine boluses only (IV). The cumulative meperidine doses administered were 0 (0-40) and 30 (10-80) mg for the pESPB and IV groups, respectively (p < 0.001). NRS scores of group pESPB were significantly lower than those of Group IV on T30 and T60. CONCLUSION: ESPB reduces the frequency of opioid administration and the amount of opioids administered in the early post-operative period. When post-operative rescue therapy is required, it should be considered before opioids.
OBJETIVO: Evaluar el efecto del bloqueo del plano erector espinal (ESPB) como terapia de rescate en la sala de recuperación. MÉTODO: Este estudio de cohortes histórico de un solo centro incluyó a pacientes que recibieron ESPB o meperidina intravenosa para el tratamiento del dolor en la sala de recuperación. Se evaluaron las puntuaciones de la escala de calificación numérica (NRS) de los pacientes y los consumos de opiáceos. RESULTADOS: En el análisis estadístico se incluyeron 108 pacientes. Recibieron ESPB 62 (57%) pacientes y los otros 46 (43%) fueron manejados solo con bolos de meperidina intravenosa. Las dosis acumuladas de meperidina administradas fueron 0 (0-40) y 30 (10-80) mg para los grupos de ESPB y de meperidina sola, respectivamente (p < 0.001). Las puntuaciones de dolor del grupo ESPB fueron significativamente más bajas que las del grupo de meperidina sola en T30 y T60. CONCLUSIONES: El ESPB reduce la frecuencia de administración de opiáceos y la cantidad de estos administrada en el posoperatorio temprano. Cuando se requiera terapia de rescate posoperatoria, se debe considerar antes que los opiáceos.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Meperidina , Bloqueio Nervoso , Dor Pós-Operatória , Músculos Paraespinais , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Músculos Paraespinais/inervação , Adulto , Meperidina/administração & dosagem , Meperidina/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Medição da Dor , Idoso , Colecistectomia , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the relationship of the pre-operative neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to the timing of epidural analgesia administration and post-operative acute and chronic pain in thoracotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 60 patients, with NLR ≥ 2 (Group A) and NLR < 2 (Group B). Each group was divided into subgroups pre-emptive analgesia (Group P) and control group (Group C). Epidural analgesic solution was administered as a bolus before the surgical incision in Group P and at the end of the operation in Group C. NRS was questioned postoperatively at the 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, 24th h, 1st, and 3rd months and also additional analgesic needs were recorded. RESULTS: In Group A, the pain scores of the patients who received pre-emptive epidural analgesia were lower at the post-operative 2nd, 4th, and 8th h and analgesic consumption was less in the post-operative first 24 h. CONCLUSION: It was observed that pre-emptive epidural analgesia reduced pain levels and additional analgesic consumption in the acute post-operative period in patients with pre-operative NLR ≥ 2.
OBJETIVO: Este estudio investigó la relación de la relación neutrófilos/linfocitos (NLR) preoperatoria con el momento de la administración de la analgesia epidural y el dolor agudo y crónico posoperatorio en la toracotomía. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: El estudio se realizó en 60 pacientes, como NLR ≥ 2 (Grupo A) y NLR < 2 (Grupo B). Cada grupo se dividió en subgrupos de analgesia preventiva (Grupo P) y grupo control (Grupo C). La solución analgésica epidural se administró en bolo antes de la incisión quirúrgica en el Grupo P y al final de la operación en el Grupo C. La NRS se cuestionó posoperatoriamente a las 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 horas, 1 y 3 meses también adicionales Se registraron las necesidades analgésicas. RESULTADOS: En el Grupo A, los puntajes de dolor de los pacientes que recibieron analgesia epidural preventiva fueron menores a las 2, 4 y 8 horas postoperatorias y el consumo de analgésicos fue menor en las primeras 24 horas postoperatorias. CONCLUSIÓN: Se observó que la analgesia epidural preventiva redujo los niveles de dolor y el consumo adicional de analgésicos en el postoperatorio agudo en pacientes con NLR preoperatorio ≥ 2.
Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural , Humanos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Neutrófilos , Toracotomia , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , LinfócitosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to investigate the effect of pre-operative sleep quality on post-operative pain and emergence agitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study was performed 80 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II and 18-65 years of age. The patients were divided into poor (Group A, n = 40) and good sleep quality (Group B, n = 40). All patients were operated on under standard general anesthesia. The emergence agitation and pain status of all groups were evaluated in the recovery room and post-operative period. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups regarding demographic data. Post-operative numeric rating scale scores and analgesic consumption were significantly higher in Group A than in Group B (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding post-operative emergence agitation and extubation quality (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In our study, poor pre-operative sleep quality increases post-operative pain and analgesic consumption; however, emergence agitation is not associated with sleep quality in the pre-operative period.
OBJETIVO: Nuestro estudio tuvo como objetivo investigar el efecto de la calidad del sueño preoperatorio sobre el dolor posoperatorio y la agitación de emergencia. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Nuestro estudio se realizó en 80 pacientes con ASA I-II y de 18 a 65 años de edad. Los pacientes se dividieron en mala (grupo A, n = 40) y buena calidad del sueño (grupo B, n = 40). Todos los pacientes fueron operados bajo anestesia general estándar. La agitación de emergencia y el estado del dolor de todos los grupos se evaluaron en la sala de recuperación y en el período postoperatorio. RESULTADOS: No hubo diferencia significativa entre los grupos con respecto a los datos demográficos. Las puntuaciones NRS postoperatorias y el consumo de analgésicos fueron significativamente más altos en el Grupo A que en el Grupo B (p < 0.05). No hubo diferencia significativa entre los grupos con respecto a la agitación de emergencia postoperatoria y la calidad de la extubación (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIÓN: En nuestro estudio, la mala calidad del sueño preoperatorio aumenta el dolor posoperatorio y el consumo de analgésicos; sin embargo, la agitación de emergencia no se asocia con la calidad del sueño en el período preoperatorio.
Assuntos
Delírio do Despertar , Humanos , Delírio do Despertar/epidemiologia , Delírio do Despertar/etiologia , Delírio do Despertar/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade do Sono , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Analgésicos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: In this randomized and prospective research, we aimed to relieve surgical and muscle-related pain early after lumbar disc operations with caudal preemptive analgesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation were included in this study. The caudal epidural injection was performed for all patients 20 min before surgery. The patients were divided into three groups. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or tramadol use were recorded. Pre-operative and post-operative pain was interpreted through a visual analog scale. RESULTS: There was a difference between the groups in all post-operative measurements (p < 0.05), between Group 1 and Group 3, and between Group 2 and Group 3. A statistical significance has been achieved between the groups at the 1st h, 2nd h, 4th h, and 24th h (p < 0.05). The difference between the pain intensities of the patients at the 24th h and the 1st week was statistically significant in Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05). Evaluation of the effects of medical treatments reduced the severity of back pain and foot pain. CONCLUSION: The preemptive bupivacaine or in combination with methylprednisolone caudal injection is an effective and safe method to reduce post-operative pain and ameliorate functional capacity for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.
OBJETIVO: En esta investigación prospectiva aleatorizada, nuestro objetivo fue aliviar el dolor quirúrgico y muscular temprano después de las operaciones de disco lumbar con analgesia preventiva caudal. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: en este estudio se incluyeron un total de 120 pacientes con hernia de disco lumbar de un solo nivel. La inyección epidural caudal se realizó para todos los pacientes 20 minutos antes de la cirugía. Los pacientes fueron divididos en tres grupos. Se registró el uso de AINE o tramadol. El dolor preoperatorio y postoperatorio se interpretó a través de una escala analógica visual. RESULTADOS: Hubo diferencia entre los grupos en todas las medidas postoperatorias (p < 0.05), entre el grupo 1 y el grupo 3, y entre el grupo 2 y el grupo 3. Se ha logrado una significación estadística entre los grupos a la 1a hora, 2a hora, 4 y 24 horas (p < 0.05). La diferencia entre las intensidades de dolor de los pacientes a la hora 24 y la primera semana fue estadísticamente significativa en los Grupos 1 y 2 (p < 0.05). La evaluación de los efectos de los tratamientos médicos redujo la gravedad del dolor de espalda y de pie. CONCLUSIÓN: La bupivacaína preventiva, o en combinación con la inyección caudal de metilprednisolona, es un método eficaz y seguro para reducir el dolor posoperatorio y mejorar la capacidad funcional para el tratamiento de la hernia de disco lumbar.
Assuntos
Anestesia Caudal , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral , Humanos , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Dor nas Costas/cirurgia , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Discotomia , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Abstract Background There has been a growing interest in the use of ketamine following orthopedic surgeries. We hypothesized that low dose intravenous ketamine during surgery would help in mobilization following total knee replacement (TKR) in oncology patients as assessed by the timed to up and go (TUG) test at 72 hours post-surgery. Our secondary objectives were to compare the opioid requirement at the end of 72 hours, pain scores, satisfaction with pain management, adverse effects, range of joint movement achieved in the post-operative period and the functional recovery at the end of 1 month. Methods After the ethics commitee approval, registration of the trial with the Clinical Trial Registry - India (CTRI), and informed consent, this double-blinded trial was conducted. Using computer generated randomization chart, an independent team randomized the patients into ketamine group which received at induction, a ketamine bolus dose of 0.5 mg.kg-1 before the incision followed by 10 µg.kg-1min-1 infusion which was maintained intraoperatively till skin closure and the saline group received an equivalent volume of saline. Postoperatively, patient controlled morphine pumps were attached and the pain score with morphine usage were recorded for 72 hours. The TUG tests and range of motion were assessed by the physiotherapists until 72 hours. Results Fifty-two patients were enrolled in the trial. Demographics were comparable. No significant intraoperative hemodynamic changes and post-operative adverse events were noted between the groups. A decrease in the TUG test, along with decreased opioid usage with a better range of movements was noted in the ketamine group, but this was not statistically significant. Day of discharge, patient satisfaction score, and functional recovery assessed by Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were comparable between the groups. Conclusion In conclusion, low dose intraoperative ketamine infusion does not provide clinical benefit in perioperative pain management and postoperative rehabilitation following total knee endoprosthetic replacement in oncology.
Assuntos
Humanos , Artroplastia do Joelho , Ketamina , Neoplasias/cirurgia , Neoplasias/complicações , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Manejo da Dor , Analgésicos , Analgésicos Opioides , MorfinaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There has been a growing interest in the use of ketamine following orthopedic surgeries. We hypothesized that low dose intravenous ketamine during surgery would help in mobilization following total knee replacement (TKR) in oncology patients as assessed by the timed to up and go (TUG) test at 72.áhours post-surgery. Our secondary objectives were to compare the opioid requirement at the end of 72.áhours, pain scores, satisfaction with pain management, adverse effects, range of joint movement achieved in the post-operative period and the functional recovery at the end of 1 month. METHODS: After the ethics commitee approval, registration of the trial with the Clinical Trial Registry - India (CTRI), and informed consent, this double-blinded trial was conducted. Using computer generated randomization chart, an independent team randomized the patients into ketamine group which received at induction, a ketamine bolus dose of 0.5.ámg.kg-1 before the incision followed by 10.á..g.kg-1min-1 infusion which was maintained intraoperatively till skin closure and the saline group received an equivalent volume of saline. Postoperatively, patient controlled morphine pumps were attached and the pain score with morphine usage were recorded for 72.áhours. The TUG tests and range of motion were assessed by the physiotherapists until 72.áhours. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled in the trial. Demographics were comparable. No significant intraoperative hemodynamic changes and post-operative adverse events were noted between the groups. A decrease in the TUG test, along with decreased opioid usage with a better range of movements was noted in the ketamine group, but this was not statistically significant. Day of discharge, patient satisfaction score, and functional recovery assessed by Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, low dose intraoperative ketamine infusion does not provide clinical benefit in perioperative pain management and postoperative rehabilitation following total knee endoprosthetic replacement in oncology.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Ketamina , Neoplasias , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides , Manejo da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Morfina , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/cirurgia , Método Duplo-Cego , AnalgésicosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Postoperative chronic pain (PCP) is defined as a discomfort that lasts more than expected or beyond 3 months after surgery. The recognition and study of this clinical entity has been gaining interest in the past few years. One of the main reasons is the great impact it can have on the quality of life of patients who suffer from it. OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence, risk factor and impact of PCP on patients subjected to different surgical procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Search on MED- LINE/Pubmed, using the following terms: "chronic postsurgical pain", "chronic post operative pain", "chronic post operative pain", "chronic post surgical pain". Publications were then sieved using their title and abstract. RESULTS: Fifty-seven articles were analyzed. Ten to fifty percent of patients were reported as suffering PCP, with up to 10% incidence of severe pain. The main risk factors identified were the use of analgesics, pre-operative pain and type of surgery. Orthopedic surgery was highly associated with moderate to severe PCP within the first year. Twenty-one percent of patients referred PCP affected their quality of life and sleep; ability to carry out physical activity and return to work. CONCLUSION: The first approach to PCP is getting to know its impact and epidemiology. Surgical treatments can cause PCP, which will affect patient recovery and increase costs. Recognizing those patients at risk and establishing preventive management protocols could improve the quality of life of postsurgical patients.
INTRODUCCIÓN: El dolor crónico posoperatorio (DCPO) es aquel que aparece tras un procedimiento quirúrgico y se mantiene por más tiempo de lo esperado o más de tres meses luego de la cirugía. Es una entidad de reciente estudio y que tiene un gran impacto en la calidad de vida de los pacientes postoperados. OBJETIVO: Describir la prevalencia, factores de riesgo y el impacto del DCPO en pacientes sometidos a diferentes procedimientos quirúrgicos. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Se realizó una revisión de la literatura utilizando la base de datos MEDLINE/Pubmed. Los términos libres fueron "chronic postsurgical pain", "chronic postoperative pain", "chronic post operative pain", "chronic post surgical pain". Se realizó un cribado según título y resumen. RESULTADOS: Fueron analizados 57 artículos. De 10%-50% de los pacientes presentan DCPO y hasta 10% puede ser severo. El uso de analgésicos, presencia de dolor preoperatorio y especialidad quirúrgica han sido señalados como los principales factores de riesgo. La cirugía traumatológica aparece como la más asociada a DCPO moderado y severo a un año. Hasta 21% de los pacientes refieren que afecta su calidad de vida, el sueño, actividad física y reincorporación laboral. CONCLUSIÓN: El conocimiento de la epidemiología e impacto del DCPO es un primer acercamiento a este problema. Patologías de resolución quirúrgica pueden evolucionar con DCPO, afectando su recuperación y aumentando los costos que se desea contener. El reconocimiento de la población de riesgo y la instauración de protocolos preventivos pudiera mejorar la calidad de vida de los pacientes postoperados.
Assuntos
Humanos , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Opioid abuse has been an increasing problem since the 1990s. With over 47,000 opioid related deaths recorded in 2017 alone, concerns have been raised regarding the dangers of introducing opioids perioperatively to patients undergoing major surgeries. OBJECTIVES: The present study proposes to examine the frequency, amount, and trends in post-operative opioid consumption in patients undergoing orthopedic surgical procedures. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized, retrospective questionnaire-based study. SETTING: Patients who underwent any type of orthopedic surgery at the University of Pennsylvania Presbyterian Hospital from 1/1/2018 to 3/12/2019 were randomly selected and called during the summer of 2019. METHODS: In this retrospective questionnaire-based study, 828 patients were called by telephone in the summer of 2019. These patients were asked a variety of questions involving opioid consumption behavior post-surgery. The study ended after receiving responses from 200 patients. RESULTS: Nineteen (9.5%) patients reported positively for experiencing euphoria while taking opioids post-surgery. Of the 200 patients contacted, 6 patients (3%) reported switching to marijuana instead of opioids. Thirty-eight (19%) patients preferred to take no opioids at all post-surgery, and one patient was found to have given their prescription to a family member or friend. Twenty-one patients (10.5%) were found to have been taking opioids for non-severe pain. Blacks and whites were the most common racial demographics, making up 84 and 109 of the totals, respectively. The odds ratios for all of the predictors showed that the relative risk for opioid misuse was higher for black patients than white patients (OR = 3.034). There was no relationship between the intra- and post-operative opioid administration and long-term opioid misuse. LIMITATIONS: Patients are self-selected and had the option to opt out of the study when contacted. Some patients may not have been available to answer the phone when our study was being conducted. This study was only conducted for orthopedic patients and for patients who received surgery at the University of Pennsylvania Presbyterian Hospital, thus affecting the demographics for our research. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription opioid misuse is more common among the black population. The total opioid consumption is frequently lower than the quantity prescribed. Patients frequently use opioids even though they feel that pain is insufficient to deserve such an intervention. Euphoria is experienced by a significant number of patients taking prescription opioids Often patients do not take any opioids, although they had prescriptions.