RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In recent years, evidence has accumulated that a second method of conserving the breast from cancer with re-irradiation as part of treatment may be feasible and safe. Many oncologists are skeptical of breast re-irradiation due to concerns about late complications, so access to quantitative data on the prevalence of breast re-irradiation complications is very important. In this meta-analysis, we determine the prevalence of complications in normal tissue after breast re-irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search was done to recognize qualified studies using EMBASE, MEDLINE, PUBMED, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Collaboration Library electronic databases from 2000 to 2023. In total, ten primary studies were applied in this meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of complications of disorders, skin fibrosis, and chest pain. Heterogeneity was investigated using the I2 index and the meta-regression to evaluate variables suspected of causing heterogeneity. Statistical analysis and synthesis were performed using Stata 17. RESULTS: The average dose received by patients who underwent radiation therapy in two stages was 100.32 Gy, and in these patients, the prevalence of skin fibrosis and disorders was 47% (95% CI 71-22%; I2 = 96.76%, P < 0.001) and the prevalence of chest pain was 35% (95% CI 68-8%; I2 = 98.13%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is little clinical information about the incidence of complications in breast re-irradiation therapy. This meta-analysis presents the prevalence of complications after breast re-irradiation to help radiation oncologists and physicists make better decisions.

RESUMO

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of radiotherapy and different endodontic treatment protocols on the bond strength to pulp chamber dentin. Eighty mandibular molars were randomly divided into two groups (n = 40): non-irradiated and irradiated (60 Gy). The pulp chambers were sectioned, and each group was subdivided (n = 8), according to the endodontic treatment protocol: no treatment (Control); Single-visit; Two-visits; Immediate dentin sealing (IDS) + single-visit; and IDS + two-visits. Each endodontic treatment visit was simulated through irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl, 17% EDTA and distilled water. IDS was performed by actively applying two coats of a universal adhesive to the lateral walls of the pulp chamber. After, the pulp chambers were restored with resin composite and four sticks were obtained for microtensile test. In addition, the dentin of the pulp chamber roof was assessed for surface roughness, chemical composition, and topography after each treatment protocol. Two-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's post hoc were performed (α = 5%). The treatment protocol affected bond strength (p < 0.05), while the irradiation did not (p > 0.05). The control group presented the highest values (p < 0.05). The single-visit group demonstrated better performance compared to the other groups (p < 0.05), which did not differ from each other (p > 0.05) The use of IDS changed the surface roughness (p < 0.05), chemical composition (p < 0.05) and topography of the dentin. In conclusion, the treatment protocol influenced dentin adhesion, while irradiation did not.

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Angiosarcoma (AS) is a rare malignancy with considerable heterogeneity seen in its aetiology, anatomical location, and clinicopathological behaviour. Diagnosis is often delayed and prognosis poor. The purpose of this study was to perform a retrospective review of all cases of AS over 10 years at a high-volume regional UK referral centre. METHODS/PATIENTS: We reviewed all cases of AS discussed at the sarcoma multidisciplinary meetings of University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust from September 2013 to August 2023. Demographic and clinicopathologic features at diagnosis, approaches to treatment, and outcomes were compared between four AS subtypes. RESULTS: A total of 130 cases were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 71 years, with the majority being female (78%). The most common AS subtype was radiation-induced AS (RIAS) (n = 72; 55%), followed by primary cutaneous (n = 28; 22%), primary non-cutaneous (n = 25; 19%), and AS secondary to lymphoedema (n = 5; 4%). Metastases were present at diagnosis in 18% of patients. Treatment was with surgery in the majority of patients (71%). The median survival for the cohort was 30 months (95% CI 20-40), although this differed significantly by AS subtype (p < 0.001), ranging from 5 months in primary non-cutaneous AS to 76 months in RIAS. CONCLUSION: RIAS is the most common AS subtype, with surgery the only potentially curative treatment modality. Overall prognosis varies significantly by subtype. An international consensus on classification of AS subtypes is required to allow meaningful comparisons across studies and/or a prospective multi-centre registry.

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical outcomes after SABR in a cohort of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or pulmonary metastases in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with forced expiratory volume in the first second predicted (FEV1) ≤ 50%. METHODS: Retrospective single-center study was performed to analyze clinical outcomes and toxicities in COPD patients with severe lung dysfunction treated with SABR from 1st June 2015 to 31st October 2022. RESULTS: Thirty four patients (forty locations) were enrolled for analysis. Median follow-up was 2.9 years. Median age was 73.5 years (range, 65.6-80.1). FEV1 was 38% (range, 28.2-50.0) prior to radiotherapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 41.1 months (95% CI 38.9-not reached). OS rates at 2-, 3-, and 5- years were 79%, 71%, and 36%, respectively. Cancer-specific survival rates at 2-, 3-, and 5- years were 96%, 96%, and 68%, respectively. Local control rates at 2-, 3-, and 5- years were 88%, 83%, and 83%, respectively. No grade 4 or 5 toxicity was observed. The most common acute toxicity was pneumonitis (38.2%), of which only 1 patient (2.9%) reported grade 3 acute toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Lung SABR in patients with poor pulmonary function may be effective with acceptable toxicity.

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to assess the role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy  (HBOT) in patients with dysphagia after radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. METHOD: A systematic search was conducted in the electronic databases Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant studies until March 14, 2023. No restriction on language or publication date. The criteria for inclusion: patients with HNC who had received both radiation therapy and HBOT as 1) a preventive treatment against swallowing difficulties, 2) to preserve swallowing function, or 3) to promote swallowing difficulties. RESULTS: We identified 1396 records. After removal of 31 duplicates, 1365 records were accessible for title and abstract screening. This yielded 53 studies for full text assessment. Six studies met the eligibility criteria and were included for qualitative analysis. CONCLUSION: Evidence of HBOT benefits in patients with dysphagia after radiation therapy for head and neck cancer is inconsistent. Well-designed studies using validated outcome measures and long-term follow-up are warranted.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSES: This study aimed to develop and validate algorithms for automating intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning in breast cancer patients, with a focus on patient anatomical characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively selected 400 breast cancer patients without lymph node involvement for automated treatment planning. Automation was achieved using the Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface (ESAPI) integrated into the Eclipse Treatment Planning System. We employed three beam insertion geometries and three optimization strategies, resulting in 3600 plans, each delivering a 40.05 Gy dose in 15 fractions. Gantry angles in the tangent fields were selected based on a criterion involving the minimum intersection area between the Planning Target Volume (PTV) and the ipsilateral lung in the Beam's Eye View projection. ESAPI was also used to gather patient anatomical data, serving as input for Random Forest models to select the optimal plan. The Random Forest classification considered both beam insertion geometry and optimization strategy. Dosimetric data were evaluated in accordance with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 1005 protocol. RESULTS: Overall, all approaches generated high-quality plans, with approximately 94% meeting the acceptable dose criteria for organs at risk and/or target coverage as defined by RTOG guidelines. Average automated plan generation time ranged from 6 min and 37 s to 9 min and 22 s, with the mean time increasing with additional fields. The Random Forest approach did not successfully enable automatic planning strategy selection. Instead, our automated planning system allows users to choose from the tested geometry and strategy options. CONCLUSIONS: Although our attempt to correlate patient anatomical features with planning strategy using machine learning tools was unsuccessful, the resulting dosimetric outcomes proved satisfactory. Our algorithm consistently produced high-quality plans, offering significant time and efficiency advantages.

Assuntos

RESUMO

La radioterapia de cabeza y cuello posee un rol central en el tratamiento de las neoplasias otorrinolaringológicas, ya sea como tratamiento adyuvante a la cirugía o como terapia definitiva. Dentro de este campo de estudio, un tópico aún poco explorado y motivo de debate, es la indicación de irradiación de los ganglios linfáticos retrofaríngeos, correspondientes a los niveles VIIa y VIIb de cuello. Hemos llevado a cabo una revisión sistemática con el objetivo de dilucidar criterios de irradiación electiva de estos grupos nodales y de emitir recomendaciones en cuanto a su inclusión en la práctica de la radio-oncología.

Radiation therapy has a central role in the management of head and neck malignancies, either as adjuvant treatment after surgery or as definitive therapy. Within this field of study, a still poorly explored and matter-of-debate topic is the indication for irradiation of retropahyngeal lymph nodes, corresponding to neck levels VIIa and VIIb. We have conducted a systematic review with the objective of elucidating elective irradiation criteria for these nodal groups and to issue recommendations about its inclusion in the practice of radiation oncology.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Cervical disease control might be challenging in advanced thyroid cancer (DTC). Indications for cervical external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) are controversial. PURPOSE: To identify clinical and molecular factors associated with control of cervical disease with EBRT. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation and molecular analysis of the primary tumor DTC patients who underwent cervical EBRT between 1995 and 2022 was performed. RESULTS: Eighty adults, median age of 61 years, were included. T4 disease was present in 43.7%, lymph node involvement in 42.5%, and distant metastasis in 47.5%. Those with cervical progression were older (62.5 vs. 57.3, p = 0.04) with more nodes affected (12.1 vs. 2.8, p = 0.04) and had EBRT performed later following surgery (76.6 vs. 64 months, p = 0.05). EBRT associated with multikinase inhibitors showed longer overall survival than EBRT alone (64.3 vs. 37.9, p = 0.018) and better local disease control. Performing EBRT before radioiodine (RAI) was associated with longer cervical progression-free survival (CPFS) than was RAI before (67.5 vs. 34.5, p < 0.01). EBRT ≥2 years after surgery was associated with worse CPFS (4.9 vs. 34, p = 0.04). The most common molecular alterations were ERBB2, BRAF, FAT1, RET and ROS1 and TERT mutation was predictive of worse disease control after EBRT (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Younger patients, with fewer affected nodes and treated earlier after surgery had better cervical disease control. Combination of EBRT with MKI improved OS. TERT mutation might indicate worse responders to EBRT; however, further studies are necessary to clarify the role of molecular testing in selecting candidates for cervical EBRT.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We investigated the effect of boost radiation therapy (RT) in addition to whole pelvis RT (WPRT) on treatment outcome and safety of cervical cancer patients following hysterectomy with close/positive resection margins (RM). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 51 patients with cervical cancer who received WPRT with or without boost-RT as adjuvant treatment between July 2006 and June 2022. Twenty patients (39.2%) were treated with WPRT-alone, and 31 (60.8%) received boost-RT after WPRT using brachytherapy or intensity-modulated RT. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 41 months. According to RT modality, the 4-year local control (LC) and locoregional control (LRC) rates of patients treated with WPRT-alone were 61% and 61%, respectively, whereas those in LC and LRC rates in patients who underwent WPRT with boost-RT were 93.2% and 75.3%, with p-values equal to 0.005 and 0.090, respectively. Seven patients (35.0%) had local recurrence in the WPRT-treated group compared to only two out of the 31 patients (6.5%) in the WPRT with boost-RT-treated counterparts (p = 0.025). Boost-RT was a significantly good prognostic factor for LC (p = 0.013) and LRC (p = 0.013). Boost-RT did not result in statistically-significant improvements in progression-free survival or overall survival. The acute and late toxicity rates were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Boost RT following WPRT is a safe and effective treatment strategy to improve LC without increasing toxicity in patients with cervical cancer with close/positive RM after hysterectomy.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Assess the local recurrence rate and global survival rate among women diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) between 2007 and 2017, in a single private healthcare setting in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study based on medical records about the outcomes of patients submitted to breast-conserving surgery followed by IOERT. The collected variables included the patient's profile and tumor features, IOERT isodose, and outcomes. The quantitative data were presented in tables of frequency. The survival curves were created with the Kaplan-Meier method. In all tests, the adopted relevance level was 5%. The analyses were carried out with SPSS version 25.0. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The samples consisted of 78 patients, among which a total of 14 (17.9%) recurrences were observed. The median time of recurrence was 49 months after the IOERT was performed. Of the 78 patients analyzed, 13 (16.7%) died, 5 (6.4%) of which were due to breast cancer. The global survival rate in 5 years was 94.9% and 90.4% in 10 years. The local recurrence rate in 5 years was 89.7% and 86.4% in 10 years. Our findings revealed a higher local recurrence rate than the literature data. However, our results also showed that patients classified as low-risk had an overall survival of 5 and 10 years similar to other studies in the literature, reaffirming that low-risk women can benefit from IOERT. Given this finding, it is reaffirmed that rigorous eligibility criteria for IOERT are critical to reducing local recurrence.

Assuntos