RESUMO
Ulnar-sided wrist pain (USWP) is a diagnostic challenge. Although most of the etiologies are associated with the triangular fibrocartilage complex, the distal radioulnar joint, ulnocarpal impingement, or extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) tendinopathy, other differential diagnoses should be suggested during propaedeutics. Carpal anatomical variations, specifically the hamatolunate joint, may be responsible for USWP. The purpose of this case report is to highlight the diagnostic approach to USWP and discuss an infrequent differential diagnosis and its surgical management. We present a 44-year-old male patient, a waiter, with USWP and work difficulties. After careful clinical investigation and radiologic studies (magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic fluoroscopy), it was observed the hamatolunate joint impingement. The patient underwent arthroscopy with inspection of the midcarpal joint through the midcarpal radial portal, revealing joint degradation of both articular surfaces. The proximal pole of the hamate was removed. The patient evolved well and returned to work two months later. Function and pain scores were satisfactory at the one-year follow-up.
RESUMO
Background Ulnarly sided wrist pain is a common and challenging symptom. Arthroscopy has become a safe and effective tool for the correct diagnosis and treatment, proving to be better than all other clinical and imaging diagnostic methods. Some tests have been described for the diagnosis of triangular fibrocartilage (TFC) lesions, such as the trampoline test for peripheral lesions and the hook, ghost, and suction tests for foveal detachments. In tears at the disc level, when they affect all layers of the TFC (complete lesion) at the same point, testing with the probe will usually suffice for the diagnosis. However, in some apparently partial lesions, the probe cannot pass through all layers because the proximal and distal sites of the lesion are not aligned. There has been no arthroscopic test described for such cases. Case Description We describe a simple and practical test that we have called the "bubble test" in a typical case to diagnose TFC central injuries, aiming to discriminate partial from complete lesions, which are eventually hard to differentiate through direct vision and arthroscopic probing, leading to a direct influence onto the treatment. The bubble test is performed with external compression of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) aspect, with the thumb on the back of the DRUJ and the index and middle fingers onto the volar aspect. The abrupt compression of this region causes the passage of air mixed with synovial fluid from the DRUJ to the radiocarpal joint, generating bubble formation. Clinical Relevance The bubble test should correlate to physical examination and imaging (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) findings and is particularly useful in central and degenerative (Type II) TFC lesions in patients complaining of chronic pain on the ulnar region of the wrist, with no history of trauma and with inconclusive MRI findings. Once the diagnosis is confirmed, arthroscopic treatment consists of wide debridement of the lesion with resection of the injured tissue and the local inflammatory reaction. Thus, it is essential for the correct treatment to define the exact location of the lesion and to know whether the disc injury is complete.
RESUMO
Background Synovial cysts (SCs) are the most frequent wrist tumors; the arthroscopic treatment presents good results when surgery is indicated for symptomatic or patients with cosmetic concerns. The tumoral lesion should be arthroscopically decompressed or drained toward the inside of the joint through pedicle opening and resection of a small portion of the capsule. Hence, the cyst pedicle must be found for the success of this technique. Description of Technique Some tricks have already been described to facilitate SC location during arthroscopy. We describe an indirect technique that employs an 18-G needle to enhance SC pedicle location and drainage. The technique involves a puncture on the interval of the carpal extrinsic ligaments where the pedicle is suspected to be remain. When found, cyst is drained with a single-puncture motion of the need which promotes cyst content extravasation due to pressure toward the joint. Patients and Methods This method has been employed in 16 patients, including 9 with dorsal cysts, and seven with volar cysts. Results All patients presented complete recovery and symptom improvement in up to 30 days, with total disappearance of the cyst. There were no relapses or severe complications within the 12-month follow-up. Conclusion This is a safe, useful technique that facilitates location of intra-articular cyst pedicle, thus avoiding unnecessary damage in healthy tissues with no increased costs.
RESUMO
Background The importance of the dorsal ulnar fragment (DUF) for stability and articular congruence of the radius is widely recognized, and standard surgical techniques often fail to ensure its reduction. Description of Technique We describe a modification of volar wrist portals for arthroscopic management of the DUF of the distal radius. It is made in an outside-in fashion in line with the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) approach for the distal radius. Through this volar portal, we achieve wide and direct visualization of the DUF, with the advantage of protecting important anatomic structures such as the FCR tendon, the radial artery, and the median nerve; all protected with the previously made volar approach for the distal radius. In addition, easy manipulation and reduction of the DUF is obtained with instrumentation through standard dorsal portals. Patients and Methods We performed this procedure in 23 patients with distal radius fractures (DRF) with displaced DUF. Results Early and late postoperative evaluation demonstrated intraoperative reduction maintenance and adequate range of motion, compatible with the usual findings of standard volar plating, with the benefit of anatomic reduction of the DUF. Conclusion With our technique, volar plating associated with arthroscopy-assisted dorsal fragment specific fixation with dorsal standard and the FCR portals permits optimal surgical treatment of most DRFs.
RESUMO
Introduction Four-corner arthrodesis is a salvage technique for patients with carpal advanced osteoarthritis. Nowadays, percutaneous techniques with arthroscopic assistance have been described, achieving favorable results with minimally invasive techniques advantages over open surgery. Objective To compare functional and radiological results in patients with SLAC or SNAC wrists operated with open surgical technique versus percutaneous surgery with arthroscopic assistance. Materials and Methods Retrospective case-control study of clinical records and radiological images of patients with carpal advanced osteoarthritis operated with both surgical techniques. We studied demographic variables, pain with visual analog scale (VAS) score, function in ranges of mobility, time of consolidation, and correction of DISI deformity. Results A total of 22 male patients with an average age of 32.5 years were studied. Thirteen patients in the case group (percutaneous technique with arthroscopic assistance) and nine patients in the control group (open surgery). Pain score in VAS at discharge was 3 for cases and 5 in controls ( p = 0.008), and at 30 days postoperatively, it was 0 and 3 respectively ( p = 0.00). The extension and flexion ranges were 52.6°and 38.7° in the cases and 35.7° and 32.4° in the control group ( p = 0.119 and 0.0016, respectively). The capitolunate angle was 10°in the controls and 5°in the cases ( p = 0.0008). The time of consolidation was 8.8 weeks in cases and 12.5 weeks in controls ( p = 0.039). Conclusions The percutaneous technique with arthroscopic assistance for the 4-courner arthrodesis is a reproducible technique and is effective in achieving consolidation, pain reduction and preservation of wrist motion. In the present study, we demonstrate superiority of this technique over the open surgery. Level of Evidence This is a Level III, therapeutic study.
RESUMO
INTRODUCCIÓN: La artrodesis de cuatro esquinas es una técnica de salvataje para los pacientes con artrosis avanzada del carpo. Los objetivos quirúrgicos son disminuir el dolor y mantener cierto movimiento de la muñeca. En el último tiempo, se han descrito técnicas percutáneas con asistencia artroscópica que han logrado resultados favorables, a pesar de que la técnica abierta sigue siendo el gold estándar para realizar esa técnica quirúrgica. OBJETIVO: Comparar resultados funcionales y radiológicos en pacientes con muñecas con colapso avanzado escafolunar (scapholunate advanced collapse, SLAC) o colapso avanzado en la pseudoartrosis del escafoides (scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse, SNAC) operados con técnica quirúrgica abierta versus técnica percutánea con asistencia artroscópica. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo tipo caso-control, de fichas clínicas e imagenología de pacientes con artrosis avanzada del carpo operados con técnica percutánea y asistencia artroscópica y cirugía abierta. Se estudian variables demográficas, dolor mediante la Escala Visual Analógica (EVA), función en rangos de movilidad, tiempo de consolidación, y corrección del ángulo capitolunar. Se describe la técnica quirúrgica de la cirugía abierta y la cirugía percutánea con asistencia artroscópica. RESULTADOS: Se estudiaron 22 pacientes del sexo masculino con edad promedio de 32,5 años. Había 13 pacientes en el grupo de casos (técnica percutánea con asistencia artroscópica) y 9 pacientes en el grupo de controles (técnica abierta). El dolor en la EVA al momento del egreso hospitalario fue de 3 para los casos y de 5 para los controles (p » 0,008), y a los 30 días del postoperatorio, fue de 0 y 3 respectivamente (p » 0,00). Los rangos de extensión y flexión fueron de 52,6° y 38,7° para los casos y de 35,7° y 32,4° para los controles (p » 0,1119 y 0,0016, respectivamente). El ángulo capitolunar fue de 10° para los controles y de 5° para los casos (p » 0,0008). El tiempo de consolidación fue de 8,8 semanas para los casos y de 12,5 semanas para los controles (p » 0,039). DISCUSIÓN: Tanto la técnica percutánea con asistencia artroscópica cuanto la cirugía abierta para realizar una artrodesis de cuatro esquinas son técnicas reproducibles y efectivas en lograr consolidación, disminución del dolor, y mantenimiento de rangos de movimiento en la muñeca. CONCLUSIÓN: En el presente trabajo se demuestran mejores promedios de los parámetros evaluados con la técnica percutánea que con la cirugía abierta; sin embargo, es necesario realizar estudios prospectivos para realizar una recomendación con respecto a la técnica quirúrgica de elección.
INTRODUCTION: Four-corner arthrodesis is a salvage technique for patients with advanced carpal osteoarthritis. This procedure aims to reduce pain and preserve wrist motion. Even though percutaneous techniques with arthroscopic assistance reportedly have favorable outcomes and the advantages of minimal invasiveness, open surgery remains the gold standard for four-corner arthrodesis. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of patients with scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) or scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) submitted to open surgery versus percutaneous surgery with arthroscopic assistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective case-control study of clinical records and radiological images of patients with advanced carpal osteoarthritis submitted to percutaneous surgery with arthroscopic assistance versus open surgery. Demographic variables, pain score using the visual analog scale (VAS), function ranges of motion, time until consolidation, and correction of the capitolunate angle were analyzed. Both techniques are described. RESULTS: In total, 22 male patients with an average age of 32.5 years were studied, including 13 patients from the case group (percutaneous surgery with arthroscopic assistance) and 9 patients from the control group (open surgery). The VAS score for pain at discharge was of 3 for the cases and of 5 for the controls (p » 0.008); 30 days postoperatively, it was of 0 and 3 respectively (p » 0.00). The ranges of extension and flexion were of 52.6° and 38.7° for the case group, and of 35.7° and 32.4° for the control group (p » 0.119 and 0.0016 respectively). The capitolunate angle was of 10° for the controls and of 5° for the cases (p » 0.0008). The time until consolidation was of 8.8 weeks for the cases and of 12.5 weeks for the controls (p » 0.039). DISCUSSION: Both four-corner arthrodesis techniques are reproducible and effective in achieving consolidation, pain reduction and preservation of wrist motion. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates the superiority of the percutaneous technique with arthroscopic assistance over open surgery. Further prospective studies are required for an adequate recommendation.
Assuntos
Artrodese/métodos , Articulação do Punho/cirurgia , Osso Escafoide/cirurgia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Artroscopia , Articulação do Punho/fisiopatologia , Articulação do Punho/diagnóstico por imagem , Medição da Dor , Estudos Retrospectivos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Osso Escafoide/fisiopatologia , Osso Escafoide/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
Bucket-handle injury to the triangular fibrocartilage complex is a rare and poorly described condition in the literature that is not included in the Palmer classification. A young man presented with right wrist torsional trauma while playing sports. He progressed with local pain and limited range of motion with a supination block. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a bucket-handle injury to the central portion of the triangular fibrocartilage complex with a volar flap, measuring 0.6 cm × 0.6 cm. The patient underwent wrist arthroscopy with debridement, removal of a loose body, and resection of the bucket-handle lesion. In the postoperative period, pain alleviation and a considerable gain in range of motion occurred. The patient was able to resume his participation in sporting activities 3 months after surgery. There is no consensus about the treatment of bucket-handle injuries to the triangular fibrocartilage complex because of the small number of cases described in the literature.
RESUMO
INTRODUCCIÓN: La pseudoartrosis de escafoides con deformidad en joroba es una patología compleja que si no recibe tratamiento oportuno puede llevar a una deformidad avanzada, con colapso del carpo produciendo un deterioro significativo en la función de la muñeca. En la actualidad se considera como tratamiento estándar la reducción abierta de la deformidad utilizando injerto estructural. El OBJETIVO del presente trabajo es describir una técnica de reducción artroscópica, utilizando injerto no estructural para la no-unión de escafoides con deformidad en joroba. Se muestran los resultados obtenidos en una serie de casos manejados con la técnica propuesta. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Estudio retrospectivo de una serie de casos de pacientes diagnosticados con pseudoartrosis de escafoides con deformidad en joroba manejados con la técnica propuesta. Se describe la técnica quirúrgica. Se utiliza el programa STATA 15 para el análisis estadístico de los resultados, al igual que test de Wilcoxon para variables no paramétricas. RESULTADOS: Once pacientes de sexo masculino, con edad promedio de 23,4 años, completaron seguimiento promedio de 12 meses. En todos los pacientes se comprobó consolidación de la no-unión mediante Tomografía Computada en un tiempo promedio de 9,1 semanas. Todos los pacientes mejoraron sus rangos de movilidad y ángulos imagenológicos de manera significativa y mejoraron en la prueba funcional de DASH (p » 0.0033). DISCUSiÓN: Se muestra una técnica de reducción percutánea con asistencia artroscópica utilizando injerto no estructural para corregir la no-unión de escafoides con deformidad en joroba produciéndose buenos resultados clínicos con consolidación, en todos los pacientes de nuestra serie, similar a lo encontrado en la literatura internacional. Creemos que esa técnica permite una corrección parcial de la anatomía del carpo y favorece la consolidación ósea al tener las ventajas teóricas de una técnica mínimamente invasiva.
INTRODUCTION: Scaphoid pseudoartrosis with humpback deformity is a complex pathology that if not treated promptly can lead to an advanced deformity with collapse of the carpus producing a significant deterioration in wrist function. At present, open reduction of the deformity using structural bone graft is considered the gold standard of treatment. The AIM of the present study is to describe a surgical technique of percutaneous reduction with arthroscopic assistance using non-structural bone graft for scaphoid non-union with humpback deformity. We present a case series of patients treated with the proposed technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of a case series of patients diagnosed with scaphoid pseudarthrosis with humpback deformity treated with the proposed technique. We describe the surgical technique. We used STATA 15 for the statistical analysis and Wilcoxon test for non-parametric variables. RESULTS: 11 male patients, with an average age of 23.4 years, completed an average follow-up of 12 months. Bone healing was confirmed with Computed Tomography in an average time of 9.1 weeks in all of our patients. All patients improved their range of mobility and radiographic measurements significantly and all improved in the DASH functional test (p » 0.0033). DISCUSSION: We describe a technique of percutaneous reduction with arthroscopic assistance using non-structural graft to correct scaphoid non-union with humpback deformity. We found good clinical results and high union rate in all the patients of our series. Similar to what is found in international literature, we believe that this technique allows a partial correction of carpal anatomy and favors bone consolidation by having the advantages of a minimally invasive technique.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Adulto Jovem , Artroscopia/métodos , Pseudoartrose/cirurgia , Osso Escafoide/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Seguimentos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCCIÓN: El fragmento dorso-ulnar (FDU) en la fractura intraarticular de radio distal es de especial importancia puesto que implica una alteración en la articulación radio-carpiana así como también en la articulación radio-ulnar distal (RUD), donde la incongruencia articular permanente puede generar secuelas a largo plazo. OBJETIVO: Proponer una clasificación del FDU, definiendo cuándo realizar el procedimiento quirúrgico con asistencia artroscópica, basado en una serie consecutiva de casos operados de fractura del radio distal estudiados con tomografía computada (TC). MÉTODO: Estudio descriptivo de una serie de casos de pacientes operados por fractura del radio distal entre enero del 2015 y diciembre del 2016. En base a eso, se elabora una clasificación del FDU y se sugiere un esquema de manejo específico. Se describe el FDU como aquel fragmento específico ubicado en la esquina dorso-ulnar de la carilla articular del radio distal, con compromiso de más del 30% de la superficie articular RUD y más de 5mm desde el borde ulnar hacia radial de la cortical dorsal del radio observado en el corte axial de la TC preoperatoria. Se considera un fragmento mayor (FM) cuando el rasgo de fractura compromete hacia radial hasta el tubérculo de Lister y se considera fragmento menor (Fm) cuando el rasgo no alcanza a comprometer el tubérculo de Lister. Nuestra propuesta de clasificación reconoce 4 tipos: tipo I (FM sin desplazamiento, en fracturas tipo C de la AO); tipo II (FM con desplazamiento, en fracturas tipo C de la AO); tipo III (Fm independiente del desplazamiento, en fracturas tipo C de la AO) y tipo IV (FM/Fm con desplazamiento, en fracturas tipo B2 de la AO). Esquema de manejo: Tipo I síntesis con placa bloqueada por abordaje palmar, sin obligación de asistencia artroscópica. Tipo II síntesis con placa bloqueada por abordaje palmar, con asistencia artroscópica requerida. Tipo III síntesis percutánea dorsal contornillo canulado, bajo asistencia artroscópica. Tipo IV síntesis dorsal con placa o tornillo mediante abordaje dorsal bajo visión directa o con asistencia artroscópica, usando portales artroscópicos volares. RESULTADOS: Se operaron 488 fracturas de radio distal durante el período mencionado; 375 fracturas clasificadas como tipo C de la AO. Del total operadas, solo 392 fracturas contaban con TC peroperatoria, que permitía evaluar la presencia del FDU, el cual estuvo presente en 127/392 de los casos (32,4%). Analizados por grupo, 38 casos presentaban fragmentos tipo I, 22 tipo II, 69 tipo III y 7 tipo IV. DISCUSIÓN: El FDU se presentó en un 32,4% de los casos evaluables por TC en nuestra serie. El manejo dirigido de este fragmento con asistencia artroscópica permitió una reducción anatómica con fijación estable específica de éste. CONCLUSIÓN: Proponemos una nueva clasificación del FDU basada en la TC preoperatoria que permite realizar un adecuado plan prequirurgico y abordar este fragmento de manera específica sugiriendo cuando utilizar asistencia artroscópica.
INTRODUCTION: The dorsal-ulnar fragment (DUF) in the distal radius fracture is of special importance since it implies an alteration in the radio-carpal joint as well as in the distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ), where permanent joint incongruence can generate long-term sequelae. OBJECTIVE: To propose a classification of the DUF, advising when to perform arthroscopic assistance, based on a consecutive series of operated cases of distal radius fracture studied with computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Descriptive study of a series of cases of patients operated of distal radius fracture between January 2015 and December 2016. We describe a classification of the DUF and suggest a specific treatment scheme. The DUF is described as that specific fragment located in the dorso-ulnar corner of the articular surface of the distal radius, which involves more than 30% of the articular surface of the DRUJ and more than 5mm of the ulnar edge of the dorsal cortex of the radius observed in the axial section of the preoperative CT. It is considered a major fragment (FM) when the fracture compromises the Lister tubercle and is considered a minor fragment (Fm) when it does not. Our classification recognizes 4 types of DUF: type I (FM without displacement, in type C fractures of the AO); Type II (FM with displacement, in type C fractures of the AO); Type III (Fm independent of displacement, in fractures type C of the AO) and type IV (FM/Fm with displacement, in fractures type B2 of the AO). Treatment scheme: Type I: synthesis with a palmar locked plate without arthroscopic assistance required. Type II: synthesis with palmar locked plate with arthroscopic assistance. Type III dorsal percutaneous synthesis with cannulated screw with arthroscopic assistance. Type IV dorsal synthesis with plate or screw by dorsal approach under direct vision or with arthroscopic assistance using volar portals. RESULTS: A total of 488 distal radius fractures were operated during this period. Only 392 fractures had preoperative CT, which allowed to evaluate the presence of the DUF. It was present in 127/392 of the cases (32.4%). Analyzed by group, 38 cases presented fragments type I, 22 cases type II, 69 cases type III and 7 cases type IV. DISCUSSION: The DUF was presented in 32.4% of the cases in our series. The management of this fragment with arthroscopic assistance allowed an anatomical reduction with specific stable fixation of this fragment. CONCLUSION: We propose a novel classification of the DUF based on preoperative CT that allows a specific management of this fragment and suggest when to use arthroscopic assistance.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Artroscopia/métodos , Fraturas do Rádio/cirurgia , Fraturas do Rádio/classificação , Fraturas do Rádio/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Ulna/cirurgia , Fraturas da Ulna/classificação , Fraturas da Ulna/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos do Punho/cirurgia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Resultado do Tratamento , Fixação Interna de FraturasRESUMO
PURPOSE: Wrist arthroscopy is generally considered the reference standard in the diagnosis of triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injuries. There is a paucity of data examining the reliability of wrist arthroscopy as a diagnostic modality for TFCC injuries. The goal of this study was to evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the diagnosis of TFCC pathology during wrist arthroscopy. METHODS: Twenty-five intraoperative digital videos were captured by the senior author during diagnostic and surgical arthroscopy of the wrist joint for known or suspected articular pathology. The senior author (P.K.B.) confirmed TFCC resilience on visual inspection and ballottement (trampoline effect) to make the diagnosis. Two videos were excluded for poor quality and inadequate visualization. Three hand surgeons subsequently reviewed the remaining 23 videos in a blinded fashion at 2 time points separated by 4 weeks. The reviewers determined if the trampoline test was positive and if a TFCC tear was present. Tears were classified using a morphologic classification. Statistical measures of reliability including percentage agreement and κ coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: Agreement between observers for the presence or absence of a tear was 66.7%. The average intraobserver agreement regarding the presence or absence of a tear was 67.4% The kappa value for interobserver agreement was 0.33, whereas the intrarater agreement was 0.88. The 3 reviewers identified an average of 11.3 positive trampoline tests. Agreement between observers for a positive trampoline test was 65.2%. The average percentage of intraobserver agreement regarding a positive trampoline test was 49.3%. In cases where all 3 reviewers agreed on the presence of a TFCC tear, the agreement regarding tear location was 76.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Wrist arthroscopy remains instrumental in the treatment of TFCC tears. However, given that inter-rater reliability in the assessment of these tears is probably too low, reconsideration should be given to arthroscopy as the reference standard in the diagnosis of these tears. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic III.