RESUMO

The NHEPACHA Iberoamerican Network, founded on the initiative of a group of researchers from Latin American countries and Spain, aims to establish a research framework for Chagas disease that encompasses diagnosis and treatment. For this purpose, the network has created a questionnaire to gather relevant data on epidemiological, clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects of the disease. This questionnaire was developed based on a consensus of expert members of the network, with the intention of collecting high-quality standardized data, which can be used interchangeably by the different research centers that make up the NHEPACHA network. Furthermore, the network intends to offer a clinical protocol that can be embraced by other researchers, facilitating comparability among published studies, as well as the development of therapeutic response and progression markers.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Patients with acute respiratory failure often require mechanical ventilation to reduce the work of breathing and improve gas exchange; however, this may exacerbate lung injury. Protective ventilation strategies, characterized by low tidal volumes (≤ 8mL/kg of predicted body weight) and limited plateau pressure below 30cmH2O, have shown improved outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, in the transition to spontaneous ventilation, it can be challenging to maintain tidal volume within protective levels, and it is unclear whether low tidal volumes during spontaneous ventilation impact patient outcomes. We developed a study protocol to estimate the prevalence of low tidal volume ventilation in the first 24 hours of spontaneous ventilation in patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure and its association with ventilator-free days and survival. METHODS: We designed a multicenter, multinational, cohort study with a 28-day follow-up that will include patients with acute respiratory failure, defined as a partial oxygen pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio < 300mmHg, in transition to spontaneous ventilation in intensive care units in Latin America. RESULTS: We plan to include 422 patients in ten countries. The primary outcomes are the prevalence of low tidal volume in the first 24 hours of spontaneous ventilation and ventilator-free days on day 28. The secondary outcomes are intensive care unit and hospital mortality, incidence of asynchrony and return to controlled ventilation and sedation. CONCLUSION: In this study, we will assess the prevalence of low tidal volume during spontaneous ventilation and its association with clinical outcomes, which can inform clinical practice and future clinical trials.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Much has been said by actors from different fields and perspectives about the manifold changes in world affairs triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, it is to be expected that there will be impacts on long-standing partnerships such as the one between the European Union and the Community of Latin American and Caribbean Countries. However, few studies have demonstrated these impacts, either empirically, by uncovering their specificities or from a historical perspective, to allow for a reasonable methodological comparison of the patterns used to define the partnership and that have changed or have been affected in some way by the pandemic. RESULTS: Through an in-depth qualitative assessment of primary and secondary sources, this article contributes to this research gap. It analyzes the patterns and changes or impacts in light of two strands of behavior that can make sense of EU-CELAC health cooperation-revisionist or reformist. The findings show an economy-driven health agenda as a new pattern of cooperation, which derives from EU reformist behavior after the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: The EU power to enforce its priorities in the context of health cooperation with CELAC is the main factor that will define how (and not just which) competing interests and capacities will be accommodated. The relevance of the study to the fields of global governance for health, interregional health cooperation and EU foreign policy is threefold. It shows us i.how two more international regimes are easily intertwined with health-trade and intellectual property-with the potential to deepen asymmetries and divergences even between long-standing strategic partners; ii.contrary to the idea that reformist behaviors are only adopted by actors who are dissatisfied with the status quo, the study shows us that the reformist actor can also be the one who has more material power and influence and who nevertheless challenges the success of cooperation in the name of new priorities and the means to achieve them; and iii.how the EU will find it difficult to operationalize its new priorities internally, among states and private actors, and with those of CELAC, given the history of intense disputes over health-related economic aspects.

Assuntos

RESUMO

[ABSTRACT]. Objectives. This paper describes and analyzes embedded implementation research and the empirical processes of planning for utilization, strategies to promote utilization and the sustainability of utilization of results from research led by decision-makers in Latin America and the Caribbean. Methods. This qualitative, descriptive and interpretive study is based on the findings from semistructured interviews with members of teams working under the Embedding Research for the Sustainable Development Goals initiative (2018–2019) as well as their responses to a self-assessment follow-up questionnaire 1 year after the project was completed. Results. Altogether 13 teams from 11 countries participated in the Initiative. Nine teams had a core team composed of a decision-maker as the principal investigator assisted by a researcher as co-principal investigator. Four teams included more than one co-principal investigator; and in five teams, the originally assigned principal investigator was replaced. There was an interesting relationship between the expected utilization of research results, the utilization strategies, the sustainability of research uptake and the teams’ collaboration modalities. When decision-makers and co-principal investigators were active participants, the intention to use the results and strategies for utilization were clearly oriented to improve implementation. In teams with basically a formal collaboration between the two principals, plans for utilization were unclear or focused on producing academic knowledge. The participation of implementers below the rank of principal investigator decision-maker may be relevant. Conclusions. Embedded implementation research is an innovative tool that may foster the utilization of research and strengthen health programs and services. Considering the internal dynamics of such research teams will enhance planning and strategies for research utilization as well as the sustainability of practical and actionable findings.

[RESUMEN]. Objetivos. En este artículo se describe y analiza la incorporación de la investigación sobre implementación y los procesos empíricos de planificación de su utilización, las estrategias para promoverla y la sostenibilidad de la utilización de los resultados de la investigación dirigida por los responsables de la toma de decisiones en América Latina y el Caribe. Métodos. Este estudio cualitativo, descriptivo e interpretativo se basa en los resultados de entrevistas semiestructuradas a miembros de equipos que trabajan en el marco de la iniciativa Incorporación de la investigación para avanzar en el cumplimiento de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (2018-2019), así como en sus respuestas a un cuestionario de autoevaluación de seguimiento un año después de la finalización del proyecto. Resultados. En la iniciativa participaron un total de 13 equipos de 11 países. Nueve equipos disponían de un equipo central formado por un responsable de la toma de decisiones como investigador principal, que contaba con la colaboración de un investigador como coinvestigador principal. Cuatro equipos tenían más de un coinvestigador principal, y en cinco equipos se sustituyó al investigador principal asignado inicialmente. Se observó una relación interesante entre la utilización prevista de los resultados de la investigación, las estrategias de utilización, la sostenibilidad de la adopción de la investigación y las modalidades de colaboración de los equipos. Cuando había una participación activa de los responsables de la toma de decisiones y los coinvestigadores principales, el objetivo del uso de los resultados y las estrategias de utilización estaban claramente orientados a la mejora de su implementación. En los equipos en los que había una colaboración básicamente formal entre los dos directores, los planes de utilización no eran claros o se centraban en la producción de conocimiento académico. La participación de responsables de la puesta en práctica con cargos inferiores a los de investigador principal con capacidad de decisión puede ser un factor de interés. Conclusiones. La incorporación de la investigación sobre implementación es una herramienta innovadora que puede fomentar la utilización de la investigación y fortalecer los programas y servicios de salud. La consideración de la dinámica interna de estos equipos de investigación mejorará la planificación y las estrategias para su utilización, así como la sostenibilidad de los resultados prácticos y aplicables.

[RESUMO]. Objetivos. Este artigo descreve e analisa a pesquisa com implementação incorporada e processos empíricos de planejamento da aplicação, estratégias de promoção do uso e sustentabilidade da utilização dos resultados de pesquisas lideradas por tomadores de decisão da América Latina e do Caribe. Métodos. Este estudo qualitativo, descritivo e interpretativo baseia-se nos achados de entrevistas semiestruturadas com membros de equipes que trabalharam no âmbito da iniciativa “Incorporação de Pesquisas para os Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável” (2018–2019), além de suas respostas a um questionário de autoavaliação aplicado um ano após a conclusão do projeto. Resultados. Treze equipes de 11 países participaram da iniciativa. Nove equipes contavam com uma equipe central composta por um tomador de decisão como investigador principal, auxiliado por um pesquisador como coinvestigador principal. Quatro equipes incluíram mais de um coinvestigador principal; e cinco equipes substituíram o investigador principal designado inicialmente. Houve uma relação interessante entre a aplicação esperada dos resultados da pesquisa, as estratégias de uso, a sustentabilidade da adoção da pesquisa e as modalidades de colaboração das equipes. Quando os tomadores de decisão e os coinvestigadores principais eram participantes ativos, a intenção de usar os resultados e as estratégias de utilização estavam claramente orientadas para o aprimoramento da implementação. Nas equipes em que a colaboração entre os dois investigadores principais era basicamente uma formalidade, os planos de utilização não estavam claros ou se concentravam na produção de conhecimento acadêmico. A participação de implementadores abaixo da posição de tomador de decisão do pesquisador principal pode ser importante. Conclusões. A pesquisa com implementação incorporada é uma ferramenta inovadora que pode promover a aplicação das pesquisas e fortalecer os programas e serviços de saúde. Levar em conta a dinâmica interna dessas equipes de pesquisa aprimorará o planejamento e as estratégias de utilização da pesquisa, bem como a sustentabilidade de achados práticos e implementáveis.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: to identify the perception of professional empowerment among midwives in selected Latin American countries (LA). Specifically, this study aimed to compare i) the global level of empowerment among midwives in different LA countries, ii) the scores according to the different dimensions of the scale, and iii) scores according to area the of expertise. DESIGN: A quantitative, observational, analytical, cross-sectional and multisite study using an adaptation of the Perceptions Midwifery Empowerment Scale (PEMS). SETTINGS: Clinical, educational and managerial midwifery positions in 5 LA countries belonging to a Latin American Research Network in Midwifery. All the participating countries reported a similar profile regarding type of education, association and regulation procedures. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1127 responses from midwives with different professional backgrounds were included in the study. FINDINGS: A total mean score of 73.28 (74.23-72.03) points was reported. Chile reported the lowest score of empowerment compared to the other countries, while Argentina reported the highest. Midwives' perceptions of empowerment within their area of expertise, primary health care (PHC) was the area of reference, and gynaecology reported a significantly lower score. Midwives working in management were significantly more empowered compared with those in other areas. Midwives who had continuous education and postgraduate studies were the most empowered. Regarding the provision of woman-centred Care, Chile and El Salvador differed significantly from Argentina (reference), while Uruguay reported a significantly higher score in this dimension. Midwives working in hospital wards reported significantly lower scores compared to those working in PHC. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study suggests that midwifery programmes in the LA countries would benefit from prioritising professional empowerment, especially in the areas of hospital practice, where midwives' perceptions of empowerment were most limited.

Assuntos

RESUMO

World Health Organization (WHO) / Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) encouraged the utilization of whole-of-society and whole-of-government strategic approaches to increase countries' resilience towards mitigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Strategies included the implementation of multi-sectoral, multi-partner and multi-stakeholder planning, coordination, consultation, and action. We reviewed the experiences of three Latin American and Caribbean countries, related to the implementation of collaborative strategies in tackling COVID-19, specifically the nature of the collaboration, the dynamics and the stakeholders involved.A systematic literature review identified relevant publications and content analysis was conducted to determine the collaborative strategies. Colombia, Costa Rica, and Trinidad and Tobago were selected as case studies since they were from different LAC subregions and because of the accessibility of relevant literature.In the three countries, the pandemic response was coordinated by a national executive committee, led by the Ministry of Health. Intersectoral collaboration was evident in each, with the key stakeholders being public sector agencies, the private/corporate sector, private/non-profit, academic institutions, and international agencies. It was used primarily to facilitate data-driven, evidenced-informed decision-making and guidelines; to expand clinical care capacity and strengthen the national medical response; and to provide support for the most vulnerable populations.While the institutionalization of intersectoral collaboration can be recommended for the health sector beyond the pandemic, research is needed to evaluate the impact of specific collaborative strategies as well as barriers and facilitators.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

Latin America is one of the most unequal regions in the world. Due to colonization and occupation of the territory, structural inequalities mark people's living and health conditions. In health, we can observe how different dimensions of inequalities condition access and user experience in the service. This scoping review aimed to map and analyze the expressions of inequalities in access to health services in Latin American countries from the scientific production of the last ten years, from which 272 articles were selected. The categorical analysis classified articles into five dimensions, which characterize the expressions of inequalities in access to health services: socioeconomic, geospatial, ethnic/racial, gender, and people with disabilities. The most frequent access barriers were socioeconomic or ability to pay, geographic or transportation difficulty, availability of services, cultural/ethnic, communication, and architecture. The main conditioning factors of health inequalities were income, schooling, transportation, and living conditions. Combating health inequalities requires proposing structuring and sectorial policies.

A América Latina é uma das regiões mais desiguais do mundo. Desigualdades estruturais, fruto dos processos de colonização e ocupação do território, marcam as condições de vida e saúde das pessoas. Na saúde, é possível observar como diferentes dimensões das desigualdades condicionam o acesso e a experiência do usuário no serviço. Objetivou-se mapear e analisar as expressões das desigualdades no acesso aos serviços de saúde nos países da América Latina a partir da produção científica dos últimos dez anos. O desenho de estudo foi a revisão de escopo, por meio da qual foram selecionados 272 artigos. A análise categorial permitiu a classificação dos artigos em cinco dimensões, que caracterizam as expressões das desigualdades no acesso aos serviços de saúde: socioeconômica, geoespacial, étnica/racial, gênero e de pessoas com deficiência. As barreiras de acesso mais frequentes foram: socioeconômica ou capacidade de pagamento; geográfica ou dificuldade de transporte; disponibilidade de serviços; cultural/étnica; comunicação; e arquitetônica. Os principais fatores condicionantes das desigualdades em saúde foram renda, escolaridade, transporte e condições de moradia. O enfrentamento das desigualdades em saúde requer a proposição de políticas estruturantes e setoriais.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the overall prevalence, stratified by sex and age group of global physical activity (GPA), active commuting to school (ACS), and sedentary behavior (SB) among adolescents from ten Latin American countries, and to assess the correlation of Development Index with the indicators. METHODS: This research is grounded on data from the Global School-Based Student Health Survey (2009-2015) and the 2015 Brazilian National School Health Survey. The prevalence and 95% confidence intervals for GPA (≥5 d/wk), ACS (≥1 d/wk), and SB (>2 h/d) were calculated using the chi-square test to compare the sexes (male; female) and age group (≤13 y; 14 y; 15 y; ≥16 y). We also performed Pearson correlation analysis with the Human Development Index. RESULTS: The prevalence of indicators ranged from 16.1% to 28.2% for GPA, from 56.7% to 71.2% for ACS, and from 20.7% to 62.6% for SB. Boys generally had a higher prevalence of GPA and ACS, and girls had a higher prevalence of SB. The prevalence of the indicators by age group varied between countries, with significant differences observed in some, depending on each indicator. A positive correlation was observed between Human Development Index, GPA, and SB. CONCLUSION: Health promotion policies must include guidelines that encourage and promote a more active and less sedentary lifestyle among young people in Latin America, considering specific groups, the local socioeconomic context, and differences between countries.

Assuntos

Assuntos