RESUMO
Objetivo: analisar efetividade e custos de modelos de cuidados transitórios em atenção domiciliar de pacientes com condições agudas e crônicas comparados a outras modalidades. Método: revisão integrativa de uma amostra de 18 artigos dentre os 278 pesquisados em sete bases de dados. Resultados: Destacaram-se, em 15 modelos de cuidados transitórios, os de: reabilitação; terapêuticas parenterais; acompanhamento de doenças crônicas; pós-operatórios e internação domiciliar. Foram efetivos para tratar condições agudas ou crônicas agudizadas; simplificar acesso a hospital; prevenir readmissões; reduzir tempo de internação; ampliar adesão em reabilitação ambulatorial, reduzir mortalidade e melhorar estado emocional/sobrecarga do cuidador. O principal componente de custo foi os valores de diárias. Em nove estudos, os modelos significaram quedas no custo geral com internação. Conclusão: Cuidados transitórios em Atenção Domiciliar possibilitam a continuidade do tratamento com efetividade e economia para provedores e sistemas de saúde
Objective: to analyze the effectiveness and costs of transitional care models in home care of patients with acute and chronic conditions compared with other modalities. Method:integrative review of a sample of 18 articles among the 278 searched in seven databases. Results: among 15 transitional care models, the following stood out: rehabilitation; parenteral therapies; chronic disease follow-up; postoperative care; and home hospitalization. They were effective in treating acute or chronic conditions; simplifying access to hospital; preventing readmissions; reducing length of stay; increasing adherence to outpatient rehabilitation, reducing mortality, and improving emotional status/caregiver burden. The main cost component was per diem rates. In nine studies, the models meant decreases in overall hospitalization costs. Conclusion: transitional care in home care enables effective and cost-efficient continuity of care for providers and health systems.
Objetivo: analizar la efectividad y los costes de los modelos de cuidados transitorios en la atención domiciliaria de pacientes con patologías agudas y crónicas en comparación con otras modalidades. Método: revisión integradora en una muestra de 18 artículos, entre 278 encontrados en siete bases de datos. Resultados: Entre los 15 modelos de cuidados transitorios destacaron los siguientes: rehabilitación; terapias parenterales; seguimiento de enfermedades crónicas; cuidados postoperatorios; y hospitalización a domicilio. Los modelos fueron eficaces para tratar enfermedades agudas o crónicas; simplificar el acceso al hospital; prevenir los reingresos; reducir la duración de la estancia; aumentar la adherencia a la rehabilitación ambulatoria; reducir la mortalidad; y mejorar el estado emocional/la carga para los cuidadores. El principal componente de coste fueron las tarifas diarias. En nueve estudios, los modelos resultaron en una disminución de los costes generales de hospitalización. Conclusión: Los cuidados de transición en la atención domiciliaria permiten una continuidad asistencial eficaz y rentable para los proveedores y los sistemas sanitarios
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Efetividade , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Cuidado Transicional , Análise de Custo-Efetividade , Assistência DomiciliarRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) has been recommended for infants in Argentina's national immunization program (NIP) in a 2 + 1 schedule since 2012. Licensure of the 15-valent vaccine (PCV15) is anticipated soon, and the 20-valent vaccine (PCV20) recently received regulatory approval. This cost-effectiveness analysis examined the public health and economic implications of transitioning from PCV13 to either PCV15 or PCV20 in Argentina's pediatric NIP. METHODS: A decision-analytic Markov model was used with a 10-year time horizon and a 3.0% annual discount rate for costs and benefits. Vaccine effectiveness estimates were derived from Argentinian surveillance data, PCV13 clinical effectiveness and impact studies, and PCV7 efficacy studies. Population, epidemiologic, and economic inputs were obtained from literature and Argentinian-specific data. The study adopted a healthcare system perspective; sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to assess input parameters and structural uncertainty. RESULTS: Compared with PCV13, PCV20 was estimated to avert an additional 7,378, 42,884, and 172,389 cases of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), all-cause pneumonia, and all-cause otitis media (OM), respectively, as well as 3,308 deaths, resulting in savings of United States Dollars (USD) 50,973,962 in direct medical costs. Compared with PCV15, PCV20 was also estimated to have greater benefit, averting an additional 6,140, 35,258, and 142,366 cases of IPD, pneumonia, and OM, respectively, as well as 2,624 deaths, resulting in savings of USD 37,697,868 in direct medical costs. PCV20 was associated with a higher quality-adjusted life year gain and a lower cost (i.e., dominance) versus both PCV13 and PCV15. Results remained robust in sensitivity analyses and scenario assessments. CONCLUSION: Over a 10-year horizon, vaccination with PCV20 was expected to be the dominant, cost-saving strategy versus PCV13 and PCV15 in children in Argentina. Policymakers should consider the PCV20 vaccination strategy to achieve the greatest clinical and economic benefit compared with lower-valent options.
Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Infecções Pneumocócicas , Vacinas Pneumocócicas , Vacinas Conjugadas , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/economia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Humanos , Argentina/epidemiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecções Pneumocócicas/economia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Lactente , Vacinas Conjugadas/economia , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Conjugadas/imunologia , Pré-Escolar , Programas de Imunização/economia , Cadeias de Markov , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Criança , Feminino , Masculino , Análise de Custo-EfetividadeRESUMO
Importance: Standard of care for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves definitive chemoradiotherapy followed by maintenance therapy with durvalumab. However, the cost of durvalumab has been cited as a barrier to its use in various health systems. Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab vs placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC from 4 international payer perspectives (US, Brazil, Singapore, and Spain). Design, Setting, and Participants: In this economic evaluation, a Markov model was designed to compare the lifetime cost-effectiveness of maintenance durvalumab for unresectable stage III NSCLC with that of placebo, using 5-year outcomes data from the PACIFIC randomized placebo-controlled trial. Individual patient data were extracted from the PACIFIC, KEYNOTE-189, ADAURA, ALEX, and REVEL randomized clinical trials to develop a decision-analytic model to determine the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab compared with placebo maintenance therapy over a 10-year time horizon. Direct costs, adverse events, and patient characteristics were based on country-specific payer perspectives and demographic characteristics. The study was conducted from June 1, 2022, through December 27, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Life-years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated at country-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds ([data reported in US$] US: $150â¯000 per QALY; Brazil: $22â¯251 per QALY; Singapore: $55â¯288 per QALY, and Spain: $107â¯069 per QALY). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to account for parameters of uncertainty. A cost-threshold analysis was also performed. Results: The US base-case model found that treatment with durvalumab was associated with an increased cost of $114â¯394 and improved effectiveness of 0.50 QALYs compared with placebo, leading to an ICER of $228â¯788 per QALY. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, according to base-case models, were $141â¯146 for Brazil, $153â¯461 for Singapore, and $125â¯193 for Spain. Durvalumab price adjustments to the PACIFIC data improved cost-effectiveness in Singapore, with an ICER of $45â¯164. The model was most sensitive to the utility of durvalumab. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab as maintenance therapy for unresectable stage III NSCLC, the therapy was found to be cost-prohibitive from the perspective of various international payers according to country-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds per QALY. The findings of the study suggest that discounted durvalumab acquisition costs, as possible in Singapore, might improve cost-effectiveness globally.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Análise Custo-Benefício , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/economia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/economia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/economia , Brasil , Espanha , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Masculino , Singapura , Feminino , Estados Unidos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/economia , Cadeias de Markov , Análise de Custo-EfetividadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate cost-effective pharmacological treatment in adult kidney transplant recipients from the perspective of the Colombian health system. METHODS: A decision tree model for the induction phase and a Markov model for the maintenance phase were built. A review of the clinical literature was conducted to extract probabilities, and the life-years were used as the outcome. Costs were calculated using the administrative databases. The evaluating treatment schemes are organized by groups of evidence with direct comparisons. RESULTS: In the induction phase, anti-thymocyte immunoglobulin+ methylprednisolone is dominant, more effective, and less expensive, compared with basiliximab+methylprednisolone. In the maintenance phase, azathioprine (AZA) is dominant in contrast to mycophenolate mofetil (MFM) both with cyclosporine (CIC)+ corticosteroids (CE); CIC is dominant relative to sirolimus (SIR) and tacrolimus (TAC) (both with MFM+CE or AZA+CE), and TAC is dominant compared with SIR (in addition with MFM+CE or mycophenolate sodium [MFS]+CE); MFM is dominant in relation to MFS and everolimus, and SIR is more effective MFM but it does not exceed the threshold (in sum with TAC+CE); MFS and MFM are dominant relative to everolimus, and SIR is more effective than MFM, but it does not exceed the threshold (in addiction with CIC+CE); MFM is dominant in relation to TAC (in sum with SIR+CE), and CIC+AZA+CE is dominant in relation to TAC+MFM+CE. CONCLUSIONS: The base-case results for all evidence groups are consistent with the different sensitivity analyses.
Assuntos
Imunossupressores , Transplante de Rim , Adulto , Humanos , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Corticosteroides/economia , Azatioprina/uso terapêutico , Azatioprina/economia , Colômbia , Análise de Custo-Efetividade , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Ciclosporina/economia , Árvores de Decisões , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Rejeição de Enxerto/economia , Imunossupressores/economia , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim/economia , Cadeias de Markov , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapêutico , Ácido Micofenólico/economia , Sirolimo/uso terapêutico , Sirolimo/economia , Tacrolimo/economia , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico , Transplantados/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the Pare de Fumar Conosco software compared with the standard of care adopted in Brazil for the treatment of smoking cessation. METHODS: In the cohort of smokers with multiple chronic conditions, we developed an decision tree model for the benefit measures of smoking cessation. We adopted the perspectives of the Brazilian Unified Health System and the service provider. Resources and costs were measured by primary and secondary sources and effectiveness by a randomized clinical trial. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated, followed by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. No willingness to pay threshold was adopted. RESULTS: The software had a lower cost and greater effectiveness than its comparator. The ICER was dominant in all of the benefits examined (-R$2 585 178.29 to -R$325 001.20). The cost of the standard of care followed by that of the electronic tool affected the ICER of the benefit measures. In all probabilistic analyses, the software was superior to the standard of care (53.6%-82.5%). CONCLUSION: The Pare de Fumar Conosco software is a technology that results in cost savings in treating smoking cessation.
Assuntos
Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Padrão de Cuidado , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Brasil , Análise de Custo-Efetividade , Tomada de Decisões , Árvores de Decisões , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/economia , Software/normas , Padrão de Cuidado/economiaRESUMO
La seguridad y eficacia de los programas de suplementación con hierro a lactantes, está actualmente en discusión. El objetivo de esta revisión fue identificar estudios sobre riesgos y beneficios de la suplementación con hierro profiláctico en lactantes menores de un año, nacidos a término, con niveles de hemoglobina (Hb) y ferremia desconocidos. Se realizó una búsqueda en Pubmed y Cochrane, identificando 3 revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Estos estudios arrojaron resultados que indican mejoras en los niveles séricos de hierro y hemoglobina como resultado de la suplementación con hierro. Sin embargo, no se observó un beneficio significativo en el desarrollo cognitivo de los lactantes. Los efectos adversos más reportados son los gastrointestinales, efectos en el crecimiento (menor ganancia de talla y peso) y menor absorción de zinc. En resumen, la evidencia en cuanto a la profilaxis con hierro en lactantes es limitada, lo que nos lleva a recomendar un seguimiento cercano de los lactantes que reciben suplementos de hierro, con el objetivo de detectar posibles eventos adversos. Es fundamental evaluar cuidadosamente los riesgos y beneficios de esta intervención antes de su implementación (AU)
The safety and efficacy of iron supplementation programs for infants are currently under discussion. The objective of this review was to identify studies on the risks and benefits of prophylactic iron supplementation in infants under one year of age, born at term, with unknown hemoglobin (Hb) and serum iron levels. The search was conducted on Pubmed and Cochrane, identifying three systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The results indicate improvements in serum iron and hemoglobin levels as a result of iron supplementation. However, a significant benefit in infant cognitive development was not observed. The most reported adverse effects were gastrointestinal, effects on growth (reduced height and weight gain), and reduced zinc absorption. In summary, the evidence regarding iron prophylaxis in infants is limited, leading us to recommend close monitoring of infants receiving iron supplements to detect potential adverse events. It is crucial to carefully assess the risks and benefits of this intervention before implementation (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Lactente , Sulfato Ferroso , Ferro da Dieta/uso terapêutico , Suplementos Nutricionais/provisão & distribuição , Análise de Custo-Efetividade , Hemoglobinas , Anemia Ferropriva/prevenção & controleRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of whitening toothpastes and at-home bleaching for the treatment of tooth discoloration. METHODOLOGY: A cost-effectiveness economic analysis was conducted, and eight randomized clinical trials were selected based on the whitening agent product used: blue covarine dentifrices (BCD), hydrogen peroxide dentifrices (HPD), dentifrices without bleaching agents (CD, negative control), and 10% carbamide peroxide (CP10, positive control) for at-home bleaching. The consumer/patient perspective was adopted, macro-costing techniques were used and a decision tree model was performed considering the costs in the American and Brazilian markets. The color change evaluation (ΔE*ab) was used to calculate the effectiveness of tooth bleaching. A probabilistic analysis was performed using a Monte Carlo simulation and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were obtained. RESULTS: CP10 resulted in the highest cost-effectiveness compared to the use of dentifrices in both markets. In Brazil, HPD was more cost-effective than BCD and CD. In the US, the increased costs of HPD and BCD did not generate any whitening benefit compared to CD. CONCLUSIONS: CP10 was more cost-effective than BCD and HPD for tooth bleaching from the perspectives of the Brazilian and American markets. Decision-making should consider the use of CP10 for treating tooth discoloration.
Assuntos
Clareadores Dentários , Clareamento Dental , Descoloração de Dente , Humanos , Cor , Análise de Custo-Efetividade , Dentifrícios/uso terapêutico , Peróxido de Hidrogênio/uso terapêutico , Clareamento Dental/métodos , Clareadores Dentários/uso terapêutico , Descoloração de Dente/tratamento farmacológico , Cremes Dentais/uso terapêutico , Ureia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) compared with centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs). METHODS: Prospective cohort study was followed by an economic analysis over a 30-day time horizon. Propensity score matching was used to select hospitalized adults with similar indications for PICC or CICC. The composite outcome was device removal or replacement because of complications before the end of treatment. The economic evaluation was based on a decision tree model for cost-effectiveness analysis, with calculation of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per catheter removal avoided. All costs are presented in Brazilian reais (BRL) (1 BRL = 0.1870 US dollar). RESULTS: A total of 217 patients were followed in each group; 172 (79.3%) of those receiving a PICC and 135 (62.2%) of those receiving a CICC had no device-related complication, respectively. When comparing the events leading to device removal, the risk of composite endpoint was significantly higher in the CICC group (hazard ratio 0.20; 95% CI 0.11-0.35). The cost of PICC placement was BRL 1290.98 versus BRL 467.16 for a CICC. In the base case, the ICER for placing a PICC instead of a CICC was BRL 3349.91 per removal or replacement avoided. On univariate sensitivity analyses, the model proved to be robust within an ICER range of 2500.00 to 4800.00 BRL. CONCLUSIONS: PICC placement was associated with a lower risk of complications than CICC placement. Although the cost of a PICC is higher, its use avoided complications and need for catheter replacement before the end of treatment.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateterismo Periférico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Brasil , Cateterismo Venoso Central/economia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Cateterismo Periférico/economia , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentação , Análise de Custo-Efetividade , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Malaria transmission modelling has demonstrated the potential impact of semiquantitative glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) testing and treatment with single-dose tafenoquine for Plasmodium vivax radical cure but has not investigated the associated costs. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of P. vivax treatment with tafenoquine after G6PD testing using a transmission model. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We explored the cost-effectiveness of using tafenoquine after G6PD screening as compared to usual practice (7-day low-dose primaquine (0.5 mg/kg/day) without G6PD screening) in Brazil using a 10-year time horizon with 5% discounting considering 4 scenarios: (1) tafenoquine for adults only assuming 66.7% primaquine treatment adherence; (2) tafenoquine for adults and children aged >2 years assuming 66.7% primaquine adherence; (3) tafenoquine for adults only assuming 90% primaquine adherence; and (4) tafenoquine for adults only assuming 30% primaquine adherence. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated by dividing the incremental costs by the disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted. These were compared to a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of US$7,800 for Brazil, and one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. All 4 scenarios were cost-effective in the base case analysis using this WTP threshold with ICERs ranging from US$154 to US$1,836. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the results were most sensitive to severity and mortality due to vivax malaria, the lifetime and number of semiquantitative G6PD analysers needed, cost per malaria episode and per G6PD test strips, and life expectancy. All scenarios had a 100% likelihood of being cost-effective at the WTP threshold. The main limitations of this study are due to parameter uncertainty around our cost estimates for low transmission settings, the costs of G6PD screening, and the severity of vivax malaria. CONCLUSIONS: In our modelling study that incorporated impact on transmission, tafenoquine prescribed after a semiquantitative G6PD testing was highly likely to be cost-effective in Brazil. These results demonstrate the potential health and economic importance of ensuring safe and effective radical cure.