RESUMO
OBJETIVE: To investigate the association between analgesia during labor and occurrence of neonatal outcomes. METHOD: Retrospective cohort study with medical records of 850 parturient. The exposure variable of interest was receiving pharmacological analgesia during labor and neonatal outcomes were: one- and five-minute Apgar, resuscitation maneuvers and referral of the newborn to Neonatal ICU. A logistic regression was carried out to obtain Odds Ratios and 95% confidence interval, with adjustment for confounding factors. RESULTS: Among the women studied, 35% received analgesia and this use was associated with a greater chance of neonatal outcomes such as one-minute Apgar < 7 (p <0.0001), resuscitation maneuvers (p <0.001) and referral to the Neonatal ICU (p = 0.004), mostly were among low-risk pregnant women, even after adjustments. CONCLUSION: The use of pharmacological analgesia during labor is associated with one-minute Apgar < 7, resuscitation maneuvers and referral to the Neonatal ICU.
Assuntos
Analgesia Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Analgesia Obstétrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Trabalho de Parto/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Índice de Apgar , Brasil/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJETIVES: To investigate the association between analgesia during labor and occurrence of neonatal outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with medical records of 850 parturient. The exposure variable of interest was receiving pharmacological analgesia during labor and neonatal outcomes were: one- and five-minute Apgar, resuscitation maneuvers and referral of the newborn to Neonatal ICU. A logistic regression was carried out to obtain Odds Ratios and 95% confidence interval, with adjustment for confounding factors. RESULTS: Among the women studied, 35% received analgesia and this use was associated with a greater chance of neonatal outcomes such as one-minute Apgar < 7 (p <0.0001), resuscitation maneuvers (p <0.001) and referral to the Neonatal ICU (p = 0.004), mostly were among low-risk pregnant women, even after adjustments. CONCLUSIONS: The use of pharmacological analgesia during labor is associated with one-minute Apgar < 7, resuscitation maneuvers and referral to the Neonatal ICU.
Assuntos
Analgesia Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Trabalho de Parto/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Índice de Apgar , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Logísticos , Razão de Chances , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
This study aimed to identify the maternal, labour and newborn risk factors associated with an Apgar score of ≤3 in the first minute of life. This was a cross-sectional evaluation from an internal database information system in a tertiary referral obstetric and neonatal centre. Newborns with gestational age ≥24 weeks and birth weight ≥500 g with a registered Apgar score in the first minute of life were included. A total of 4475 newborns had an Apgar score >3 and 154 newborns had an Apgar score ≤3 in the first minute of life. A multivariate analysis revealed that eclampsia (OR = 31.53), twin pregnancy (OR = 7.06), analgesia (OR = 1.97), prematurity (OR = 2.00) and caesarean section (OR = 2.06) were risk factors for an Apgar score ≤3 in the first minute of life. Identification of these risk factors indicates prompt assistance during prenatal and labour care to prevent neonatal hypoxia and low Apgar scores, identifying newborns that may need resuscitation procedures.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Adequate prenatal care and proper labour management are the main factors that reduce the risk of complications at birth. The Apgar score at the first minute of life reflects conditions during labour but it is not a parameter that indicates resuscitation procedures. Previous studies have reported the association Apgar score at five minutes of life with the neonatal outcome.What the results of this study add? This study identifies risk factors associated with an Apgar score ≤3 in the first minute of life in a tertiary referral hospital. Eclampsia was the greatest independent risk factor, increasing by 31 times the risk of having an Apgar score ≤3 in the first minute of life.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Identification of these risk factors, especially prompt treatment antenataly and during labour for hypertensive pregnant women, can prevent neonatal hypoxia and reduce the number of newborns that may need resuscitation procedures.
Assuntos
Índice de Apgar , Maternidades/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/etiologia , Assistência Perinatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Analgesia Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Eclampsia/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Análise Multivariada , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/fisiopatologia , Gravidez de Gêmeos/estatística & dados numéricos , Nascimento Prematuro/fisiopatologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
ABSTRACT Objetives: To investigate the association between analgesia during labor and occurrence of neonatal outcomes. Methods: Retrospective cohort study with medical records of 850 parturient. The exposure variable of interest was receiving pharmacological analgesia during labor and neonatal outcomes were: one- and five-minute Apgar, resuscitation maneuvers and referral of the newborn to Neonatal ICU. A logistic regression was carried out to obtain Odds Ratios and 95% confidence interval, with adjustment for confounding factors. Results: Among the women studied, 35% received analgesia and this use was associated with a greater chance of neonatal outcomes such as one-minute Apgar < 7 (p <0.0001), resuscitation maneuvers (p <0.001) and referral to the Neonatal ICU (p = 0.004), mostly were among low-risk pregnant women, even after adjustments. Conclusions: The use of pharmacological analgesia during labor is associated with one-minute Apgar < 7, resuscitation maneuvers and referral to the Neonatal ICU.
RESUMEN Objetivos: Investigar la asociación entre la analgesia en el trabajo de parto y la aparición de resultados neonatales. Métodos: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo con datos de 850 parturientas. La exposición fue recibir analgesia farmacológica en el trabajo de parto, resultados: Apgar del primer y quinto minuto < 7, maniobras de reanimación y derivación a la UCIN. La regresión logística se utilizó para obtener el Odds Ratio (OR) y el intervalo de confianza del 95% (IC95%), ajustado por variables de confusión. Resultados: De las mujeres estudiadas, el 35% recibió analgesia y su uso se asoció con una mayor probabilidad de resultados como: Apgar en el primer minuto < 7 (p<0,0001), maniobras de reanimación (p<0,001) y derivación a la UCIN (p=0,004). Conclusiones: el uso de analgesia farmacológica durante el trabajo de parto se asoció con Apgar < 7 en el primer minuto, maniobras de reanimación y derivación a la UCIN.
RESUMO Objetivos: Investigar a associação entre analgesia no trabalho de parto e ocorrência de desfechos neonatais. Métodos: Estudo de coorte retrospectiva com dados de prontuários de 850 parturientes. A exposição foi receber analgesia farmacológica no trabalho de parto e os desfechos: Apgar do primeiro e quinto minuto < 7, manobras de reanimação e encaminhamento para Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal (UTI). Utilizou-se regressão logística para obter Odds Ratio (OR) e intervalo de 95% de confiança (IC95%), sendo ajustados por confundidores. Resultados: Das mulheres estudadas, 35% receberam analgesia e seu uso esteve associado a maior chance de desfechos, como: Apgar do primeiro minuto < 7 (p<0,0001), manobras de reanimação (p<0,001) e encaminhamento para UTI Neonatal (p=0,004), principalmente entre gestantes de risco habitual, mesmo após ajustes. Conclusões: O uso de analgesia farmacológica durante o trabalho de parto foi associado a Apgar do primeiro minuto < 7, manobras de reanimação e encaminhamento para UTI neonatal.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Recém-Nascido , Adolescente , Adulto , Trabalho de Parto/efeitos dos fármacos , Analgesia Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Índice de Apgar , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Modelos Logísticos , Razão de Chances , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estudos de Coortes , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodosRESUMO
ABSTRACT Objetives: To investigate the association between analgesia during labor and occurrence of neonatal outcomes. Methods: Retrospective cohort study with medical records of 850 parturient. The exposure variable of interest was receiving pharmacological analgesia during labor and neonatal outcomes were: one- and five-minute Apgar, resuscitation maneuvers and referral of the newborn to Neonatal ICU. A logistic regression was carried out to obtain Odds Ratios and 95% confidence interval, with adjustment for confounding factors. Results: Among the women studied, 35% received analgesia and this use was associated with a greater chance of neonatal outcomes such as one-minute Apgar < 7 (p <0.0001), resuscitation maneuvers (p <0.001) and referral to the Neonatal ICU (p = 0.004), mostly were among low-risk pregnant women, even after adjustments. Conclusions: The use of pharmacological analgesia during labor is associated with one-minute Apgar < 7, resuscitation maneuvers and referral to the Neonatal ICU.
RESUMEN Objetivos: Investigar la asociación entre la analgesia en el trabajo de parto y la aparición de resultados neonatales. Métodos: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo con datos de 850 parturientas. La exposición fue recibir analgesia farmacológica en el trabajo de parto, resultados: Apgar del primer y quinto minuto < 7, maniobras de reanimación y derivación a la UCIN. La regresión logística se utilizó para obtener el Odds Ratio (OR) y el intervalo de confianza del 95% (IC95%), ajustado por variables de confusión. Resultados: De las mujeres estudiadas, el 35% recibió analgesia y su uso se asoció con una mayor probabilidad de resultados como: Apgar en el primer minuto < 7 (p<0,0001), maniobras de reanimación (p<0,001) y derivación a la UCIN (p=0,004). Conclusiones: el uso de analgesia farmacológica durante el trabajo de parto se asoció con Apgar < 7 en el primer minuto, maniobras de reanimación y derivación a la UCIN.
RESUMO Objetivos: Investigar a associação entre analgesia no trabalho de parto e ocorrência de desfechos neonatais. Métodos: Estudo de coorte retrospectiva com dados de prontuários de 850 parturientes. A exposição foi receber analgesia farmacológica no trabalho de parto e os desfechos: Apgar do primeiro e quinto minuto < 7, manobras de reanimação e encaminhamento para Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal (UTI). Utilizou-se regressão logística para obter Odds Ratio (OR) e intervalo de 95% de confiança (IC95%), sendo ajustados por confundidores. Resultados: Das mulheres estudadas, 35% receberam analgesia e seu uso esteve associado a maior chance de desfechos, como: Apgar do primeiro minuto < 7 (p<0,0001), manobras de reanimação (p<0,001) e encaminhamento para UTI Neonatal (p=0,004), principalmente entre gestantes de risco habitual, mesmo após ajustes. Conclusões: O uso de analgesia farmacológica durante o trabalho de parto foi associado a Apgar do primeiro minuto < 7, manobras de reanimação e encaminhamento para UTI neonatal.
Assuntos
Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Trabalho de Parto/efeitos dos fármacos , Analgesia Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Analgesia Obstétrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Apgar , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Brasil/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estudos de Coortes , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodosRESUMO
AIM: To compare the effect on epidural catheter migration of three different types of dressing used in labor. INTRODUCTION: Failure of labor epidural is due to multiple factors including catheter migration. Epidural catheter migration has been showed to be related to body mass index and patient position. The dressing technique also influences catheter migration and the risk of epidural failure. METHODS: Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups based on type of dressing of labor epidural: TegadermTM (Group T), TegadermTM with sticky pad (Group P), and TegadermTM with Steri-StripTM (Group S). Measured variables included parity, gestational age, body mass index (BMI), level of puncture and distance of epidural catheter migration. RESULTS: There was an overall difference in epidural catheter migration (ECM) distance among different groups (p<0.05). Pairwise comparison revealed only a significant difference between groups P and T (0.76±1.35 vs. -0.14±1.03, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Taping the lumbar epidural catheter used for labor analgesia with TegadermTM is inferior to TegadermTM with sticky pad or with Steri-StripTM in terms of catheter migration. There is no association of catheter migration and BMI.
Objetivo: Comparar el efecto de tres diferentes tipos de fijación sobre la migración del catéter epidural durante el trabajo de parto. Introducción: El fallo del bloqueo epidural en el trabajo de parto se debe a múltiples factores incluyendo la migración de catéter. La migración de catéter epidural se ha relacionado con el índice de masa corporal y la posición, así como con movimientos del paciente. La técnica de fijación también afecta la migración de catéter y el riesgo de bloqueo epidural fallido. Método: Las pacientes fueron aleatorizadas y asignadas a uno de tres grupos según el tipo de fijación: TegadermTM (Grupo T), TegadermTM con almohadilla adhesiva (Grupo P) y Tegaderm TM con Steri-StripTM (Grupo S). Las variables evaluadas incluyeron paridad, edad gestacional, índice de masa corporal (IMC), nivel de punción y distancia de migración del catéter epidural. Resultados: Se detectó una diferencia en la distancia de migración de catéter epidural entre los diferentes grupos (p<0.05). La comparación reveló diferencia únicamente entre los grupos P y T (0.76±1.35 vs. -0.14±1.03, p<0.01). Conclusión: TegadermTM como método de fijación de catéter epidural en el trabajo de parto resultó ser inferior al TegadermTM con almohadilla adhesiva o con Steri-StripTM en términos de migración de catéter. No existe una asociación entre migración de catéter epidural e IMC.
Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural/efeitos adversos , Analgesia Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Migração de Corpo Estranho/prevenção & controle , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Analgesia Epidural/instrumentação , Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgesia Obstétrica/instrumentação , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Bandagens , Índice de Massa Corporal , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentação , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Feminino , Migração de Corpo Estranho/etiologia , Humanos , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/etiologia , Gravidez , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Abstract Introduction: Lumbar epidural block is an effective and routinely used technique for labor pain relief, and the combined spinal-epidural block has the benefit of using lower doses of local anesthetics and rapid onset of analgesia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two anesthetic techniques: combined spinal-epidural block and continuous epidural block in pregnant women for labor analgesia. Methods: Eighty patients, ASA II and III, with cephalic presentation and cervical dilation between 5 and 6 cm, undergoing labor analgesia, allocated in two groups according to the anesthetic technique: combined spinal-epidural (GI) and continuous epidural (GII). Pain severity before the blockade, time to complete analgesia, degree of motor blockade, time to full cervical dilation, duration of the second stage of labor, pain severity during the 1st and 2nd stage of labor, type of delivery, use of oxytocin during labor, maternal cardiocirculatory and respiratory parameters and adverse events, and neonatal repercussions were recorded. Results: At the time of anesthesia, pain severity was similar in both groups. Pain relief was faster in GI (4.5 ± 1.5 min) when compared to GII (11.6 ± 4.6 min) p = 0.01; pain scores in the first and second stages of delivery were lower in GI (0.9 ± 0.3 and 1.8 ± 0.7, respectively) when compared to GII (1.9 ± 0.6 and 2.2 ± 0.5, respectively), with p = 0.01 only in the first stage of labor; there was need for local anesthetics supplementation in GII; there were more frequent spontaneous deliveries in GI (80% of patients) than in GII (50%) (p = 0.045) and more frequent use of instrumental (p = 0.03) in GII (12 patients) compared to GI (4 patients); the frequency of cesarean deliveries was significantly higher (p = 0.02) in Group II than in Group I, with 4 cases in GI and 8 cases in GII; absence of maternal cardiocirculatory and respiratory changes and neonatal repercussions; more frequent pruritus in GI (10 patients) and (0 patients in GII) (p = 0.02). Conclusion: The combined blockade proved to be effective with better quality of analgesia and greater comfort for pregnant women, constituting a good option for the practice of obstetric analgesia.
Resumo Introdução: O bloqueio peridural lombar constitui técnica eficaz e rotineiramente empregada para alívio da dor do parto e o bloqueio combinado raquiperidural tem como benefícios o emprego de doses menores de anestésicos locais e rápido início de analgesia. O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar comparativamente a eficácia e a segurança de duas técnicas anestésicas: bloqueio combinado raquiperidural e peridural contínua em grávidas submetidas à analgesia de parto. Método: Oitenta gestantes, ASA 2 e 3, apresentação cefálica e dilatação cervical entre cinco e seis centímetros, submetidas à analgesia de parto, distribuídas em dois grupos de acordo com a técnica anestésica: técnica combinada raquiperidural (GI) e peridural contínua (GII). Avaliaram-se: intensidade de dor antes do bloqueio; tempo para completa analgesia; grau do bloqueio motor; tempo para dilatação cervical total; duração do 2° estágio do trabalho de parto; intensidade de dor durante o 1° e o 2° estágio do trabalho de parto; tipo de parto; uso de ocitocina durante trabalho de parto; parâmetros cardiocirculatórios, respiratórios e eventos adversos maternos; repercussões neonatais. Resultados: No momento da anestesia a intensidade de dor era semelhante em ambos os grupos. O alívio da dor foi mais rápido no GI (4,5 ± 1,5 min) quando comparado com o GII (11,6 ± 4,6 min) p = 0,01; os escores de dor no primeiro e segundo estágios de parto foram menores no GI (0,9 ± 0,3) e (1,8 ± 0,7) quando comparados com o GII (1,9 ± 0,6) e (2,2 ± 0,5) com p = 0,01 somente no primeiro estágio de trabalho de parto; houve necessidade de complementação com anestésicos locais no GII; partos espontâneos mais frequentes em GI (80% das pacientes) do que em GII (50%) p = 0,045 e instrumentais mais frequentes (p = 0,03) em GII (12 pacientes) quando comparadas com o GI (quatro pacientes); a frequência de partos cesáreos foi significativamente maior (p = 0,02) no Grupo II do que no Grupo I, quatro casos no GI e oito no GII; ausência de alterações cardiocirculatórias e respiratórias maternas e repercussões neonatais; prurido mais frequente no GI (10 pacientes) e (0 paciente no GII) p = 0,02. Conclusão: O bloqueio combinado mostrou-se eficaz com melhor qualidade de analgesia e maior conforto às gestantes, constitui boa opção para a prática de analgesia obstétrica.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Adulto Jovem , Analgesia Epidural/efeitos adversos , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Método Duplo-Cego , Analgesia Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Terapia Combinada , Raquianestesia/efeitos adversos , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodosRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to summarize the evidence derived from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing dural puncture epidural analgesia (DPEA) and conventional lumbar epidural analgesia (LEA) for women undergoing labor. INTERVENTIONS: The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to July 2018 in order to find RCTs published in the English language, which investigated DPEA in laboring women. MAIN RESULTS: Six RCTs were included in the final analysis. Their collective results remain ambiguous. Dural puncture with small (i.e., 26- or 27-gauge) spinal needles seems to confer either minimal benefits or improved analgesic quality and lower pain scores in the first 10â¯min. Dural puncture with 25-gauge spinal needles has been reported to provide higher success rate than conventional LEA in one trial; however two other studies could only agree on the fact that DPEA results in improved sacral blockade and fewer unilateral blocks compared to LEA. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence regarding DPEA for labor analgesia remains ambiguous. Future research should investigate the optimal (spinal) needle size for dural puncture as well as factors governing transmeningeal flux of local anesthetics and opioids in the presence of a dural hole.
Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Dor do Parto/diagnóstico , Punção Espinal/métodos , Analgesia Epidural/efeitos adversos , Analgesia Epidural/instrumentação , Analgesia Obstétrica/efeitos adversos , Analgesia Obstétrica/instrumentação , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Epidurais/instrumentação , Injeções Epidurais/métodos , Dor do Parto/etiologia , Trabalho de Parto , Agulhas , Medição da Dor , Gravidez , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Punção Espinal/efeitos adversos , Punção Espinal/instrumentação , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Lumbar epidural block is an effective and routinely used technique for labor pain relief, and the combined spinal-epidural block has the benefit of using lower doses of local anesthetics and rapid onset of analgesia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two anesthetic techniques: combined spinal-epidural block and continuous epidural block in pregnant women for labor analgesia. METHODS: Eighty patients, ASA II and III, with cephalic presentation and cervical dilation between 5 and 6 centimeters, undergoing labor analgesia, allocated in two groups according to the anesthetic technique: combined spinal-epidural (GI) and continuous epidural (GII). Pain severity before the blockade, time to complete analgesia, degree of motor blockade, time to full cervical dilation, duration of the second stage of labor, pain severity during the 1st and 2nd stage of labor, type of delivery, use of oxytocin during labor, maternal cardiocirculatory and respiratory parameters and adverse events, and neonatal repercussions were recorded. RESULTS: At the time of anesthesia, pain severity was similar in both groups. Pain relief was faster in GI (4.5±1.5min) when compared to GII (11.6±4.6min) p=0.01; pain scores in the first and second stages of delivery were lower in GI (0.9±0.3 and 1.8±0.7, respectively) when compared to GII (1.9±0.6 and 2.2±0.5, respectively), with p=0.01 only in the first stage of labor; there was need for local anesthetics supplementation in GII; there were more frequent spontaneous deliveries in GI (80% of patients) than in GII (50%) (p=0.045) and more frequent use of instrumental (p=0.03) in GII (12 patients) compared to GI (4 patients); the frequency of cesarean deliveries was significantly higher (p=0.02) in Group II than in Group I, with 4 cases in GI and 8 cases in GII; absence of maternal cardiocirculatory and respiratory changes and neonatal repercussions; more frequent pruritus in GI (10 patients) and (0 patients in GII) (p=0.02). CONCLUSION: The combined blockade proved to be effective with better quality of analgesia and greater comfort for pregnant women, constituting a good option for the practice of obstetric analgesia.