Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 229
Filtrar
1.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 79: 100345, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38513297

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The antiemetic effectiveness of olanzapine, as a prophylactic off-label antiemetic drug, for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) is unknown. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the authors evaluate the efficacy and side effects of olanzapine as a prophylactic antiemetic in adult patients who undergo general anesthesia and assess adverse effects. METHODS: A systematic search was done on electronic bibliographic databases in July 2023. Randomized controlled trials of olanzapine as a prophylactic antiemetic for PONV in adults who underwent general anesthesia were included. The authors excluded non-RCTs and retracted studies. The authors set no date of publication or language limits. The outcomes were the incidence of PONV within 24 h postoperatively and the safety of olanzapine. The risk of bias was assessed according to the tool suggested by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. RESULTS: Meta-analysis included 446 adult patients. Olanzapine reduced on average 38 % the incidence of PONV. The estimated risk ratio (95 % CI) of olanzapine versus control was 0.62 (0.42-0.90), p = 0.010, I2 = 67 %. In the subgroup meta-analysis, doses of olanzapine (10 mg) reduced on average 49 % of the incidence of PONV (RR = 0.51 [0.34-0.77], p = 0.001, I2 = 31 %). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review with meta-analysis indicated that olanzapine as a prophylactic antiemetic alone or combined with other antiemetic agents reduced the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. However, this conclusion must be presented with some degree of uncertainty due to the small number of studies included. There was a lack of any evidence to draw conclusions on side effects.


Assuntos
Anestesia Geral , Antieméticos , Olanzapina , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios , Humanos , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/prevenção & controle , Olanzapina/uso terapêutico , Olanzapina/efeitos adversos , Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 102: 101-109, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38307225

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia (EA) is recommended along with general anesthesia (GA) for patients undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AAA) and is known to be associated with improved postoperative outcomes. This study evaluates inequities in using this superior analgesic approach and further assesses the disparities at patient and hospital levels. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using the Vascular Quality Initiative database of adult patients undergoing elective open AAA repair between 2003 and 2022. Patients were grouped and analyzed based on anesthesia utilization, that is, EA + GA (Group I) and GA only (Group II). Study groups were further stratified by race, and outcomes were studied. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to study the impact of race on the utilization of EA with GA. A subgroup analysis was also carried out to learn the EA analgesia utilization in hospitals performing open AAA with the least to most non-White patients. RESULTS: A total of 8,940 patients were included in the study, of which EA + GA (Group I) comprised n = 4,247 (47.5%) patients, and GA (Group II) had n = 4,693 (52.5%) patients. Based on multivariate regression analysis, the odds ratio of non-White patients receiving both EA and GA for open AAA repair compared to White patients was 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.53-0.72, P < 0.001). Of the patients who received both EA + GA, non-White race was associated with increased length of intensive care unit stay and a longer total length of hospital stay compared to White patients. Hospitals with the lowest quintile of minorities had the highest utilization of EA + GA for all patients compared to the highest quintile. CONCLUSIONS: Non-White patients are less likely to receive the EA + GA than White patients while undergoing elective open AAA repair, demonstrating a potential disparity. Also, this disparity persists at the hospital level, with hospitals with most non-White patients having the least EA utilization, pointing toward system-wide disparities.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural , Anestesia Epidural , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Analgesia Epidural/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco
3.
Einstein (Sao Paulo) ; 21: eRC0628, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38126547

RESUMO

Pulmonary aspiration of gastric residues during anesthesia is a potentially fatal complication for which no specific treatment is available. The primary way to prevent its occurrence in the context of elective surgeries is adherence to fasting protocols. However, some clinical conditions can prolong the gastric emptying time, and the risk of aspiration may exist despite adequate fasting. Recognizing the risk factors for gastroparesis allows the adoption of preventive methods and is the primary way to reduce morbidity and mortality from pulmonary aspiration. In this scenario, the anesthesiologist can investigate the gastric content by using ultrasound, adjust the anesthetic technique, and even postpone elective surgeries. Here, we describe incidental computed tomography finding of solid contents in the stomach of a patient without prior identification of the risk factors for gastroparesis. The patient underwent elective renal nodule ablation under general anesthesia after fasting for 9 hours. During the procedure, solid contents in the stomach were noted on computed tomography. Subsequently, it was discovered that the patient had been using semaglutide for 6 days and had not disclosed this information. Semaglutide use may represent a new and significant risk factor for anesthesia-related pulmonary aspiration. Until studies provide information on the appropriate perioperative management of patients using semaglutide, anesthesiologists need to adopt preventive measures to avoid aspiration. Awareness of this potential association and open communication among patients, physicians, and anesthesia teams are essential for enhancing patient safety.


Assuntos
Gastroparesia , Humanos , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Jejum , Aspiração Respiratória , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
4.
Rev. cient. Esc. Univ. Cienc. Salud ; 10(1): 18-27, ene.-jun. 2023. tab.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, BIMENA | ID: biblio-1555972

RESUMO

El manejo de la vía aérea es de preocupación del anestesiólogo y es su deber anticipar las dificultades al realizar una intubación. Existen múltiples pruebas para predecir la vía aérea difícil. Objetivo: Describir los resultados de las escalas de Mallampati, distancia interincisivos, distancia esternomentoniana y circunferencia de cuello y la clasificación de Cormack-Lehane en pacientes adultos sometidos a cirugía electiva bajo anestesia general. Pacientes y Métodos: Estudio cuantitativo, descriptivo, de corte transversal; método de recolección de datos fue: cuestionario; en el Hospital Nacional Doctor Mario Catarino Rivas. Un total de 50 pacientes mayores de 18 años. Resultados: En la escala de Mallampati 4 (44%) de los pacientes fueron intubación difícil coincidiendo conlos resultados de la escala de Cormack-Lehane. En la apertura mayor de 3 cm el 32 (94%) fueron intubación fácil. De los pacientes con distancia esternomentoniana mayor de 13 cm el 41 (89.1%) fueron intubación fácil. En el grosor del cuello menor o igual a 36 cm, 32 (94%) fueron intubación fácil. Conclusión: Al comparar los resultados de pruebas predictoras de via aérea difícil y la clasificación de Cormack-Lehane se encontró que la clasificación de Mallampati y apertura bucal fueron similares a la clasificación Cormack-Lehane...(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intubação/classificação , Cirurgia Geral/métodos , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos
5.
PLoS One ; 18(3): e0283039, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36928465

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: General anesthesia is associated with the development of atelectasis, which may affect lung ventilation. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a noninvasive imaging tool that allows monitoring in real time the topographical changes in aeration and ventilation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pattern of distribution of pulmonary ventilation through EIT before and after anesthesia induction in pediatric patients without lung disease undergoing nonthoracic surgery. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study including healthy children younger than 5 years who underwent nonthoracic surgery. Monitoring was performed continuously before and throughout the surgical period. Data analysis was divided into 5 periods: induction (spontaneous breathing, SB), ventilation-5min, ventilation-30min, ventilation-late and recovery-SB. In addition to demographic data, mechanical ventilation parameters were also collected. Ventilation impedance (Delta Z) and pulmonary ventilation distribution were analyzed cycle by cycle at the 5 periods. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included, and redistribution of ventilation from the posterior to the anterior region was observed with the beginning of mechanical ventilation: on average, the percentage ventilation distribution in the dorsal region decreased from 54%(IC95%:49-60%) to 49%(IC95%:44-54%). With the restoration of spontaneous breathing, ventilation in the posterior region was restored. CONCLUSION: There were significant pulmonary changes observed during anesthesia and controlled mechanical ventilation in children younger than 5 years, mirroring the findings previously described adults. Monitoring these changes may contribute to guiding the individualized settings of the mechanical ventilator with the goal to prevent postoperative complications.


Assuntos
Respiração Artificial , Tomografia , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Impedância Elétrica , Tomografia/métodos , Ventilação Pulmonar , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos
9.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 73(4): 426-433, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34560115

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Few trials have examined the efficacy of esmolol to attenuate hemodynamic and respiratory responses during extubation. However, the most appropriate dose of esmolol and an optimal protocol for administering this beta-blocker are uncertain. METHODS: Ninety patients ASA physical status I, II, and III (aged 18...60 years) scheduled to procedures with general anesthesia and tracheal extubation were selected. Patients were randomized into esmolol and placebo group to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single bolus dose of esmolol (2...mg.kg-1) on cardiorespiratory responses during the peri-extubation period. The primary outcome was the rate of tachycardia during extubation. RESULTS: The rate of tachycardia was significantly lower in esmolol-treated patients compared to placebo-treated patients (2.2% vs. 48.9%, relative risk (RR): 0.04, 95% confidence interval (95% CI)...=...0.01 to 0.32, p...=...0.002). The rate of hypertension was also significantly lower in the esmolol group (4.4% vs. 31.1%, RR: 0.14, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.6, p...=...0.004). Esmolol-treated patients were associated with higher extubation quality compared to patients who received placebo (p...<...0.001), with an approximately two-fold increase in the rate of patients without cough (91.1%) in the esmolol group compared to the placebo group (46.7%). The rate of bucking was approximately 5-fold lower in the esmolol group (8.9% vs. 44.5%, respectively, RR: 0.20 (95% CI, 0.1 to 0.5, p...=...0.002, with an NNT of 2.8). CONCLUSION: A single bolus dose of esmolol is an effective and safe therapeutic strategy to attenuate cardiorespiratory responses during the peri-extubation period.


Assuntos
Hipertensão , Propanolaminas , Humanos , Extubação/efeitos adversos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/etiologia , Propanolaminas/farmacologia , Propanolaminas/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/farmacologia , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Taquicardia/tratamento farmacológico , Taquicardia/etiologia , Taquicardia/prevenção & controle , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Frequência Cardíaca
10.
Braz. J. Anesth. (Impr.) ; 73(4): 426-433, 2023. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1447630

RESUMO

Abstract Background Few trials have examined the efficacy of esmolol to attenuate hemodynamic and respiratory responses during extubation. However, the most appropriate dose of esmolol and an optimal protocol for administering this beta-blocker are uncertain. Methods Ninety patients ASA physical status I, II, and III (aged 18-60 years) scheduled to procedures with general anesthesia and tracheal extubation were selected. Patients were randomized into esmolol and placebo group to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single bolus dose of esmolol (2 mg.kg-1) on cardiorespiratory responses during the peri-extubation period. The primary outcome was the rate of tachycardia during extubation. Results The rate of tachycardia was significantly lower in esmolol-treated patients compared to placebo-treated patients (2.2% vs. 48.9%, relative risk (RR): 0.04, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.01 to 0.32, p= 0.002). The rate of hypertension was also significantly lower in the esmolol group (4.4% vs. 31.1%, RR: 0.14, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.6, p= 0.004). Esmolol-treated patients were associated with higher extubation quality compared to patients who received placebo (p< 0.001), with an approximately two-fold increase in the rate of patients without cough (91.1%) in the esmolol group compared to the placebo group (46.7%). The rate of bucking was approximately 5-fold lower in the esmolol group (8.9% vs. 44.5%, respectively, RR: 0.20 (95% CI, 0.1 to 0.5, p= 0.002, with an NNT of 2.8). Conclusion A single bolus dose of esmolol is an effective and safe therapeutic strategy to attenuate cardiorespiratory responses during the peri-extubation period.


Assuntos
Humanos , Propanolaminas/uso terapêutico , Propanolaminas/farmacologia , Hipertensão/etnologia , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Taquicardia/etnologia , Taquicardia/prevenção & controle , Taquicardia/tratamento farmacológico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/farmacologia , Extubação/efeitos adversos , Frequência Cardíaca , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA