RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Curvilinear array ultrasound transducers enable tissue sampling and have therapeutic capabilities. Nevertheless, colonic intubation and maneuvering with these transducers is technically challenging and is therefore typically limited to the rectosigmoid area. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and diagnostic yield of colonoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in deep colonic intubation. IMPACT OF INNOVATION: The impact of this innovation is to enable tissue sampling of colonic and extracolonic lesions guided by endoscopic ultrasound. TECHNOLOGY, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: Curvilinear array ultrasound is used in the evaluation of luminal and extraluminal colonic diseases. Thirteen patients underwent colonoscopic ultrasound with a curvilinear array ultrasound endoscope in a single center for subepithelial lesions, cancer staging, and extracolonic lesions from July 2015 to February 2021. Endosonography was performed using an Olympus EU-ME1 and GF-UCT 180 with a 5-12MHz curvilinear array transducer. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who were successfully scanned with the endoscopic ultrasound. The secondary outcomes included the success rate of fine-needle aspiration, the diagnostic yield of the tissue samples, and the adverse events related to the procedure. PRELIMINARY RESULTS: A total of 13 female patients underwent colonoscopic ultrasound. All patients (100%, 13/13) were successfully scanned. Fine-needle aspiration was deemed necessary and successfully performed in 100% (5/5) of the patients. Tissue samples collected by fine-needle aspiration resulted in a diagnostic yield of 60%, and no adverse events resulted from this intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of performing colonoscopic ultrasound with a curvilinear array transducer. Fine-needle aspiration for subepithelial, colonic, and extracolonic lesions is feasible and safe in this setting with no adverse events reported in our study. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Future research should be directed toward validating colonoscopic ultrasound with a curvilinear array transducer technique in prospective randomized trials. Studies evaluating the feasibility and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided interventions in the colon, such as abscess drainage and enteral anastomosis, should be considered.
Assuntos
Doenças do Colo/patologia , Colonoscopia/instrumentação , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/instrumentação , Endossonografia/instrumentação , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doenças do Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Colonoscopia/efeitos adversos , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/efeitos adversos , Endossonografia/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fine needle biopsy (FNB) histological samples by endoscopic ultrasound. It is important to obtain representative histological samples of solid biliopancreatic lesions without a clear indication for resection. The role of new needles in such task is yet to be determined. AIM: To compare performance assessment between 20G double fine needle biopsy (FNB) and conventional 22G fine needle aspiration (FNA) needles for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biopsy. METHODS: This prospective study examined 20 patients who underwent the random puncture of solid pancreatic lesions with both needles and the analysis of tissue samples by a single pathologist. RESULTS: The ProCore 20G FNB needle provided more adequate tissue samples (16 vs. 9, p=0.039) with better cellularity quantitative scores (11 vs. 5, p=0.002) and larger diameter of the histological sample (1.51±1.3 mm vs. 0.94±0.55 mm, p=0.032) than the 22G needle. The technical success, puncture difficulty, and sample bleeding were similar between groups. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 88.9%, 100%, and 90% and 77.8%, 100%, and 78.9% for the 20G and 22G needles, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The samples obtained with the ProCore 20G FNB showed better histological parameters; although there was no difference in the diagnostic performance between the two needles, these findings may improve pathologist performance.
Assuntos
Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/normas , Agulhas/classificação , Pâncreas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/instrumentação , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Agulhas/efeitos adversos , Pâncreas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are different techniques for obtaining tissue using a fine needle guided by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS); all aim to obtain the most appropriate material, free of defects, of good quality and in sufficient quantity. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine which of the two EUS-guided techniques (capillary and wet) provides better quality samples for cytopathological analysis and which should be used for obtaining tissue from pancreatic, bile duct, liver, and lymph node tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a pilot prospective study that included 26 patients with evidence of pancreatic tumor, liver tumor, and/or lymph node metastasis of primary tumor. All patients were subjected to two different tissue sampling techniques, the capillary technique and the wet technique, during the same procedure. Both techniques relied on EUS guidance. The samples obtained for the cytopathological analysis were evaluated in blinded manner by two different pathologists. RESULTS: Pathologist A was able to make a diagnosis using the capillary technique in 96.15% of the cases and in 88.46% of the cases using the wet technique. Pathologist B was able to make a diagnosis using the capillary technique in 96.15% of the cases and in 92.30% of the cases using the wet technique. The kappa coefficient between observers for histopathological diagnosis was 1 for capillarity and 0.948 for wet technique. CONCLUSION: The capillary technique yielded better results than the wet technique in terms of sample quality and cellularity.
ANTECEDENTES: Existen diferentes técnicas para la obtención de tejido usando la aguja fina guiada por ultrasonido endoscópico. Todas ellas pretenden obtener el tejido mas apropiado, libre de defectos, con una buena calidad y una cantidad suficiente. OBJETIVO: Determinar cuál de las dos técnicas guiadas por ultrasonido endoscópico (capilar y húmeda) proporciona mejor calidad de la muestra para análisis citopatológico y biopsia de tejido pancreático, vías biliares, hígado y tumores de nodos linfáticos. MÉTODO: Estudio piloto, prospectivo, que incluyó 26 pacientes con evidencia de tumor pancreático, hepático o metástasis de nodos linfáticos. Durante el mismo procedimiento, los pacientes fueron sometidos a las dos técnicas de obtención de muestra tisular guiadas por ultrasonido endoscópico. Las muestras para el análisis citopatológico fueron evaluadas de forma cegada por dos patólogos diferentes. RESULTADOS: El patólogo A pudo hacer el diagnóstico usando la técnica de capilaridad en el 96.15% de los casos y en el 88.46% cuando se usó la técnica húmeda; el patólogo B realizó el diagnóstico en el 96.15% y el 92.30% de los casos, respectivamente. El coeficiente kappa entre los observadores para el diagnóstico histopatológico fue de 1 para la técnica de capilaridad y de 0.948 para la técnica húmeda. CONCLUSIÓN: La técnica de capilaridad mostró mejores resultados en términos de calidad de la muestra y celularidad.
Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/patologia , Colangiocarcinoma/patologia , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/métodos , Endossonografia/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Biópsia por Agulha Fina/instrumentação , Biópsia por Agulha Fina/métodos , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/instrumentação , Endossonografia/instrumentação , Feminino , Humanos , Fígado/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pâncreas/patologia , Projetos Piloto , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
ABSTRACT Background: It is important to obtain representative histological samples of solid biliopancreatic lesions without a clear indication for resection. The role of new needles in such task is yet to be determined. Aim: To compare performance assessment between 20G double fine needle biopsy (FNB) and conventional 22G fine needle aspiration (FNA) needles for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biopsy. Methods: This prospective study examined 20 patients who underwent the random puncture of solid pancreatic lesions with both needles and the analysis of tissue samples by a single pathologist. Results: The ProCore 20G FNB needle provided more adequate tissue samples (16 vs. 9, p=0.039) with better cellularity quantitative scores (11 vs. 5, p=0.002) and larger diameter of the histological sample (1.51±1.3 mm vs. 0.94±0.55 mm, p=0.032) than the 22G needle. The technical success, puncture difficulty, and sample bleeding were similar between groups. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 88.9%, 100%, and 90% and 77.8%, 100%, and 78.9% for the 20G and 22G needles, respectively. Conclusions: The samples obtained with the ProCore 20G FNB showed better histological parameters; although there was no difference in the diagnostic performance between the two needles, these findings may improve pathologist performance.
RESUMO Racional: As lesões sólidas pancreáticas não ressecáveis cirurgicamente demandam boa amostragem tecidual para definição histológica e condução oncológica . O papel das novas agulhas de ecopunção no aprimoramento diagnóstico ainda necessita elucidação. Objetivo: Comparar as biópsias guiadas por ecoendoscoopia com a nova agulha 20G de bisel frontal duplo (FNB) com a agulha de aspiração fina 22G convencional. Métodos: Este estudo prospectivo avaliou 20 pacientes submetidos à punção de lesões pancreáticas sólidas com ambas agulhas e envolveu análise de amostras teciduais por um único patologista. Resultados: A agulha FNB 20G forneceu amostras de tecido mais adequadas (16 vs. 9, p=0,039) com melhores escores quantitativos de celularidade (11 vs. 5, p=0,002) e maior diâmetro máximo da amostra histológica (1,51±1,3 mm vs. 0,94±0,55 mm, p=0,032) que a agulha 22G. O sucesso técnico, dificuldade de punção e sangramento da amostra foram semelhantes entre os grupos. A sensibilidade, especificidade e acurácia diagnóstica foram 88,9%, 100% e 90% e 77,8%, 100% e 78,9% para as agulhas 20G e 22G, respectivamente. Conclusão: As amostras obtidas com a FNB 20G apresentaram melhores parâmetros histológicos, embora não tenha havido diferença no desempenho diagnóstico entre as duas agulhas.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adulto Jovem , Pâncreas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/normas , Agulhas/classificação , Pâncreas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/instrumentação , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/métodos , Agulhas/efeitos adversosRESUMO
The endobronchial ultrasound is a minimally invasive technique that simultaneously associates ultrasound and bronchoscopy, to visualize lung nodule or masses, airway wall, and structures adjacent to the tracheobronchial tree. Endobronchial ultrasound has been incorporated into clinical practice all over the world because of its low risk and high diagnostic yield in neoplastic and non-neoplastic disease.
Assuntos
Broncoscopia/métodos , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/métodos , Endossonografia/métodos , Doenças do Mediastino/diagnóstico por imagem , Broncoscopia/instrumentação , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/instrumentação , Endossonografia/instrumentação , Humanos , Pneumopatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeAssuntos
Broncoscopia/instrumentação , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/instrumentação , Agulhas/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Broncoscopia/métodos , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
ABSTRACT The endobronchial ultrasound is a minimally invasive technique that simultaneously associates ultrasound and bronchoscopy, to visualize lung nodule or masses, airway wall, and structures adjacent to the tracheobronchial tree. Endobronchial ultrasound has been incorporated into clinical practice all over the world because of its low risk and high diagnostic yield in neoplastic and non-neoplastic disease.
RESUMO A ultrassonografia endobrônquica é uma técnica minimamente invasiva que associa simultaneamente broncoscopia à ultrassonografia, com a finalidade de visualizar nódulos ou massas pulmonares, paredes das vias aéreas, e estruturas ao redor de toda a árvore traqueobrônquica. A ultrassonografia endobrônquica foi incorporada à prática clínica em todo o mundo devido a seu baixo risco e elevado rendimento diagnóstico em doenças neoplásicas e não neoplásicas.
Assuntos
Humanos , Broncoscopia/métodos , Endossonografia/métodos , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/métodos , Doenças do Mediastino/diagnóstico por imagem , Broncoscopia/instrumentação , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Endossonografia/instrumentação , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/instrumentação , Pneumopatias/diagnóstico por imagemAssuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Broncoscopia/instrumentação , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/instrumentação , Agulhas/normas , Padrões de Referência , Broncoscopia/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tissue diagnosis is required for gastric subepithelial lesions for differential diagnosis of GISTs. However, there has not been consensus about the best needle for EUS-guided sampling of these lesions. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA for gastric subepithelial lesions of the proper muscle layer with large-bore 19 gauge needles. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed to identify consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA with 19 and 22 gauge needles for gastric subepithelial lesions of the fourth endosonographic layer in a tertiary care referral center. EUS-FNA was performed by the same endosonographer, using the fanning technique, without on-site cytopathologist. Specimens were analysed through cell blocks by the same pathologist. Procedure results were categorized into diagnostic, defined as enough material for histopathology and immunohistochemistry, or nondiagnostic. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients (mean age: 59 years, 77% women) underwent 92 EUS-FNA with 19 (75) or 22 (17) gauge needles. Mean lesion size was 22.6 mm. Overall diagnostic yield was 88%. The diagnostic yield of 19 gauge was higher than that of 22 gauge needle (92%x70.6%; p=0.0410), and similar for lesions >2 cm and <2 cm (93.7%x90.7%; p=0.9563). The best performance for 19 gauge needles was obtained performing <3 needle passes. Complication rate was 2.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA with 19 gauge needles is 92% for gastric subepithelial lesions of the proper muscle layer. It is safe and highly valuable for differentiation between GIST and leiomyoma, no matter the size of the lesion.