RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Biliary access refractory to conventional cannulation techniques is a challenging clinical scenario for most endoscopists. The endoscopic-percutaneous rendezvous technique is an optimal alternative with high success rates and low complication rates in expert hands, however its routine use in the West, mainly in Latin America, is still limited. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of endoscopic-percutaneous rendezvous in the management of difficult biliary tract in an endoscopic center in Peru. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Descriptive study - case series type that included 21 patients, with diagnosis of difficult bile duct, all treated by endoscopic-percutaneous rendezvous between July 2017 to July 2020. We evaluated: age, gender, number of previous failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, associated endoscopic findings, rate of successful cannulation, rate of successful resolution of difficult choledocholithiasis, adverse events and procedure-related mortality. RESULTS: The rate of successful cannulation was 100% (21/21). There were 12 cases (57.1%) of difficult choledocholithiasis of which there was a successful resolution rate of 91.6% (11/12). The overall adverse event rate was 4.7% (1/21), which was one case of post-sphincteroplasty gastrointestinal bleeding that was successfully resolved endoscopically only. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic-percutaneous rendezvous performed by expert hands is feasible, safe and clinically effective for the management of the difficult bile duct in Latin America.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC) offer a diagnostic and therapeutic alternative with an improved optical resolution over conventional techniques; however, there are no standardized clinical practice guidelines for this technology. This evidence-based guideline from the Colombian Association of Digestive Endoscopy (ACED) intends to support patients, clinicians, and others in decisions about using in adults the SOC compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), to diagnose indeterminate biliary stricture and to manage difficult biliary stones. METHODS: ACED created a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. Universidad de los Andes and the Colombia Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Network supported the guideline-development process, updating and performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The GRADE approach was used, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks. RESULTS: The panel agreed on one recommendation for adult patients with indeterminate biliary strictures and one for adult patients with difficult biliary stones when comparing SOC versus ERCP. CONCLUSION: For adult patients with indeterminate biliary strictures, the panel made a conditional recommendation for SOC with stricture pattern characterization over ERCP with brushing and/or biopsy for sensitivity, specificity, and procedure success rate outcomes. For the adult patients with difficult biliary stones the panel made conditional recommendation for SOC over ERCP with large-balloon dilation of papilla. Additional research is required on economic estimations of SOC and knowledge translation evaluations to implement SOC intervention in local contexts.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) defines "difficult biliary cannulation" by the presence of one or more of the following: more than 5 contacts with the papilla, more than 5 minutes attempting to cannulate, or inadvertent cannulation of the pancreatic duct in 2 or more times (5-5-2 criteria), recommending these cut-off points to perform advanced cannulation techniques in order to reduce the rate of post-ERCP adverse events. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of the 5-5-2 criteria and their association with post-ERCP complications in a reference hospital in Peru. We performed a prospective analytical case-control study and 120 patients who underwent ERCP were enrolled. The case group included 30 patients who met at least one of the 5-5-2 criteria and the control group included 90 patients without any of these criteria. The ERCP- related complications in both groups and their association with each of the 5-5-2 criteria were compared. The ERCP-related complications that occurred were post-ERCP pancreatitis (6.6% in the case group vs. 3.3% in the control group), bleeding (3.3% controls vs. 0% cases) and perforation (1.1% controls vs. 0% cases); no statistically significant differences were observed. The criterion of 2 or more unintended cannulations to the pancreatic duct showed a significant association (OR= 10.29, CI: 1.47-71.98; p= 0.005) with the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. The criteria 5 minutes and 5 attempts were not associated with post-ERCP complications. In conclusion, among 5-5-2 criteria only the unintended cannulation of 2 or more times into the pancreatic duct was associated with an increased risk of post-ERC pancreatitis. The time and number of attempts criteria could be cautiously expanded without increasing the rate of post-ERCP complications.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The local experience and the success rate of different available treatments for difficult biliary stones in Colombia are poorly described. We made an observational study reporting patients treated for difficult biliary stones, at Hospital Universitario San Ignacio in Bogotá, Colombia between January 2015, and November 2021. Clinical characteristics, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) findings, and outcomes are presented. Additionally, the success rates of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Plus Large Balloon Dilation (ESLBD), Mechanical Lithotripsy (ML), temporary stenting (TS), cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy (CGLL), and surgery are described. A total of 146 patients were included (median age 69 years, IQR 58.5-78.5, 33.8% men). The median stone diameter was 15 mm (IQR 10 - 18 mm). One stone was presented in 39.9%, two stones in 18.2%, and ≥3 stones in the remaining stone. A 67.6% disproportion rate was observed between the stone and distal common bile duct. Successful stone extraction was achieved in 56.2% in the first procedure, 22.6% in the second, 17.1% in the third, 3.4% in the fourth, and 0.7% in the fifth procedures. The successful extraction rates were 56.8% for ESLBD, 75% for ML, 23.4% for TS, 57.7% for CGLL, and 100% for surgery. Endoscopic management of difficult stones is usually successful, although it usually requires 2 or more ERCPs procedures. The surgical requirements were low. ESLBD is an effective technique unlike TS. Few patients required advanced techniques such as ML or CGLL. Endoscopic procedures are associated with a low rate of complications.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) guidelines recommend a 14-day break-in period after catheter placement, yet this period could be shortened with new insertion techniques. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study to compare percutaneous vs. surgical catheter insertion in a newly established PD program. The break-in period was intentionally shortened to <24 h to start PD almost immediately. RESULTS: We included 223 subjects who underwent percutaneous (34%) or surgical (66%) catheter placement. Compared to the surgical group, the percutaneous group had a higher proportion of early dialysis initiation within 24 h (97% vs. 8%, p < 0.001), similar successful initiation rates (87% vs. 92%, p = 0.34), and shorter lengths of stay (12 [9-18] vs. 18 [14-22] days, p < 0.001). Percutaneous insertion increased the likelihood of successful PD initiation within 24 h (OR 74, 95% CI 31-182), without increasing major complications. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous placement could represent a cost-effective and efficient technique to shorten break-in periods.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of innominate artery cannulation strategy with side-graft technique in proximal aortic pathologies. METHODS: A total of 70 patients underwent innominate artery cannulation with a side graft for surgery on the proximal aorta from 2012 to 2020. There were 46 men and 24 women with an average age of 56±13 years. The indications for surgery were type A aortic dissection in 17 patients (24.3%), aortic aneurysm in 52 patients (74.3%), and ascending aorta pseudoaneurysm in one patient (1.4%). The innominate artery was free of disease in all patients. Hypothermic circulatory arrest with antegrade cerebral perfusion was utilized in 60 patients (85.7%). Three patients had previous sternotomy (4.2%). The most common surgical procedure was ascending aorta with hemiarch replacement in 34 patients (48.5%). RESULTS: The mean cardiac ischemia and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 116+46 minutes and 164+56 minutes, respectively. Mean antegrade cerebral perfusion time was 27+14 minutes. The patients were cooled between 22°C and 30°C during surgery. Thirty-day mortality rate was 7.1% (five patients). One patient (1.4%) had stroke, one patient (1.4%) had temporary neurologic deficit, and eight patients (11.4%) had confusion and agitation that resolved completely in all cases. There was no local complication or arterial injury. CONCLUSION: Cannulation of the innominate artery with side graft is safe and effective for both cardiopulmonary bypass and antegrade cerebral perfusion. This technique provides satisfactory neurologic outcomes for proximal aortic surgery.

Assuntos

RESUMO

A prevalência da nefrolitíase está em torno de 1-15% com estimativa crescente, sendo a ureterolítíase comum nos atendimentos de urgência. Custos elevados estão associados ao manejo da ureterolitíase em proporções que chegam ultrapassar 5 bilhões de dólares nos EUA. A cateterização com duplo-J por pielonefrite obstrutiva pode, em alguns casos, ser a única intervenção necessária. O objetivo foi analisar o impacto da retirada de cateteres duplo-J em pacientes com pielonefrite obstrutiva por ureterolitíase menor ou igual a 7 mm, sem intervenção cirúrgica prévia. Foi realizado um estudo clínico prospectivo, no período de Outubro de 2021 a Abril de 2023 em um hospital terciário da cidade de São Paulo. O estudo incluiu pacientes sem manipulação endourológica prévia, submetido à passagem de cateter duplo-J por pielonefrite obstrutiva secundária à ureterolitíase menor ou igual a 7mm. O cateter foi retirado a partir de 21 dias do evento inicial, e tomografia computadorizada foi realizada 14 dias após a extração do cateter. Durante o período, 36 pacientes foram incluídos no estudo, sendo 19 homens, e 61,1% com topografia em ureter distal. Desses, 29 pacientes (80,5%) apresentaram depuração do cálculo na tomografia de controle, apenas 7 (19,5%) desses pacientes foram submetidos ao retratamento. O diâmetro médio dos cálculos no grupo de pacientes que depuraram foi de 4,9mm (variação de 3 a 7 mm), com tempo médio de permanência do cateter de 39,5 dias. Em relação ao grupo que necessitou de retratamento, o diâmetro médio foi de 5,2 mm (variação de 4 a 7 mm), com tempo de permanência de 52,1 dias. Pacientes com ureterolitíase não infecciosa podem, inicialmente, serem tratados clinicamente. No tratamento da pielonefrite obstrutiva a utilização do cateter ureteral pode ser uma ferramenta única, devido à elevada depuração e incidência mínima de complicações, reduzindo a morbidade e os custos aos serviços de saúde. Palavras-chave: Ureterolitíase. Pielonefrite. Cateter duplo-J.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The success of peritoneal dialysis depends on the proper placement and functional longevity of the dialysis catheter. Laparoscopic implantation of a catheter through a rectus sheath tunneling can minimize the risks of catheter failure. AIMS: This study aims to describe one-port simplified technique for laparoscopic placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter with rectus sheath tunneling. METHODS: The simplified laparoscopic insertion of a Tenckhoff catheter with rectus sheath tunneling was performed in 16 patients with chronic renal failure. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, no major complications occurred. Three patients were excluded. One was referred to the renal transplant some weeks after implantation, and one died for other reasons during the follow-up. Another patient needed adhesiolysis due to previous surgery, so an additional port was necessary. The other 13 catheters worked properly, and no postoperative hemorrhage, early leaks, hernia, or catheter migration occurred. One patient had a tunnel infection 11 months after the implant. No peritonitis was observed during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The technique is simple, reproducible, and safe, with good results in catheter function, few complications, and a high catheter survival rate. It does not require a special device or trocar and avoids excessive port sites.

Assuntos