RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the trends in cesarean sections from 2014 to 2020 across both public and private sectors, utilizing the Robson Classification. METHODS: this time series study analyzed the proportion of women who underwent cesarean sections between 2014 and 2020, considering both the Robson classification and the type of healthcare service. Trend analysis was conducted using the Prais-Winsten regression. RESULTS: higher proportions of cesarean sections were observed in all Robson groups within the private sector compared to the public sector. This was despite a decreasing trend in the private sector and an increasing trend in the public sector. Notably, elevated proportions of cesarean sections were recorded in groups that are typically favorable to normal childbirth (Robson 1, 4, and 5). CONCLUSIONS: although there was a decreasing trend in cesarean sections within the private sector, an increasing trend was observed in the public sector. Additionally, there was a high proportion of cesarean sections among women with conditions favorable to normal childbirth. It is crucial to continuously monitor these indicators to evaluate and implement interventions aimed at reducing unnecessary cesarean sections.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Cesarean delivery is major surgery associated with higher costs and adverse outcomes, such as surgical complications, compared with vaginal delivery (1-3). The cesarean delivery rate in Puerto Rico rose from just over 30% in the early to mid-1990s to over 40% by the early 2000s (4,5). During this time, cesarean delivery rates in Puerto Rico were 40%-70% higher than rates in the U.S. mainland and up to 78% higher than rates for Hispanic women in the U.S. mainland (4,5). This report describes trends in Puerto Rico's cesarean delivery rate from 2010 to 2022 and explores changes by maternal age, gestational age, and municipality from 2018 to 2022.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: identificar os fatores sociodemográficos associados à via de parto. Método: trata-se de revisão sistemática com busca nas bases de dados Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, PubMed e Cochrane em maio de 2021. O protocolo do estudo foi registrado na PROSPERO sob o nº CRD42021257340. Os artigos selecionados foram posteriormente analisados pelos sistemas Joanna Briggs Institute e Sistema Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Resultados: mulheres com maior nível socioeconômico, maior nível de escolaridade, com idade acima de 35 anos e parto em instituições privadas possuem maior chance de realizar cesariana comparado ao parto vaginal. A qualidade da evidência para variável de prestador hospitalar foi baixa, para idade e escolaridade materna a qualidade é moderada e classe econômica a qualidade é alta. Conclusões: os fatores sociodemográficos contribuem para o aumento da taxa de cesárea e reforçam o cenário encontrado na literatura.

Objective: to identify the sociodemographic factors associated with the mode of delivery. Method: this is a systematic review with a search in the Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences, PubMed and Cochrane databases in May 2021. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO under number CRD42021257340. The selected articles were analyzed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Grading System of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation systems. Results:women with a higher socioeconomic level, higher education, aged over 35 years and private institutions have a greater chance of having a cesarean section compared to the vaginal level. The quality of quality of quality for the service provider variable was low and the quality of maternal schooling is low and the quality of economic class is high. Conclusion: Sociodemographic conclusions in the literature.

Objetivo: identificar los factores sociodemográficos asociados a la modalidad de parto. Método: se trata de una revisión sistemática con búsqueda en las bases de datos Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud, PubMed y Cochrane en mayo de 2021. El protocolo de estudio fue registrado en PROSPERO con el número CRD42021257340. Los artículos seleccionados fueron analizados por el Instituto Joanna Briggs y los sistemas Grading System of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Resultados: las mujeres con mayor nivel socioeconómico, educación superior, mayores de 35 años e instituciones privadas tienen mayor probabilidad de tener una cesárea en comparación con el nivel vaginal. La calidad de calidad de calidad para la variable proveedor de servicios fue baja y la calidad de escolaridad materna es baja y la calidad de clase económica es alta.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In Haiti where there are high rates of maternal and neonatal mortality, efforts to reduce mortality and improve maternal newborn child health (MNCH) must be tracked and monitored to measure their success. At a rural Haitian hospital, local surveillance efforts allowed for the capture of MNCH indicators. In March 2018, a new stand-alone maternity unit was opened, with increased staff, personnel, and physical space. We aimed to determine if the new maternity unit brought about improvements in maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: We conducted an interrupted time series analysis using data collected between July 2016 and October 2019 including 20 months before the opening of the maternity unit and 20 months after. We examined maternal-neonatal outcomes such as physiological (vaginal) births, caesarean birth, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), maternal deaths, stillbirths and undesirable outcomes (eclampsia, PPH, perineal laceration, postpartum infection, maternal death or stillbirth). RESULTS: Immediately after the opening of the new maternity, the number of physiological births decreased by 7.0% (ß = - 0.070; 95% CI: - 0.110 to - 0.029; p = 0.001) and there was an increase of 6.7% in caesarean births (ß = 0.067; 95% CI: 0.026 to 0.107; p = 0.002). For all undesirable outcomes, preintervention there was an increasing trend of 1.8% (ß = 0.018; 95% CI: 0.013 to 0.024; p < 0.001), an immediate 14.4% decrease after the intervention (ß = - 0.144; 95% CI: - 0.255 to - 0.033; p = 0.012), and a decreasing trend of 1.8% through the postintervention period (ß = - 0.018; 95% CI: - 0.026 to - 0.009; p < 0.001). No other significant level or trend changes were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The new maternity unit led to an upward trend in caesarean births yet an overall reduction in all undesirable maternal and neonatal outcomes. The new maternity unit at this rural Haitian hospital positively impacted and improved maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Applying the Robson classification to all births in Brazil, the objectives of our study were to estimate the rates of caesarean section delivery, assess the extent to which caesarean sections were clinically indicated, and identify variation across socioeconomic groups. METHODS: We conducted a population-based study using routine records of the Live Births Information System in Brazil from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2017. We calculated the relative size of each Robson group; the caesarean section rate; and the contribution to the overall caesarean section rate. We categorised Brazilian municipalities using the Human Development Index to explore caesarean section rates further. We estimated the time trend in caesarean section rates. RESULTS: The rate of caesarean sections was higher in older and more educated women. Prelabour caesarean sections accounted for more than 54 % of all caesarean deliveries. Women with a previous caesarean section (Group 5) made up the largest group (21.7 %). Groups 6-9, for whom caesarean sections would be indicated in most cases, all had caesarean section rates above 82 %, as did Group 5. The caesarean section rates were higher in municipalities with a higher HDI. The general Brazilian caesarean section rate remained stable during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Brazil is a country with one of the world's highest caesarean section rates. This nationwide population-based study provides the evidence needed to inform efforts to improve the provision of clinically indicated caesarean sections. Our results showed that caesarean section rates were lower among lower socioeconomic groups even when clinically indicated, suggesting sub-optimal access to surgical care.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Resumen: Las estadísticas mundiales muestran una tendencia al alza en las tasas de cesáreas que superan el 15% recomendado por la OPS/OMS. Esta cirugía se ha convertido en la más frecuente en los países de ingresos medios y altos. Algunos estudios sugieren que no todas estas cesáreas estarían justificadas. Al respecto se plantean algunas reflexiones sobre los dilemas éticos que se pueden observar desde varias posiciones teóricas, como el consecuencialismo, el kantianismo, la ética de la virtud y la teoría feminista. A su vez, estos dilemas están inmersos en múltiples factores individuales, sociales y culturales, entre otros. Desde la salud pública se debe revisar el parámetro actual definido como "rango aceptable" de cesáreas, ya que puede ser demasiado bajo. Igualmente se recomienda la aplicación de medidas para fortalecer en los pacientes el deseo de un parto normal, cuando sea posible, a través de información y educación oportuna durante la atención prenatal. Las decisiones del profesional de la salud y de las mujeres deben estar respaldadas por la mejor información disponible.

Abstract: World statistics show an upward trend in Cesarean section rates that exceed the 15% recommended by PAHO / WHO. This surgery has become the most common in high- and middle-income countries. Some studies suggest that not all these caesarean sections would be justified. In this regard, some reflections are made on the ethical dilemmas that can be observed from various theoretical positions such as consequentialism, Kantianism, the ethics of virtue and feminist theory. In turn, these dilemmas are immersed in multiple individuals, social and cultural factors, among others. From Public Health, the current parameter defined as the "acceptable range" of Caesarean sections should be reviewed as it may be too low. It is also recommended that measures be applied to strengthen patients' desire for a normal delivery whenever possible through timely information and education during prenatal care. The decisions of the health professional and women must be supported by the best information available.

Resumo: As estatísticas mundiais mostram uma tendência de alta nas taxas de cesáreas que superam em 15% o recomendado pela OPAS/OMS. Esta cirurgia se converteu na mais frequente em países de renda média e alta. Alguns estudos sugerem que não todas estas cesáreas seriam justificadas. A esse respeito se colocam algumas reflexões sobre os dilemas éticos que se podem observar desde várias posiciones teóricas, como o consequencialismo, o kantianismo, a ética da virtude e a teoria feminista. Por sua vez, estes dilemas estão imersos em múltiplos fatores individuais, sociais e culturais, entre outros. Deve-se revisar, a partir da saúde pública, o parâmetro atual definido como "faixa aceitável" de cesáreas, já que pode ser demasiado baixo. Igualmente se recomenda a aplicação de medidas para fortalecer nas pacientes o desejo de um parto normal, quando possível, através de informação e educação oportuna durante a assistência pré-natal. As decisões do profissional da saúde e das mulheres devem estar respaldadas pela melhor informação disponível.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Se realizó un analisis de la tasa de cesáreas en dos maternidades públicas de referencia de Uruguay (Hospital de Clínicas y Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell) utilizando la clasificación de Robson para compararlas entre sí, mediante un estudio observacional, descriptivo, retrospectivo y transversal en un periodo de 10 años y 10 meses (2009-2019). Se analizaron 85.526 nacimientos (7.685 (8,9%) en el Clínicas vs 77.841 (91.1%) Pereira Rossell). El porcentaje de cesáreas por año en el Clínicas fue 49,2% ± 5 vs 29,3% ± 3 en Pereira Rossell. Los grupos de Robson más prevalentes fueron 1, 5A y 10 en el Clínicas vs 3, 1 y 5A en Pereira Rossell. En ambos centros los grupos con mayor contribución relativa a la tasa global de cesáreas fueron: 5A, 10 y 1. Ambos centros presentan un aumento en la tasa de cesárea en la última década, pese a que se asisten poblaciones dispares entre cada uno de ellos. Se debe seguir buscando estrategias que ayuden a reducir la tasa de cesáreas principalmente en pacientes sin cesáreas anteriores o con una única cesárea previa, en caso de no presentan contraindicaciones para el parto vaginal.

An analysis of the caesarean section rate was carried out in two reference public maternity wards in Uruguay (Hospital de Clínicas and Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell) using Robson's classification to compare them with each other, through an observational, descriptive, retrospective and cross-sectional study in a period 10 years and 10 months (2009-2019). 85,526 births were analyzed (7,685 (8.9%) in the Clinics vs 77,841 (91.1%) Pereira Rossell). The percentage of caesarean sections per year in the Clinics was 49.2% ± 5 vs 29.3% ± 3 in Pereira Rossell. The most prevalent Robson groups were 1, 5A and 10 in the Clinicas vs 3, 1 and 5A in Pereira Rossell. In both centers, the groups with the highest relative contribution to the overall rate of cesarean sections were: 5A, 10 and 1. Both centers show an increase in the rate of cesarean section in the last decade, despite the fact that different populations are attended between each of them. Strategies should continue to be sought to help reduce the rate of cesarean sections, mainly in patients without previous cesarean sections or with a single previous cesarean section, if they do not present contraindications for vaginal delivery.

Foi realizada análise da taxa de cesárea em duas maternidades públicas de referência do Uruguai (Hospital de Clínicas e Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell), utilizando a classificação de Robson para compará-las, por meio de estudo observacional, descritivo, retrospectivo e transversal. em um período de 10 anos e 10 meses (2009-2019). Foram analisados 85.526 partos (7.685 (8,9%) nas Clínicas vs 77.841 (91,1%) Pereira Rossell). A porcentagem de cesarianas por ano nas Clínicas foi de 49,2% ± 5 vs 29,3% ± 3 em Pereira Rossell. Os grupos de Robson mais prevalentes foram 1, 5A e 10 nas Clínicas vs 3, 1 e 5A em Pereira Rossell. Em ambos os centros, os grupos com maior contribuição relativa para a taxa global de cesárea foram: 5A, 10 e 1. Ambos os centros apresentam aumento da taxa de cesárea na última década, apesar de diferentes populações serem atendidas entre cada um deles. Estratégias devem continuar a ser buscadas para ajudar a reduzir a taxa de cesárea, principalmente em pacientes sem cesárea anterior ou com cesárea única, se não apresentarem contra-indicações para parto normal.

Assuntos

RESUMO

This article traces the historical processes by which Brazil became a world leader in cesarean sections. It demonstrates that physicians changed their position toward and use of different obstetric surgeries, in particular embryotomies and cesarean sections, over the course of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The authors demonstrate that Catholic obstetricians, building upon both advancements in cesarean section techniques and new civil legislation that gave some personhood to fetuses, began arguing that fetal life was on par with its maternal counterpart in the early twentieth century, a shift that had a lasting impact on obstetric practice for decades to come. In the second half of the twentieth century, cesarean sections proliferated in clinical practice, but abortions remained illegal. Most importantly, women remained patients to be worked on rather than active participants in their reproductive lives.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Cesarean section (CS) is a surgical procedure used to deliver babies that is medically indicated to prevent maternal and neonatal mortality. However, it is associated with short- and long-term risks. CS rates have increased, and efforts are being made to ensure that CS is performed only when necessary. The Robson classification system is considered useful for studying, evaluating, monitoring, and comparing CS rates within and between healthcare facilities. In Brazil, there are few studies on this subject, and no large epidemiological studies on this topic utilizing the Robson classification have been reported. This study aimed to report and analyze CS rates in Brazil using the Robson classification system, and subsequently suggest possible measures to address it.Data were collected from the Brazilian Live Birth Information System (Sistema de Informações sobre Nascidos Vivos) that contains data of the entire obstetric population, from 2014 to 2017. All births in the country during this period were analyzed according to the Robson classification.A total of 11,774,665 live births were reported in Brazil during 2014 to 2017, most of which were mostly via CS (55.8%). Regions with high human development indexes had significantly higher CS rates than those with low human development indexes. The Robson group (RG) 1 to 4 accounts for 60.2% of live births and 47.1% of all CSs. RG5 was larger than all the other groups and contributed to the highest global rate of CS (31.3%), in addition to being the group who presented the largest growth.Although RG 1 to 4 present favorable initial conditions for vaginal delivery, CS accounted for almost half of births in these groups. The size of RG1 and RG2 in Brazil was comparable to that in countries with low CS rates; however, CS rates in these groups were 3 times higher in Brazil. Nulliparous women in RG1 and RG2 who undergo CS are subsequently categorized into RG5, increasing the global CS rate by 1% annually.We suggest the implementation of health policies to avoid the unnecessary performance of CS in RG1 and RG2 to decrease the CS rates in Brazil.

Assuntos