RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between appendectomy and cognitive impairment in adults aged 50-70 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A case-control study was carried out with 270 patients between May and July 2023. Ninety cases (with cognitive impairment) and 180 controls (without impairment), diagnosed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), were assessed. RESULTS: 31.11% of the total cases with cognitive impairment were submitted to an appendectomy, with an average of 25 years since surgery. Regarding other surgeries: 40% with impairment underwent cholecystectomy and 23.33% reported other operations. The analysis revealed significant differences in age, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes and smoking between the groups. However, there was no significant difference by gender. Logistic regression analysis highlighted that age and past appendectomy were strongly associated with cognitive impairment, with an Odds Ratio (OR) of 1.20 and 12.91, respectively. Associations were also found with cholecystectomy (OR 7.33), other surgeries (OR 13.39) and smoking (OR 6.91). CONCLUSION: Appendectomy might be a significant risk factor for cognitive impairment in adults aged 50-70 years.
Assuntos
Apendicectomia , Disfunção Cognitiva , Humanos , Apendicectomia/métodos , Apendicectomia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Disfunção Cognitiva/etiologia , Disfunção Cognitiva/epidemiologia , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Fatores de Risco , Colecistectomia/métodos , Colecistectomia/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bile duct injury (BDI) causes significant sequelae for the patient in terms of morbidity, mortality, and long-term quality of life, and should be managed in centers with expertise. Anatomical variants may contribute to a higher risk of BDI during cholecystectomy. AIMS: To report a case of bile duct injury in a patient with situs inversus totalis. METHODS: A 42-year-old female patient with a previous history of situs inversus totalis and a BDI was initially operated on simultaneously to the lesion ten years ago by a non-specialized surgeon. She was referred to a specialized center due to recurrent episodes of cholangitis and a cholestatic laboratory pattern. Cholangioresonance revealed a severe anastomotic stricture. Due to her young age and recurrent cholangitis, she was submitted to a redo hepaticojejunostomy with the Hepp-Couinaud technique. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of BDI repair in a patient with situs inversus totalis. RESULTS: The previous hepaticojejunostomy was undone and remade with the Hepp-Couinaud technique high in the hilar plate with a wide opening in the hepatic confluence of the bile ducts towards the left hepatic duct. The previous Roux limb was maintained. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, the drain was removed on the seventh post-operative day, and the patient is now asymptomatic, with normal bilirubin and canalicular enzymes, and no further episodes of cholestasis or cholangitis. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical variants may increase the difficulty of both cholecystectomy and BDI repair. BDI repair should be performed in a specialized center by formal hepato-pancreato-biliary surgeons to assure a safe perioperative management and a good long-term outcome.
Assuntos
Colangite , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Colestase , Situs Inversus , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Qualidade de Vida , Ductos Biliares/cirurgia , Ductos Biliares/lesões , Colecistectomia/métodos , Colangite/complicações , Colangite/cirurgia , Colestase/cirurgia , Situs Inversus/complicações , Situs Inversus/cirurgia , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/métodosRESUMO
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been standard of care for surgical treatment of benign gallbladder pathology for decades. With the advent of robotic surgical technology, robotic cholecystectomy (RC) has gained attention as an alternative to conventional laparoscopy. This study introduces a single-surgeon experience with laparoscopic versus robotic cholecystectomy and an umbrella systematic review of the outcomes of both approaches. A retrospective chart review was performed at a single institution on a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder pathology. An umbrella systematic review was conducted using PRISMA methodology. A total of 103 patients were identified; 61 patients underwent LC and 42 underwent RC. In the RC cohort, 17 cases were completed using a four-port technique while 25 were completed using a three-port technique. Patients undergoing RC were older compared to the LC group (44.78 vs 57.02 years old; p < 0.001) and exhibited lower body mass index (29.37 vs 32.37 kg/m2, p = 0.040). No statistically significant difference in operative time or need for postoperative ERCP was noted. Neither this series nor the umbrella systematic review revealed significant differences in conversion to open surgery or readmissions between the LC and RC cohorts. Three-port RC was associated with reduced operative time compared to four-port RC (101.28 vs 150.76 min; p < 0.001). Robotic cholecystectomy is feasible and safe at a young robotic surgery program in an academic center setting and comparable to laparoscopic cholecystectomy clinical outcomes.
Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Estudos de Viabilidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Feminino , Masculino , Duração da Cirurgia , Colecistectomia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Conversão para Cirurgia Aberta/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic cholelithiasis is a highly prevalent disease, and became more evident after the currently greater access to imaging tests. Therefore, it is increasingly necessary to analyse the risks and benefits of performing a prophylactic cholecystectomy. AIMS: To seek the best evidence in order to indicate prophylactic cholecystectomy or conservative treatment (clinical follow-up) in patients with asymptomatic cholelithiasis. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the PubMed/Medline database, according to PRISMA protocol guidelines. The review was based on studies published between April 26, 2001 and January 07, 2022, related to individuals older than 18 years., The following terms/operators were used for search standardization: (asymptomatic OR silent) AND (gallstones OR cholelithiasis). RESULTS: We selected 18 studies eligible for inference production after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Also, the Tokyo Guideline (2018) was included for better clarification of some topics less or not addressed in these studies. CONCLUSIONS: Most evidence point to the safety and feasibility of conservative treatment (clinical follow-up) of asymptomatic cholelithiasis. However, in post-cardiac transplant patients and those with biliary microlithiasis with low preoperative surgical risk, a prophylactic cholecystectomy is recommended. To establish these recommendations, more studies with better levels of evidence must be conducted.
Assuntos
Colecistectomia , Cálculos Biliares , Humanos , Colecistectomia/métodos , Cálculos Biliares/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nonagenarian patients are an age group in progressive growth. In this age group, indications for surgical procedures, including cholecystectomy, will be increasingly frequent, as biliary pathology and its complications are frequent in this population group. The main objective of this study was to analyze the safety and outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients older than 90 years. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was designed. This study involved 600 patients that were classified in 4 age groups for analysis (under 50 years, 50-69 years, 70-89 years, and over 90 years). Demographic, clinical, paraclinics, surgical, and outcome variables were compared according to age group. A multivariate analysis, which included variables considered clinically relevant, was performed to identify factors associated with mortality and complications classified with the Clavien-Dindo scale. RESULTS: The patients evaluated had a median age of 65.0 (IQR 34.0) years and there was a female predominance (61.8%). A higher complication rate, conversion rate, subtotal cholecystectomy rate, and prolonged hospital stay were found in nonagenarians. The overall mortality rate was 1.6%. Mortality in the age group over 90 years was 6.8%. Regression models showed that age over 90 years (RR 4.6 CI95% 1.07-20.13), presence of cholecystitis (RR 8.2 CI95% 1.29-51.81), and time from admission to cholecystectomy (RR 1.2 CI95% 1.10-1.40) were the variables that presented statistically significant differences as risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSION: Cholecystectomy in nonagenarian patients has a higher rate of complications, conversion rate, subtotal cholecystectomy rate, and mortality. Therefore, an adequate perioperative assessment is necessary to optimize comorbidities and improve outcomes. Also, it is important to know the greatest risk for informed consent and choose the surgical equipment and schedule of the procedure.
Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Colecistite Aguda , Colecistite , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Colecistectomia/métodos , Colecistite/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Colecistite Aguda/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to investigate the relationship between bile reflux (BR) and diameter of the common bile duct (CBD) in patients after cholecystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our case series analysis, according to the endoscopy results, the patients who underwent cholecystectomy were divided into two groups as those with BR and those non-BR. Age, sex, CBD diameter measured on ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic biopsy results of the patients were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: In a total of 188 patients included in the study, BR was detected in 93 patients, it was not observed in 95 patients. The CBD diameter of the patients was observed to be 7 mm or less in 70.9% (n = 66) in the BR group, and 23% (n = 22) in the non-BR group. The statistical analysis revealed that while there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of CBD diameter and intestinal metaplasia, the results were similar in both groups in terms of inflammation, activity, atrophy, and Helicobacter pylori. CONCLUSION: We believe that CBD diameter may be a predictive factor in the detection of BR after cholecystectomy.
OBJETIVO: Investigar la relación entre el reflujo biliar y el diámetro del colédoco después de la colecistectomía. MÉTODO: Estudio retrospectivo en el que, de acuerdo con los resultados de la endoscopia, los pacientes que se sometieron a colecistectomía se dividieron en dos grupos: con reflujo biliar y sin reflujo biliar. Se analizaron estadísticamente la edad, el sexo, el diámetro del conducto biliar común medido por ultrasonografía, tomografía computarizada y colangiopancreatografía por resonancia magnética, y los resultados de la biopsia endoscópica. RESULTADOS: En un total de 188 pacientes incluidos en el estudio, se detectó reflujo biliar en 93 pacientes y no se observó en 95 pacientes. Se vio que el diámetro del conducto biliar común de los pacientes era de 7 mm o menos en el 70.9% (n = 66) del grupo con reflujo biliar y en el 23% (n = 22) del grupo sin reflujo biliar. El análisis estadístico reveló que, si bien hubo una diferencia significativa entre los dos grupos en términos de diámetro del conducto biliar común y metaplasia intestinal, los resultados fueron similares en ambos grupos en términos de inflamación, actividad, atrofia y presencia de Helicobacter pylori. CONCLUSIONES: Creemos que el diámetro del colédoco puede ser un factor predictivo en la detección de reflujo biliar después de la colecistectomía.
Assuntos
Refluxo Biliar , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Humanos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Refluxo Biliar/diagnóstico por imagem , Refluxo Biliar/etiologia , Refluxo Biliar/patologia , Ducto Colédoco/diagnóstico por imagem , Colecistectomia/efeitos adversos , Colecistectomia/métodos , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Introducción: La incidencia de fístula colecistocutánea ha disminuido debido al abordaje quirúrgico precoz de los pacientes con litiasis vesicular. Objetivo: Presentar un caso de fístula colecistocutánea secundaria a colecistopatía litiásica crónica. Caso clínico: Paciente femenina de 87 años de edad que fue atendida en los servicios de urgencia de cirugía luego de haber sufrido, 2 semanas antes, dolor en hipocondrio derecho acompañado de aumento de volumen progresivo de dicha región. Al examen físico se constató secreción espontánea de bilis oscura de carácter continuo por orificio fistuloso. Se decide llevar al salón de operaciones y se le realizó colecistectomía de cuello a fondo y colangiografía transcística visualizándose litos. Se procedió a realizar coledocotomía, extracción de cálculos con lavado de la vía biliar y se colocó sonda en T. La evolución fue satisfactoria. Conclusiones: El tratamiento combinado de cirugía y antibioterapia es curativo(AU)
Introduction: The incidence of cholecystocutaneous fistula has decreased due to the early surgical managment of patients with vesicular lithiasis. Objective: To present a case of cholecystocutaneous fistula secondary to chronic lithiasic cholecystopathy. Clinical case: An 87-year-old female patient was attended in the emergency surgical services after having suffered, two weeks earlier, pain in the right hypochondrium accompanied by progressive increase in volume in that region. Physical examination revealed spontaneous discharge of dark bile continuously through a fistulous orifice. The patient was decided to be taken to the operating room, where she was performed a profound infundibulum cholecystectomy and transcystic cholangiography, lithiasis being visualized. The next considered step was choledochotomy for stone extraction with bile duct lavage, and a T-tube was placed. Evolution was satisfactory. Conclusions: The treatment combining surgery and antibiotic therapy is curative(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colecistectomia/métodos , Litíase/cirurgia , Fístula/epidemiologia , Colangiografia/métodosRESUMO
Introducción: Con el advenimiento de la pandemia por la enfermedad de la COVID-19 ha sido necesario reorganizar los servicios de salud y modificar en cierta medida la indicación quirúrgica en la colecistitis aguda. Objetivo: Caracterizar la colecistostomía como una alternativa segura y eficaz para la resolución de la colecistitis aguda litiásica en pacientes en los que no está indicada la cirugía, portador o no de la COVID-19. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión descriptiva narrativa desde el 2019 hasta el 2021 de las fuentes primarias y secundarias que abordan este tema; fue este período de tiempo en el que se desarrolló la pandemia provocada por SARS-Cov 2. Se usaron el Google Chrome y las bases de datos electrónicas MEDLINE/PubMed, INDEXMEDICUS y fuentes de información en revistas basadas en evidencias como ACP Journal Best Evidence y Cochrane. Desarrollo: El impacto de la crisis sanitaria sobre los servicios quirúrgicos se traduce en la cancelación de las colecistectomías electivas en el 97,6 por ciento de los centros. Esta decisión no es inocua, puesto que se ha estimado un riesgo anual de desarrollar complicaciones del 1-3 por ciento en la colelitiasis sintomática. Conclusiones: La colecistostomía es el método más acertado a utilizar para la resolución de la colecistitis aguda litiásica en pacientes en los que no está indicada la cirugía, con mala respuesta al tratamiento médico y sin tener la completa seguridad de que el paciente es o no portador de la COVID-19(AU)
Introduction: With the arrival of the COVID-19 pandemic, to reorganize health services has been necessary, as well as to modify, to a certain extent, the surgical indication for acute cholecystitis. Objective: To characterize cholecystostomy as a safe and effective alternative for the resolution of acute lithiasic cholecystitis in patients with no surgical indication, whether or not they have COVID-19. Methods: A narrative-descriptive review was carried out from 2019 to 2021 of primary and secondary sources addressing this topic; this time period marked the development of the pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2. Google Chrome was used, together with the electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed and INDEXMEDICUS, as well as sources of information in evidence-based journals, such as ACP Journal Best Evidence and Cochrane. Development: The impact of the health crisis over surgical services is translated into the cancellation of elective cholecystectomies in 97.6 percent of the centers. This decision is not innocuous, since an annual risk of developing complications has been estimated at 1-3 percent for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Conclusions: Cholecystostomy is the most successful method to be used for the resolution of acute lithiasic cholecystitis in patients with no surgical indication or poor response to medical treatment, without complete certainty as to whether or not the patient has COVID-19(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Colecistectomia/métodos , Colecistite Aguda/etiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Epidemiologia DescritivaRESUMO
Introducción: Las lesiones iatrogénicas de las vías biliares representan una complicación quirúrgica grave de la colecistectomía. Objetivo: Determinar la morbilidad de las lesiones de la vía biliar en el servicio de cirugía del Hospital Universitario "Manuel Ascunce Domenech". Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, prospectivo y observacional de pacientes que ingresaron en el servicio de cirugía del Hospital Universitario "Manuel Ascunce Domenech" con diagnóstico de lesión de la vía biliar, desde septiembre del 2018 hasta enero del 2022. El universo estuvo conformado por 12 pacientes que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. Se utilizaron métodos estadísticos descriptivos y cálculos con valores porcentuales. Resultados: La mayor incidencia de los pacientes fue del sexo femenino y de piel blanca, con un 61,4 por ciento y 85,7 por ciento, respectivamente. Predom inó el tipo de cirugía convencional y diagnóstico intraoperatorio con un 66,7 por ciento y 50 por ciento, respectivamente. El tipo E1 y E2 de la clasificación de Strasberg y la hepaticoyeyunostomía fue la operación con mayor frecuencia con un 66,7 por ciento. La bilirragia fue la complicación que predominó con el 70 por ciento. Conclusiones: La mayoría de los pacientes son del sexo femenino y de piel blanca, donde la cirugía convencional y el diagnóstico intraoperatorio son los hallazgos más frecuentes. Más de la mitad de los pacientes son clasificados como tipo E1 y tipo E2 según clasificación de Strasberg. La hepaticoyeyunostomía en Y de Roux y en asa de Braum transmesocólica es el proceder realizado en casi la totalidad de los pacientes. La fuga biliar es la complicación más frecuente(AU(
Introduction: Iatrogenic bile duct lesions represent a serious surgical complication of cholecystectomy. Objective: To determine the morbility of bile duct lesions in the surgical service of Hospital Universitario "Manuel Ascunce Domenech". Methods: A descriptive, prospective and observational study was carried out with patients admitted to the surgery service of Hospital Universitario "Manuel Ascunce Domenech" with a diagnosis of bile duct lesion, from September 2018 to January 2022. The study universe consisted of twelve patients who met the inclusion criteria. Descriptive statistical methods and calculations with percentage values were used. Results: The highest incidence of patients corresponded to the female sex and the white skin, accounting for 61.4 percent and 85.7(Percent(, respectively. Conventional surgery and intraoperative diagnosis predominated, accounting for 66.7 % and 50 %, respectively. Types E1 and E2 according to the Strasberg classification, together with hepaticojejunostomy, was the most frequent surgery type, accounting for 66.7 %. Biliary bleeding was the predominant complication, accounting for 70 %. Conclusions: Most of the patients belong to the female sex and have white skin, in which cases conventional surgery and intraoperative diagnosis are the most frequent findings. More than half of the patients are classified as types E1 or E2 according to the Strasberg classification. Transmesocolic Braun loop and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy is the procedure performed in almost all patients. Biliary leakage is the most frequent complication(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Ductos Biliares/lesões , Colecistectomia/métodos , Morbidade , Epidemiologia Descritiva , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudo ObservacionalRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy is one of the most performed surgeries. Several techniques were created, generating less pain, better aesthetic results and faster return to activities. Robotic surgery through a single portal combined the advantages of single-incision surgery with the principles of conventional laparoscopy, making it a safe and feasible procedure. However, due to the high costs, this technology is hardly available in practice, especially in the public health system. The objective is to evaluate the safety of robotic cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site © Surgical Platform (DVSSP) in a tertiary public hospital, and to assess alternatives that can reduce the costs, influencing the final real value of the procedure. METHODS: Prospective and descriptive study evaluating robotic cholecystectomies using the DVSSP technology performed at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre from May 2017 to November 2018. RESULTS: A total of 37 cholecystectomies were performed. The average time of surgery was 82.62 min, and no intraoperative complications were observed. There was a need for conversion to conventional laparoscopy in two surgeries (5.4%). The average cost of the robotic procedure was U$ 1146.23 and the amount passed on to the institution by the Brazilian Unified Health System was on average U$ 212.59 (p < 0.05). Postoperative outcomes were satisfactory, with an incisional hernia index of 8.1%. CONCLUSION: Although robotic surgery in this setting is a safe and feasible alternative, the high cost of the procedure prevents its dissemination on a large scale. New alternatives are needed to reduce the value and to allow greater accessibility.