RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The production of radiopharmaceuticals, especially the PET ones, is a complex combination of economic and social factors. Despite the social aspects, that are essential, the economic issue must be considered and play an important parameter for the implementation and maintenance of producer centers around the world, with especial regards for countries which face economic crisis and/or belongs to aegis of under development countries. OBJECTIVES: In order to evaluate this scenario with carried out this study, comparing a well-established producer center in Brazil and a new on in Belarus. RESULTS: The results showed that the producer center in Brazil face serious economic problems and all the production logistic must be re-done. On the other hand the new producer center in Belarus started following a new model of production and although it has not been profitable, the perspectives seem to be better than the Brazilian producer center. CONCLUSION: The Brazilian model for PET radiopharmaceutical productions should be revised in order to avoid waste and create a new perspective for the research area.
Assuntos
Fluordesoxiglucose F18/economia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/economia , Brasil , Países Desenvolvidos , Países em Desenvolvimento , Humanos , República de BelarusRESUMO
PURPOSE: Surveillance imaging of asymptomatic patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in first remission remains controversial. A decision-analytic Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of follow-up strategies following first-line immunochemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three strategies were compared in 55-year-old patient cohorts: routine clinical follow-up without serial imaging, routine follow-up with biannual computed tomography (CT) scans for 2 years, or routine follow-up with biannual [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) for 2 years. The baseline model favored imaging-based strategies by associating asymptomatic imaging-detected relapses with improved clinical outcomes. Lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for each surveillance strategy. RESULTS: Surveillance strategies utilizing 2 years of routine CT or PET/CT scans were associated with minimal survival benefit when compared with clinical follow-up without routine imaging (life-years gained: CT, 0.03 years; PET/CT, 0.04 years). The benefit of imaging-based follow-up remained small after quality-of-life adjustments (CT, 0.020 QALYs; PET/CT, 0.025 QALYs). Costs associated with imaging-based surveillance strategies are considerable; ICERs for imaging strategies compared with clinical follow-up were $164,960/QALY (95% CI, $116,510 to $766,930/QALY) and $168,750/QALY (95% CI, $117,440 to 853,550/QALY) for CT and PET/CT, respectively. Model conclusions were robust and remained stable on one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Our cost-effectiveness analysis suggests surveillance imaging of asymptomatic DLBCL patients in remission offers little clinical benefit at substantial economic costs.
Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/diagnóstico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/economia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Fluordesoxiglucose F18/economia , Humanos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Imagem Multimodal/economia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/economia , Indução de Remissão , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Estimating the cost-effectiveness of 18FDG-PET/CT (positron emission tomography) compared to computer tomography (CT) followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case at the end of treatment in Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients under 18 years-old. METHODS: A decision tree was built for comparing 18FDG-PET/CT to CT followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case in detecting residual lesions; outcome was measured in life years gained (LYG). The cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated; the threshold was 3 times the per capita GDP per LYG. Values were expressed in Colombian pesos for 2010 (1 US dollar=$ 1,897.89) and submitted to deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Assuming a difference of 13 months in true positives' life expectancy compared to that for false negatives, the cost of an additional LYG with 18FDG-PET/CT compared to CT followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case when evaluating the end of pediatric HL patients' treatment was $ 34,508,590 (COP). CONCLUSION: If differential life-expectancy between true positives and false negatives is at least 1.03 years, then using 18FDG-PET/CT for evaluating the end of HL pediatric patients' therapy is a cost-effective strategy for Colombia.
Assuntos
Doença de Hodgkin/economia , Imagem Multimodal/economia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Adolescente , Criança , Colômbia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Árvores de Decisões , Reações Falso-Negativas , Reações Falso-Positivas , Feminino , Radioisótopos de Flúor/economia , Fluordesoxiglucose F18/economia , Doença de Hodgkin/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença de Hodgkin/patologia , Humanos , Expectativa de Vida , Masculino , Neoplasia Residual/diagnóstico , Neoplasia Residual/economia , Prognóstico , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/economiaRESUMO
Objetivo Estimar la costo-efectividad de 18FDG-PET/CT comparado con CT seguido de 18FDG-PET/CT como prueba confirmatoria de un caso positivo en la evaluación al final del tratamiento en pacientes menores de 18 años con Linfoma Hodgkin (LH). Métodos Se construyó un árbol de decisión donde se comparó el uso de 18FDG-PET/CT con CT seguido de 18FDG-PET/CT como prueba confirmatoria de un caso positivo en la detección de lesión residual. El resultado se midió en Años de Vida Ganados (AVG). Se calculó la razón de costo-efectividad incremental. Se utilizó como umbral 3 veces el PIB per cápita por año AVG. Valores expresados en pesos colombianos de 2010 (1 US dólar = $ 1 897,89) Se realizaron análisis de sensibilidad univariados, bivariados y probabilísticos. Resultados Suponiendo un diferencial en AVG entre verdaderos positivos y falsos negativos de 13 meses, el costo de un AVG adicional con 18FDG-PET/CT comparado con CT seguido de 18FDG-PET/CT como prueba confirmatoria de un caso positivo en la evaluación al final del tratamiento en pacientes pediátricos con LH fue $ 34 508 590. Conclusión Si el diferencial de esperanza de vida entre verdaderos positivos y falsos negativos es de al menos un 1,03 años, el uso de 18FDG-PET/CT en la evaluación al final del tratamiento de pacientes pediátricos con LH, es una estrategia costo-efectiva para Colombia.
Objective Estimating the cost-effectiveness of 18FDG-PET/CT (positron emission tomography) compared to computer tomography (CT) followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case at the end of treatment in Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients under 18 years-old. Methods A decision tree was built for comparing 18FDG-PET/CT to CT followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case in detecting residual lesions; outcome was measured in life years gained (LYG). The cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated; the threshold was 3 times the per capita GDP per LYG. Values were expressed in Colombian pesos for 2010 (1 US dollar=$ 1,897.89) and submitted to deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results Assuming a difference of 13 months in true positives' life expectancy compared to that for false negatives, the cost of an additional LYG with 18FDG-PET/CT compared to CT followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case when evaluating the end of pediatric HL patients' treatment was $ 34,508,590 (COP). Conclusion If differential life-expectancy between true positives and false negatives is at least 1.03 years, then using 18FDG-PET/CT for evaluating the end of HL pediatric patients' therapy is a cost-effective strategy for Colombia.
Assuntos
Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Doença de Hodgkin/economia , Imagem Multimodal/economia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Colômbia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Árvores de Decisões , Reações Falso-Negativas , Reações Falso-Positivas , Radioisótopos de Flúor/economia , /economia , Doença de Hodgkin/patologia , Doença de Hodgkin , Doença de Hodgkin , Expectativa de Vida , Neoplasia Residual/diagnóstico , Neoplasia Residual/economia , Prognóstico , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/economiaRESUMO
OBJETIVO: Estabelecer os custos dos controles de qualidade para os radiofármacos marcados com [99mTc]tecnécio nos serviços de medicina nuclear do Brasil, em atenção às resoluções RDC nº 38/2008 e RDC nº 63/2009 editadas pela Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foram apurados preços de materiais de consumo, equipamentos e de mão-de-obra para a realização dos controles de qualidade. Os valores foram convertidos para unidades de volume, tempo e outras unidades cabíveis para a determinação do preço unitário. RESULTADOS: O investimento para aquisição de materiais de consumo e equipamentos foi estimado ser de R$ 35.500,00. O custo final para o controle de cada kit variou entre R$ 6,44 e R$ 7,80, dependendo do produto a ser analisado e do profissional selecionado para execução do procedimento. Esses valores podem representar de 0,5 por cento a 10 por cento do valor recebido pelas instituições pela realização dos exames. Na prática, o custo efetivo pode ser menor, uma vez que o produto de um kit pode ser utilizado em diversos pacientes. CONCLUSÃO: Em face do ganho de qualidade e segurança dos pacientes, concluímos que os custos da implantação do programa de controle de qualidade podem ser absorvidos no planejamento financeiro dos serviços de medicina nuclear.
OBJECTIVE: To establish the costs for quality control of [99mTc]technetium radiopharmaceuticals in Brazilian nuclear medicine centers, in compliance with Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (National Health Surveillance Agency) resolutions RDC No. 38/2008 and No. 63/2009. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prices for consumables, equipment and labor involved in quality control procedures were calculated and the values were converted into units of volume, time or other appropriate units for use in mathematical formulas for determining unit prices. RESULTS: Estimated investment for acquisition of consumables and equipment was R$ 35,500.00. The final unit cost for quality control of a [99mTc]technetium radiopharmaceutical kit ranged from R$ 6.44 to R$ 7.80 per kit, depending on the product under analysis, on the methodology applied and on the qualification of the professional involved in the process. Such values may correspond to 0.5 percent to 10 percent of the amount received by the institution per diagnostic procedure. In practice the effective cost might be lower, considering that a single labeled kit can be fractionated into several doses. CONCLUSION: Considering the gains in quality and patients' safety, the authors conclude that costs for implementing a quality control program for radiopharmaceuticals can be absorbed in the financial planning of nuclear medicine centers.