RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Patients with univentricular hearts who require permanent pacing systems typically require placement of epicardial leads. It is frequently difficult to find a position with good thresholds due to epimyocardial fibrosis or fat. The goal of the study is to assess the progression of capture thresholds (CT), sensing parameters (P waves and R waves), and impedances (imp) of steroid eluting epicardial pacing leads in young adults who underwent Fontan conversion and a pacemaker implant. METHODS: All patients undergoing Fontan conversion in two institutions were retrospectively identified. Demographic data, congenital heart defects, pacing leads used, and pacing parameters were analyzed at implant, at 6 weeks and 12 months after implant. RESULTS: Twenty patients were identified (twelve males); mean age at conversion was 24.9 ± 5.4 years (range 18-35). Epicardial bipolar steroid eluting leads were used. The site of implant both in the atria and the ventricles varied depending on the parameters. At implant, mean atrial and ventricular impedances were 617 ± 171 Ω and 1061 ± 771 Ω, respectively, mean P wave amplitude was 2 ± 0.7 mV, and mean R wave amplitude was 12.5 ± 7.7 mV. Mean CT was 1.7 ± 0.8 V at 0.5 ms for the atrium and 2.2 ± 1.2 V at 0.5 ms for the ventricle. Ventricular CT and impedance showed an improvement within the first 12 months after implant, with four patients having a decrease in threshold of more than 2 V. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing Fontan conversion, implant ventricular CT and impedances are frequently higher than expected but typically improve during follow-up. Acceptance of higher initial threshold values may be a potential strategy in this patient population.
OBJETIVO: Los pacientes con corazón univentricular que requieren estimulación cardíaca reciben sistemas de estimulación epicárdicos. Debido a la presencia de fibrosis o grasa epi-miocárdica es dificultoso en esta población encontrar sitios con adecuados parámetros de estimulación. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar la progresión de los umbrales de captura, los parámetros de sensado (medición de las ondas P y R) e impedancias (imp) de los catéteres epicárdicos con liberación de esteroides implantados en adultos jóvenes sometidos a cirugía de reconversión de Fontan e implante de marcapasos. MÉTODOS: Los pacientes sometidos a cirugía de reconversión de Fontan en dos instituciones fueron analizados retrospectivamente. Los datos demográficos, el tipo de cardiopatía congénita, de catéteres de estimulación y los parámetros de estimulación fueron analizados al momento del implante, a las 6 semanas y al año. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 20 pacientes (12 de ellos de sexo masculino); la edad media al momento de la reconversión fue de 24.9 ± 5.4 años (rango 18-35). Se utilizaron catéteres epicárdicos bipolares de fijación pasiva y con liberación de esteroides en todos los casos. El sitio de implante en las aurículas y en los ventrículos fue variable de acuerdo a los parámetros. En el momento del implante las impedancias medias fueron 617 ± 171 W y 1061 ± 771 W respectivamente, la amplitud media de la onda P fue 2 ± 0.7 mV y la media de amplitud de la onda R fue de 12.5 ± 7.7 mV. Las medias de los umbrales de captura fueron 1.7 ± 0.8 V at 0.5 ms para los catéteres auriculares y 2.2 ± 1.2 V at 0.5 ms para los ventriculares. Los umbrales de captura y las impedancias ventriculares mostraron una mejoría en los 12 meses posteriores al implante, y en 4 pacientes esa mejoría en el umbral de captura ventricular fue mayor a 2 V. CONCLUSIONES: En pacientes sometidos a una cirugía de reconversión de Fontan e implante de marcapasos, los umbrales de captura e impedancias ventriculares son más elevados que los esperados, pero mejoran durante el seguimiento. La aceptación de valores más elevados puede potencialmente constituir una alternativa en esta población de pacientes.
Assuntos
Cardiopatias Congênitas , Marca-Passo Artificial , Adolescente , Adulto , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/normas , Impedância Elétrica , Eletrodos Implantados , Técnica de Fontan , Glucocorticoides/farmacologia , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Ventrículos do Coração/efeitos dos fármacos , Ventrículos do Coração/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pericárdio/efeitos dos fármacos , Pericárdio/patologia , Pericárdio/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: More patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs) are presenting to spine and pain practices for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) procedures for chronic pain. Although the potential for electromagnetic interference (EMI) affecting CIED function is known with RFA procedures, available guidelines do not specifically address CIED management for percutaneous RFA for zygapophyseal (z-joint) joint pain, and thus physician practice may vary. OBJECTIVES: To better understand current practices of physicians who perform RFA for chronic z-joint pain with respect to management of CIEDs. Perioperative CIED management guidelines are also reviewed to specifically address risk mitigation strategies for potential EMI created by ambulatory percutaneous spine RFA procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Web-based provider survey and narrative review. SETTING: Multispecialty pain clinic, academic medical center. METHODS: A web-based survey was created using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). A survey link was provided via e-mail to active members of the Spine Intervention Society (SIS), American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, as well as distributed freely to community Pain Physicians and any receptive academic departments of PM&R or Anesthesiology. The narrative review summarizes pertinent case series, review articles, a SIS recommendation statement, and multi-specialty peri-operative guidelines as they relate specifically to spine RFA procedures. RESULTS: A total of 197 clinicians participated in the survey from diverse clinical backgrounds, including anesthesiology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, radiology, neurosurgery, and neurology, with 81% reporting fellowship training. Survey responses indicate wide variability in provider management of CIEDs before, during, and after RFA for z-joint pain. Respondents indicated they would like more specific guidelines to aid in management and decision-making around CIEDs and spine RFA procedures. Literature review yielded several practice guidelines related to perioperative management of CIEDs, but no specific guideline for percutaneous spine RFA procedures. However, combining the risk mitigation strategies provided in these guidelines, with interventional pain physician clinical experience allows for reasonable management recommendations to aid in decision-making. LIMITATIONS: Although this manuscript can serve as a review of CIEDs and aid in management decisions in patients with CIEDs, it is not a clinical practice guideline. CONCLUSIONS: Practice patterns vary regarding CIED management in ambulatory spine RFA procedures. CIED presence is not a contraindication for spine RFA but does increase the complexity of a spine RFA procedure and necessitates some added precautions. KEY WORDS: Radiofrequency ablation, neurotomy, cardiac implantable electrical device, zygapophyseal joint, spondylosis, neck pain, low back pain, chronic pain.
Assuntos
Dor nas Costas/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/normas , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/normas , Médicos/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Anestesia por Condução/métodos , Anestesia por Condução/normas , Anestesiologia/métodos , Anestesiologia/normas , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Dor Crônica/cirurgia , Humanos , Articulação Zigapofisária/cirurgiaRESUMO
Optimal programming of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is essential to appropriately treat ventricular tachyarrhythmias and to avoid unnecessary and inappropriate shocks. There have been a series of large clinical trials evaluating tailored programming of ICDs. We reviewed the clinical trials evaluating ICD therapies and detection, and the consensus statement on ICD programming. In doing so, we found that prolonged ICD detection times, higher rate cutoffs, and antitachycardia pacing (ATP) programming decreases inappropriate and painful therapies in a primary prevention population. The use of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia discriminators can also decrease inappropriate shocks. Tailored ICD programming using the knowledge gained from recent ICD trials can decrease inappropriate and unnecessary ICD therapies and decrease mortality.
Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis/normas , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Humanos , Fibrilação Ventricular/diagnósticoAssuntos
Cardiomiopatia Chagásica/mortalidade , Cardiomiopatia Chagásica/terapia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/normas , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , RiscoRESUMO
AIMS: This cross-sectional study evaluated the application of accepted international implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) guidelines for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: The PLASMA (Probabilidad de Sufrir Muerte Arritmica) study was designed to characterize management of cardiac patients in Latin America. Twelve centres included 1958 consecutively admitted patients in cardiology units in 2008 and 2009. Discharged patients were evaluated for primary prevention, ICD indication and prescription by general cardiologists. Of 1711 discharged patients, 1525 (89%) had data available for evaluating indication status. Class I indications for ICD therapy were met for 153 (10%) patients based on collected data. Only 20 (13%, 95% confidence interval: 7.7-18.4%) patients with indication were prescribed an ICD. Patients prescribed an ICD were younger than patients who were not prescribed an ICD (62 vs. 68 years, P < 0.01). The reasons given by cardiologists for not prescribing an ICD for 133 patients with an indication were: indication criteria not met (75%), life expectancy <1 year (9.7%), rejection by the patient (5.2%), no medical coverage paying for the device (3.7%), psychiatric patient (2.2%), and other reasons (4.2%). CONCLUSIONS: In Latin America, international guidelines for primary prevention ICD implantation are not well followed. The main reason is that cardiologists believe that patients do not meet indication criteria, even though study data confirm that criteria are met. This poses a significant challenge and underlines the importance of continuous and improved medical education.