RESUMO
Abstract: Introduction: a specific instrument is needed to monitor the development of competencies in pediatric surgery during the residency. Objective: to develop an instrument in conformity with the "Milestone Project", using the competencies determined by the Brazilian Association of Pediatric Surgery, for use in the Pediatric Surgery Residency in Brazil. Method: the research was developed in three stages: the development of the initial instrument, qualification with a focal group of experts, and instrument evaluation by Brazilian pediatric surgeons in order to validate and quantify the instrument's acceptance. Result: The initial instrument was created with 4 competencies and 13 sub-competencies, each with 5 levels of assessment. Four experts performed the initial qualification, which resulted in 44 adaptations, and the instrument was finalized with 4 competencies subdivided into 10 sub-competencies, each with 5 levels of assessment. Subsequently, the instrument was evaluated by the Brazilian Pediatric Surgery Group and the Brazilian Pediatric Urology Group. There were 40 expert responses, with a total of 2394 positive responses from the 50 assessment items. The instrument had a general acceptance of 91.2%, being considered applicable (96.7%), reproducible (93.3), relevant to the covered topics (96%), technically (93.6%) and theoretically appropriate (93.3%), reliable (85.5%), and dependable (79.8%). Conclusion: an instrument was developed to assist in the assessment of competencies developed during residency in pediatric surgery in conformity with the Milestone Project. This instrument has been validated by experts and considered applicable, reproducible, relevant, technically and theoretically adequate, reliable and dependable.
Resumo: Introdução: Uma adequada formação na residência em cirurgia pediátrica deve avaliar e acompanhar constantemente o desenvolvimento de competências e, para isso, necessita de um instrumento específico como ferramenta de avaliação. Objetivo: Este estudo tem como objetivo apresentar um instrumento de avaliação nos moldes do "Milestone Project" com base nas competências determinadas pela Associação Brasileira de Cirurgia Pediátrica, para uso nos programas de residência médica em cirurgia pediátrica no Brasil. Método: Adotaram-se as seguintes etapas: desenvolvimento do instrumento, qualificação de um grupo de especialistas e avaliação do instrumento por cirurgiões pediatras brasileiros, a fim de validar e quantificar a aceitação do instrumento quanto à fidedignidade, confiabilidade, aplicabilidade, reprodutibilidade, relevância dos temas abordados e adequação dos pontos de vista técnico e teórico. Resultados: O instrumento inicial possuía quatro competências gerais e 13 subcompetências específicas, com cinco níveis de avaliação. Quatro experts realizaram a qualificação que gerou 44 adaptações, finalizando o instrumento com quatro competências gerais subdividias em dez subcompetências, com cinco níveis avaliativos. Sequentemente, o instrumento foi avaliado pelo Grupo Brasileiro de Cirurgia Pediátrica e pelo Grupo Brasileiro de Urologia Pediátrica. Houve 40 respostas de especialistas, 2.394 respostas positivas dos 50 itens. O instrumento teve aceitação de 91,2% e foi considerado aplicável (96,7%), reprodutível (93,3), relevante (96%), tecnicamente adequado (93,6%), teoricamente adequado (93,3%), confiável (85,5%) e fidedigno (79,8%). Conclusão: Esse instrumento nos moldes do "Milestone Project" foi validado por cirurgiões pediatras e considerado aplicável, reprodutível, relevante, adequado, sob os pontos de vista técnico e teórico, confiável e fidedigno.
Assuntos
Humanos , Pediatria/normas , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/normas , Competência Clínica , Internato e Residência , Pediatria/educação , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/educação , Grupos Focais , Avaliação EducacionalRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Decision-making related to the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is complex. Aneurysms present with varying risks of rupture, and patient-specific factors influence anticipated life expectancy, operative risk, and need to intervene. Careful attention to the choice of operative strategy along with optimal treatment of medical comorbidities is critical to achieving excellent outcomes. Moreover, appropriate postoperative surveillance is necessary to minimize subsequent aneurysm-related death or morbidity. METHODS: The committee made specific practice recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Three systematic reviews were conducted to support this guideline. Two focused on evaluating the best modalities and optimal frequency for surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). A third focused on identifying the best available evidence on the diagnosis and management of AAA. Specific areas of focus included (1) general approach to the patient, (2) treatment of the patient with an AAA, (3) anesthetic considerations and perioperative management, (4) postoperative and long-term management, and (5) cost and economic considerations. RESULTS: Along with providing guidance regarding the management of patients throughout the continuum of care, we have revised a number of prior recommendations and addressed a number of new areas of significance. New guidelines are provided for the surveillance of patients with an AAA, including recommended surveillance imaging at 12-month intervals for patients with an AAA of 4.0 to 4.9 cm in diameter. We recommend endovascular repair as the preferred method of treatment for ruptured aneurysms. Incorporating knowledge gained through the Vascular Quality Initiative and other regional quality collaboratives, we suggest that the Vascular Quality Initiative mortality risk score be used for mutual decision-making with patients considering aneurysm repair. We also suggest that elective EVAR be limited to hospitals with a documented mortality and conversion rate to open surgical repair of 2% or less and that perform at least 10 EVAR cases each year. We also suggest that elective open aneurysm repair be limited to hospitals with a documented mortality of 5% or less and that perform at least 10 open aortic operations of any type each year. To encourage the development of effective systems of care that would lead to improved outcomes for those patients undergoing emergent repair, we suggest a door-to-intervention time of <90 minutes, based on a framework of 30-30-30 minutes, for the management of the patient with a ruptured aneurysm. We recommend treatment of type I and III endoleaks as well as of type II endoleaks with aneurysm expansion but recommend continued surveillance of type II endoleaks not associated with aneurysm expansion. Whereas antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended for patients with an aortic prosthesis before any dental procedure involving the manipulation of the gingival or periapical region of teeth or perforation of the oral mucosa, antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended before respiratory tract procedures, gastrointestinal or genitourinary procedures, and dermatologic or musculoskeletal procedures unless the potential for infection exists or the patient is immunocompromised. Increased utilization of color duplex ultrasound is suggested for postoperative surveillance after EVAR in the absence of endoleak or aneurysm expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Important new recommendations are provided for the care of patients with an AAA, including suggestions to improve mutual decision-making between the treating physician and the patients and their families as well as a number of new strategies to enhance perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing elective and emergent repair. Areas of uncertainty are highlighted that would benefit from further investigation in addition to existing limitations in diagnostic tests, pharmacologic agents, intraoperative tools, and devices
Assuntos
Humanos , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/normas , Fatores de Tempo , Prótese Vascular , Biomarcadores , Biomarcadores/análise , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/complicações , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/genética , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/normas , Medição de Risco , Antibioticoprofilaxia/normas , Assistência Perioperatória , Endoleak/cirurgia , Endoleak/diagnóstico , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Enxerto Vascular , Conduta Expectante , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: In 2008, a Position Statement of the Society of University Surgeons (SUS) recommended the creation of institutional surgical innovation committees (SICs) to ensure appropriate oversight of surgical innovations. The purpose of this study was to determine the level of awareness of the position statement, and how innovations are handled in academic departments of surgery. METHODS: An electronic survey was designed to determine the level of awareness of the SUS recommendations among members of the Society of Surgical Chairs; the existence and characteristics of SICs; and alternative means of oversight of surgical innovations. RESULTS: The survey was distributed to 150 persons, and 65 (43%) surveys were returned; 84% reported their institution promoted innovative surgery as a strength, but 55% were unaware of the SUS recommendations; 23% reported that their institution has an SIC, and 20% said their institution has discussed or plans an SIC. Existing SICs have a median of 7 members; 57% reviewed 3 or fewer procedures in the prior year; and only 7% reviewed 10 or more. The majority of respondents reported alternative mechanisms of oversight, including morbidity/mortality conferences (88%), peer review (77%), and outcomes registries (51%). CONCLUSIONS: A minority of Surgery Department Chairs is aware of the SUS Position Statement. Although most reported surgical innovation was an institutional strength, only 23% had an SIC and most rely on other mechanisms of oversight. It is unclear whether academic surgical departments are committed to providing education and awareness of the appropriate development and implementation of surgical innovations.
Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/normas , Comitês de Ética Clínica/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/normas , Terapias em Estudo/normas , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/ética , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Canadá , Comitês de Ética Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/ética , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/ética , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Terapias em Estudo/ética , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Introdução: O Serviço de Cirurgia Plástica Programada do Hospital João XXIII exerce o suporte às demais especialidades através de inter-consultas e, realiza atendimento aos pacientes com entrada no Hospital pela cirurgia plástica. O escopo deste estudo foi analisar o perfil epidemiológico dos pacientes atendidos durante o período de Março à Agosto de 2013. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo observacional prospectivo com coleta de dados realizada através de anamnese e exame físico. Resultados: Dentre os pacientes avaliados 75,23% eram do sexo masculino e 21,34% do sexo feminino. A faixa etária predominante foi a economicamente ativa com 62,86% dos pacientes entre 16 e 45 anos. Foi observado que os acidentes de trânsito figuraram como os principais determinantes de atendimentos (44,85%). As escaras constituíram os diagnósticos mais frequentes e dentre as outras lesões avaliadas, observou-se que se concentraram nos membros. A Clínica Médica e a Ortopedia solicitaram o maior número de inter-consultas. Evidenciou-se que o tratamento através de abordagem cirúrgica (52,9%) e o acompanhamento com cuidados locais (47,1%) apresentaram frequências aproximadas. Conclusão: Na busca por propor medidas para prevenir e tratar as lesões próprias de abrangência da cirurgia plástica reparadora destacaram-se dois pontos: os acidentes de trânsito e as escaras de decúbito. Ambos com fatores determinantes bem elucidados, porém mantendo alta prevalência. Torna-se evidente a necessidade de atuação nas esferas públicas para uma melhor educação no trânsito e redução da ocorrência de acidentes. No âmbito hospitalar é primordial que se adotem medidas eficazes que impeçam o surgimento das temíveis escaras de decúbito.
Introduction: The Plastic Surgery Service of the João XXIII Hospital provides support to other specialties through interdepartmental consultation and follows patients admitted to the hospital for plastic surgery. This study analyzed the epidemiological profile of patients treated from March to August 2013. Methods: This was a prospective observational study with data collection performed by medical history and physical examination. Results: Of the patients evaluated, 75.23% were male and 21.34% female. The predominant age group was economically active, with 62.86% of the patients between 16 and 45 years. Traffic accidents were the main reason for care (44.85%). Pressure ulcers were the most frequent diagnoses, and other lesions evaluated were predominantly of the extremities. Internal Medicine and Orthopedics requested most consultations. Surgical treatment (52.9%) and follow-up with local care (47.1%) showed similar frequencies. Conclusion: In order to propose measures for prevention and treatment of injuries within the scope of reconstructive plastic surgery, two issues were highlighted: traffic accidents and pressure ulcers. Both have well-defined causes, but remain at high prevalence. The need for public action that promotes better traffic education and reduction of accidents is clear. In the hospital environment, it is essential to take effective measures to prevent the emergence of dreaded pressure ulcers.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , História do Século XXI , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Cirurgia Plástica , Perfil de Saúde , Acidentes de Trânsito , Epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudo de Avaliação , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos , Estudo Observacional , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Pacientes Internados , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/educação , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/métodos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/normas , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia Plástica/organização & administração , Cirurgia Plástica/estatística & dados numéricos , Acidentes de Trânsito/estatística & dados numéricos , Epidemiologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/normas , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
A cirurgia geral atualmente é considerada, por alguns, como uma especialidade cansativa, desinteressante. Acredita-se que o aparecimento de novas tecnologias, a internet, a videocirurgia, a robótica, a telemedicina, a especialização e o desinteresse, dos recém formados, pela cirurgia geral são fatores que contribuem para esta mudança. Neste artigo são discutidas as mudanças no exercício da cirurgia geral que ocorrem no Brasil, no mundo, as suas consequencias na formação do Cirurgião Geral e o reflexo no atendimento à população.
Nowadays, general surgery is considered as a tiring and uninteresting specialty. It is believed that the advent of new technologies, the internet, videosurgery, robotics, telemedicine, specialization and the indifference of recently graduated for the general surgery may be factors that had contributed to this change. In this article the changes of general surgery practice in Brazil, in the world an their consequences in the general surgeon professional development are being discussed.
Assuntos
Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Brasil , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/normas , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/tendênciasRESUMO
Nowadays, general surgery is considered as a tiring and uninteresting specialty. It is believed that the advent of new technologies, the internet, videosurgery, robotics, telemedicine, specialization and the indifference of recently graduated for the general surgery may be factors that had contributed to this change. In this article the changes of general surgery practice in Brazil, in the world an their consequences in the general surgeon professional development are being discussed.