RESUMO
Based on molecular markers, genomic prediction enables us to speed up breeding schemes and increase the response to selection. There are several high-throughput genotyping platforms able to deliver thousands of molecular markers for genomic study purposes. However, even though its widely applied in plant breeding, species without a reference genome cannot fully benefit from genomic tools and modern breeding schemes. We used a method to assemble a population-tailored mock genome to call single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers without an available reference genome, and for the first time, we compared the results with standard genotyping platforms (array and genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) using a reference genome) for performance in genomic prediction models. Our results indicate that using a population-tailored mock genome to call SNP delivers reliable estimates for the genomic relationship between genotypes. Furthermore, genomic prediction estimates were comparable to standard approaches, especially when considering only additive effects. However, mock genomes were slightly worse than arrays at predicting traits influenced by dominance effects, but still performed as well as standard GBS methods that use a reference genome. Nevertheless, the array-based SNP markers methods achieved the best predictive ability and reliability to estimate variance components. Overall, the mock genomes can be a worthy alternative for genomic selection studies, especially for those species where the reference genome is not available.
Assuntos
Biologia Computacional , Técnicas de Genotipagem , Modelos Genéticos , Animais , Quimera/genética , Biologia Computacional/métodos , Biologia Computacional/normas , Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto , Genoma , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla/métodos , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla/normas , Genômica/métodos , Genômica/normas , Genótipo , Técnicas de Genotipagem/métodos , Técnicas de Genotipagem/normas , Fenótipo , Padrões de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Seleção Genética , Especificidade da Espécie , Zea mays/classificação , Zea mays/genéticaRESUMO
This study compared imputation from lower-density commercial and customized panels to high-density panels and a combined panel (Illumina and Affymetrix) in Nelore beef cattle. Additionally, linkage disequilibrium and haplotype block conformation were estimated in individual high-density panels and compared with corresponding values in the combined panel after imputation. Overall, 814 animals were genotyped using BovineHD BeadChip (IllumHD), and 93 of these animals were also genotyped using the Axion Genome-Wide BOS 1 Array Plate (AffyHD). In general, customization considering linkage disequilibrium and minor allele frequency had the highest accuracies. The IllumHD panel had higher values of linkage disequilibrium for short distances between SNPs than AffyHD and the combined panel. The combined panel had an increased number of small haplotype blocks. The use of a combined panel is recommended due to its increased density and number of haplotype blocks, which in turn increase the probability of a marker being close to a quantitative trait locus of interest. Considering common SNPs between IllumHD and AffyHD for the customization of a low-density panel increases the imputation accuracy for IllumHD, AffyHD and the combined panel.
Assuntos
Bovinos/genética , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla/métodos , Técnicas de Genotipagem/métodos , Animais , Frequência do Gene , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla/normas , Técnicas de Genotipagem/normas , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/normas , Desequilíbrio de Ligação , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Locos de Características QuantitativasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Metafounders are pseudo-individuals that encapsulate genetic heterozygosity and relationships within and across base pedigree populations, i.e. ancestral populations. This work addresses the estimation and usefulness of metafounder relationships in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP). RESULTS: We show that ancestral relationship parameters are proportional to standardized covariances of base allelic frequencies across populations, such as [Formula: see text] fixation indexes. These covariances of base allelic frequencies can be estimated from marker genotypes of related recent individuals and pedigree. Simple methods for their estimation include naïve computation of allele frequencies from marker genotypes or a method of moments that equates average pedigree-based and marker-based relationships. Complex methods include generalized least squares (best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE)) or maximum likelihood based on pedigree relationships. To our knowledge, methods to infer [Formula: see text] coefficients from marker data have not been developed for related individuals. We derived a genomic relationship matrix, compatible with pedigree relationships, that is constructed as a cross-product of {-1,0,1} codes and that is equivalent (apart from scale factors) to an identity-by-state relationship matrix at genome-wide markers. Using a simulation with a single population under selection in which only males and youngest animals are genotyped, we observed that generalized least squares or maximum likelihood gave accurate and unbiased estimates of the ancestral relationship parameter (true value: 0.40) whereas the naïve method and the method of moments were biased (average estimates of 0.43 and 0.35). We also observed that genomic evaluation by ssGBLUP using metafounders was less biased in terms of estimates of genetic trend (bias of 0.01 instead of 0.12), resulted in less overdispersed (0.94 instead of 0.99) and as accurate (0.74) estimates of breeding values than ssGBLUP without metafounders and provided consistent estimates of heritability. CONCLUSIONS: Estimation of metafounder relationships can be achieved using BLUP-like methods with pedigree and markers. Inclusion of metafounder relationships reduces bias of genomic predictions with no loss in accuracy.