RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hemophilia is a rare congenital bleeding disorder that results from complete or partial deficiency of blood coagulation factor (F)VIII (hemophilia A) or FIX (hemophilia B) due to pathogenic variants in their coding genes. Hemophilia requires complex management. To date, there is no evidence-based clinical practice guideline on hemophilia treatment based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. OBJECTIVES: This evidence-based clinical practice guideline from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis aims to provide an overview of evidence and support patients, caregivers, hematologists, pediatricians, other clinicians, researchers, and stakeholders in treatment decisions about congenital hemophilia A and B. METHODS: The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel of physicians and patients with global representation, balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The panel prioritized a set of clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. A methodological team supported the guideline development process, including searching for evidence and performing systematic reviews. The GRADE approach was used, including GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks. The recommendations were subject to public comment. RESULTS: The panel selected 13 questions, of which 11 addressed the treatment of hemophilia A and 2 the treatment of hemophilia B. Specifically, the panel addressed questions on prophylactic and episodic treatment with FVIII concentrates, bypassing agents, and nonfactor therapy (emicizumab) for hemophilia A (with and without inhibitors) as well as immune tolerance induction for hemophilia A. For hemophilia B, the panel addressed questions on prophylactic and episodic treatment of bleeding events with FIX concentrates. Agreement was reached for all 13 recommendations, of which 7 (54%) were based on evidence from randomized clinical trials, 3 (23%) on observational studies, and 3 (23%) on indirect comparisons. CONCLUSION: Strong recommendations were issued for prophylactic over episodic treatment for severe and moderately severe hemophilia A and B. Only conditional recommendations were issued for the remaining questions. Future research should focus on direct treatment comparisons and the treatment of hemophilia B with and without inhibitors. Future updates of this guideline will provide an updated evidence synthesis on the current questions and focus on new FVIII and FIX concentrates, novel nonfactor therapies, and gene therapy for severe and nonsevere hemophilia A and B.
Assuntos
Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Hemofilia A , Hemofilia B , Humanos , Coagulantes/uso terapêutico , Consenso , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Fator VIII/uso terapêutico , Fator VIII/genética , Hemofilia A/sangue , Hemofilia A/genética , Hemofilia A/terapia , Hemofilia A/diagnóstico , Hemofilia B/sangue , Hemofilia B/terapia , Hemofilia B/diagnóstico , Hemofilia B/genética , Hemorragia/sangue , Hemostasia , Sociedades Médicas , Resultado do Tratamento , Hematologia/métodos , Hematologia/normasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Exploring the expression of X linked disorders like haemophilia A (HA) in females involves understanding the balance achieved through X chromosome inactivation (XCI). Skewed XCI (SXCI) may be involved in symptomatic HA carriers. We aimed to develop an approach for dissecting the specific cause of SXCI and verify its value in HA. METHODS: A family involving three females (two symptomatic with severe/moderate HA: I.2, the mother, and II.1, the daughter; one asymptomatic: II.2) and two related affected males (I.1, the father and I.3, the maternal uncle) was studied. The genetic analysis included F8 mutational screening, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, SNP microarray, whole exome sequencing (WES) and Sanger sequencing. XCI patterns were assessed in ectoderm/endoderm and mesoderm-derived tissues using AR-based and RP2-based systems. RESULTS: The comprehensive family analysis identifies I.2 female patient as a heterozygous carrier of F8:p.(Ser1414Ter) excluding copy number variations. A consistent XCI pattern of 99.5% across various tissues was observed. A comprehensive filtering algorithm for WES data was designed, developed and applied to I.2. A Gly58Arg missense variant in VMA21 was revealed as the cause for SXCI.Each step of the variant filtering system takes advantage of publicly available genomic databases, non-SXCI controls and case-specific molecular data, and aligns with established concepts in the theoretical background of SXCI. CONCLUSION: This study acts as a proof of concept for our genomic filtering algorithm's clinical utility in analysing X linked disorders. Our findings clarify the molecular aspects of SXCI and improve genetic diagnostics and counselling for families with X linked diseases like HA.
Assuntos
Hemofilia A , Linhagem , Inativação do Cromossomo X , Humanos , Inativação do Cromossomo X/genética , Feminino , Hemofilia A/genética , Masculino , Algoritmos , Sequenciamento do Exoma/métodos , Fator VIII/genética , Cromossomos Humanos X/genética , Genômica/métodos , Variações do Número de Cópias de DNA/genética , Mutação/genética , AdultoAssuntos
Anticorpos Biespecíficos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Hemofilia A , Humanos , Hemofilia A/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Biespecíficos/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Biespecíficos/farmacologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Uruguai , Criança , Masculino , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Feminino , Fator VIII/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Introduction Treatment of hemophilia A in Brazil is offered to all patients at no cost. However, several unmet medical needs exist. Method In this study, we applied the Delphi method to discuss with seven hemophilia A specialists the challenges that patients and the health system face regarding hemophilia A treatment and opportunities for improvement. Results A consensus was obtained regarding the number of weekly infusions and patient adherence to treatment. The bleeding profile, unfavourable pharmacokinetics (PKs), low adherence and high daily activity were patient profiles that would benefit from using the extended half-life (EHL) recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII). The advantages of treatment with the EHL rFVIII were the lower number of infusions per week, which could increase patient adherence and decrease the risk of bleeds, due to a more constant plasma level, a lower value. Additionally, the EHL rFVIII could improve quality of life, especially in patients with high daily activity, such as adolescents and young adults. The panelists mentioned that EHL rFVIII, if available, could be offered first to the priority group (adolescents between 12 and 19 years old), followed by adults (20 to 64 years old) and elderly people (over 65 years old). Conclusion In summary, the EHL rFVIII offers the optimal prophylaxis by decreasing the dose frequency, increasing the treatment adherence and improving the QoL, without compromising safety and efficacy.
Assuntos
Hemofilia A , Fator VIII , Técnica DelphiRESUMO
Introducción: el desarrollo de inhibidores contra el factor VIII (FVIII) es la complicación más seria del tratamiento en la hemofilia A. La inducción de tolerancia inmune (ITI) permite utilizar nuevamente el concentrado de FVIII para profilaxis o tratamiento. Objetivos: describir la experiencia con la ITI en menores de 18 años con hemofilia A severa (HAS) en un prestador integral de salud pública. Material y métodos: estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, de menores de 18 años con HAS, concentraciones de inhibidores de FVIII ≥ a 5 UB, a quienes se les realizó ITI y seguimiento completo entre 2009 y 2020. Para la ITI se utilizó concentrado de FVIII derivado plasmático. El beneficio se expresa como la tasa de éxito definido por la negativización del inhibidor. Resultados: se incluyeron seis pacientes. Edad promedio al diagnóstico de inhibidor 2,96 años, luego de 24,4 días de exposición (DDE) a concentrados de FVIII. Media de inicio de ITI 3,76 niños y el tiempo de latencia del diagnóstico de inhibidor y el inicio de la ITI fue de 10,33 meses. El pico máximo del título pre-ITI fue en promedio de 114,7 UB. Cuatro pacientes iniciaron el régimen de ITI con títulos de inhibidor menor a 10 UB. El título del inhibidor se negativizó en 8,2 meses y el porcentaje de recuperación in vivo >65% se logró con una media de 15,7 meses. La ITI fue exitosa en 83% de los casos. Conclusiones: en niños con hemofilia A e inhibidores de alto título, la ITI tiene un elevado éxito, tal como ocurrió en esta serie. Dado que el tiempo de respuesta es variable, la ITI debe ser individualizada.
Introduction: the development of inhibitors against factor VIII is the most serious complication of treatment in hemophilia A. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) enables the factor VIII concentrate to be used again for prophylaxis or treatment. Objectives: describe the experience with ITI in children of under 18 years of age with severe hemophilia A (SAH) in a health care provider. Material and methods: descriptive, retrospective study of children under 18 years of age with SAH, concentrations of FVIII inhibitors ≥ 5BU, who underwent ITI and full follow-up between 2009-2020. For ITI, we used plasma derived FVIII concentrate. The benefit is expressed as the success rate defined by the inhibitor's negativization. Results: 6 patients were included. Mean age at diagnosis of inhibitor 2,96 years, after 24,4 days of exposure (DAE) to FVIII concentrates. Mean ITI onset was 3,76 years and latency time from inhibitor diagnosis and ITI onset was 10,33 months. Maximum peak of the pre ITI title was an average of 114,7 UB. Four patients started the ITI regimen with inhibitors titers less than 10 BU. The inhibitor titer negative in 8,2 months and in vivo recovery rate >65% was achieved with a mean of 15,7 months. The ITI was successful in 83% of the cases. Conclusions: ITI is highly successful in children with hemophilia A and high-titer inhibitors, as this case suggests. Since the response time is variable, the ITI must be individualized.
Introdução: o desenvolvimento de inibidores contra o fator VIII é a complicação mais grave do tratamento da hemofilia A. A indução de tolerância imunológica (ITI) permite que o concentrado de fator VIII seja novamente utilizado para profilaxia ou tratamento. Objetivos: descrever a experiência com ITI em crianças menores de 18 anos com hemofilia A grave (HAS) em um serviço de saúde pública abrangente. Material e métodos: estudo descritivo e retrospectivo de crianças menores de 18 anos com HAS, concentrações de inibidor do FVIII ≥ 5 BU), que realizaram ITI e acompanhamento completo entre 2009-2020. Concentrado de FVIII derivado de plasma foi utilizado para ITI. O benefício é expresso como a taxa de sucesso definida pela negativação do inibidor. Resultados: 6 pacientes foram incluídos. Idade média no diagnóstico do inibidor 2,96 anos, após 24,4 dias de exposição (DDE) a concentrados de FVIII. A média de início da ITI foi de 3,76 crianças e o tempo de latência do diagnóstico do inibidor e início da ITI foi de 10,33 meses. O pico máximo do título pré-ITI foi em média 114,7 BU. Quatro pacientes iniciaram o regime ITI com títulos de inibidor inferiores a 10 BU. O título do inibidor tornou-se negativo em 8,2 meses e a percentagem de recuperação in vivo >65% foi alcançada com uma média de 15,7 meses. O ITI foi bem-sucedido em 83% dos casos. Conclusões: em crianças com hemofilia A e inibidores de títulos elevados, a ITI é altamente bem sucedida, como ocorreu nesta série. Como o tempo de resposta é variável, o ITI deve ser individualizado.
Assuntos
Humanos , Fator VIII/antagonistas & inibidores , Coagulantes/antagonistas & inibidores , Hemofilia A/tratamento farmacológico , Tolerância Imunológica/efeitos dos fármacos , Fator VIII/uso terapêutico , Coagulantes/uso terapêutico , Doença Catastrófica , Estudos Retrospectivos , SeguimentosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Emicizumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for prophylaxis against bleeds for people with hemophilia A (PwHA). A systematic review was conducted evaluating the efficacy/effectiveness and the safety of emicizumab as prophylaxis for PwHA compared to prophylaxis with factor VIII (FVIII) or bypassing agents (BPA), respectively in patients without and with inhibitors. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Database-directed search strategies were performed in Aug/26/2022 and updated in Mar/16/2023. Studies evaluating the prophylaxis with emicizumab versus prophylaxis with FVIII or BPA in PwHA without or with inhibitors, respectively, were selected by two independent reviewers. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Annualized bleeding rates for total treated bleeding events (ABR-all) were evaluated by meta-analysis. The quality of studies and certainty of evidence were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies were included. The standard mean differences for ABR-all were -0.6 (95%CI -1.0 to -0.2, p-value = 0.0002), among PwHA without inhibitors, and -1.7 (95%CI -2.4 to -0.9, p-value <0.00001), among PwHA with inhibitors. However, there was moderate heterogeneity in both meta-analyses. The most frequent adverse event was injection site reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Emicizumab prophylaxis was superior in reducing the ABR-all when compared with prophylaxis with FVIII or BPA.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Biespecíficos , Hemofilia A , Hemostáticos , Humanos , Hemofilia A/complicações , Hemofilia A/tratamento farmacológico , Fator VIII/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/etiologia , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Biespecíficos/efeitos adversos , Hemostáticos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Hemophilia A and B are disorders associated with the deficit of coagulation factors VIII and IX. OBJECTIVE: Was to determine the incidence of complications in a cohort of patients diagnosed with moderate and severe hemophilia A or B under treatment in a specialized institution. METHODS: A retrospective study of a cohort of patients with replacement therapy for hemophilia A or B, evaluating treatment and complications between January/2012 and July/2019. Sociodemographic, clinical and disease management-related variables were extracted from the medical records. Time to inhibitor development and rate associated with bleeding and hospitalizations were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 159 male patients were identified with hemophilia A (n = 140; 88.1%) and B (n = 19; 11.9%) with a mean follow-up of 5.9±2.3 years. The mean age was 23.6±16.1 years, hemophilia was reported as severe in 125 patients in hemophilia A (89.3%) and 13 patients in hemophilia B (68.4%). Primary prophylaxis was registered in 17.0% of patients, 44.7% secondary, and 38.3% tertiary, with recombinant factors (n = 84; 52.8%) followed by plasma derived factors (n = 75; 47.2%). The incidence of inhibitor development was 0.3 per 100 patients/year, with mean time to event of 509 days. The incidence of bleeding was 192 per 100 patients/year, especially at the joint (n = 99; 62.3%) and muscle (n = 25; 15.7%) level. The incidence of hospitalization was 3.7 per 100 patients/year. CONCLUSIONS: The most common complication was joint bleeding which was expected in this type of patients. Low proportion of patients developed factor inhibitors during the follow up.
Assuntos
Hemofilia A , Hemofilia B , Humanos , Masculino , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Hemofilia A/complicações , Hemofilia A/tratamento farmacológico , Hemofilia A/epidemiologia , Hemofilia B/complicações , Hemofilia B/tratamento farmacológico , Hemofilia B/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Fator VIII/uso terapêutico , Hemorragia/etiologia , Hemorragia/complicaçõesRESUMO
INTRODUÇÃO: A hemofilia A é uma condição rara que afeta a habilidade de coagulação do sangue, caracterizada pela disfunção ou diminuição da produção do fator de coagulação VIII (FVIII), uma proteína chave na cascata de coagulação para uma hemostasia efetiva. Tal deficiência está associada com a ocorrência de sangramentos, sendo os principais sintomas da doença a presença de sangramentos prolongados. Os quadros podem ser classificados de acordo com a atividade coagulante endógena do fator seja 0,01 UI/ml ou < 1% (grave), 0,01 a 0,05 UI/mL ou 1% a 5% (moderada) e > 0,05 a < 0,40 IU/ml ou > 5% a < 40% (leve), respectivamente. O tratamento dos sangramentos na hemofilia requer a infusão intravenosa do fator de coagulação deficiente. A reposição deste fator pode ser feita sob demanda (tratamento do episódio hemorrágico) ou de forma profilática (manutenção dos níveis de FVIII suficientemente elevados para prevenir os episódios hemorrágicos). Entretanto, uma complicação grave na hemofilia A é o desenvolvimento de inibidores, anticorpos da classe IgG, contra o FVIII infundido, inibindo assim a atividade coagulante dos concentrados de FVIII. A presença destes inibidores tem como consequência a ausência de resposta ao tratamento ou maior frequência ou gra