Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Digit Imaging ; 25(1): 91-100, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21614654

RESUMO

A common teleradiology practice is digitizing films. The costs of specialized digitizers are very high, that is why there is a trend to use conventional scanners and digital cameras. Statistical clinical studies are required to determine the accuracy of these devices, which are very difficult to carry out. The purpose of this study was to compare three capture devices in terms of their capacity to detect several image characteristics. Spatial resolution, contrast, gray levels, and geometric deformation were compared for a specialized digitizer ICR (US$ 15,000), a conventional scanner UMAX (US$ 1,800), and a digital camera LUMIX (US$ 450, but require an additional support system and a light box for about US$ 400). Test patterns printed in films were used. The results detected gray levels lower than real values for all three devices; acceptable contrast and low geometric deformation with three devices. All three devices are appropriate solutions, but a digital camera requires more operator training and more settings.


Assuntos
Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica/economia , Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica/instrumentação , Software/economia , Telerradiologia/economia , Filme para Raios X/economia , Apresentação de Dados/economia , Desenho de Equipamento , Humanos , Controle de Qualidade , Telerradiologia/instrumentação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA