RESUMO

OBJETIVO Comparar los resultados funcionales obtenidos en dos cohortes de pacientes ancianos tratados de forma quirúrgica (artroplastia reversa de hombro) versus tratamiento conservador. MATERIAL Y METODOS Estudio ambispectivo, no aleatorizado. Se incluyeron pacientes de 75 años o más, 15 tratados de forma quirúrgica y 16 siguieron tratamiento conservador. Seguimiento mínimo de 12 meses. A los 3, 6 y 12 meses de la fractura evaluamos las escalas ASES, Constant-Murley and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH) y EVA. Además evaluamos los resultados radiológicos y las complicaciones. RESULTADOS No encontramos diferencias significativas para las escalas ASES, DASH, ni EVA .El grupo tratado de forma quirúrgica obtuvo a los 12 meses una puntuación media en la escala Constant mayor, diferencia estadísticamente significativa(75.1 þ/-10.3 vs. 51.9 þ/-12.4 p » 0.001). Además presentaban mayor rango de movilidad para flexión y rotación externa (128.9 þ/-17 versus 99.3 þ/-20.1 p » 0.001, and 35.7 þ/-13.9 vs. 23.4 þ/-15.5 p » 0.032). El 43% de los pacientes tratados mediante artroplastia reversa presentaban tuberosidades normoposicionadas y mejores resultados en las escalas versus pacientes con tuberosidades ausentes o malposicionadas. El grupo sometido a cirugía no presentó mayor tasa de complicaciones.CONCLUSIONES El tratamiento conservador en las fracturas de EPH en tres y cuatro fragmentos en pacientes ancianos ofrece buenos resultados en cuanto a dolor y funcionalidad en la mayoría de pacientes. Falta por definir qué pacientes por tener alta demanda funcional serían candidatos a tratamiento quirúrgico de entrada

OBJECTIVE This study compared functional results in two cohorts of older adults with three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) per Neer's classification treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) or nonoperative management. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ambispective, non-randomized study with two cohorts of patients aged 75 or older treated with RSA (n » 15) or nonoperative management (n » 16) with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. We analyzed the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant-Murley, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at 3, 6, and 12 months. In addition, we recorded radiological findings and surgical complications. RESULTS The mean Constant-Murley score at 12 months was significantly higher for the RSA group (75.1 þ/- 10.3 vs. 51.9 þ/- 12.4, p » 0.001). There were no differences in ASES, DASH, and VAS scores. Statistically significant differences for flexion and external rotation in abduction favored the RSA group (128.9 þ/- 17.0 versus 99.3 þ/- 20.1, p » 0.001, and 35.7 þ/- 13.9 vs. 23.4 þ/- 15.5, p » 0.032, respectively). For the RSA group, tuberosity positioning was correct in 43% of subjects. These patients presented better scores than those with malpositioned or absent tuberosities but with no statistical significance. Complications in the surgical group were not higher. CONCLUSIONS Nonoperative treatment is a valid option regarding pain and functionality in elderly patients with three- and four-part PHFs. Characteristics of patients with high demands who may be candidates for the initial surgical treatment remain to be defined

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Eighty percent of the Proximal humerus fractures are not displaced or minimally displaced and stable. The international treatment recommendation is conservative. Immobilization of the limb carries risk of stiffness, pain and decreased function. Currently being used rehabilitation programs with early mobilization of the injured shoulder within the first week post-fracture, with evidence of early functional and labor recovery and with no risk for displacement of fragments. However, in our country, these patients start rehabilitation late, which leads to a delay in the recovery of functionality and delay in returning to work, translating into increased costs. At the moment there is no national benchmark for the cost of this late-onset rehabilitation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From a non-probabilistic sample for convenience, were analyzed records of 52 patients, treated in the period from January to December 2019. Inclusion criteria were workers diagnosed with a proximal humeral fracture, conservative management; exclusion criteria were peripheral nerve injury, aggregate fracture or surgically treated. RESULTS: The mean direct medical cost was $19,090.69 Mexican pesos, directly proportional to the days of stay in the unit and disability. CONCLUSION: Late rehabilitation leads to more days of disability than recommended by the based guidelinesin the workload, therefore, higher cost.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Ochenta por ciento de las fracturas de húmero proximal son no desplazadas o mínimamente desplazadas y estables. La recomendación internacional de tratamiento es de uno conservador. La inmovilización de la extremidad conlleva riesgo de rigidez, dolor y disminución de función. Actualmente se están empleando programas de rehabilitación con movilización precoz del hombro lesionado dentro de la primera semana postfractura, con evidencia de recuperación funcional y laboral precoces y con ausencia de riesgo para desplazamiento de fragmentos. Sin embargo, en nuestro país, estos pacientes inician la rehabilitación de forma tardía, lo que conlleva un retardo en la recuperación de funcionalidad y retardo en reincorporación laboral, traduciendo incremento en costos. Al momento no existe un referente nacional del costo que implica esta rehabilitación de inicio tardío. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: De una muestra no probabilística por conveniencia, se analizaron expedientes de 52 pacientes, atendidos en el período de Enero a Diciembre de 2019. Los criterios de inclusión fueron trabajadores con diagnóstico de fractura de húmero proximal, manejo conservador; criterios de exclusión fueron lesión de nervio periférico, fractura agregada o postoperados. RESULTADOS: La media del costo médico directo fue $19,090.69 pesos mexicanos, con relación directamente proporcional a los días de estancia en la unidad y de incapacidad. CONCLUSIÓN: La rehabilitación tardía conlleva más días de incapacidad que las recomendadas por las guías con base en la carga de trabajo, por ende, mayor costo.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract Objectives To describe the functional result of the conservative treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHF) using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score after 12 months and assess whether the different initial classifications and radiographic measurements are related to clinical results. Methods Forty patients > 60 years old, with displaced PHUs submitted to conservative treatment were evaluated at standardized times (3, 6, and 12 months). The American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant-Murley and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scales were used as clinical outcomes. Radiographic variables included the Neer and Resch classifications, the presence and displacement of tuberosity fracture, metaphyseal comminution, medial periosteal lesion, and angular and translational deviations of the head in the coronal and sagittal plane. Results The result of the ASES score was 77.7 23.2 for the whole sample, the mean absolute values of the Constant-Murley score were 68.7 16 and 82.6% for the scale relative to the contralateral side. The SANE scale at 12 months was 84.8 19. We observed that the severity of the Neer classification and the coronal plane angular deviation (measured by the head-shaft angle) and the presence of fractures in both tuberosities negatively influenced the ASES score after 12 months of treatment. Conclusion Nonoperative treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients results in good clinical results. Clinical results are negatively influenced by the angular deviation of the humeral head and the presence of fractures of the greater and lesser tubercles, as well as by the Neer classification.

Resumo Objetivos Descrever o resultado funcional do tratamento não operatório de fraturas desviadas da extremidade proximal do úmero (FEPU) pela escala da American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES, na sigla em inglês) após 12 meses e avaliar se as diferentes classificações e medidas radiográficas iniciais têm correlação com os resultados clínicos. Métodos Foram avaliados em tempos padronizados (3, 6 e 12 meses), 40 pacientes > 60 anos com FEPU submetidos ao tratamento não operatório. Foram utilizadas as escalas da ASES, Constant-Murley e Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE, na sigla em inglês). As variáveis radiográficas incluíram as classificações de Neer e Resch, a presença de fratura e desvio dos tubérculos, cominuição metafisária, lesão periosteal medial, desvios angulares e translacionais da cabeça no plano coronal e sagital e desvio dos tubérculos. Resultados Observamos resultados pela escala de ASES de 77,7 23,2 para toda a amostra, pelade Constant-Murley de 68,7 16e de 82,6% paraa escala em relação aolado contralateral.AescaladeSANEaos12mesesfoide84,8 19.Oscritériosradiográficosque apresentaram influência negativa no resultado clínico pela escala de ASES aos 12 meses foram a gravidade pela classificação de Neer e pelo desvio angular no plano coronal (mensurado pelo ângulo cabeça-diáfise) e a presença de fratura dos tubérculos. Conclusão O tratamento não operatório de fraturas desviadas da extremidade proximal do úmero em pacientes idosos resulta em bons resultados clínicos. Os resultados clínicos são influenciados negativamente pelo desvio angular da cabeça do úmero e pela presença de fratura dos tubérculos maior e menor, assim como pela classificação de Neer.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Tecnologia: Hemiprótese de ombro ajustável. Próteses de cabeça excêntrica reproduzem a anatomia da extremidade proximal do úmero. Indicação: Reconstrução da extremidade proximal do úmero no tratamento de fraturas complexas de úmero. Pergunta: o tratamento cirúrgico é superior ao tratamento conservador, para tratamento de fratura proximal de úmero, com melhores desfechos funcionais, menos complicações, menor mortalidade? Os efeitos terapêuticos da prótese de ombro excêntrica são superiores aos da prótese de ombro Neer II em pacientes com fratura proximal de úmero submetidos a hemiartroplastia de ombro nos desfechos de resultados funcionais e complicações cirúrgicas? Métodos: Levantamento bibliográfico foi realizado em bases de dados Pubmed, BVS e Google com estratégias estruturadas de busca. Foi feita avaliação da qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas com a ferramenta AMSTAR e para os estudos econômicos, foi utilizado o QHES checklist. Resultados: Foram identificados 485 registros nas bases de dados internacionais e nacionais. Após a remoção de duplicatas e exclusão dos não elegíveis, pela análise de título e resumo, foram selecionadas quatro revisões sistemáticas e um estudo econômico. Conclusão: Não há evidências suficientes de ensaios clínicos para informar qual a melhor escolha entre as intervenções (não cirúrgicas, cirúrgicas ou de reabilitação) para essas fraturas. Não foram encontrados estudos brasileiros sobre eficácia e custo-efetividade das diferentes abordagens cirúrgicas bem como os tipos e marcas de próteses entre si

Technology: Adjustable shoulder hemi prosthesis. Eccentric head prostheses reproduce the anatomy of the proximal extremity of the humerus. Indication: Reconstruction of the proximal extremity of the humerus in the treatment of complex humerus fractures. Question: Is surgical treatment superior to conservative treatment, for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures, with better functional outcomes, less complications, less mortality? Are the therapeutic effects of the eccentric shoulder prosthesis superior to those of the Neer II shoulder prosthesis in patients with proximal humerus fractures who underwent shoulder hemiarthroplasty in the outcomes of functional results and surgical complications? Methods: Bibliographic survey was carried out in Pubmed, BVS and Google databases with structured search strategies. The methodological quality of systematic reviews was assessed using the AMSTAR tool and for economic studies, the QHES checklist was used. Results: Were they identified 485 records in international and national databases. After removing duplicates and excluding the ineligible ones, by analyzing the title and summary, four systematic reviews and one economic study were selected. Conclusion: There is not enough evidence of clinical trials to inform which is the best choice between interventions (nonsurgical, surgical or rehabilitation) for these fractures. No brazilian studies were found about the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the different surgical approaches, as well as the types and brands of prostheses between them

Assuntos

RESUMO

El tratamiento de fracturas desplazadas de húmero proximal puede realizarse de manera conservadora o quirúrgica. A partir de una viñeta clínica en la cual una señora adulta mayor tiene una fractura de húmero proximal por una caída de su propia altura se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica que identificó una revisión sistemática Cochrane que compara ambas alternativas de tratamiento. Los resultados clínicos que resume esta revisión indican que el tratamiento quirúrgico no sería superior al tratamiento conservador y se asociaría a un número mayor de procedimientos quirúrgicos adicionales. (AU)

The treatment of displaced fracture of the proximal humerus can be managed surgically or conservatively. From a clinical vi-gnette in which an elderly woman suffers a proximal fracture of the humerus due to a fall from her own height, a bibliographic search was run and identified a Cochrane systematic review which compared both treatment options. The clinical results sum-marized in this review indicated that surgical treatment would not be superior to conservative management. Furthermore, surgi-cal treatment would be associated with a greater number of additional surgical procedures. (AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introducción: Las fracturas de húmero proximal de tres o más fragmentos presentan riesgo elevado de necrosis, siendo éste el segundo sitio más frecuente sólo después del fémur, presentándose causas traumáticas y no traumáticas, siendo las traumáticas las más comunes, presentando una incidencia de 13 a 34% en fracturas de más de cuatro fragmentos. El propósito de este estudio es valorar el resultado funcional de pacientes con antecedente de fractura humeral proximal y osteonecrosis con manejo conservador. Material y métodos: Se presenta un estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, observacional con seguimiento de 6 a 12 meses de pacientes mayores de 60 años con diagnóstico de fractura de húmero proximal con manejo conservador, en el período comprendido de Enero de 2004 a Noviembre de 2009, se seleccionaron 122 pacientes que cumplían los criterios de inclusión, perdiendo el seguimiento de 12 de ellos, con edad promedio de 71.02 años con rango de 60 a 92 años, 41 hombres y 69 mujeres, realizándose escalas de DASH y CONSTANT. Resultados: Posterior a la realización de las escalas de valoración funcional se realiza la validación de dichos resultados obteniendo un coeficiente de correlación de 0.80 siendo estadísticamente significativo. Conclusión: El tratamiento conservador debe ser reservado sólo en pacientes que cumplan con las características necesarias. Dependiendo del tipo de fractura y las características del individuo, el tratamiento siempre está enfocado a la estabilización y a la movilización temprana y en la obtención de la recuperación funcional precoz. Encontrando en este estudio que las fracturas tratadas de forma conservadora, desarrollan algún estadio de osteonecrosis de la cabeza pero con adecuada función casi similar a la extremidad sana.

Introduction: Fractures of the proximal humerus resulting in three or more fragments represent a high risk of necrosis. The former is the second most frequent site of necrosis, only after the femur, due to either traumatic or nontraumatic causes. The former are the most common, with an incidence rate of necrosis of 13-34% in fractures with more than four fragments. The purpose of this study is to assess the functional outcome of patients with a history of fracture of the proximal humerus and osteonecrosis treated conservatively. Material and methods: This is a descriptive, retrospective, observational study with a 6-12 month follow-up of patients older than 60 years of age with a diagnosis of fracture of the proximal humerus managed conservatively between January 2004 and November 2009. One hundred and twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria and 12 were lost to follow-up. Mean age was 71.02 years with a range between 60 and 92 years; 41 males and 69 females. The DASH and CONSTANT scales were applied. Results: After applying the functional assessment scales and validating the results, the correlation coefficient obtained was 0.80, and it was statistically significant. Conclusion: Conservative treatment should be used only in patients who meet the necessary criteria. Depending on the type of fracture and the patient's characteristics, treatment should always be aimed at stabilization, early mobilization, and early functional recovery. This study found that fractures treated conservatively eventually develop some degree of osteonecrosis of the head, but they have proper function, similar to that of a healthy limb.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the proximal humerus resulting in three or more fragments represent a high risk of necrosis. The former is the second most frequent site of necrosis, only after the femur, due to either traumatic or nontraumatic causes. The former are the most common, with an incidence rate of necrosis of 13-34% in fractures with more than four fragments. The purpose of this study is to assess the functional outcome of patients with a history of fracture of the proximal humerus and osteonecrosis treated conservatively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a descriptive, retrospective, observational study with a 6-12 month follow-up of patients older than 60 years of age with a diagnosis of fracture of the proximal humerus managed conservatively between January 2004 and November 2009. One hundred and twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria and 12 were lost to follow-up. Mean age was 71.02 years with a range between 60 and 92 years; 41 males and 69 females. The DASH and CONSTANT scales were applied. RESULTS: After applying the functional assessment scales and validating the results, the correlation coefficient obtained was 0.80, and it was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment should be used only in patients who meet the necessary criteria. Depending on the type of fracture and the patient's characteristics, treatment should always be aimed at stabilization, early mobilization, and early functional recovery. This study found that fractures treated conservatively eventually develop some degree of osteonecrosis of the head, but they have proper function, similar to that of a healthy limb.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Displaced proximal humeral physeal fractures (PHPF) are rare injuries. Because of the lack of comparative studies, treatment has historically been based on surgeon preference. The purpose of this study was to compare treatment outcomes among skeletally immature patients who underwent operative versus nonoperative treatment for Neer-Horwitz (NH) III or IV PHPF. METHODS: Skeletally immature patients who underwent treatment for a displaced PHPF from 2003 to 2012 were identified. Eligible subjects were invited to complete a validated shoulder outcome instrument (QuickDASH) and a phone survey. A propensity score matching approach was utilized to match subjects who underwent operative treatment to subjects who underwent nonoperative treatment on the basis of age at injury and NH classification. RESULTS: Seventy patients were identified with a NH III or IV PHPF, of whom 32 subjects completed the study. There was also no difference (P=0.5637) in the proportion of subjects who developed a less than desirable treatment outcome in operative group (57.14%, 4/7) as compared with the nonoperative group (42.86%, 3/7). There was also no difference (P=0.5637) in the proportion of subjects who developed a less than desirable treatment outcome in operative group (57.14%, 4/7) as compared with the nonoperative group. Differences in rate of return to preinjury level of activity (P>0.9999), or cosmetic appearance scores (P>0.999) were not significantly different. QuickDASH scores were 1.9 points (95% CI, 3.0-6.9; P=0.3699) higher overall in the nonoperative group as opposed to the operative group. A less than desirable treatment outcome was noted in 4/23 (17.4%) subjects who underwent nonoperative treatment. Subgroup analysis of the nonoperative cases showed that, for every 1 year increase in age at initial injury, the odds of less than desirable outcome increased by a factor of 3.81 (95% CI, 1.31-21.0). CONCLUSIONS: In a matched cohort of patients with proximal humerus physeal fractures, there was no difference in occurrence of complications, rate of return to activity, or cosmetic satisfaction. Functional outcomes were also nonsignificant, but tended to be higher among fractures that underwent nonoperative treatment. Among nonoperatively treated fractures, less than desirable outcomes were more common in older patients, particularly those older than 12 years of age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic.

Assuntos

RESUMO

La luxofractura de hombro y la luxación de codo están descritas, pero son poco frecuente que ocurran en el mismo hemicuerpo. Caso clínico: paciente de 45 años, masculino, de piel blanca, que acudió al servicio de Traumatología del Hospital Universitario Martín Chang Puga de Nuevitas por presentar luxofractura de hombro y luxación posterior de codo en un mismo hemicuerpo, a causa de un accidente automovilístico. Se realizó reducción manual de urgencia de ambas luxaciones y control radiológico, con resultados satisfactorios. Se inmovilizó el codo con una férula posterior de yeso para el miembro superior y vendaje de Velpeau para el hombro. Se retiró inmovilización del codo a las tres semanas y la del hombro a las seis semanas. Posteriormente se comenzó con la rehabilitación, donde se obtuvo magníficos resultados con la función de ambas articulaciones y del miembro superior en general

Dislocation and fracture of shoulder and dislocation of elbow are described but is very unusual when they are concomitant and on the same side of the body.Clinical case: a case of a 45-year-old, male patient who was treated in the service of Traumatology at the University Hospital Martín Chang Puga from Nuevitas, presenting dislocation and fracture of the right shoulder and dislocation of the elbow on the same side of the body due to a car accident. Urgent manual reduction of both dislocations and radiological control, with satisfactory results took place. The elbow was immobilized with a backboard plaster splint and a Velpeau´s bandage for the shoulder. The immobilization devise of the elbow was removed after three weeks and that of the shoulder after six. Subsequently began rehabilitation, and great results were obtained with both joints and the upper limb functions

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Avaliar, através dos resultados clínicos, a eficácia e a segurança da técnica cirúrgica denominada "sistema paraquedas" aplicada em pacientes adultos que sofreram fraturas desviadas e instáveis em duas ou em três partes do úmero proximal. MÉTODOS: Durante o período de janeiro de 1995 a junho de 2006, 59 pacientes adultos com fraturas em duas ou em três partes desviadas e instáveis foram operados pelo Grupo de Ombro e Cotovelo do Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia do Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo com a técnica do "sistema paraquedas". Este método consiste em uma banda de tensão intramedular e fixação extra medular em "8" unindo os fragmentos da fratura, utilizando um parafuso esponjoso de 6,5mm com rosca parcial, arruela e dois fios inabsorvíveis, produzindo uma síntese estável, com mínima agressão às partes moles vizinhas, não requerendo a posterior retirada do material. A forma final desta síntese lembra a figura de um paraquedas aberto. Os pacientes tiveram um seguimento pós-operatório mínimo de seis meses. Para o diagnóstico foram realizadas radiografias nas incidências da série trauma de ombro. As fraturas foram classificadas de acordo com o sistema proposto por Neer. Utilizamos a escala da Universidade da Califórnia em Los Angeles (UCLA) na avaliação dos resultados. RESULTADOS: Obteve-se 47 por cento de bons e 26 por cento de excelentes resultados com a técnica do "sistema paraquedas" de acordo com o escore da UCLA. CONCLUSÃO: A técnica do "sistema paraquedas" é opção segura e eficaz de tratamento das fraturas desviadas e instáveis em duas ou três partes do úmero proximal.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, through clinical outcomes, the efficacy and safety of the surgical technique called the "parachute technique" as applied to adult patients who suffered displaced and unstable fractures in two or three parts of the proximal humerus. METHODS: During the period from January 1995 to June 2006, 59 adult patients with two or three displaced and unstable fractures were operated by the Shoulder and Elbow Group of the Orthopedics and Traumatology Service of the Servidor Público Estadual de São Pauloïs Hospital using the "parachute technique". This method consists of an internal bone tension band and a settling external bone in "8" joining the pieces of the fractures, using a 6.5-millimeter spongy screw with a partial thread, a washer and two nonabsorbable sutures, creating a stable synthesis with little aggression to the surrounding soft tissue , requiring no posterior material ressection. The final shape of this synthesis is reminiscent of the shape of an opened parachute. The patients had a minimum of 6 months follow-up post-operation. For diagnosis, trauma series radiographs of the shoulder were taken. The fractures were classified according to the system proposed by Neer. We used the scale of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), in the evaluation of results. RESULTS: There were 47 percent good and 26 percent excellent results using the "parachute technique" according to the UCLA score. CONCLUSION: the "parachute technique" is a safe and effective treatment for two or three part displaced and unstable fractures of the proximal humerus.

Assuntos