RESUMO

INTRODUCCIÓN: El uso de tigeciclina ha ido en aumento en los últimos años, debido al incremento de la resistencia bacteriana y la escasez de alternativas terapéuticas. OBJETIVO: Caracterizar y evaluar las prescripciones de tigeciclina en pacientes internados en un hospital universitario, durante los años 2017 y 2018. METODOLOGÍA: Estudio observacional retrospectivo, donde se caracterizaron los pacientes, las terapias, la microbiología asociada, los desenlaces clínicos y las reacciones adversas asociadas a los tratamientos con tigeciclina. Se determinó la proporción de prescripciones apropiadas por un comité de expertos y el consumo de tigeciclina medido en DDD/100 camas-día. RESULTADOS: Se caracterizaron 89 pacientes, de los cuales 67 (75,3%) cumplieron los criterios de selección. El 53,7% de los pacientes eran hombres, con una edad promedio de 60 ± 15 años. El principal motivo de hospitalización fue quirúrgico (65,7%). El 67,1% de los tratamientos con tigeciclina se inició en una Unidad de Paciente Critico y el foco de infección predominante fue abdominal (64,3%). El 50% de las terapias con tigeciclina fueron dirigidas según la microbiología identificada. En 65,7% de los casos se usó tigeciclina como monoterapia en la dosis habitual (62,9%). Náuseas (8,6%), diarrea (7,1%) y vómitos (4,3%) fueron los efectos adversos más reportados. El 84,3% de los tratamientos se consideraron apropiados. El año 2017 se consumió 0,4 DDD/100 camas-día y 0,6 DDD/100 camas/día el 2018, siendo la UCI el servicio que presentó el mayor uso en ambos años. DISCUSIÓN: Tigeciclina fue utilizada principalmente en monoterapia para el tratamiento de infecciones intraabdominales en pacientes hospitalizados, por motivos quirúrgicos, en una unidad de paciente crítico, en las dosis habituales recomendadas de 100 mg como dosis de carga seguida de 50 mg cada 12 hs IV. En 50% de los casos, la terapia fue dirigida según microbiología. Los eventos adversos más habituales fueron los gastrointestinales. CONCLUSIÓN: La mayoría de las terapias prescritas fueron consideradas apropiadas por el comité de expertos.

BACKGROUND: The use of tigecycline has been increasing in recent years, due to increase in bacterial resistance and the scarcity of therapeutics alternatives. AIM: To characterize and evaluate the tigecycline prescriptions of patients hospitalized in a university hospital, during the years 2017 and 2018. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was carried out, where the patients, the therapies, the associated microbiology, the clinical outcomes and the adverse reactions associated with tigecycline were characterized. The proportion of appropriate prescriptions was determined by committee of experts and the consumption of tigecycline measure in DDD/100 bed-days. RESULTS: 89 patients who used tigecycline were characterized, of which 67 (75.3%) met the selection criteria. 53.7% of the patients were male, with a mean age of 60 +/- 15 years The main reason for hospitalization was surgical (65.7%). 67.1% of the treatments with tigecycline were started in a critical patient unit and the predominant focus of the infection was the abdomen (64.3%). 50% of the therapies with tigecycline were ordered according to the identified microbiology. In 65.7% of the cases, tigecyclin was used as monotherapy at the usual dose (62.9%). Nausea (8.6%), diarrhea (7.1%) and vomiting (4.3%) were the most reported adverse events. 84.3% of the treatments were considered appropriate. In 2017, 0.4 DDD/100 bed/days were consumed and 0.6 DDD/100 bed/days in 2018, with de ICU being the service that presented the highest use in both years. DISCUSSION: Tigecycline was mainly used as monotherapy for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections in patients hospitalized for surgical reasons in a critical patient unit at the usual doses of 100 mg loading followed by 50 mg every 12 hours IV. In 50% of the case the therapy was directed according to microbiology. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal. CONCLUSION: Most of the prescribed therapies were considered appropriate by the expert committee.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background: Intra-abdominal infection (IAI) results in prolonged in-hospital length-of-stay, critical care unit requirements, and multiple surgical procedures. Several antimicrobial agents are available for treatment of IAI. In Colombia, there are no data on the comparative effectiveness of the different regimens used. Patients and Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was completed in four third-level hospitals by comparing treatment effectiveness of five different antibiotic protocols (ampicillin-sulbactam, clindamycin-amikacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, amikacin-metronidazole, and cefuroxime-metronidazole) in patients with a diagnosis of IAI. Analysis was based on a composed outcome of therapeutic failure (change of antibiotic because of no clinical improvement, requirement of surgical re-intervention, post-operative infection, change of antibiotic because of antimicrobial resistance, and in-hospital mortality). Association of each antibiotic protocol to therapeutic failure was assessed through logistic regression analysis. Results: Five hundred ninety-three individuals were included. Two hundred twenty-nine were prescribed ampicillin-sulbactam; 170, clindamycin-amikacin; 77, amikacin-metronidazole; 83, piperacillin-tazobactam; and 34, cefuroxime-metronidazole. Therapeutic failure rate was 22%. Multivariable analysis showed none of the evaluated antibiotic protocols had an association with the primary outcome. Variables having an association for higher risk were age >70 years old (odds ratio [OR], 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-4.18); complicated IAI (OR, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.4-8.07); and World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) Sepsis Severity Score (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.18-1.45). Adequate source control (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05-0.45) and hospitalization at Health Center 2 (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.14-0.63) were identified as protective factors. Conclusions: There are no differences between the rate of therapeutic failure among the different antibiotic protocols evaluated. This outcome depends heavily on risk factors related to disease severity when surgical intervention occurs.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introduction: Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spn) is occasionally implicated as a cause of intra-abdominal infection (IIASpn) that can be 1) spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in elderly patients with previous peritoneal disease, associated with cirrhosis, in most of the cases 2) associated or adjacent to an intra-abdominal organ or postsurgical. (IIAbq) 3) peritonitis in previously healthy young women (PHYW). Our objective is report 18 cases of IIASpn describing: clinical presentation, comorbidities, need for surgery, microbiological findings, sensitivity of Spn to antimicrobials, therapeutic behavior, and evolution. Methods: study of 18 adult patients with IIASpn. Clinical and microbiological characteristics and evolution of infections were analyzed. Results: IIASpn occurred in 9 PHYW, 6 men and 1 woman with SBP, and 2 men with appendicitis. The PHYW were operated on (4 pelviperitonitis, 3 salpingitis, 2 and tubo ovarian abscess) and had a favorable evolution. In the intraoperative samples, pure culture of Spn sensitive to penicillin was isolated. Three of four patients had positive blood culture. Five of seven patients with SBP died and in the peritoneal fluid developed Spn in pure culture. A large percentage of strains presented decreased sensitivity to penicillin. Four of five had a positive blood culture. Patients with appendicitis had favorable evolution. Conclusions: IIASpn in PHYW was the most frequent presentation, surgery played a significant role in treatment and the clinical response was excellent. The second presentation occurred in elderly patients with cirrhosis, most of whom died. Appendicitis was the third presentation in patients who evolved favorably.

Introducción: Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spn) ocasionalmente causa infección intraabdominal (IIASpn) que puede ser: 1) peritonitis bacteriana espontánea (PBE) en paciente añosos con enfermedad peritoneal previa, asociada con cirrosis, en la mayoría de los casos; 2) asociada o adyacente a un órgano intraabdominal o postquirúrgica (IIAbq); 3) peritonitis en mujeres jóvenes previamente sanas (MJPS). Nuestro objetivo es reportar 18 casos de IIASpn describiendo: presentación clínica, comorbilidades, necesidad de cirugía, microbiología y sensibilidad a los antimicrobianos, conducta terapéutica y evolución. Métodos: estudio de 18 pacientes adultos con IIASpn en un período de 23 años. Análisis de las características clínicas, microbiología y evolución de los pacientes. Resultados: las IIASpn ocurrieron en 9 MJPS, 6 varones y una mujer con PBE, y 2 varones con apendicitis. Las MJPS fueron intervenidas quirúrgicamente (4 pelviperitonitis, 3 salpingitis y 2 abscesos tubo ovárico) y evolucionaron favorablemente. En las muestras intraoperatorias se aisló Spn cultivo puro sensible a penicilina. Tres de cuatro pacientes tuvieron hemocultivo positivo. Cinco de siete pacientes con PBE fallecieron y en las muestras de líquido peritoneal desarrolló Spn cultivo puro. Gran porcentaje de cepas presentó sensibilidad disminuida a penicilina. Cuatro de cinco, tuvieron hemocultivo positivo. Los pacientes con apendicitis evolucionaron favorablemente. Conclusiones: La IIASpn en MJPS fue la presentación más frecuente, la cirugía jugó un rol significativo en el tratamiento y la respuesta clínica fue excelente. La segunda presentación ocurrió en pacientes añosos con cirrosis y en su mayoría, fallecieron. La apendicitis fue la tercera presentación en pacientes que evolucionaron favorablemente.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Strict adherence to clinical practice guidelines is recognized to improve outcomes but the inconvenient truth is that only a small subset of what is done in medicine has been tested in appropriate, well designed studies. In this article, we aim to review controversial aspects of the clinical management of invasive candidiasis recommended by guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite still being recommended by guidelines, we fail to identify a single randomized clinical trial documenting that the use of antifungal drugs in high-risk critically ill patients without microbiologic documentation of Candida infection decreases mortality. Regarding deep-seated Candida infections, most cohort studies of patients with candidemia found less than 5% of patients developed endophthalmitis and endocarditis. In this scenario, it is reasonable to reconsider routine universal screening of both complications in candidemic patients. Finally, a large number of studies have shown that critically ill patients usually have lower echinocandin exposure when compared with other populations. We need more data on the clinical relevance of this finding. SUMMARY: We need robust studies to validate new strategies for the clinical management of candidemia in ICU, including: the use of fungal biomarkers in the early initiation or interruption of antifungal therapy in high-risk patients to replace the conventional empirical antifungal therapy driven by predictive rules; validation of targeted screening of eye infection and endocarditis with the aid of fungal biomarkers only in high-risk patients; we should clarify if higher doses of candins are necessary to treat invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients, especially in the case of intra-abdominal infections where drug penetration is suboptimal.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background: Antimicrobial drug resistance in community-acquired (CA) infections is a growing problem. Knowing the local epidemiology is essential to design empirical antibiotic therapy. Therefore, we conducted this study to evaluate the resistance patterns of microorganisms isolated from surgical samples of community-acquired intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) and to determine the factors associated with resistance. Methods: We analyzed retrospectively the records of patients treated from January 2015 to June 2017 who had IAIs with positives aerobic cultures performed in the first 72 hours after admission. Surgical site infections, abdominal wall procedures, peritoneal dialysis catheters, and patients with admissions in the prior month were excluded. To identify the factors associated with resistance, we considered the resistance to the regimen recommended at our institution, ampicillin/sulbactam (AMS) plus ciprofloxacin (CIP). Results: There were 119 patients with 133 isolates, 59% women, and mean age 54 years. The main sources of infection were appendicitis (38%) and cholecystitis (20%), with 64 patients presenting a complicated IAI (cIAI), defined by the presence of peritonitis (55%). Resistance in Enterobacteriaceae was AMS 32% (6.4% intermediate resistance), CIP 31%, cefotaxime 9%, piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ) 3%, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 32%, gentamicin 9.5%, and amikacin 2%. Considering all patients, resistance to AMS + CIP was 16.8%. Factors associated with resistant to this regimen was, by univariable and multivariable analysis, the presence of diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR] 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-11.6; p = 0.03). Female gender (OR 2.7; CI 0.9-8.4; p = 0.08) and complicated IAI (OR 2.0; CI 0.7-5.4; p = 0.17) were associated with resistance but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: High resistance to CIP and AMS was observed. Although the combination of AMS + CIP offers coverage for 84% of patients, PTZ should be considered as an option for patients with severe infections or diabetes mellitus. Finding factors associated with antibiotic resistance could help to select empirical therapy for CA IAIs better.

Assuntos

RESUMO

En los últimos años se han desarrollado nuevos antimicrobianos destinados a combatir infecciones causadas por microorganismos multirresistentes a drogas (MDR), incluyendo combinaciones entre agentes ß-lactámicos (BL) e inhibidores de ß-lactamasas (IBL). En nuestro país se encuentran disponibles dos nuevas combinaciones de BL/IBL: ceftolozano/tazobactam (C/T) y ceftazidima/avibactam (CAZ/AVI). La adición de tazobactam a ceftolozano incrementa la actividad in vitro contra microorganismos productores de BL de espectro extendido (BLEE), por lo que la combinación presenta una potente actividad intrínseca frente a P. aeruginosa. Por su parte, CAZ/AVI conserva las características que definen el perfil de actividad de ceftazidima, por lo que con el agregado de avibactam presenta una potente actividad inhibidora frente a las BLEE y carbapenemasas (KPC, ß-lactamasas de clase C y algunas de clase D). Se presenta a continuación una revisión de la evidencia publicada. A partir de la misma, y considerando la situación actual de tasas crecientes de resistencia antimicrobiana, particularmente en bacilos Gram negativos, se considera que el uso de C/T o CAZ/AVI constituye una excelente alternativa para el manejo de infecciones graves causadas por microorganismos multirresistentes. Sin embargo, su utilización en forma empírica no es recomendable, salvo en situaciones puntuales y estrictamente seleccionadas, y en el contexto un programa de uso racional de antibióticos, bajo el control por parte del equipo de infectología responsable

In recent years, new antimicrobials have been developed to combat infections caused by multidrug-resistant microorganism (MDR), including combinations between ß-lactam agents (BL) and ß-lactamase inhibitors (IBL). Two new combinations of BL / IBL are available in our country: ceftolozano / tazobactam (C / T) and ceftazidime / avibactam (CAZ / AVI). The addition of tazobactam to ceftolozano increases in vitro activity against microorganisms producing extended spectrum BL (ESBL), so the combination has a potent intrinsic activity against P. aeruginosa. For its part, CAZ / AVI retains the characteristics that define the activity profile of ceftazidime, to which with the addition of avibactam it presents a potent inhibitory activity against ESBL and carbapenemases (KPC, ß-lactamases of class C and some of class D). A review of the published evidence is presented below. Based on this, and considering the current situation of increasing rates of antimicrobial resistance, particularly in Gram-negative bacilli, we consider that the use of C/T or CAZ/AVI is an excellent alternative for the management of serious infections caused by multi-resistant microorganisms. However, its use empirically is not recommended, except in specific and strictly selected situations, and in the context of a program for the rational use of antibiotics, under the control of the responsible infectious disease team

Assuntos

RESUMO

A high prevalence of invasive candidiasis has been reported in recent years. Patients admitted to an intensive care unit are at the highest risk for invasive candidiasis, mostly due to the severity of their disease, immune-suppressive states, prolonged length of stay, broad-spectrum antibiotics, septic shock, and Candida colonization. Intraabdominal candidiasis comprises a range of clinical manifestations, from just the suspicion based on clinical scenario to fever, leukocytosis, increase in biomarkers to the isolation of the responsible microorganism. In critically ill patients with IAC prompt treatment and adequate source control remains the ultimate goal.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Antimicrobial resistance is an increasing worldwide concern, which poses unique challenges for the effective prevention and treatment of several infections, especially the ones triggered by organisms producing extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL). Here, we present the surveillance results of the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) of Gram-negative bacilli isolated from intra-abdominal infections (IAI, n = 1,235) and urinary-tract infections (UTI, n = 2,682), collected in Mexico from 2009 to 2015. Susceptibility and ESBL status were determined according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method. Both E. coli (57%) and K. pneumoniae (12%) were the most frequently reported organisms, as well as the ones with the highest prevalence of ESBL-producing isolates (54% and 39%, respectively). The overall prevalence of ESBL-producing organisms was higher in nosocomial infections than in community-acquired infections (21% vs. 27%). The ESBL rates were 36% for IAI (953/2,682) and 37% for UTI (461/1,235). In addition, ertapenem, imipenem and amikacin were the antibiotics that mostly preserved bacterial susceptibility. Our results show consistency with global trends, although higher than the rates observed in Latin America.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (CIAIs) and complicated urinary tract infections (CUTIs) with meta-analysis method. METHOD: We included six randomized clinical trials identified from Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, "ISRCTN Register" and "ClinicalTrials.gov" which compared ceftazidime-avibactam with comparison group. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software version 5.3. RESULTS: Ceftazidime-avibactam versus active comparisons demonstrated a statistically significant higher rate of microbiological response success on microbiological evaluable populations at the test-of-cure visit (95CI 1.10-2.38, p=0.02) and late-follow-up visit (95CI 1.09-2.23, p=0.02) for the treatment of CUTIs. Ceftazidime-avibactam versus active comparisons demonstrated a statistically significant higher rate of microbiological response success on EME populations at the test-of-cure visit (95CI 1.08-4.27, p=0.03) and late-follow-up visit (OR=1.75, 95CI 1.33-2.29, p<0.0001) for the treatment of CUTIs. Similar results were obtained at the late-follow-up visit (OR = 1.58, 95CI 1.26-1.97, p<0.0001) on microbiologically modified intent-to-treat (mMITT) populations for the treatment of CUTIs. We can find better eradication rates for E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae based on mMITT populations. In terms of AEs, SAEs and mortality, ceftazidime-avibactam had a safety and tolerability profile broadly similar to the comparison group. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides evidence of the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam as a potential alternative for the treatment of patients with CUTIs, and CIAIs.

Assuntos