RESUMO
Dolutegravir (DTG) has shown effectiveness in combination with rilpivirine in with experience of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and with 3TC in naïve patients (GEMINI trial). The main objectives of this real-life study were to analyze the effectiveness and safety of 3TC plus DTG in virologically suppressed HIV-1 patients and to conduct a pharmacoeconomic analysis.We conducted an observational, retrospective and multicenter study of HIV+ patients pretreated for at least 6 months with ART that was then simplified to 3TC + DTG for any reason. We gathered data on viral loads (VLs) during exposure to the DT, calculating the rate with VL < 50âcopies/mL at week 48, and on associated adverse effects.The 177 HIV+ patients were collected, 77.4% male, with average age of 48.5 years and mean count of 252.2cell/µL CD4+ nadir lymphocytes; 96.6% had VL < 50âcopies/mL and 674âcells/µL CD4+ lymphocytes. Median time since HIV diagnosis was 15 years, and median ART duration was 13 years, and 34.5% of patients were on mono- or dual-therapy before the switch. At week 48, 82.4% of patients had VL < 50âcop/µL using an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, 89.6% according to mITT, and 96.7% according to Per-Protocol analysis. 3.3% patients had virological failure (VF). These effectiveness data and costs were compared with those for 2 reference triple therapies (DTG/ABC/3TC and EVG/cobi/FTC/TAF) in a cost minimization analysis, showing cost savings with administration of DTG+3TC (2741â&OV0556;/year vs DTG/ABC/3TC and 4164â&OV0556;/year vs EVG/cobi/FTC/TAF) and in a cost-effectiveness analysis, finding the DT to be the most cost-effective approach (ICERâ=â-548 vs DTG/ABC/3TC and ICERâ=â-4,627&OV0556; vs EVG/cobi/FTC/TAF)The combination of 3TC with DTG appears to be a safe and effective option for the simplification of ART in pretreated and virologically stable HIV-positive patients, being cost-effective and offering the same effectiveness as the triple therapy it replaces.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos Heterocíclicos com 3 Anéis/uso terapêutico , Lamivudina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Anti-HIV/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Anti-HIV/economia , Contagem de Linfócito CD4 , Análise Custo-Benefício , Quimioterapia Combinada , Farmacoeconomia , Honorários Farmacêuticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , HIV-1 , Compostos Heterocíclicos com 3 Anéis/administração & dosagem , Compostos Heterocíclicos com 3 Anéis/efeitos adversos , Compostos Heterocíclicos com 3 Anéis/economia , Humanos , Lamivudina/administração & dosagem , Lamivudina/efeitos adversos , Lamivudina/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxazinas , Piperazinas , Piridonas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carga ViralRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different drug therapies for chronic hepatitis B in adult patients. METHODS: Using a Markov model, a hypothetical cohort of 40 years for HBeAg-positive or HBeAg-negative patients was constructed. Adefovir, entecavir, tenofovir and lamivudine (with rescue therapy in cases of viral resistance) were compared for treating adult patients with chronic hepatitis B undergoing treatment for the first time, with high levels of alanine aminotransferase, no evidence of cirrhosis and without HIV co-infection. Values for cost and effect were obtained from the literature, and expressed in effect on life years (LY). A discount rate of 5% was applied. Univariate sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess model uncertainties. RESULTS: Initial treatment with entecavir or tenofovir showed better clinical outcomes. The lowest cost-effectiveness ratio was for entecavir in HBeAg-positive patients (R$ 4,010.84/LY) and lamivudine for HBeAg-negative patients (R$ 6,205.08/LY). For HBeAg-negative patients, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of entecavir (R$ 14,101.05/LY) is below the threshold recommended by the World Health Organization. Sensitivity analysis showed that variation in the cost of drugs may make tenofovir a cost-effective alternative for both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: Entecavir is the recommended alternative to start treating patients with chronic hepatitis B in Brazil. However, if there is a reduction in the cost of tenofovir, it can become a cost-effective alternative.
Assuntos
Antivirais/economia , Hepatite B Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Adenina/economia , Adenina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Antivirais/classificação , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Brasil , Análise Custo-Benefício , Progressão da Doença , Guanina/análogos & derivados , Guanina/economia , Guanina/uso terapêutico , Vírus da Hepatite B , Humanos , Lamivudina/economia , Lamivudina/uso terapêutico , Cadeias de Markov , Organofosfonatos/economia , Organofosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Tenofovir , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The aim of this study was to conduct a cost-utility study of adefovir, entecavir, interferon alpha, pegylated interferon alpha, lamivudine and tenofovir for chronic hepatitis B in the context of Brazilian Public Health Care System. A systematic review was carried out for efficacy and safety. Another review was performed to collect utility data and transition probabilities between health states. A Markov model was developed in a time horizon of 40 years with annual cycles for three groups of: HBeAg positive, HBeAg negative, and all patients. These strategies were compared to a fourth group that received no treatment. Discount rates of 5% were applied and sensitivity analyses were performed. Tenofovir offered the best cost-utility ratio for the three evaluated models: U$397, U$385 and U$384 (per QALY, respectively, for HBeAg positive, negative, and all patients). All other strategies were completely dominated because they showed higher costs and lower effectiveness than tenofovir. The sequence of cost-utility in the three models was: tenofovir, entecavir, lamivudine, adefovir, telbivudine, pegylated interferon alpha, and interferon alpha. In the sensitivity analysis, adefovir showed lower cost-utility than telbivudine in some situations. The study has some limitations, primarily related to the creation of scenarios and modeling. In this study, tenofovir presented the best cost-utility ratio. The results obtained in this study will be valuable in decision-making and in the review of the clinical protocol, mainly involving the allocation of available resources for health care.
Assuntos
Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Antivirais/economia , Antígenos E da Hepatite B/sangue , Hepatite B Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Adenina/economia , Adenina/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Brasil , Análise Custo-Benefício , Quimioterapia Combinada/economia , Guanina/análogos & derivados , Guanina/economia , Guanina/uso terapêutico , Interferon-alfa/economia , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Lamivudina/economia , Lamivudina/uso terapêutico , Cadeias de Markov , Organofosfonatos/economia , Organofosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Polietilenoglicóis/economia , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Recombinantes/economia , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJETIVO Avaliar o custo-efetividade de diferentes tratamentos medicamentosos para hepatite B crônica entre pacientes adultos. MÉTODOS Utilizando modelo de Markov, construiu-se coorte hipotética de 40 anos para pacientes HBeAg-positivo ou HBeAg-negativo. Foram comparados os usos de adefovir, entecavir, tenofovir e lamivudina (com terapia de resgate em caso de resistência viral) para tratamento de pacientes adultos com hepatite B crônica, virgens de tratamento, com elevados níveis de alanina aminotransferase, sem evidência de cirrose e sem coinfecção por HIV. Valores para custo e efeito foram obtidos da literatura. A medida do efeito foi expressa em anos de vida ganhos (AVG). Taxa de desconto de 5% foi aplicada. Análise de sensibilidade univariada foi conduzida para avaliar incertezas do modelo. RESULTADOS O tratamento inicial com entecavir ou tenofovir apresentou melhores resultados clínicos. As menores razões custo-efetividade foram de entecavir para pacientes HBeAg-positivo (R$ 4.010,84/AVG) e lamivudina para pacientes HBeAg-negativo (R$ 6.205,08/AVG). Para pacientes HBeAg-negativo, a razão custo-efetividade incremental de entecavir (R$ 14.101,05/AVG) está abaixo do limiar recomendado pela Organização Mundial da Saúde. Análise de sensibilidade mostrou que variação nos custos dos medicamentos pode tornar tenofovir alternativa custo-efetiva tanto para pacientes HBeAg-positivo quanto para HBeAg-negativo. CONCLUSÕES Entecavir é alternativa recomendada para iniciar o tratamento de pacientes com hepatite B crônica no Brasil. Contudo, se houver redução no custo de tenofovir, esta pode se tornar alternativa mais custo-efetiva. .
OBJETIVO Evaluar el costo-efectividad de diferentes tratamientos medicamentosos para hepatitis B crónica entre pacientes adultos. MÉTODOS Utilizando el modelo de Markov, se construyó cohorte hipotética de 40 años para pacientes HBeAg-positivo o HBeAg-negativo. Se compararon los usos de adefovir, entecavir, tenofovir y lamivudina (con terapia de rescate en caso de resistencia viral) para tratamiento de pacientes adultos con hepatitis B crónica, vírgenes de tratamiento, con elevados niveles de alanina aminotransferasa, sin evidencia de cirrosis y sin coinfección por VIH. Valores para costo y efecto fueron obtenidos de la literatura y efecto en años de vida ganados (AVG). Tasa de descuento de 5% fue aplicada. Análisis de sensibilidad univariado fue conducido para evaluar incertidumbres del modelo. RESULTADOS El tratamiento inicial con entecavir o tenofovir presentó mejores resultados clínicos. Los menores cocientes costo-efectividad fueron de entecavir para pacientes HBeAg-positivo (R.010,84/AVG) y lamivudina para pacientes HBeAg-negativo (R.205,08/AVG).Para pacientes HBeAg-negativo, el cociente costo-efectividad incrementado de entecavir (R.101,05/AVG) está por debajo del límite recomendado por la Organización Mundial de la Salud. El análisis de sensibilidad mostró que la variación en los costos de los medicamentos puede tornar tenofovir una alternativa costo-efectiva tanto para pacientes HBeAg-positivo como para los HBeAg-negativo. CONCLUSIONES Entecavir es una alternativa recomendada para iniciar el tratamiento de pacientes con hepatitis B crónica en Brasil. Sin embargo, al haber reducción en el costo de tenofovir, éste puede convertirse en una alternativa más costo-efectiva. .
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different drug therapies for chronic hepatitis B in adult patients. METHODS Using a Markov model, a hypothetical cohort of 40 years for HBeAg-positive or HBeAg-negative patients was constructed. Adefovir, entecavir, tenofovir and lamivudine (with rescue therapy in cases of viral resistance) were compared for treating adult patients with chronic hepatitis B undergoing treatment for the first time, with high levels of alanine aminotransferase, no evidence of cirrhosis and without HIV co-infection. Values for cost and effect were obtained from the literature, and expressed in effect on life years (LY). A discount rate of 5% was applied. Univariate sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess model uncertainties. RESULTS Initial treatment with entecavir or tenofovir showed better clinical outcomes. The lowest cost-effectiveness ratio was for entecavir in HBeAg-positive patients (R$ 4,010.84/LY) and lamivudine for HBeAg-negative patients (R$ 6,205.08/LY). For HBeAg-negative patients, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of entecavir (R$ 14,101.05/LY) is below the threshold recommended by the World Health Organization. Sensitivity analysis showed that variation in the cost of drugs may make tenofovir a cost-effective alternative for both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS Entecavir is the recommended alternative to start treating patients with chronic hepatitis B in Brazil. However, if there is a reduction in the cost of tenofovir, it can become a cost-effective alternative. .
Assuntos
Adulto , Humanos , Antivirais/economia , Hepatite B Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Adenina/economia , Adenina/uso terapêutico , Análise de Variância , Antivirais/classificação , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Brasil , Análise Custo-Benefício , Progressão da Doença , Guanina/análogos & derivados , Guanina/economia , Guanina/uso terapêutico , Vírus da Hepatite B , Lamivudina/economia , Lamivudina/uso terapêutico , Cadeias de Markov , Organofosfonatos/economia , Organofosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The aim of this study was to conduct a cost-utility study of adefovir, entecavir, interferon alpha, pegylated interferon alpha, lamivudine and tenofovir for chronic hepatitis B in the context of Brazilian Public Health Care System. A systematic review was carried out for efficacy and safety. Another review was performed to collect utility data and transition probabilities between health states. A Markov model was developed in a time horizon of 40 years with annual cycles for three groups of: HBeAg positive, HBeAg negative, and all patients. These strategies were compared to a fourth group that received no treatment. Discount rates of 5% were applied and sensitivity analyses were performed. Tenofovir offered the best cost-utility ratio for the three evaluated models: U$397, U$385 and U$384 (per QALY, respectively, for HBeAg positive, negative, and all patients). All other strategies were completely dominated because they showed higher costs and lower effectiveness than tenofovir. The sequence of cost-utility in the three models was: tenofovir, entecavir, lamivudine, adefovir, telbivudine, pegylated interferon alpha, and interferon alpha. In the sensitivity analysis, adefovir showed lower cost-utility than telbivudine in some situations. The study has some limitations, primarily related to the creation of scenarios and modeling. In this study, tenofovir presented the best cost-utility ratio. The results obtained in this study will be valuable in decision-making and in the review of the clinical protocol, mainly involving the allocation of available resources for health care.
Assuntos
Antivirais/economia , Antígenos E da Hepatite B/sangue , Hepatite B Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Adenina/economia , Adenina/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Brasil , Análise Custo-Benefício , Quimioterapia Combinada/economia , Feminino , Guanina/análogos & derivados , Guanina/economia , Guanina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Interferon-alfa/economia , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Lamivudina/economia , Lamivudina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Organofosfonatos/economia , Organofosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Polietilenoglicóis/economia , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Recombinantes/economia , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , TenofovirRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether costs of multidose antiretroviral regimens (MD-ARVs), including highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), for prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV might be offset by savings gained from treating fewer perinatally acquired infections. METHODS: Rates of MTCT reported in the Dominican Republic among mother-infant pairs treated with single-dose nevirapine (SD-NVP; n=39) and MD-ARVs (n=91) for PMTCT were compared. Annual births to women infected with HIV were estimated from seroprevalence studies. Antiretroviral costs for both PMTCT and for HAART during the first 2 years of life (in cases of perinatal infection) were based on 2008 low-income country price estimates. RESULTS: Rates of MTCT were 3.3% and 15.4% for the MD-ARV and SD-NVP groups, respectively (P=0.02). Assuming that 5775 of 231 000 annual births (2.5%) were to HIV-positive women, it was estimated that 191 perinatally acquired infections would occur using MD-ARVs and 889 using SD-NVP. High costs of maternal MD-ARVs (HAART, US$914,760 versus SD-NVP, $1155) would be offset by lower 2-year HAART costs ($250,344 versus $1,168,272 for infants in the SD-NVP group) for the lower number of children with prenatally acquired infection (191 versus 889) associated with the use of MD-ARVs for PMTCT (net national saving $3168). CONCLUSION: Despite the high costs, use of MD-ARVs, such as HAART, for PMTCT offer societal savings because fewer perinatally acquired infections are anticipated to require treatment.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Benzoxazinas/uso terapêutico , Infecções por HIV/transmissão , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Lamivudina/uso terapêutico , Nevirapina/uso terapêutico , Zidovudina/uso terapêutico , Alcinos , Fármacos Anti-HIV/economia , Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade , Benzoxazinas/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Ciclopropanos , República Dominicana , Esquema de Medicação , Custos de Medicamentos , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/economia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/economia , Lamivudina/economia , Nevirapina/economia , Gravidez , Segundo Trimestre da Gravidez , Terceiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Zidovudina/economiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-effectiveness evaluation from the perspective of the Brazilian National Health System of alternatives strategies (i.e., conventional interferon, pegylated interferon, and lamivudine) for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B who present elevated aminotransferase levels and no evidence of cirrhosis at the beginning of treatment. METHODS: A Markov model was developed for chronic hepatitis B (hepatitis B antigen e [HBeAg] positive and negative) with 40 years' time horizon. Costs and benefits were discounted at 5%. Annual rates of disease progression, costs due to complications, and the efficacy of medicines were obtained from the literature. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis evaluated uncertainties. RESULTS: For HBeAg positive patients, peginterferon (48 weeks) resulted in an increase of 0.21 discounted life-years gained compared to interferon (24 weeks). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) converted to US dollars using the 2009 purchasing power parity conversion factor was US$100,752.24 per life-year gained. For HBeAg negative patients, it was observed that interferon (48 weeks) compared with long-term lamivudine presented an increase of 0.45 discounted life-years gained and ICER of US$15,766.90 per life-year gained. In the sensitivity analysis, the ICER was more sensitive to variation in the probability of transition from chronic hepatitis B to compensated cirrhosis, discount rate, and medicine prices. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve for HBeAg positive (pegylated interferon vs. conventional interferon) and negative (conventional interferon vs. lamivudine) showed that conventional interferon was cost-effective until three times the gross domestic product per capita. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with chronic hepatitis B with elevated aminotransferase levels in the pretreatment and no cirrhosis who were HBeAg positive, pegylated interferon (48 weeks) provided more life-years gained when compared to conventional interferon (24 weeks), and the ICER surpasses the country's buying power, which makes conventional interferon the chosen alternative. For HBeAg negative patients, conventional interferon (48 weeks) compared to lamivudine provided more life-years gained at a favorable ICER.
Assuntos
Antivirais/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , Hepatite B Crônica/economia , Interferons/economia , Lamivudina/economia , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Adulto , Alanina Transaminase/sangue , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores/sangue , Brasil , Análise Custo-Benefício , Progressão da Doença , Produto Interno Bruto , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite B/sangue , Antígenos E da Hepatite B/imunologia , Hepatite B Crônica/complicações , Hepatite B Crônica/diagnóstico , Hepatite B Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Interferons/uso terapêutico , Lamivudina/uso terapêutico , Cadeias de Markov , Modelos Econômicos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Chronic hepatitis B is a highly prevalent disease worldwide, leading to serious consequences if not properly treated. Six treatment options for chronic hepatitis B are currently provided by the Brazilian public health system. Telbivudine is a nucleoside analogue that is neither included in the Brazilian clinical protocol nor in the therapeutic guidelines for chronic hepatitis B. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of telbivudine for the viewpoint of the Brazilian public system, comparing it to lamivudine. METHODS: A Markov model was used to project lifetime complications and costs of treatment with lamivudine or telbivudine for chronic hepatitis B in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. To evaluate disease progression, probabilities and utilities of virologic response, virologic resistance, compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, treatment, interruption of treatment, death and seroconversion were collected in systematic reviews. Costs were collected in DATASUS, ABC da Saúde and scientific literature. RESULTS: Higher rate of virologic response and seroconversion was obtained with telbivudine, and also higher values of quality adjusted life years. However lamivudine is associated with lower costs and also lower cost-effectiveness values. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for telbivudine, when compared with lamivudine, were US$ 30,575 and US$ 40,457, respectively for HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. CONCLUSION: In chronic hepatitis B lamivudine is a more cost-effective or even cost-saving strategy when compared with telbivudine.
Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepatite B Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Lamivudina/uso terapêutico , Nucleosídeos/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinonas/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Transcriptase Reversa/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Hepatite B Crônica/economia , Humanos , Lamivudina/economia , Nucleosídeos/economia , Pirimidinonas/economia , Inibidores da Transcriptase Reversa/economia , Telbivudina , Timidina/análogos & derivadosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Chronic hepatitis B is a highly prevalent disease worldwide, leading to serious consequences if not properly treated. Six treatment options for chronic hepatitis B are currently provided by the Brazilian public health system. Telbivudine is a nucleoside analogue that is neither included in the Brazilian clinical protocol nor in the therapeutic guidelines for chronic hepatitis B. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of telbivudine for the viewpoint of the Brazilian public system, comparing it to lamivudine. METHODS: A Markov model was used to project lifetime complications and costs of treatment with lamivudine or telbivudine for chronic hepatitis B in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. To evaluate disease progression, probabilities and utilities of virologic response, virologic resistance, compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, treatment, interruption of treatment, death and seroconversion were collected in systematic reviews. Costs were collected in DATASUS, ABC da Saúde and scientific literature. RESULTS: Higher rate of virologic response and seroconversion was obtained with telbivudine, and also higher values of quality adjusted life years. However lamivudine is associated with lower costs and also lower cost-effectiveness values. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for telbivudine, when compared with lamivudine, were US$ 30,575 and US$ 40,457, respectively for HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. CONCLUSION: In chronic hepatitis B lamivudine is a more cost-effective or even cost-saving strategy when compared with telbivudine.
Assuntos
Humanos , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepatite B Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Lamivudina/uso terapêutico , Nucleosídeos/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinonas/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Transcriptase Reversa/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Hepatite B Crônica/economia , Lamivudina/economia , Nucleosídeos/economia , Pirimidinonas/economia , Inibidores da Transcriptase Reversa/economiaRESUMO
Hepatitis B virus infection is an important public-health issue. Chronic patients have a higher risk of death due to complications, which increases health-care expenses in. Cost-effectiveness analysis of entecavir (ETV) versus lamivudine (LVD) for treatment of chronic hepatitis B, in e antigen (AgHBe)-positive and negative patients, based on two phase 3, controlled and randomized studies. A decision analysis model was developed, using the following endpoints: cost per patient with undetectable viral load and cost per quality life year (QALY) gained. Risks for complications (compensated or decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma) were based on the cohort study REVEAL, published in 2006. The REVEAL parameters were applied to the results of the viral load levels obtained from the clinical assay data. The complication costs were based on a study of the disease cost conducted in Brazil, in 2005. The cost data were obtained predominantly from Sistema Único de Saúde [SUS - Brazilian public health system] payment tables and drug price lists. The utility data were obtained from literature and life expectancy information was based on IBGE data. The analysis perspective was that of SUS. A discount rate of 3 percent per year was used. For the horizon of time of 10 years, the ETV had an incremental cost of approximately two million Brazilian Reais (R$) compared to LVD. Reducing the number of complications, ETV treatment reduced costs by around 3 million, reducing final costs by 1 million, for AgHBe-positive patients. ETV also reduced the incremental cost per QALY gained. ETV was found to be the most cost-effective alternative for AgHBe-positive and negative patients.