Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.096
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent ; 32(3): 326-334, 2024 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39038187

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study focused on verifying the influence of different ambient light conditions on the accuracy and precision of models obtained from digital scans. METHODOLOGY: To measure the tested illuminances: chair light/reflector; room light, and natural light at the time of scanning, a luxmeter was used. From the STL file, nine experimental groups were formed. RESULTS: Of the nine specific combinations between the three IOS and the three types of lighting, it was verified that for all of them, as well as the ICC, the accuracy was also excellent, in which the measured values were not significantly influenced by the IOS brand (p = 0.994) nor by the type of lighting (p = 0.996). For precision data, GLM indicated a statistically significant interaction between IOS and lighting type. Under LS, accuracy was significantly higher with 3Shape® than with CS 3600 CareStream®, which had significantly higher accuracy than Virtuo Vivo™ Straumann®. CONCLUSIONS: The models obtained with the three IOS evaluated exhibited excellent accuracy under the different illuminance tested and the 3Shape® under the three illuminance conditions was the device that presented the best precision, specifically when using LC and LS.


Assuntos
Iluminação , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Modelos Dentários , Luz , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
2.
Dental Press J Orthod ; 29(3): e2423117, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38985074

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to clinically compare the accuracy of bracket positioning between three-dimensionally (3D) printed indirect bonding trays and vacuum-formed trays made over 3D-printed models. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fourteen patients, planned for fixed orthodontic therapy, were randomly divided into two equal groups. For both groups, both dental arches were scanned, to acquire virtual models, brackets were virtually positioned from central incisors to second premolars, and scans for the final bracket positions were performed. In the first group, transfer trays were 3D-printed. In the second group, virtual models were 3D-printed, and vacuum-formed soft sheets were thermoformed on the printed model. Teeth were indirectly bonded and then scanned. Superimposition of the virtual and the final bracket positioning scans was performed to measure linear and angular deviations in brackets positions. RESULTS: The first group showed significantly less occlusogingival and buccolingual linear errors than the second group. No significant differences in angular deviations were found between both groups. The frequencies of clinically acceptable linear errors within 0.5 mm and angular errors within 2° showed no statistically significant difference between both groups (p> 0.05 for all measurements). The transfer errors in both groups showed linear directional biases toward the mesial, gingival and labial directions. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of immediate debonding between both groups (10.7% and 7.1% for the first and the second groups, respectively, p=0.295). CONCLUSIONS: 3D-printed indirect bonding trays were more accurate than vacuum-formed trays, in terms of linear deviations. Both types of trays showed similar angular control.


Assuntos
Colagem Dentária , Braquetes Ortodônticos , Impressão Tridimensional , Humanos , Colagem Dentária/métodos , Modelos Dentários , Feminino , Vácuo , Masculino , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Dente Pré-Molar/diagnóstico por imagem
3.
Dental Press J Orthod ; 29(3): e2423159, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38985075

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Extraction vs. non-extraction is a crucial decision in orthodontic therapy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the changes in the dental arch width and buccal corridor after orthodontic treatment using extraction and non-extraction therapy with Damon self-ligating system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study consisted of 35 patients (20 female and 15 male patients with median age of 12.5 years), treated by extracting 4 or 2 premolars, and 37 patients (16 female and 21 male patients with the median age of 12.8 years), treated without premolar extraction. Both groups were treated with Damon self-ligating system. Plaster models before (T0) and after (T1) treatment were measured, and the arch width values were determined at the level of the first molars, second premolars, canines and palatal rugae. Buccal corridor width was measured using the extraoral images at T0 and T1. Paired t-test was used for the analysis of the normally distributed data, and Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney U test was used for the data with non-normal distribution. Values of p<0.05 were set as statistically significant. RESULTS: The upper intercanine width increased significantly in both groups (p<0.01). In the non-extraction group, the arch width increased significantly in the maxillary second premolar and first molar region (p<0.01) as well as in the region of the canines (p=0.04), second premolars (p=0.01) and first molars (p<0.01) of the mandible. The buccal corridor decreased significantly in the non-extraction group (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Premolar extraction in combination with Damon self-ligating system did not lead to reduction of the dental arch width in the maxilla, nor did it increase the size of the buccal corridors.


Assuntos
Dente Pré-Molar , Arco Dental , Modelos Dentários , Extração Dentária , Humanos , Arco Dental/anatomia & histologia , Masculino , Dente Pré-Molar/cirurgia , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Criança , Adolescente , Desenho de Aparelho Ortodôntico , Cefalometria , Dente Molar , Braquetes Ortodônticos , Dente Canino , Ortodontia Corretiva/métodos , Técnicas de Movimentação Dentária/métodos , Técnicas de Movimentação Dentária/instrumentação , Aparelhos Ortodônticos Fixos
4.
Dental Press J Orthod ; 29(2): e2423253, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865515

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a customized distalizer with Variety SP® screws anchored on palatal miniscrews for upper molar distalization. METHODS: Seventeen patients aged between 12.5 and 24 years underwent distalization with a customized distalizer. Lateral cephalogram and cast analysis were performed before and after distalization. Linear and angular parameters of the upper first molar, first premolar, and central incisor were assessed. RESULTS: Distalization with the force passing near the center of resistance (CRes) of the upper first molars resulted in distal movement, with minimal distal tipping (2.8 ±â€Š0.45°, p< 0.05). However, distalization passing occlusal to the CRes led to greater distal tipping (13.6 ±â€Š1.63°, p< 0.05). Statistically significant spontaneous distal tipping and distal movement of the upper first premolars occurred, with a mean of 6.2 ±â€Š1.24° (p< 0.05) and 0.68 ±â€Š0.34 mm (p< 0.05), respectively. The positional change of the upper central incisors presented a mean of -0.23 ±â€Š0.1 mm (p> 0.05) and 2.65 ±â€Š1.1° (p< 0.05). Upper first molar intrusion was statistically significant, with a mean of 0.88 ±â€Š0.2 mm (p< 0.05). Upper right and left first molars rotation towards palatal midline presented mean of 4.1 ±â€Š0.19° (p< 0.05) and 3.4  ±â€Š0.1° (p< 0.05), respectively. Additionally, the distance between upper right and left first molars increased significantly, with a mean of 2.54 ±â€Š0.01 mm (p< 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study successfully demonstrated the efficiency of molar distalization without anchorage loss using a customized distalizer anchored on palatal miniscrews.


Assuntos
Parafusos Ósseos , Cefalometria , Dente Molar , Procedimentos de Ancoragem Ortodôntica , Desenho de Aparelho Ortodôntico , Técnicas de Movimentação Dentária , Humanos , Técnicas de Movimentação Dentária/instrumentação , Técnicas de Movimentação Dentária/métodos , Procedimentos de Ancoragem Ortodôntica/instrumentação , Procedimentos de Ancoragem Ortodôntica/métodos , Adolescente , Criança , Adulto Jovem , Feminino , Masculino , Maxila/cirurgia , Dente Pré-Molar , Incisivo , Modelos Dentários
5.
J. oral res. (Impresa) ; 13(1): 136-149, mayo 29, 2024. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1563412

RESUMO

Background: Denture adhesives are alternatives used to improve retention, stability, comfort and satisfaction in patients with complete dentures. Evidence on the effectiveness of denture adhesives on resorbed mandibular ridges is scarce. Among the many commercially available denture adhesives, the ideal material for the severely resorbed mandibular ridge remains in dispute. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different quantities of four commercially available denture adhesives on the retention of mandibular complete dentures in severely resorbed ridges. Materials and Methods: A resorbed edentulous mandibular ridge model was manufactured in acrylic resin. A denture base was made and three loops were attached to it. Four commercially available denture adhesives (Fixodent, Perlie White, Fiftydent and Polident) were tested in amounts of 0.2 g, 0.4 g, 0.6 g, 0.8 g and 1.0 g. The acrylic resin model was evenly moistened with 1 ml of water and a weighted amount of adhesive material was applied to the denture base. The universal testing machine engaged the loops fixed on the denture base and applied the vertical displacement force. The maximum vertical displacement force values were recorded for each denture adhesive material at different amounts. Statistical calculation was performed using Kruskal Wallis with Bonferroni post hoc correction. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in the mean values of the vertical displacement force for adhesive amounts of 0.2 g, 0.4 g, 0.6 g and 1.0 g (p<0.05) between the four adhesive materials tested. Statistically significant differences were observed when four denture adhesives were compared to each other in different amounts (p<0.05). Statistically significant differences were observed between different amounts for each of four denture adhesives (p<0.05). Conclusions: Among the four materials tested, Polident showed greater effectiveness at 0.6 g and 0.8 g, Fittydent at 0.6 g, 0.8 g and 1 g, Fixodent at 0.4 g and 0.6 g and Perlie White at 1 g and 0.8g quantity to resist vertical displacement. forces on the severely resorbed mandibular crest. Using an appropriate amount of denture adhesive allows for proper retention of the denture; Replacement of this adhesive is necessary once a day.


Introducción: Los adhesivos para prótesis dentales son alternativas utilizadas para mejorar la retención, la estabilidad, la comodidad y la satisfacción en los pacientes con prótesis completas. La evidencia sobre la efectividad de los adhesivos para prótesis dentales en los rebordes mandibulares reabsorbidos es escasa. Entre los muchos adhesivos para prótesis dentales disponibles comercialmente, sigue estando en disputa cuál es el material ideal para el reborde mandibular severamente reabsorbido. Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la efectividad de diferentes cantidades de cuatro adhesivos para prótesis dentales disponibles comercialmente sobre la retención de prótesis dentales completas mandibulares en reborde mandibular reabsorbido severamente. Materiales y Métodos: Se fabricó un modelo de reborde mandibular edéntulo reabsorbido en resina acrílica. Se hizo una base para la prótesis y se le colocaron tres bucles. Se probaron cuatro adhesivos para dentaduras postizas disponibles comercialmente (Fixodent, Perlie White, Fiftydent y Polident) en cantidades de 0,2 g, 0,4 g, 0,6 g, 0,8 g y 1,0 g. El modelo de resina acrílica se humedeció uniformemente con 1 ml de agua y se aplicó la cantidad correspondiente de material adhesivo sobre la base de la dentadura. La máquina de prueba universal enganchó los bucles fijados en la base de la dentadura postiza y aplicó la fuerza de desplazamiento vertical. Se registraron los valores máximos de fuerza de desplazamiento vertical para cada material adhesivo para dentaduras postizas en diferentes cantidades. El cálculo estadístico se realizó utilizando Kruskal Wallis con corrección post hoc de Bonferroni. Resultado: Se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en los valores medios de la fuerza de desplazamiento vertical para cantidades de 0,2 g, 0,4 g, 0,6 g y 1,0 g (p<0,05) entre los cuatro materiales adhesivos para prótesis dentales probados. Se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas cuando se compararon cuatro adhesivos para prótesis dentales entre sí en diferentes cantidades (p<0,05). Se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre diferentes cantidades en los cuatro adhesivos para prótesis (p<0,05). Conclusión: De los cuatro materiales probados, Polident mostró mayor efectividad a 0,6 g y 0,8 g, Fittydent a 0,6 g, 0,8 g y 1 g, Fixodent a 0,4 g y 0,6 g y Perlie White a 1 g y 0,8 g para resistir fuerzas de desplazamiento vertical en la cresta mandibular severamente reabsorbida. El uso de una cantidad adecuada de adhesivo para dentaduras postizas permite una retención adecuada de la dentadura postiza; El reemplazo de este adhesivo es necesario una vez al día.


Assuntos
Humanos , Adesivos/uso terapêutico , Retenção de Dentadura/métodos , Planejamento de Dentadura , Prótese Dentária/métodos , Modelos Dentários , Prótese Total , Mandíbula/patologia
6.
Dental Press J Orthod ; 29(2): e2423237, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38775600

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aimed to assess the predictability of Invisalign® aligners regarding rotational, mesio-distal and buccal-lingual tip movements. METHODS: Two materials were included in the analysis - EX30, used until 2013; and SmartTrack, in current use. The study comprised 56 adult patients treated with Invisalign Comprehensive. Data sample were assessed on three sets of digital models; model 1 - initial, model 2 - predicted, and model 3 - achieved. Sixty reference points were marked in each dental arch, and two reference planes assisted the superimposition. The degree of rotation, mesio-distal and buccal-lingual tip was obtained via trigonometric calculations, through a previously published validated method. The accuracy of outcomes was compared according to the types of tooth movement and teeth groups,and the influence of predetermined variables on movement accuracy was also investigated. RESULTS: Rotation and mesio-distal tip did not present any significant difference when comparing EX30 and SmartTrack groups. Only buccal-lingual tip presented a significant difference, incisor and canine groups treated with EX30 aligners presented an increase in accuracy (p= 0.007 and p = 0.007, respectively). For each additional degree planned for rotation movements, there was an increase of 0.35° in the discrepancy, and an increase of 0.40° and 0.41° for mesio-distal and buccal-lingual tip, respectively. EX30 and SmartTrack discrepancies were compared by multilevel linear regression. CONCLUSION: EX30 aligners reached higher accuracy for buccal-lingual tip in anterior teeth. However, for rotation and mesio-distal tip, SmartTrack and EX30 are similarly accurate. The total amount of planned movement has a significant impact on accuracy rates, with a decrease in accuracy for every additional degree.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Movimentação Dentária , Humanos , Técnicas de Movimentação Dentária/instrumentação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Rotação , Feminino , Masculino , Desenho de Aparelho Ortodôntico , Incisivo , Modelos Dentários , Aparelhos Ortodônticos Removíveis , Arco Dental
7.
Dental Press J Orthod ; 29(2): e24spe2, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38775602

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The superimposition of 3 dimensions (3D) digital models has been increasingly used for evaluating dental changes resulting from orthodontic treatment, and different superimposition techniques have been described. Although the maxilla has areas with greater stability for superimposition, such as the palatal rugae, there is still no reliable method for superimposing models of the lower arch. OBJECTIVE: Therefore, this article aims to describe a technique for superimposing virtual models. METHODS: To evaluate pre- and post-orthodontic treatment changes, the Geomagic Qualify 2013 software (3D Systems®, Rock Hill, South Carolina, USA) was used, with reference points in the maxilla, including the rugae and a reference area in the palate and midpalatal raphe. The lower arch was superimposed using the maximum habitual intercuspation (MHI) model as reference. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: 3D models superimposition using palatal rugae and MHI occlusion seems to offer satisfactory results in the interpretation of clinical changes at different follow-up moments in terms of development and/or orthodontic treatment.


Assuntos
Imageamento Tridimensional , Modelos Dentários , Software , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional/métodos , Maxila/anatomia & histologia , Palato Duro/anatomia & histologia , Palato/anatomia & histologia , Oclusão Dentária , Mandíbula/anatomia & histologia
8.
Dental Press J Orthod ; 29(1): e2423217, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38567923

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the accuracy and precision of digital models acquisition using a home-built, low-cost scanning system based on the structured light method. METHODS: a plaster model (PM) was scanned using the experimental device (SL) and a dental desktop scanner (DS). The teeth dimensions of PM and SL models were measured in triplicate, with a caliper and digitally, respectively. The agreement of the measurements of each model was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient, and the validity between the different measurement techniques was assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis. The accuracy and precision of the models were qualitatively investigated using the mesh superposition of the SL and DS models. RESULTS: A high intraclass correlation coefficient was observed in all models (PM=0.964; SL1=0.998; SL2=0.995; SL3=0.998), and there was no statistical difference between the measurements of the SL models (p>0.05). PM and SL model measurements were found to be in good agreement, with only 3.57% of the observed differences between the same measurement being located outside 95% limits of agreement according to Bland and Altman (0.43 and -0.40 mm). In the superimpositions of SL-SL and SL-DS models, areas of discrepancy greater than 0.5 mm were observed mainly in interproximal, occlusal, and cervical sites. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the home-built SL scanning system did not possess sufficient accuracy and precision for many clinical applications. However, the consistency in preserving the dental proportions suggests that the equipment can be used for planning, storage, and simple clinical purposes.


Assuntos
Imageamento Tridimensional , Dente , Imageamento Tridimensional/métodos , Modelos Dentários , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
9.
São Paulo; s.n; 20240301. 70 p.
Tese em Português | LILACS, BBO - Odontologia | ID: biblio-1532839

RESUMO

Objetivo: Esta revisão sistemática investigou se a precisão dos escaneamentos intraorais e modelos 3D com diferentes escâneres e softwares, é suficiente para os clínicos aceitarem e implementarem as novas tecnologias como critério de diagnóstico e planejamentos dos tratamentos. Material e métodos: Protocolo PROSPERO número CRD42020218151. Duas revisoras realizaram uma pesquisa avançada de banco de dados eletrônico, sem restrição de idioma ou data, no MEDLINE/PubMed; Embase; BVS/LILACS; Scopus; Cochrane Library; Google Scholar e Web of Science até janeiro de 2021. Os estudos foram escolhidos por título e resumo para triagem, de acordo com os seguintes critérios de inclusão: Estudos Clínicos in vivo e in vitro (pacientes, modelos de gesso de pacientes e manequins simulando bocas humanas) com os diferentes softwares e técnicas de escaneamento intraoral comparando a acurácia, fidelidade e/ou precisão como desfecho dos escaneamentos intraorais, dos modelos virtuais em 3D com modelos de gesso; com um mínimo de 5 pacientes escaneados sem limite de idade ou gênero; texto completo acessível; nos estudos de coorte, transversais e caso-controle. Após a leitura do texto completo os artigos foram excluídos de acordo com os seguintes critérios: 1) estudos com menos de 5 pacientes; 2) estudos em animais; 3) revisão sistemática, descrição de técnica, intervenções, protocolos; 4) escaneamentos por Ressonância Magnética ou Tomografia computadorizada; 5) estudos em que não foram utilizados scanners intraorais. Resultados. Dos 4410 estudos inicialmente identificados, 16 preencheram os critérios de inclusão. O guia PRISMA foi utilizado para redação da revisão e a ferramenta ROBINS-1 da Cochrane foi utilizada para análise de viés. Os estudos incluídos na sua maioria mostraram diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre os resultados das moldagens convencionais e digitais, porém também demonstraram que as diferenças não têm significância clínica. Conclusões: Esta revisão sistemática permitiu levantar dados que demonstraram que os escaneamentos intraorais não são superiores às moldagens convencionais, mas de acurácia equivalente com confiabilidade para o uso das imagens digitais conseguidas por escaneamento intraoral e dos modelos digitais provenientes destes escaneamentos.


Assuntos
Diagnóstico por Imagem , Modelos Dentários , Precisão da Medição Dimensional , Imageamento Tridimensional
10.
PLoS One ; 18(12): e0295790, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38113200

RESUMO

This study aimed to compare the accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions using seven different scanbodies and four intraoral scanners. A 3D-printed maxillary model with six implants and their respective multi-unit abutments was used for this study. Seven scanbodies (SB1, SB2, SB3, SB4, SB5, SB6, and SB7) and four intraoral scanners (Primescan®, Omnican®, Trios 3®, and Trios 4®) were assessed. Each combination group was scanned ten times and a dental lab scanner (D2000, 3Shape) was used as a reference. All scans were exported as STL files, imported into Convince software (3Shape) for alignment, and later into Blender software, where their 3D positions were analyzed using a Python script. The 3D deviation, angular deviation, and linear distance between implants #3 and #14 were also measured. Accuracy was measured in terms of "trueness" (scanbody 3D deviation between intraoral scan and desktop scan). Kruskal-Wallis followed by the Bonferroni correction was used to analyze the data (⍺ = .05). The study found statistically significant differences in digital impression accuracy among the scanners and scanbodies (p<0.001). When comparing different intraoral scanners, the Primescan system showed the smallest 3D deviation (median 110.59 µm) and differed statistically from the others, while Trios 4 (median 122.35 µm) and Trios 3 (median 130.62 µm) did not differ from each other (p = .284). No differences were found in the linear distance between implants #3 and #14 between Trios 4, Primescan, and Trios 3 systems. When comparing different scanbodies, the lowest median values for 3D deviation were obtained by SB2 (72.27µm) and SB7 (93.31µm), and they did not differ from each other (p = .116). The implant scanbody and intraoral scanner influenced the accuracy of digital impressions on completely edentulous arches.


Assuntos
Implantes Dentários , Boca Edêntula , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Desenho Assistido por Computador , Modelos Dentários , Próteses e Implantes , Técnica de Moldagem Odontológica , Arco Dental/diagnóstico por imagem , Arco Dental/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA