Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 140
Filtrar
1.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health ; 8(8): 580-588, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38914091

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Temporary fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion (FETO) promotes lung growth and increases survival in selected fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). FETO is performed percutaneously by inserting into the trachea a balloon designed for vascular occlusion. However, reports on the potential postnatal side-effects of the balloon are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of tracheomalacia in infants with CDH managed with and without FETO and other consequences related to the use of the balloon. METHODS: In this multicentre, retrospective cohort study, we included infants who were live born with CDH, either with FETO or without, who were managed postnatally at four centres (UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France; BCNatal, Barcelona, Spain; and HCor-Heart Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil) between April 5, 2002, and June 2, 2021. We primarily assessed the prevalence of all (symptomatic and asymptomatic) tracheomalacia as reported in medical records among infants with and without FETO. Secondarily we assessed the prevalence of symptomatic tracheomalacia and its resolution as reported in medical records, and compared tracheal diameters as measured on postnatal x-rays. Crude and adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% CIs were calculated via modified Poisson regression models with robust error variances for potential association between FETO and tracheomalacia. Variables included in the adjusted model were the side of the hernia, observed-to-expected lung-to-head ratio, and gestational age at birth. Crude and adjusted mean differences and 95% CIs were calculated via linear regression models to assess the presence and magnitude of association between FETO and tracheal diameters. In infants who had undergone FETO we also assessed the localisation of balloon remnants on x-rays, and the methods used for reversal of occlusion and potential complications associated with balloon remnants as documented in clinical records. Finally we investigated whether the presence of balloon remnants was influenced by the interval between balloon removal and delivery. FINDINGS: 505 neonates were included in the study, of whom 287 had undergone FETO and 218 had not. Tracheomalacia was reported in 18 (6%) infants who had undergone FETO and in three (1%) who had not (aRR 6·17 [95% CI 1·83-20·75]; p=0·0030). Tracheomalacia was first reported in the FETO group at a median of 5·0 months (IQR 0·8-13·0). Symptomatic tracheomalacia was reported in 13 (5%) infants who had undergone FETO, which resolved in ten (77%) children by 55·0 months (IQR 14·0-83·0). On average, infants who had undergone FETO had a 31·3% wider trachea (with FETO tracheal diameter 7·43 mm [SD 1·24], without FETO tracheal diameter 5·10 mm [SD 0·84]; crude mean difference 2·32 [95% CI 2·11-2·54]; p<0·0001; adjusted mean difference 2·62 [95% CI 2·35-2·89]; p<0·0001). At birth, the metallic component was visible within the body in 75 (37%) of 205 infants with available thoraco-abdominal x-rays: it was located in the gastrointestinal tract in 60 (80%) and in the lung in 15 (20%). No side-effects were reported for any of the infants during follow-up. The metallic component was more likely to be in the lung than either outside the body or the gastrointestinal tract when the interval between occlusion reversal and birth was less than 24 h. INTERPRETATION: Although FETO was associated with an increased tracheal diameter and an increased probability of tracheomalacia, symptomatic tracheomalacia typically resolved over time. There is a higher risk of retention of metallic balloon components if reversal of the occlusion occurs less than 24 h before delivery. Finally, there were no reported side-effects of the metallic component of the balloon persisting in the body during follow-up. Longer-term follow-up is needed to ensure that no tracheal problems arise later in life. FUNDING: None.


Assuntos
Fetoscopia , Hérnias Diafragmáticas Congênitas , Traqueia , Traqueomalácia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fetoscopia/efeitos adversos , Fetoscopia/métodos , Hérnias Diafragmáticas Congênitas/cirurgia , Feminino , Traqueomalácia/epidemiologia , Masculino , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Oclusão com Balão/efeitos adversos , Oclusão com Balão/métodos , Prevalência
2.
J Surg Res ; 296: 735-741, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38368774

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a potential tool for the management of massive gastrointestinal bleeding (MGB). This study aims to describe the experience of the use of REBOA as adjunctive therapy in patients with MGB and to evaluate its effectiveness. METHODS: Serial cases of patients with hemorrhagic shock secondary to MGB in whom REBOA was placed were collected. Patient demographics, bleeding severity, etiology, management, and clinical outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2020, five cases were analyzed. All patients had a severe gastrointestinal bleeding (Glasgow Blatchford Bleeding Score range 12-17; Clinical Rockal Score range 5-9). The etiologies of MGB were perforated gastric or duodenal ulcers, esophageal varices, and vascular lesions. Systolic blood pressure increased after REBOA placement and total occlusion time was 25-60 min. REBOA provided temporary hemorrhage control in all cases and allowed additional hemostatic maneuvers to be performed. Three patients survived more than 24 h. All patients died in index hospitalization. The main cause of death was related to hemorrhagic shock. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular aortic occlusion can work as a bridge to further resuscitation and attempts at hemostasis in patients with MGB. REBOA provides hemodynamic support and may be used simultaneously with other hemostatic maneuvers, facilitating definitive hemorrhage control.


Assuntos
Oclusão com Balão , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Hemostáticos , Choque Hemorrágico , Humanos , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Aorta , Ressuscitação , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento
3.
Rev. colomb. cir ; 39(1): 113-121, 20240102. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1526857

RESUMO

Introducción. Se describe la utilidad del umbral crítico de administración (CAT por su denominación en inglés) como herramienta para la reanimación hemostática en pacientes con trauma severo y oclusión endovascular aórtica. Métodos. Revisión retrospectiva de pacientes adultos con hemorragia por trauma, con o sin oclusión endovascular aórtica (REBOA), atendidos entre enero de 2015 y junio de 2020, en un centro de trauma nivel I en Cali, Colombia. Se registraron variables demográficas, severidad del trauma, estado clínico, requerimiento transfusional, tiempo hasta CAT+ y CAT alcanzado (1, 2 ó 3). Resultados. Se incluyeron 93 pacientes, se utilizó REBOA en 36 y manejo tradicional en 57. El grupo REBOA presentó mayor volumen de sangrado (mediana de 3000 ml, RIC: 1950-3625 ml) frente al grupo control (mediana de1500 ml, RIC: 700-2975ml) (p<0,001) y mayor cantidad de glóbulos rojos transfundidos en las primeras 6 horas (mediana de 5, RIC:4-9); p=0,015 y en las primeras 24 horas (mediana de 6, RIC: 4-11); p=0,005. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en número de pacientes CAT+ entre grupos o tiempo hasta alcanzarlo. Sin embargo, el estado CAT+ durante los primeros 30 minutos de la cirugía fue mayor en grupo REBOA (24/36, 66,7 %) frente al grupo control (17/57, 29,8 %; p=0,001), teniendo este mayor tasa de mortalidad intrahospitalaria frente a los pacientes CAT-. Conclusión. El umbral crítico de administración es una herramienta útil en la reanimación hemostática de pacientes con trauma y REBOA, que podría predecir mortalidad precoz.


Introduction. The objective is to describe the utility of the Critical Administration Threshold (CAT) as a tool in hemostatic resuscitation in patients with severe trauma and REBOA. Methods. Retrospective review between January 2015 and June 2020 of adult patients with hemorrhage secondary to trauma with or without REBOA in a level I trauma center in Cali, Colombia. Demographic variables, trauma severity, clinical status, transfusion needs, time to CAT+ and number of CAT achieved (1, 2 or 3) were recorded. Results. Ninety-three patients were included, in which REBOA was used in 36 and traditional management in 57. The REBOA group had a higher bleeding volume (3000 ml), IQR: 1950-3625 ml vs the control group (1500 ml, IQR: 700-2975 ml) (p<0.001) and a higher rate of PRBC units transfused in the first 6 hours (median 5, IQR: 4-9); p=0.015 and in the first 24 hours (median 6, IQR: 4-11); p=0.005. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of CAT+ patients between groups or time to CAT+. However, CAT+ status during the first 30 minutes of surgery was higher in the REBOA Group (24/36, 66.7%) vs. the control group (17/57, 29.8%; p=0.001), having this group a higher in-hospital mortality rate vs. CAT- patients. Conclusion. CAT is a useful tool in the hemostatic resuscitation of patients with trauma and REBOA that could predict early mortality.


Assuntos
Humanos , Ferimentos e Lesões , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Aorta , Transfusão de Sangue , Oclusão com Balão , Hemorragia
4.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 96(3): 499-509, 2024 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37478348

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is gaining popularity worldwide for managing hypotensive trauma patients. Vascular access complications related to REBOA placement have been reported, with some cases resulting in permanent morbidity. We aim to capitalize on the increase in literature to further describe and estimate the incidence of REBOA-associated vascular access complications in adult trauma patients. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and CINAHL for studies reporting vascular access complications of REBOA in adult trauma patients from inception to October 14, 2021. Studies reporting data from adult trauma patients who underwent REBOA insertion were eligible. Exclusion criteria included patients 15 years and younger, nontrauma patients, non-REBOA use, non-vascular access complications and patient duplication. Study data was abstracted using the PRISMA checklist and verified independently by three reviewers. Meta-analysis of proportions was performed using a random effects model with Freeman-Turkey double-arcsine transformation. Post hoc meta-regression by year of publication, sheath-size, and geographic region was also performed. The incidence of vascular access complications from REBOA insertion was the primary outcome of interest. Subgroup analysis was performed by degree of bias, sheath size, technique of vascular access, provider specialty, geographical region, and publication year. RESULTS: Twenty-four articles were included in the systematic review and the meta-analysis, for a total of 675 trauma patients who underwent REBOA insertion. The incidence of vascular access complications was 8% (95% confidence interval, 5%-13%). In post hoc meta-regression adjusting for year of publication and geographic region, the use of a smaller (7-Fr) sheath was associated with a decreased incidence of vascular access complications (odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.99; p = 0.046; R 2 = 35%; I 2 = 48%). CONCLUSION: This study provides a benchmark for quality of care in terms of vascular access complications related to REBOA insertion in adult trauma patients. Smaller sheath size may be associated with a decrease in vascular access complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis; Level III.


Assuntos
Oclusão com Balão , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Choque Hemorrágico , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Aorta/lesões , Ressuscitação/métodos , Oclusão com Balão/efeitos adversos , Oclusão com Balão/métodos , Incidência , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Choque Hemorrágico/etiologia , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Choque Hemorrágico/epidemiologia
5.
J Clin Neurosci ; 109: 11-20, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36634472

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a neuropathic pain that affects one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve. Surgical options after pharmacological failure are Microvascular Decompression (MVD) or percutaneous procedures, which include Balloon Compression (PBC). This study aims to describe pain outcomes and complications after PBC and MVD procedures for patients with trigeminal neuralgia. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS, and Web of Science databases up to April 2022, following PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta-Analysis). Articles that separately describe pain outcome for MVD and PBC were included. MINORS tool was used for bias assessment. Meta-analysis results are presented in forest plot and funnel plot. RESULTS: 853 studies were assessed for screening, and 11 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. A total of 1046 patients underwent PBC and 1324 underwent MVD. The subgroup analysis for patients without multiple sclerosis shows that MVD was associated with lower number of patients with pain than PBC, with an OR value of 0.54 (95 % CI 0.34-0.84). All other analyses evidenced a tendency for better outcomes after the MVD procedure, but with no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: Considering short and long pain relief, recurrence of pain and total complications for MVD and PBC, our study found that MVD is the best surgical option available for trigeminal neuralgia.


Assuntos
Oclusão com Balão , Cirurgia de Descompressão Microvascular , Neuralgia do Trigêmeo , Humanos , Neuralgia do Trigêmeo/cirurgia , Cirurgia de Descompressão Microvascular/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Dor/cirurgia , Oclusão com Balão/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Eur J Med Res ; 27(1): 202, 2022 Oct 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36253841

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a damage control tool with a potential role in the hemodynamic resuscitation of severely ill patients in the civilian pre-hospital setting. REBOA ensures blood flow to vital organs by early proximal control of the source of bleeding. However, there is no consensus on the use of REBOA in the pre-hospital setting. This article aims to perform a systematic review of the literature about the feasibility, survival, indications, complications, and potential candidates for civilian pre-hospital REBOA. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, LILACS and Web of Science databases. Primary outcome variables included overall survival and feasibility. Secondary outcome variables included complications and potential candidates for endovascular occlusion. RESULTS: The search identified 8 articles. Five studies described the use of REBOA in pre-hospital settings, reporting a total of 47 patients in whom the procedure was attempted. Pre-hospital REBOA was feasible in 68-100% of trauma patients and 100% of non-traumatic patients with cardiac arrest. Survival rates and complications varied widely. Pre-hospital REBOA requires a coordinated and integrated emergency health care system with a well-trained and equipped team. The remaining three studies performed a retrospective analysis identifying 784 potential REBOA candidates. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-hospital REBOA could be a feasible intervention for a significant portion of severely ill patients in the civilian setting. However, the evidence is limited. The impact of pre-hospital REBOA should be assessed in future studies.


Assuntos
Oclusão com Balão , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Choque Hemorrágico , Aorta , Oclusão com Balão/métodos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Hospitais , Humanos , Ressuscitação/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Choque Hemorrágico/etiologia , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia
9.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(25): 5217-5223, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33618605

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in controlling pelvic bleeding has been reported with increasing frequency during surgical management of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). The deployment of REBOA may lead to significant variations in vital signs requiring special care by anesthesiology during surgery. These modifications of blood pressure by REBOA in PAS patients have not been accurately documented. We report the changes in blood pressure that occur when the aorta is occluded and then released in patients with PAS. METHODOLOGY: This prospective, observational study includes 10 patients with preoperative PAS suspicion who underwent prophylactic REBOA device insertion between April 2018 and October 2019. REBOA procedural-related data and blood pressure fluctuations under invasive monitoring before and after inflation and deflation were recorded in the operating room. RESULTS: After prophylactic REBOA deployment in zone 3 of the aorta in PAS patients, we observed a transitory increase in blood pressure (median increase of 22.5 mmHg in SBP and 9.5 mmHg in DBP), which reached severe hypertension (SBP >160 mmHg) in 50% of patients. All patients presented a decrease in blood pressure after the removal of the aortic occlusion (median decrease of 23 mmHg in SBP and 10.5 mmHg in DBP), and 50% (five patients) required the administration of vasopressor drugs. CONCLUSION: Immediately after aortic occlusion is applied in zone 3 in PAS patients and after the occlusion is removed, significant hemodynamic changes occur, which often lead to therapeutic interventions.


Assuntos
Oclusão com Balão , Placenta Acreta , Choque Hemorrágico , Feminino , Humanos , Placenta Acreta/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Ressuscitação , Aorta , Hemodinâmica
10.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(21): 4031-4034, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33207992

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of resuscitative endovascular balloon of the aorta (REBOA) is a useful strategy for bleeding control in placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) management. The incidence of complications associated with this procedure is variable. We report three cases of arterial thrombosis associated with REBOA, and we also analyze the factors that facilitated its occurrence. CASE REPORT: Three women with PAS, presented common femoral and external iliac arterial thrombosis after REBOA use. Among the contributing factors probably associated with thrombosis, we identified the absence of ultrasound guidance for vascular access and the not using of heparin during aortic occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: REBOA use is not exempt from complications and must be performed by experienced groups applying strategies to reduce the risks of complications.


Assuntos
Oclusão com Balão , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Placenta Acreta , Choque Hemorrágico , Trombose , Aorta , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Ressuscitação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA