RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The extent to which depression is associated with somatic complaints in children from the English-speaking Caribbean and Latin America is not well established. OBJECTIVE: We sought to explore the association between depressive and somatic symptoms among children from the English-speaking Caribbean and Latin America, while accounting for age, sex, socioeconomic status, cultural background, and anxiety score. METHOD: 1541 elementary school children, ages 9-12 years, from the English-speaking Caribbean and Latin America completed the Adolescent Depression Rating Scale (ARDS), the Numeric 0-10 Anxiety Self-Report Scale and the Children's Somatic Symptom Inventory-24 (CSSI-24). T-tests and ANOVA's were used to compare CSSI-24 and ARDS scores among countries, and the CSSI-24 scores of children with (ARDS ≥ 4) and without likely clinically significant depression. Regression analyses assessed possible predictors of CSSI-24 score. RESULTS: Depressive and somatic symptom scores were highest among the Jamaican children and lowest among the Colombian children (p < .001). Children with likely clinically significant depression exhibited higher mean somatic symptom scores (p < .001). Depressive symptom scores predicted somatic symptom scores (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Depressive symptoms were a strong predictor of reporting somatic symptoms. Knowledge of this association may facilitate better recognition of depression among youth.

Assuntos

RESUMO

There is the notion that dysregulation of executive function (EF), which disrupts behavior and cognitive processes, may explain the emotional impairment which leads to increasing sugar sweetened beverages (SSBs) intake. We aimed to test whether anxiety and depression mediate the association between self-reported problems in EF and sugar sweetened beverage intake in Mexican adults between 18-40 years. An open survey advertised as a 'mental health and sugar sweetened beverages study' was conducted, participants were recruited through Facebook ads. Males and females, between 18-40 years, able to read and write, and currently residing in Mexico were included. We analyzed data using causal mediation analysis with latent variables using a structural equation modelling framework. Significant indirect effects were found for somatic symptoms of depression (ß = 6.601, SE = 2.657, p < .05) and anxiety (ß = .679, SE =.334, p < .05). In depression model no significant direct effects of EF were found in the depression model, however they were found in the anxiety model (ß = 1.335 SE =.566, p < .05). Somatic symptoms of depression were a total mediator, and anxiety a partial mediator. The results suggest that EF increased the probability of emotional symptoms, which led to a higher consumption of SBBs.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introduction: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has proven to be effective in treating affective and somatic symptoms, which are among the leading mental health problems of health care workers (HCWs) dealing with COVID-19 (HCW-COVID-19). However, efforts to develop and evaluate the strategies required to promote its implementation in clinical practice are still scarce, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Objective: To describe and evaluate the implementation process and clinical impact of a brief, remote, manualized CBT-based intervention for moderate anxiety, depressive, and somatic symptoms among Mexican HCW-COVID-19 ≥18 years old. Methods: The implementation process comprises community engagement, intervention systematization and education, leadership engagement, and team-based coaching as main strategies. A total of 26 participants completed self-report measures of symptoms before and after treatment, and a subsample of 21 answered a final questionnaire on the acceptability of the intervention. Therapists registered the techniques used in each case, regardless of whether they were part of the intervention manual. Results: The number of sessions was 4.6 (2.43). The most frequently employed techniques were those included in the intervention manual, especially identifying and modifying maladaptive thoughts, used to treat 70% of HCW-COVID-19. Supplementary techniques were implemented to enhance treatment or meet HCW-COVID-19s special needs (such as workplace issues, insomnia, COVID-19 status, and bereavement). The intervention had a significant effect (delta Cohen's coefficients ≥1), and the majority of HCW-COVID-19 were "totally satisfied" with its contents and considered it "not complex" (95.2% and 76.1%, respectively). Conclusions: Telepsychotherapy for anxiety, depression, and somatization in HCW coping with health emergencies in middle-income countries is a feasible, clinically valuable, and acceptable form of treatment.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The context of the COVID-19 pandemic has harmed the mental health of the population, increasing the incidence of mental health problems such as depression, especially in those who have had COVID-19. Our study puts forward an explanatory model of depressive symptoms based on subjective psychological factors in those hospitalized for COVID-19 with and without biological markers (i.e., inflammatory markers). Therefore, we aim to evaluate the hypotheses proposed in the model to predict the presence of depressive symptoms. METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional study, using a simple random sampling. Data from 277 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Lima-Peru, were collected to assess mental health variables (i.e., depressive, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, and somatic symptoms), self-perception of COVID-19 related symptoms, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) such as inflammatory marker. We performed a structural equation modeling analysis to evaluate a predictive model of depressive symptoms. RESULTS: The results showed a prevalence of depressive symptoms (11.2%), anxiety symptoms (7.9%), somatic symptoms (2.2%), and symptoms of post-traumatic stress (6.1%) in the overall sample. No association was found between the prevalence of these mental health problems among individuals with and without severe inflammatory response. The mental health indicators with the highest prevalence were sleep problems (48%), low energy (47.7%), nervousness (48.77%), worry (47.7%), irritability (43.7%) and back pain (52%) in the overall sample. The model proposed to explain depressive symptoms was able to explain more than 83.7% of the variance and presented good goodness-of-fit indices. Also, a different performance between the proposed model was found between those with and without severe inflammatory response. This difference was mainly found in the relationship between anxiety and post-traumatic stress symptoms, and between the perception of COVID-19 related symptoms and somatic symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrated that our model of mental health variables may explain depressive symptoms in hospitalized patients of COVID-19 from a third-level hospital in Peru. In the model, perception of symptoms influences somatic symptoms, which impact both anxiety symptoms and symptoms of post-traumatic stress. Thus, anxiety symptoms could directly influence depressive symptoms or through symptoms of post-traumatic stress. Our findings could be useful to decision-makers for the prevention of depression, used to inform the creation of screening tools (i.e., perception of symptoms, somatic and anxiety symptoms) to identify vulnerable patients to depression.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Assessment tools are commonly used in different fields of health to assist in the diagnosis, the evaluation of the response to treatment, the measurement of quality of life and the establishment of the prognosis. OBJECTIVES: Translate, culturally adapt and perform the psychometric validation of the Somatic Symptom Scale (SSS-8) for use in the Brazilian population. METHODS: Cross-cultural adaptation followed a combination of guidelines and for psychometric evaluation a sample of 300 patients was recruited. All recommended measurement properties by the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments were evaluated, including analysis by an expert committee and analysis by the target public. The Skindex-16 was used for the evaluation of convergent validity and Cronbach's alpha was used for the determination of the internal consistency of the translated version of the SSS-8. RESULTS: The final version received approval from five experts and the agreement index was 100% for all items. During the pretest, the scale was administered to 300 patients with psoriasis and none of the items needed to be altered. A moderate correlation was found between the Skindex-16 and SSS-8-BRA. In the analysis of internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha for the SSS-8-BRA was 0.81. CONCLUSION: The SSS-8 is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of somatic symptoms in the Brazilian population.

Assuntos

RESUMO

This article aims to analyze the factors associated with suicidal ideation in the COVID-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional home-based survey, with three-stage cluster sampling, was conducted with 4,203 adults from ten municipalities in the Mato Grosso, Brazil. The data collection was carried households to assessment of sociodemographic characteristics, substance use and behavior in the pandemic. The Level 1 Symptom Cross Scale was used to identify suicidal ideation and aspects of mental health (somatic symptoms, sleep disturbances, dissociation, depression, anger, mania, anxiety, thoughts, substance use and memory). Chemiluminescence was used to detect IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The prevalence of suicidal ideation was 19.2%, and the associated with increased consumption of alcohol (RP=1.16), smoking (RP=1.30), COVID-19 symptoms (RP=1.03), having one's life affected (RP=1.04), mental illness (RP=1.09) somatic symptoms (RP=1.15), sleep disturbance (RP=1.30), dissociation (RP=1.24), depression (RP=1.24), anger (RP=1.11), anxiety (RP=1.26), substance use (RP=1.19), drug prescription use (RP=1.18) and memory (RP=1.87). Highlights the high prevalence of suicidal ideation related to COVID-19 symptoms, changes in behavior post-pandemic and mental health factors.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In the care of patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) it is important what they think about their symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To validate the psychometric properties of a symptom attribution scale in patients with MUPS and to verify its reliability. METHODS: A non-probabilistic sample of 400 male and female adult patients were interviewed in the outpatient services of a family medicine hospital, 200 with MUPS and 200 with a defined organic pathology. Each group was diagnosed with defined criteria, and a scale with content and construct validity was applied by means of principal component analysis with varimax rotation. RESULTS: The scale was made up of 12 items with two factors, one of symptom psychosocial attribution and other with organic attribution. The psychosocial-origin factor showed a variance of 49.7%. The goodness-of-fit test demonstrated that the correlation matrix was adequate, and Bartlett's sphericity test indicated statistical significance (p < 0.0001); Cronbach's alpha was 0.841. CONCLUSION: The scale showed acceptable construct validity and good reliability and stability. The implications of these results for future measurement research are discussed.

INTRODUCCIÓN: En la atención de pacientes con síntomas físicos médicamente no explicables (SFMNE) es importante lo que el paciente piensa de sus síntomas. OBJETIVO: Validar propiedades psicométricas de una escala de atribución del síntoma en pacientes con SFMNE y verificar su confiabilidad. MÉTODOS: Se entrevistó a una muestra no probabilística de 400 pacientes adultos, hombres y mujeres, en la consulta de un hospital con medicina familiar, 200 con SFMNE y 200 con patología orgánica concreta. Se diagnosticó a cada grupo con criterios definidos y se aplicó una escala con validez de contenido y de constructo por medio de análisis de componentes principales con rotación varimax. RESULTADOS: La escala quedó integrada por 12 reactivos con dos factores, uno de atribución psicosocial y otro de atribución orgánica del síntoma. El factor de origen psicosocial tuvo una varianza de 49.7 %. La prueba de bondad de ajuste mostró que la matriz de correlaciones fue adecuada y la prueba de esfericidad de Bartlett indicó significación estadística (p < 0.0001); el alfa de Cronbach fue de 0.841. CONCLUSIÓN: La escala mostró una validez de constructo aceptable y buena confiabilidad y estabilidad. Se discuten las implicaciones de estos resultados para la investigación de mediciones futuras.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: estimar a prevalência de sofrimento mental em pessoas com diabetes mellitus durante a pandemia de Covid-19. Método: estudo transversal, de caráter exploratório, com amostra de 111 pessoas com diabetes. Na coleta de dados, utilizou-se um questionário de sintomas denominado Self Report Questionnaire-20 (SRQ-20). A análise de dados foi realizada por meio da estatística descritiva. Resultados: a prevalência de sofrimento mental entre as pessoas com diabetes foi de 37,8%. No grupo de humor depressivo-ansioso, os sintomas mais prevalentes demonstraram que 64% dos diabéticos se sentiram nervosos, tensos ou preocupados. Quanto ao decréscimo de energia vital,51,4% dos diabéticos se cansaram com facilidade. Para os sintomas somáticos, identificou-se que 30,6% apresentaram sensações desagradáveis no estômago. Quanto aos pensamentos depressivos, verificou-se que 31,5% tiveram dificuldade para tomar decisões. Conclusão: recomenda-se a criação de estratégias e linhas integrais de cuidados que minimizem os impactos psicossociais causados pela pandemia da COVID-19 neste segmento populacional.

Objective: to estimate the prevalence of mental distress in people with diabetes mellitus during the Covid-19 pandemic. Method:cross-sectional, exploratory study with a sample of 111 people with diabetes. For data collection, a symptom questionnaire called the Self Report Questionnaire-20 (SRQ-20) was used. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics. Results: the prevalence of mental suffering among people with diabetes was 37.8%. In the depressed-anxious mood group, the most prevalent symptoms showed that 64% of diabetics felt nervous, tense or worried. As for the decrease in vital energy, 51.4% of diabetics got tired easily. For somatic symptoms, it was identified that 30.6% had unpleasant sensations in the stomach. As for depressive thoughts, it was found that 31.5% had difficulty making decisions. Conclusion: it is recommended to create comprehensive strategies and lines of care that minimize the psychosocial impacts caused by the COVID-19 pandemic in this population segment.

Objetivo: estimar la prevalencia de angustia mental en personas con diabetes mellitus durante la pandemia de Covid-19. Método: estudio exploratorio transversal con una muestra de 111 personas con diabetes. Para la recolección de datos, se utilizó un cuestionario de síntomas llamado Self Report Questionnaire-20 (SRQ-20). El análisis de los datos se realizó mediante estadística descriptiva. Resultados: la prevalencia de sufrimiento mental entre las personas con diabetes fue del 37,8%. En el grupo de estado de ánimo depresivo-ansioso, los síntomas más prevalentes mostraron que el 64% de los diabéticos se sentían nerviosos, tensos o preocupados. En cuanto a la disminución de la energía vital, el 51,4% de los diabéticos se cansaban con facilidad. Para los síntomas somáticos, se identificó que el 30,6% presentaba sensaciones desagradables en el estómago. En cuanto a los pensamientos depresivos, se encontró que el 31,5% tenía dificultad para tomar decisiones. Conclusión: se recomienda crear estrategias y líneas de atención integrales que minimicen los impactos psicosociales provocados por la pandemia COVID-19 en este segmento de población.

Assuntos

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and its consequences have created anxiety in various segments of society. In particular, the transition to online education brought by this process has made the education process of university students difficult. Therefore, in the COVID-19 pandemic, it is important to examine the anxiety levels of university students and their relationship with somatic symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To examine the level of generalised anxiety disorder and to reveal the relationship between somatic symptoms and the generalised anxiety disorder level of Turkish university students. METHODS: Empirical research. Participants in the research constituted a total of 605 students studying at a private university in Istanbul. The Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) was used to collect data. Data were analysed using the chi-square test and Pearson correlation analysis. RESULTS: It was found that, among the participants, 193 (31.90%) of the students had mild anxiety, 149 (24.63%) had moderate anxiety and 121 (20.00%) had severe anxiety. The study revealed that there is a significant positive relationship between the number of somatic symptoms and generalised anxiety disorder scores of university students. CONCLUSION: Most of the university students are affected by anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic and this effect is correlated with the frequency of somatic symptoms. In this context, it would be beneficial for universities to plan for acute and long-term psychological services and to cooperate with the government to provide timely crisis-oriented psychological services.

Assuntos

Assuntos