RESUMO
A public health emergency provides an opportunity and need to utilize the power of evidence, science, research and innovation, and practicality to provide rapid solutions. The COVID-19 pandemic did exactly that. It challenged the scientific and public health community from identification to tracking the virus, from characterizing the disease to developing strategies to treat and contain the pathogen. The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), as an international public health agency working in the region of the Americas, responded to these challenges with extreme vitality, transparency and accountability, and many achievements were made. The PAHO clinical management team put into practice a rapid response program to support evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) in the Region, and in Member States.
Assuntos
Emergências , Preparação para Pandemia , COVID-19 , Tomada de Decisões , Uso da Informação Científica na Tomada de Decisões em Saúde , Ciência Translacional Biomédica , AméricaRESUMO
Introdução: O país adotou, com a criação do Programa Previne Brasil, uma nova forma de financiamento da Atenção Primária à Saúde, com a portaria ministerial 2.979/2019, a qual estabeleceu critérios para alocação de recursos, com foco para o desempenho e produtividade da Atenção Primária. Talmodelo vem sendo alvo de críticas pelo campo acadêmico da Saúde Coletiva e por gestões municipais, que em diferentes situações demonstram perdas financeiras, sobretudo, devido ao componente de capitação ponderada. Objetivo: Sistematizar o desempenho da Atenção Primária à Saúde do município de Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, com base em indicadores de desempenho do Sistema de Informação em Saúde para a Atenção Básica, e o financiamento da Atenção Primária, com base no Sistema de Informações sobre Orçamentos Públicos em Saúde, entre os anos 2019 a 2022. Metodologia: Trata-se de uma pesquisa descritiva-exploratória, com utilização de dados secundários e sistematização dos sete indicadores de desempenho da Atenção Primária e análise das despesas com saúdedo município de Natal. Resultados:Dos sete indicadores analisados, o município de Natal alcançou a meta em dois indicadores, referente à proporção de gestantes com pelo menos seis consultas pré-natal realizadas (46% em 2022) e com realização de exames para sífilis e HIV (67% em 2022). O município destinou à Atenção Primária, em 2022, apenas 6,33% de todas suas despesas com saúde. Destaca-se, também, que a cobertura da Atenção Primária no município é de 60%, havendo ainda um vazio assistencial para grande parte da população natalense. Conclusões:A análise de indicadores de saúde, torna-se importante ferramenta para a ação avaliativa do Sistema Único de Saúde, bem como dá suporte para a tomada de decisão por parte de gestores e equipes de saúde, além de produzir conhecimento crítico para a qualificação da Atenção Primária à Saúde (AU).
Introduction:The country adopted, with the creation of the Previne Brasil Program, a new form of financing Primary Health Care, with ministerial decree 2.979/2019, which established criteria for resource allocation, focusing on the performance and productivity of Primary Care. This model has been criticized by the academic field of Public Health and by municipal administrations, which in different situations demonstrate financial losses, mainly due to the weighted capitation component. Objective:Systematize the performance of Primary Health Care in the city of Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, based on performance indicators from the Health Information System for Primary Care, and the financing of Primary Care, based on the Information System of Public Health Budgets, between the years 2019 and 2022. Methodology:This is descriptive-exploratory research, using secondary data and systematization of the seven Primary Care performance indicators and analysis of health expenses in the city of Natal. Results: Of the seven indicators analyzed, the municipality of Natal reached the target in two indicators, referring to the proportion of pregnant women with at least six prenatal consultations carried out (46% in 2022) and with tests for syphilis and HIV (67% in 2022). In 2022, the municipality allocated only 6.33% of all its health expenses to PrimaryCare. It is also noteworthy that Primary Care coverage in the municipality is 60%, with there still being a care gap for a large part of the population of Natal. Conclusions:The analysis of health indicators becomes an important tool for the evaluative action of the Unified Health System, as well as providing support for decision-making by managers and health teams, in addition to producing critical knowledge for the qualification of Primary Health Care (AU).
Introducción: El país adoptó, con la creación del Previne Brasil, una nueva forma de financiamiento de la Atención Primaria de Salud, con el decreto ministerial 2.979/2019, que estableció criterios para la asignación de recursos, con foco en el desempeño y productividad de la Atención Primaria. Este modelo ha sido criticado por el ámbito académico de la Salud Pública y por las administraciones municipales, que en diferentes situaciones demuestran pérdidas financieras, principalmente por el componente de capitación ponderada. Objetivo: Sistematizar el desempeño de la Atención Primaria de Salud en la ciudad de Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, con base en indicadores de desempeño del Sistema de Información en Salud para la Atención Primaria, y el su financiamiento, con base en el Sistema de Información Presupuestaria Pública en Salud, entre los años 2019 y 2022. Metodología: Se trata de una investigación descriptiva-exploratoria, utilizando datos secundarios y sistematización de siete indicadores de desempeño de la Atención Básica y análisis del gasto en salud. Resultados: De los siete indicadores analizados, el municipio de Natal alcanzó la meta en dos indicadores, referidos a la proporción de gestantes con al menos seis consultas prenatales realizadas (46% en 2022) y con pruebas de sífilis y HIV (67% en 2022). En 2022, el municipio destinó sólo el 6,33% de todos sus gastos sanitarios a la Atención Primaria. También se destaca que la cobertura de Atención Primaria en el municipio es del 60%, existiendo aún brecha de atención para gran parte de la población. Conclusiones: El análisis de indicadores de salud se convierte en herramienta importante para la acción de evaluación del Sistema Único de Salud, además de brindar apoyo para la toma de decisiones de gestores y equipos de salud, además de producir conocimiento crítico para la calificación de la Atención Primaria de Salud (AU).
Assuntos
Atenção Primária à Saúde , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Sistemas de Informação em Saúde , Brasil/epidemiologia , Epidemiologia Descritiva , Gastos em Saúde , Tomada de Decisões , Recursos em SaúdeRESUMO
Patients recovering from COVID-19 commonly exhibit cognitive and brain alterations, yet the specific neuropathological mechanisms and risk factors underlying these alterations remain elusive. Given the significant global incidence of COVID-19, identifying factors that can distinguish individuals at risk of developing brain alterations is crucial for prioritizing follow-up care. Here, we report findings from a sample of patients consisting of 73 adults with a mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection without signs of respiratory failure and 27 with infections attributed to other agents and no history of COVID-19. The participants underwent cognitive screening, a decision-making task, and MRI evaluations. We assessed for the presence of anosmia and the requirement for hospitalization. Groups did not differ in age or cognitive performance. Patients who presented with anosmia exhibited more impulsive alternative changes after a shift in probabilities (r = - 0.26, p = 0.001), while patients who required hospitalization showed more perseverative choices (r = 0.25, p = 0.003). Anosmia correlated with brain measures, including decreased functional activity during the decision-making task, thinning of cortical thickness in parietal regions, and loss of white matter integrity. Hence, anosmia could be a factor to be considered when identifying at-risk populations for follow-up.
Assuntos
Anosmia , Encéfalo , COVID-19 , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/psicologia , COVID-19/fisiopatologia , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagem , COVID-19/patologia , Anosmia/etiologia , Anosmia/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Encéfalo/patologia , Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Idoso , Tomada de Decisões , Cognição/fisiologiaRESUMO
Understanding the genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) and considering it in the selection process is a sine qua non condition for the expansion of Brazilian eucalyptus silviculture. This study's objective is to select high-performance and stable eucalyptus clones based on a novel selection index that considers the Factor Analytic Selection Tools (FAST) and the clone's reliability. The investigation explores the nuances interplay of GEI and extends its insights by scrutinizing the relationship between latent factors and real environmental features. The analysis, conducted across seven trials in five Brazilian states involving 78 clones, employs FAST. The clonal selection was performed using an extended FAST index weighted by the clone's reliability. Further insights about GEI emerge from the integration of factor loadings with 25 environmental features through a principal component analysis. Ten clones, distinguished by high performance, stability, and reliability, have been selected across the target population of environments. The environmental features most closely associated with factor loadings, encompassing air temperature, radiation, and soil characteristics, emerge as pivotal drivers of GEI within this dataset. This study contributes insights to eucalyptus breeders, equipping them to enhance decision-making by harnessing a holistic understanding-from the genotypes under evaluation to the diverse environments anticipated in commercial plantations.
Assuntos
Eucalyptus , Melhoramento Vegetal , Eucalyptus/genética , Melhoramento Vegetal/métodos , Brasil , Interação Gene-Ambiente , Tomada de Decisões , Genótipo , Meio Ambiente , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Communication is a multifaceted process, ranging from linear, one-way approaches, such as transmitting a simple message, to continuous exchanges and feedback loops among stakeholders. In particular the COVID-19 pandemic underscored the critical need for timely, effective and credible evidence communication to increase awareness, levels of trust, and evidence uptake in policy and practice. However, whether to improve policy responses in crises or address more commonplace societal challenges, comprehensive guidance on evidence communication to decision-makers in health policies and systems remains limited. Our objective was to identify and systematize the global evidence on frameworks, guidance and tools supporting effective communication of research evidence to facilitate knowledge translation and evidence-informed policy-making processes, while also addressing barriers and facilitators. METHODS: We conducted a rapid scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Manual. Literature searches were performed across eight indexed databases and two sources of grey literature, without language or time restrictions. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed, and a narrative-interpretative synthesis was applied to present the findings. RESULTS: We identified 16 documents presenting either complete frameworks or framework components, including guidance and tools, aimed at supporting evidence communication for policy development. These frameworks outlined strategies, theoretical models, barriers and facilitators, as well as insights into policy-makers' perspectives, communication needs, and preferences. Three primary evidence communication strategies, comprising eleven sub-strategies, emerged: "Health information packaging", "Targeting and tailoring messages to the audience", and "Combined communication strategies". Based on the documented barriers and facilitators at micro, meso and macro levels, critical factors for successful communication of evidence to policy-makers were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Effective communication is indispensable for facilitating knowledge translation and evidence-informed policy-making. Nonetheless gaps persist in frameworks designed to enhance research communication to policy-makers, particularly regarding the effectiveness of multiple communication strategies. To advance in this field, the development of comprehensive frameworks incorporating implementation strategies is warranted. Additionally, barriers and facilitators to implementing effective communication must be recognized and addressed taking diverse contexts into consideration. Registration https://zenodo.org/record/5578550.
Assuntos
Pessoal Administrativo , COVID-19 , Comunicação , Política de Saúde , Formulação de Políticas , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica , Pandemias , Tomada de Decisões , Disseminação de InformaçãoRESUMO
Understanding health-seeking behaviors and their drivers is key for governments to manage health policies. A growing body of research explores the role of cognitive biases and heuristics in health and care-seeking behaviors, but little is known about how a context of heightened anxiety and uncertainty might influence these behavioral drivers. This study analyzes the association between four behavioral predictors-internal locus of control, impatience, optimism bias, and aspirations-and healthcare decisions among low-income women in El Salvador, controlling for other factors. We find positive associations between internal locus of control and preventive health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic. For instance, a one standard deviation increase in locus of control is associated with a 10% increase in an index measuring the use of masks, distancing, hand washing, and vaccination. Locus of control was also associated with women's use of preventive health services (one standard deviation improves the likelihood of having a hypertension test in the last six months by 5.8 percentage points). In a sub-sample of mothers, we find significant relationships between the four behavioral drivers and the decisions the mothers make for their children. However, we find these associations are less robust compared to the decisions they make for themselves. Some associations were stronger during the pandemic, suggesting that feelings of uncertainty and stress could amplify behavioral drivers' influence on health-related behaviors. This novel finding is relevant for designing policy responses for future shocks. JEL CODES: I12, D10, D91, I30.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Tomada de Decisões , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Pobreza , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/psicologia , Feminino , Adulto , El Salvador , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle Interno-Externo , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Mães/psicologia , Mães/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Comportamentos Relacionados com a SaúdeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: to compare the decision-making of Nursing students, before and after theoretical training on basic life support, using the practice of high-fidelity simulation and medium-fidelity simulation. METHOD: an experimental study was developed, pre- and post-test type, with quantitative, descriptive and inferential analysis, with theoretical training on basic life support and clinical simulation practices, and with evaluation of knowledge and decision-making of Nursing students, at three different moments - before the simulation scenario (T0), after the simulation scenario (T1) and after clinical teaching (T2). RESULTS: 51 students participated in the research, with an average age of 20.25±3.804, of which 92.2% were female. Statistically significant differences (F=6.47; p=0.039) were evident regarding the definition of the problem and development of objectives in decision-making in the experimental group. CONCLUSION: Nursing students demonstrate an adequate level of knowledge and a good decision-making process, based on the most current instruments produced by scientific evidence, in clinical simulation scenarios in basic life support, and this innovative methodology should be deepened in the Nursing teaching. HIGHLIGHTS: (1) Clinical simulation promotes good decision-making of Nursing students.(2) Students demonstrated adequate knowledge about basic life support.(3) Knowledge and practice define the fidelity of clinical simulation.(4) Basic life support can be developed by high-fidelity simulation.
Assuntos
Estudantes de Enfermagem , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto Jovem , Tomada de Decisões , Treinamento por Simulação/métodos , Educação em Enfermagem/métodos , Treinamento com Simulação de Alta Fidelidade/métodos , AdultoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: to describe factors of influence of telenursing on naturalistic decision making about self-care of people with heart failure during COVID-19. METHOD: this is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach, with 16 participants interviewed after hospitalization for decompensated heart failure. The data was collected using audio and video technology and submitted to content analysis, guided by the Situation-Specific Theory of Heart Failure Self-Care. RESULT: two thematic categories emerged from the analysis: Self-care as a decision-making process and Factors influencing decision-making, which describe tele-nursing as a support resource for people with heart failure, during changes in care in the pandemic period. CONCLUSION: it was possible to understand the relationship between telenursing and the establishment of a bond, in order to stimulate naturalistic decision-making by people with heart failure in their daily lives in a coherent way, leading to better health outcomes. HIGHLIGHTS: (1) Different barriers compromise the decision-making of people with heart failure.(2) Nursing theories can guide coherent self-care attitudes.(3) Continuity of care and a support network are necessary after hospitalization.(4) Emotional support for people with heart failure must go hand in hand with conventional treatment.(5) The bond through tele-nursing provides positive health outcomes.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Autocuidado , Telenfermagem , Humanos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/enfermagem , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , COVID-19/enfermagem , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Pandemias , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Tomada de Decisões , AdultoRESUMO
Objective: The current study aimed to develop and validate of companions' satisfaction questionnaire of patients hospitalized in ICUs. Methods: This is a methodological study that was performed in three phases: In the first phase, the concept of companion's satisfaction of patients hospitalized in ICUs was defined through qualitative content analysis method. In the second phase, early items of questionnaire were generated based on findings of the first phase. In the third and final phase, validation of the questionnaire was evaluated using face, content and construct validity as well as reliability. Results: In exploratory factor analysis, three subscales including: satisfaction with nursing staff communication (5 items), satisfaction with nursing care (12 items), and satisfaction with decision making (5 items) were extracted by Eigen value above one and factor load above 0.5. Internal consistency and stability of the developed questionnaire confirmed with 0.94 and 0.95 respectively that indicated acceptable reliability. Conclusion: The 22-item developed questionnaire is valid and reliable for measurement of levels of companion's satisfaction of Iranian patients hospitalized in ICUs.