RESUMO

Objetivo Descrever as doações e os transplantes de órgãos no Ceará, Brasil, após a declaração da pandemia da COVID-19. Métodos Estudo descritivo, com dados da Associação Brasileira de Transplantes de Órgãos. O número de doadores e transplantes do período de abril a junho de 2020 foi comparado ao mesmo período de 2019 e ao primeiro trimestre de 2020. Resultados No primeiro semestre de 2020, o estado registrou 72 doadores efetivos. Destes, 17 (23,6%) no segundo trimestre. Dos 352 transplantes do primeiro semestre de 2020, 37 (10,7%) foram realizados no segundo trimestre. Em comparação ao período de abril a junho de 2019, houve redução de 67,9% e 89,3% no número de doadores e transplantes, respectivamente, no mesmo período de 2020. Conclusão Os números de doadores e transplantes do Ceará apresentaram importante declínio nos três meses seguintes ao decreto da pandemia da COVID-19, especialmente os das modalidades de rim, coração e córneas.

Objetivo Describir las donaciones y trasplantes de órganos en Ceará, Brasil, después de la declaración de la pandemia COVID-19. Métodos estudio descriptivo con datos de la Asociación Brasileña de Trasplantes de Órganos. Se comparó el número de donantes y trasplantes de abril a junio de 2020 con el mismo período de 2019 y el primer trimestre de 2020. Resultados El primer semestre de 2020, Ceará registró 72 donantes efectivos. De estos, 17 (23,6%) en el segundo trimestre. De 352 trasplantes realizados en el primer semestre de 2020, 37 (10.7%) fueron realizados en el segundo trimestre. En comparación al período de abril a junio de 2019, hubo reducción de 67,9% y 89,3% en el número de donantes y trasplantes, respectivamente, en el mismo período de 2020. Conclusión El número de donantes y trasplantes en Ceará mostró importante disminución en los tres meses siguientes al decreto pandémico COVID-19, especialmente las modalidades renal, cardíaca y córneas.

Objective To describe organ donations and transplants in Ceará state, Brazil, following the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods This was a descriptive study using data from the Brazilian Organ Transplantation Association. The number of donors and transplants from April to June 2020 was compared to the same period in 2019 and to the first quarter of 2020. Results In the first half of 2020, the state registered 72 effective donors, just 17 (23.6%) of whom related to the second quarter. Of the 352 transplants in the first half of 2020, 37 (10.7%) were performed in the second quarter. Compared with the period from April to June 2019, there was a reduction of 67.9% and 89.3% in the number of donors and transplants, respectively, in the same period of 2020. Conclusion The number of donors and transplants in Ceará showed an important fall in the three months following the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for kidney, heart and cornea transplants.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The evolution of the activity of deceased organ donation and solid organ transplantation in Mexico was analyzed for the period of 2004-2018. METHOD: The information of deceased donation and organ transplantation in Mexico was collected and ordered for said period. When there was no complete information for 2018, the data for 2017 were used instead. Main sources of information: The global observatory on donation and transplantation and the National Transplant Center, Centro National de Trasplantes or CENATRA of the Mexican Secretariat of Health (SSA). RESULTS: (1) In Mexico, deceased donation rates were: 3.2 donations per million population (pmp) in 2007 and 3.94 in 2017, an increase of 23.1%. The rate in 2017 is quite lower than the average reported for Latin America 9.5 donations pmp. (2) The number of patients awaiting a solid organ transplant increased from 4993 in 2007 to 15,448 in 2018, an increase of 309%. (3) In 2017, Mexico reported having 255 authorized centers for renal transplantation, more than any other country in the world. In the case of other -organs: liver, heart, lung, and pancreas, Mexico is the country with the highest number of authorized centers in Latin America. CONCLUSION: The evolution of the figures regarding the activity of deceased donation and solid organ transplantation during the aforementioned study period explains an increasing shortage of organs for transplants in Mexico, despite an apparent large installed capacity. The national organ donation and transplantation system is ineffective and inefficient.

ANTECEDENTES: Se analiza la evolución de la actividad de donación cadavérica de órganos y de la realización de trasplantes de órganos sólidos en México de 2007 a 2018. MÉTODO: Se recolectó y ordenó la información de donación cadavérica y de trasplante de órganos en México en ese período. Cuando no hubo información completa de 2018, se consideró la de 2017. Las principales fuentes de información fueron The Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation y el Centro Nacional de Trasplantes de la Secretaría de Salud de México. RESULTADOS: 1) La tasa de donación cadavérica de México en 2007 fue de 3.2 donaciones por millón de población (pmp), y en 2017 fue de 3.94 pmp (incremento del 23.1%). La tasa de 2017 está muy por debajo de la media reportada para América Latina (9.5 pmp). 2) El número de pacientes en espera de trasplante de un órgano sólido pasó de 4,993 en 2007 a 15,448 en 2018 (incremento del 309%). 3) En 2017, México reportó tener 255 centros autorizados para trasplante renal, más que cualquier país en el mundo. Para el caso de otros órganos, como hígado, corazón, pulmón y páncreas, México es el país que tiene más centros autorizados en América Latina. CONCLUSIÓN: La evolución de las cifras de donación cadavérica y de trasplante de órganos sólidos en el período de estudio explica una escasez cada vez mayor de órganos para trasplante en México, a pesar de una aparente gran capacidad instalada. El sistema nacional de donación y trasplante de órganos es ineficaz e ineficiente.

Assuntos

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

Vaccine-preventable infections (VPIs) are a common and serious complication following transplantation. One in six pediatric solid organ transplant recipients is hospitalized with a VPI in the first 5 years following transplant and these hospitalizations result in significant morbidity, mortality, graft injury, and cost. Immunizations are a minimally invasive, cost-effective approach to reducing the incidence of VPIs. Despite published recommendations for transplant candidates to receive all age-appropriate immunizations, under-immunization remains a significant problem, with the majority of transplant recipients not up-to-date on age-appropriate immunizations at the time of transplant. This is extremely concerning as the rate for non-medical vaccine exemptions in the United States (US) is increasing, decreasing the reliability of herd immunity to protect patients undergoing transplant from VPIs. There is an urgent need to better understand barriers to vaccinating this population of high-risk children and to develop effective interventions to overcome these barriers and improve immunization rates. Strengthened national policies requiring complete age-appropriate immunization for non-emergent transplant candidates, along with improved multi-disciplinary immunization practices and tools to facilitate and ensure complete immunization delivery to this high-risk population, are needed to ensure that we do everything possible to prevent infectious complications in pediatric transplant recipients.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: descrever a distribuição dos transplantes de órgãos sólidos no Brasil, bem como informações da lista de espera (demanda) e origem dos pacientes transplantados, por tipo de órgão e Unidade da Federação, de 2001 a 2017. Métodos: estudo descritivo, com dados das Centrais Estaduais de Transplantes, da Associação Brasileira de Transplantes de Órgãos e do Sistema de Informações Hospitalares do Sistema Único de Saúde (SIH/SUS). Resultados: 153 centros de transplante foram identificados em 2017, apenas 11,8% deles localizados nas regiões Norte e Centro-Oeste; no período em estudo, foram realizados 99.805 transplantes, variando de 3.520 (2001) a 8.669 (2017); as regiões Sul e Sudeste concentraram o maior número de transplantes. Conclusão: existem desigualdades regionais na realização dos transplantes, possivelmente por não haver uniformidade na distribuição dos serviços.

Objetivo: describir la distribución de los trasplantes de órganos sólidos en Brasil, así como informaciones de la lista de espera (demanda) y origen de los pacientes trasplantados por tipo de órgano y unidad federativa, entre 2001 y 2017. Métodos: estudio descriptivo usando datos extraídos de Centrales Estatales de Trasplantes, Asociación Brasileña de Trasplantes de Órganos y Sistema de Informaciones Hospitalarias del Sistema Único Nacional de Salud (SIH/SUS). Resultados: 153 centros de trasplante identificados en 2017, solamente 11,8% están ubicados en las regiones Norte y Centro-Oeste; se realizaron 99.805 trasplantes, desde 3.520 (2001) hasta 8.669 (2017); Sur y Sudeste concentran el mayor número de trasplantes. Conclusión: hay desigualdad en el acceso a los trasplantes, posiblemente debido a la falta de uniformidad en la distribución de los servicios.

Objective: to describe the distribution of solid organ transplants in Brazil, as well as information about the waiting list (demand) and origin of transplant patients by organ type and Federative Unit, from 2001 to 2017. Methods: this was a descriptive study using data from State Transplantation Centers, the Brazilian Organ Transplant Association, and the Brazilian National Health System Hospital Information System (SIH/SUS). Results: 153 transplant units were identified in 2017, with only 11.8% located in the Northern and Midwest regions; within the study period, 99,805 transplants were performed, ranging from 3,520 (2001) to 8,669 (2017); the highest number of transplants was concentrated in the Southern and Southeastern regions. Conclusion: there are inequalities in transplantation access, possibly due to lack of uniformity in service distribution.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

Chile made several legal, practical and educational changes to the organ donation and transplant system in recent years, to improve its results. However, studies evaluating these reforms and suggesting further corrections are still pending. Our aim is to assess the new regulations and their reception by both the population and health care providers. Proposals are made to promote the development of a model of Chilean transplantation able to respond to the needs of the population.

Assuntos

Assuntos